Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the juvenile court process
Juvenile court's conclusion
The effectiveness of the juvenile court
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the juvenile court process
The Intake
Jenifer R. Roberts
Brown Mackie College
The Intake
This paper will inform you on the intake process of a juvenile. There are three main parts.
The juvenile justice intake process, additional juvenile justice preadjudication processes, and
legal issues (Elrod & Ryder,2011). There is information on what all juveniles should expect
when going through the juvenile intake process, and the discretion of the intake process.
First it all begins with an arrest of a juvenile. Just because a juvenile gets arrested does not
mean that they are guilty. When arrested the juvenile will be searched, turn in all jewelry, hair
and/or head bands, wait on paperwork to be filed. Then they
…show more content…
go to the shower room and a strip search is conducted. They shower while the guard watches them, then they get jail clothes, and they walk back to the unit. Whenever the juvenile court is in session (day depends on state) they go to court and it is up to the magistrate whether the juvenile goes home or stays in dentition until the date of the hearing.
The intake unit is the one’s who will be dealing with the juvenile
after the arrest. There job is to figure a suitable way of dealing with the juveniles that they
handle. There is a wide range of things that a juvenile can get into trouble over. The intake
unit’s job is to figure out with crimes “warrants a formal court action” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011).
The intake screening a system to see whether a juvenile should go through the “juvenile
system” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) or if the intake officer should take another route. They usually
look at their past history of school, family, court, job, juveniles attitude, and their age. The
screening process may also include the juveniles race, gender, and wealth.
The intake process is usually “performed by probation officers” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011).
The attorney’s office of the prosecutor is usually the one’s who decide whether charges should
be made. They make sure there is enough legal cause to pursue a criminal charge. If the
prosecutor thinks the case should go forward then it goes to the intake officer and they make
…show more content…
a decision on it should go. Then they look at the criminal record of the juvenile, the age of the juvenile, and the degree of the crime the juvenile committed. Serious crimes have to go to court which is called petition. A petition is where “a request for formal court action” (Elrod & Ryder,2011). And it has the charges of the juvenile that they present it durning the trial phase. The officer may dismiss the charges and explain how this is The Intake not the road the juvenile should travel down. There are also programs the juvenile can attend. There is also a time in which the intake officer speaks with the charged juvenile and their parents to get all the information that they can to make their decision.
Since the prosecutor is getting involved more they are sending juveniles to court more. In
some states the intake officers gives all cases to the prosecutor to look at. States are getting a
harder on juveniles in hopes it will detour youths from committing crimes. “Punitive model of
juvenile justice” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) is to detour juvenile crimes and not be so easy on
juveniles. This lets juveniles have the “same criteria” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) as adults.
Discretion in the intake screening. It does not matter who looks at the case they always use
discretion. There factors in determining whether intake can handle the case. These are the
factors: Is there enough evidence to bring the case to court, what their performance is in school,
at home, and in and around the community, is this an issue that can be resolved, should they
remove the juvenile from the home or not, the “attitude” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) of the juvenile,
the juveniles parents, and the person that the juvenile committed the crime against, the age of the
juvenile, school attendance, what the plaintiff wants to do with the juvenile, and if the juvenile
is safe and if the public is safe. These factors determine how the case should and will be handled. Sometimes the case does not go to court, but the intake officer still gives a punishment of some kind. The intake officer and/or prosecutor looks at all aspects of the crime when determining what should happen to the juvenile. If there is a serious of enough case then they petition the court, and will be filed with the court, and the petition will include the formal charges in it. The person who made the complaint will have to show up in court. The juvenile can make a plea in retrial hearing if they wish. A plea ( in this text) is “the juveniles formal response to criminal charges” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). If the intake officer feels it is necessary the will detain the juvenile, and there will be a “detention hearing” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). The hearing will have a judge, “referees”, and the “hearing officers” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). The hearing is being held in front of officer that is detaining the juvenile or trying to get the juvenile arrested. The juvenile can have their parents at the hearing, have their rights read, they can make a plea if they want to, trial date, and get a bond. The juvenile can bootstrapping. This is where get out of detention if they follow certain rules, such as going to school everyday on time, make sure they are at home at a certain time, and obey their parents and authorities. If they do not they will return to detention. If the court feels necessary then they will not the juvenile out of detention because they might commit another crime. This is “preventive detention” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). The juvenile will also have a preliminary hearing and an arraignment. These are important time in the process. The juvenile can make a plea bargain. This is an agreement with the the youth and the attorney for the state. Juveniles have due process for them and their parents. Due process is “constitutional right to be treated fair by the law” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). The juvenile and attorney can bargain for a sentence, of course, the juvenile wants a small sentence and if the crime is bad enough the attorney will push for a more lengthily one. In this paper you was informed on a few things. The juvenile justice intake process, additional juvenile justice preadjudication process, and legal issues. Also discussed was what happened if they crime was not serious. What a plea bargain is. The process of a juvenile being detained and what would make the courts detain a juvenile. Reference Elrod, P. & Ryder, R. S. (2011) Juvenile Justice: a social, historical, and legal perspective (3rd Ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Within the last five years, violent offenses by children have increased 68 percent, crimes such as: murder, rape, assault, and robbery. Honestly, with these figures, it is not surprising at all that the Juveniles Courts focus less on the children in danger, and focus more on dangerous children. This in fact is most likely the underlying reasoning behind juveniles being tried as adults by imposing harsher and stiffer sentences. However, these policies fail to recognize the developmental differences between young people and
The adult system’s shifts leaked into the juvenile system, causing an increase in incarcerations even when delinquency rates were declining at the time. Juvenile reform legislations prompted more compulsory sentencing and more determinate sentences for juveniles, lowering of the upper age of juvenile jurisdiction, considerable ease in obtaining waivers to adult court for juvenile prosecution, and made it easier to gain access to juvenile records as well. Furthermore, it led to greater preoccupation with chronic, violent offenders, which in turn led to a redirection of resources for their confinement. Thereby, the absence of reliable criteria for identifying such offenders tends to stereotype all delinquents and is more likely to raise the level of precautionary confinements. These three major shifts in juvenile justice policy demonstrate the power and depth of traditional beliefs about the causes and cures of crimes in U.S. society. It also shows how the system can bend for a time in the direction of new approaches to prevention and control. Today, we are presently in a time of conservative responses where the prevailing views about crime express beliefs about prevention, retribution, and incapacitation that are profoundly rooted in our
There are various reasons why many juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system unjustly. The pipeline commences with inadequate resources in public schools. Many children are locked into second rate educational environments in which they are placed in overcrowded classrooms, insufficient funding, lack of special education services and even textbooks. This failure to meet the educational needs of children leads to more dropout rates which could also increase the risk of later court involvement. Surprisingly enough, some school may even encourage children to drop out in response to pressures from test-based accountability regimes which create incentives to push out low-performing students to increase overall test scores.
Police officers have a great amount of discretion. Since they are not always supervised and on patrol they choose which cases should be process and which one should just be not. Police discretion is the most important part because it determines the outcomes of the interaction between the police and the juvenile. Krisberg and Austin noted that police have five basic options in deciding what course of action to pursue with juveniles. The first one would be release, accompanied by a warning to the juvenile. The second one would be release, accompanied by an official report. The third one would be Station adjustment. Which include release to parent accompanied by an official reprimand, referral to a community youth agency, or referral to a public or private social welfare or mental health agency. Fourth would be Referral to juvenile court without detention and last referral to the juvenile court with detention.
This quote by Edward Humes sums it up the best, “The fundamental question Juvenile Court was designed to ask - What's the best way to deal with this individual kid? - is often lost in the process, replaced by a point system that opens the door, or locks it, depending on the qualities of the crime, not the child.” (No Matter How Loud I shout, 1996, p. 325). The courts need to focus on what is best for the child and finding punishment that fits the child not the crime.
Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory, Policy, and Practice Eighth Edition (2013), Steven Cox, Jennifer Allen, Robert Hanser and John Conrad, Chapter 1, Sage
... working with. Overall it helps distinguish juveniles who are in immediate needs of treatment from a large group in a short amount of time, thus making it efficient and gives a more likely reason to send them to be treated properly, rather than sending them to be imprisoned.
The Juvenile Justice system, since its conception over a century ago, has been one at conflict with itself. Originally conceived as a fatherly entity intervening into the lives of the troubled urban youths, it has since been transformed into a rigid and adversarial arena restrained by the demands of personal liberty and due process. The nature of a juvenile's experience within the juvenile justice system has come almost full circle from being treated as an adult, then as an unaccountable child, now almost as an adult once more.
public defenders office. A juvenile can stay in jail depending upon the seriousness of the crime
However, as the court system creates a level of judgment on the crime that was committed by a juvenile, there is a higher focus on providing individuals with a level of protection in terms of their information being put in the public arena. In many of the cases that can be seen in the public sphere, individuals that are of a certain age are usually not provided their names to public outlets. They are simply called witnesses or offenders, which is a key way of creating an implementation of confidentiality by shadowing the names and not providing that information to the public. Overall, this helps individuals become more protected from any type of future harm depending on the offense that might have occurred.
This paper will discuss the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has come to be what it is today. When a juvenile offender commits a crime and is sentenced to jail or reform school, the offender goes to a separate jail or reforming place than an adult. It hasn’t always been this way. Until the early 1800’s juveniles were tried just like everyone else. Today, that is not the case. This paper will explain the reforms that have taken place within the criminal justice system that developed the juvenile justice system.
Butts Jeffrey A. and Jennifer Ortiz. Teen Courts- Do They Work and Why? NYSBA Journal.
June/July 21-26. Eldelfonso, Edward. A. Law Enforcement and the Youth offenders: Juvenile Procedures. New York: Wiley, 1967. Hyde, Margaret O. & Co.
In the juvenile drug court a docket with selected delinquency cases are referred to a designated judge. These youth have been identified for having problems with alcohol and/or other drugs. The juvenile drug court judge maintains close oversight of each case through frequent court report updates through the probation officer and the therapist. The judge both services as the team leader and serve as an integral part of a team that comprises representatives from treatment, juvenile justice, social services, school and vocational training programs, law enforcement, probation, the prosecution, and the defense. This team determines how to address the problems of substance abuse and his or her family, which lead the youth into contact with the justice system (Cooper, 1998).
During the intake process there are a few things that can happen. It begins when a juvenile is caught committing a crime or if a citizen makes a complaint to the Juvenile Court of an unruly act. The complaint is then assigned