Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
Slavery pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The advantages and disadvantages of slavery
Tessa
Burning Issues
Slavery
Slavery should be legal in some states because the owners need the help they can get, slaves can still get freedom by going into the north, and this can keep the economy from flopping.
The constitution should not allow slave trade because the constitution states that all men are equal, they should be brought to the northern states first to get equal opportunity, and if slave trade is outlawed it gives other slaves hope for freedom and more motivation.
They should not be forced to return runaway slaves because once they are in the north they are free, it would be against the law to force a free man to do anything, and once they are in the north they no longer have a owner they need to return to.
2. The federal
…show more content…
government should continue to allow this practice because it gives them fair opportunity to pay back debt, it can prevent the economy from going downhill, and the number of people in jail would go down and so might taxes. 3.
I think the bonds should be payed back just a small amount to each dollar because not everyone agreed with the war, so why should they pay for it? They could already be in debt, they could reward the soldiers but also keep people from being in poverty.
4. Everyone should be allowed to vote in general elections. I believe this because, if you live in America you should be allowed to vote for who controls your country. People of all races should vote because they are a big part of America's population. Even if you don't have property, you should be able to vote for someone you think could help you.
Historical Roles
Southern Planter
1.I make my money by planting tobacco seeds. My wealth depends on my slaves. My family owns about thirty slaves so I am quite wealthy.
2. I think slavery is important and that all slaves are property. The amount of money I make depends on my slaves. I think slaves do the hardest work.
3. ‘The rabble’ people scare me. I think they want to take my property. I am surprised these people can vote in some places!
4. I am concerned about non property owners voting. I am also concerned about debts being paid back in kind and not cash. I believe this is only fair.
…show more content…
Farmer 1.I am a farmer. I a grow enough to feed me and my family but I sell whatever is left in town. But my crops failed last year and I don't make much money now. 2.I am worried because the bank I owe money to is asking for their money right away. I had to borrow money for tools to grow food. But with the crops failing I can't pay them back. 3.I thought I might as well join shays rebellion. I feel this because I have no other option. But I also joined because I feel that even though people don't have property they should still vote. 4.I want the federal national government to cut down taxes and put more money into circulation. If they did this not as many people would be struggling in debt. I also want people without property to still be able to vote. Enslaved African American 1.I am worried that I will be separated from my family. I am worried that my master will send me off to South Carolina or some place like it. Being under the constant control of my owner worries me. 2. I hope the constitution will make me and my family free. I hope we can stay free if we escaped to a free state. And that we will not be able to be returned to our previous owner. 3. If I gain my freedom, problems I might face is money. I would have to start from scratch and would probably be a very poor farmer. But even then I would be very poor and it would be hard to get the tools I need. 4. I want real freedom. So that when you escape slavery they give you land tools so you can lead a successful life. Not be in debt and go to jail like many farmers up north. Banker/merchant 1. I am a member of a prosperous banker and merchant family in New York. For a living I provide loans for other people and I get paid interest in these loans. This job makes good money, but not so much lately. 2.I think the idea of payment in kind is outrageous! There is barely any respect for property now a days. The state legislatures have too much power. 3.Daniel Shay and people like him should be stopped. I don't think that poor people should vote, people who owe money should be put in jail. They need to pay what they owe. 4.I feel good about how there is a proposal to pay all bonds back in cash. I have brought up a lot of bonds from soldiers. I would make a lot of money from this. Worker 1.I make my money from my small shop. But it really depends on how many shoes I sell. But the economy has been bad lately. 2.I couldn't pay my debts because they stopped issuing paper money. Money now is worth more, and less people are buying shoes so I went in debt from my tools. I can't pay them back because I had to bring the prices for shoes down and not a lot of people are buying. 3.I sold my bonds to a banker. I figured it was better to have cash now than to risk losing everything by waiting for the government to pay. I hear that bankers want a section of the constitution saying that would force congress to pay bondholders back in hard cash. 4.I feel that the wealthy people in America want higher taxes just so the few of them can get richer. I am upset because they don't want people without property to vote. But most of these people without property fought in the war, not them! Who really won? 1a The constitution states that the Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit. This means that it is no longer legal to import slaves from Africa into the states. With this being illegal, the need for slaves grew making young girls reproduce against will. Slavery was still legal. 1b It also states, they shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person. Refraseing, after 1808, 19 years after the constitution was made. you cannot import slaves unless you pay a certain tax. 1c In the constitution it says No Person held to Service or Labor in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or Labor, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labor may be due. This means that slaves who escaped to the north were required to be sent back to their owners in the south. So if you were helping a slave by letting them stay in your home it would be illegal. This is why there were slave hunters. 2.
Is it legal for state legislatures to pass laws allowing debts to be paid “in kind”? Well the constitution says, No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. In other words, only the federal government can conduct foreign alliances, trade, or war. Only the federal government can print money. Only the federal government can make and pass laws or break contracts.
ect. 3. Bonds being paid back from the revolutionary war is a debatable topic, the constitution reads that All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. This means that the government promises to take all debts of the older government to be collected. They wanted to show that the constitution wasn't going to be an excuse to shrink its debts. 4. I believe that everyone should be able to vote in general elections. If you live in America you should have the right to vote for how your country is run, and who it is run by. If everyone could vote all voices could be heard, therefore making it fair to all people, no matter what their property is or their race,wealth, or gender. If everyone could vote it would one step closer to making every man equal. Who really won? 5. I believe no social group won the real constitutional convention. Even though certain parts of the constitution benefited some things, there was no social group who fully won. The farmer and worker were caught up in debt, they weren't being paid back by the government and became impoverished. The southern planter is worried that people want to take their property and without slaves they cannot hold up their plantation. The enslaved African American was not free, they could try to flee to a free state but could get caught. But if they did become free they would be in poverty. And the banker/merchant would not be paid in cash but “in kind”, they do not get their money back and this changes the way they make a living. This the reason why I think no social group benefitted from the constitution, they each had their own problems that came with it. From question three the quote from the constitution says: “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility”. This talks about how only the government can make the big decisions. This an example of how America’s people may not had a lot of say in what goes on, for example, the revolutionary war.
Underneath the talk of states’ rights, expansion, tariffs, and railroads there was always slaves, toiling on southern plantations and growing in number each day. As the country entered the nineteenth century, politicians found the unanswered issue of slavery demanded attention. This attention was necessary not only because of the expanding country, welcoming new states into the fold, but because of the slaves themselves and their actions. Despite talk of other political issues crucial to politicians as the years crept toward the Civil War, slavery was constantly an undertone in each debate. The presence of slaves and free blacks throughout the United States of America influenced both northern and southern politicians to create legislation that
Slave insurrection occurred in a multitude of ways. Slaves practiced everyday resistance as well as planned and executed more elaborate forms of resistance. One form of resistance was strikes. During a strike Negros would flee to the swamps or forests and send back word that they would return if their demands were made. Demands would often include food, clothes, fewer beatings, shorter hours, or a new overseer. If demands were met they would return. However during the Civil War the demand of payment of wages. During this era they won “lifting themselves by their own bootstraps from chattels to wage workers”.3
Pro-slavery and anti-slavery were groups of advocates who both had a different perspective about slavery. The group of people that believed in slavery were mainly from the South and they were usually businessmen, traders, farmers, and slave traders. They argued that slavery was right; slavery caused a growth in the nation’s economy, it was accepted in the bible, and the slaves were better taken care of in the hands of a master. On the other hand, the Northerners thought otherwise. On their behalf, they argued that the slaves were treated poorly by their masters, it was a sin to be involved in slavery, and the Africans were unhappy because they were forced to move from their homeland. The pro-slavery authors of the articles gave support to their
From 1750 until 1800 the colonial United States endured a period of enormous achievement along with a substantial amount of struggle. Before 1750, the new colony’s first struggle was between the colonists and England over who would have leadership within the New World. Once settled, the issues emerged from within the colonies themselves, particularly with the “belongings” they brought and imported. African American slaves were seen as property, and were not given any innate rights such as liberty or freedom when following their master to the New World. The revolution for the colonists from England began, with new freedoms received by the colonists; the slaves began to question their rights as humans. Innate rights such as liberty and freedom
Those opposed to slavery argued, “The fifth amendment’s due process clause forbade Congress from allowing slavery in the territories. They also held that Congress’s plenary power to regulate the territories authorized it to establish a ‘free soil” meaning no slavery. Still, most states forbid that blacks should know how to read and write, and if they did try, they had white men watching them and beating them if they tried to be taught. Those slaves that were free, got denied for citizenship.
Constitutionally the North favored a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution, and they wanted to grant the federal government increased powers. The South wanted to reserve all undefined powers to the individual states themselves. The South relied upon slave labor for their economic well being, and the economy of the North was not reliant on such labor or in need of this type of service. This main issue overshadowed all others. Southerners compared slavery to the wage-slave system of the North, and believed their slaves received better care than the northern factory workers received from their employers. Many Southern preachers proclaimed that slavery was sanctioned in the Bible. Southern leaders had constantly tried to seek new areas into which slavery might be extended (Oates 349).
"The American constitution recognized slavery as a local constitution within the legal rights of the individual states. But in the North slavery was not adaptable to the local economy, and to many, it contradicted the vision of the founding fathers for a nation in which all men are to be free. The South considered slavery as a necessary institution for the plantation economy. It was linked to the local culture and society. As the United states expanded, the North worried that the South would introduce slavery into the new territories. Slavery had become both a moral issue and a question of political power." (Kral p61)
There was no significant desire among most delegates to abolish slavery during the 1787 Constitutional Convention. In addition, the focus of the convention was on forming a more perfect union, not dealing with the issue of slavery (Dolbeare, 71). Also complicating things was the concern among some delegates that putting too much weight on the issue of slavery might cause the unification process to fall apart. This resulted in the Constitution containing a series of compromises regarding slavery, and blatantly avoiding the issue of slavery.
Reparations Although the talk of reparations of slavery has been in discussion for over a hundred years, it is beginning to heat up again. Within these discussions, the issue of the form of reparations has been evaluated and money has been an option several times. However, reparations in the form of money should not be obtained for several reasons. Firstly, it is not a solution to the problem, secondly monetary reparations have the ability to worsen discrimination, thirdly, who gets paid, and how is it regulated, and lastly, the money can be misused.
Since the beginning of slavery in the America, Africans have been deemed inferior to the whites whom exploited the Atlantic slave trade. Africans were exported and shipped in droves to the Americas for the sole purpose of enriching the lives of other races with slave labor. These Africans were sold like livestock and forced into a life of servitude once they became the “property” of others. As the United States expanded westward, the desire to cultivate new land increased the need for more slaves. The treatment of slaves was dependent upon the region because different crops required differing needs for cultivation. Slaves in the Cotton South, concluded traveler Frederick Law Olmsted, worked “much harder and more unremittingly” than those in the tobacco regions.1 Since the birth of America and throughout its expansion, African Americans have been fighting an uphill battle to achieve freedom and some semblance of equality. While African Americans were confronted with their inferior status during the domestic slave trade, when performing their tasks, and even after they were set free, they still made great strides in their quest for equality during the nineteenth century.
B. My views are better than my opponents views, because the 2nd Amendment in the "Bill of Rights"
...ens, it should ensure that these rights are protected. Though the government has programs like charity work, social and public works that require funding by citizens, it should not get the funds by involuntarily taxing citizens. If it does so then it will be stealing from citizens which are a criminal offence. By voluntarily supporting these activities, the citizens will be helping the needy citizens who are unable to adequately support themselves. The government should ensure that every citizen has an access to all his basic needs but those who are well off should also assist the government in supporting the less fortunate.
In the whole constitution, not a single word says that slavery is good, and is needed for society. Some argue that this point is made because the northern free state delegates wanted to ban slavery, but the southern slave states wanted slavery, or they were out. The idea was that the northern free states would hint that they didn't want slavery, because they still didn’t want slavery.
My stance on slavery is that I thought it was great, having people do your work for you. I personally think that slavery should still exist, I feel like they should still be around and do our stuff for us. Yes some people may think that's lazy and very wrong but it my opinion on it should still be around today. If slavery was around today many lives will be much easier and other people in the house can be free to do anything. Just think about it a maid or butler could be seen as a slave. They get paid to do stuff for the person that's paying. Slaves and maid are very similar in a way. All around the world there is still slavery going on.
a. Citizens support their community government by voting for community issues, and being a "good" citizen.