Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Management concepts for teams
Learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Management concepts for teams
Situational Leadership Approach
GM502 ? Leadership Theory & Practice I
Unit 4 ? Team B Assignment
1
1
Outline
Introduction
Thesis
Quote
Analysis
Strengths
Criticisms
Validity of Approach
Conclusion
References
2
2
Introduction
Situational leadership approach is the most widely used training and development source for leaders today.
3
Introduction:
The purpose of this presentation is to show how organizations that utilize the situational approach to leadership prefer this model in that it is ?easy to apply and conceptualize,? (Northouse, 2016, pg. 102). Northouse (2016) talks about the SLII Approach being more practical for managers to use in a real-world situation.
However, critics have added that though there are advantages to the
…show more content…
G. (2016).?Leadership theory and practice?(7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3
Thesis
Situational Leadership Approach - is valid and effective when leaders attain the necessary strengths and knowledge of the developmental levels of their followers in a particular situation and is readily prepared with the appropriate leadership style that matches that situation.
4
Introduction:
Thesis - Situational Leadership Approach - is valid and effective when leaders attain the necessary strengths and knowledge of the developmental levels of their followers in a particular situation and is readily prepared with the appropriate leadership style that matches that situation.
Reference:
Northouse, P. G. (2016).?Leadership theory and practice?(7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4
"The programs got us all on the same page in regard to speaking the same leadership language. Our people are learning to lead themselves and others. We know how to diagnose each other's development levels and how to appropriately set goals. It's rewarding to see people tap into their sources of power and ask for what they need in terms of leadership style and approach."
? Cheryl Moreno, Express Employment Professionals
…show more content…
Team B thoroughly explained whether the situational approach was valid or not. Due to the many benefits, Team B explained that the situational approach is valid; it is Team B?s belief that the pros outweigh the cons. In any approach, there may be potential drawbacks, but in this approach, the employee gets the true benefit because it is tailored to their level. There are so many benefits of this approach especially the fact that the employee is put first. This leadership approach can help increase employee morale and job satisfaction among followers. Because it is based on the employee?s skill set, this approach allows for a personal touch. It gives the leader the ability to adjust to all situations by changing the leadership style to match the circumstance (Northouse, 2016). Within the presentation, the criticisms were also explained to describe how the situational approach may be invalid. Some have found that this approach lacks research, has an unclear commitment in certain levels and does not account for demographic characteristics (Northouse, 2016). Even with the criticisms, the situational approach is one of the most recognized approaches in leadership to help enhance training and development (Northouse, 2016). From the information presented, this approach can be a positive addition to a current leadership style by helping to enhance employee
Pierce, Jon L. and John W. Newstrom (2011) 6th edition. Leaders and the Leadership Process.
In the context of the Situational model leadership theory, there are three identifiable weaknesses in my leadership practice. These weaknesses represent shortcomings in my role as a leader and might prevent my team from fully executing the organization’s mission. The three weaknesses are:
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Situational leadership is a theory which was designed in 1969 by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. The “contingency theories of leadership” states that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent on their behaviours in relation to different situational factors. Thus, situational leadership theory, relates to how a leader 's effectiveness is depend on their ability to adjust their leadership behaviour to the required level of the “followers” capability or if the situation is modified.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (n.d.) Situational Leadership. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 207-211). New York: Simon & Schuster.
The four quadrants of Situational Leadership correspond to the four phases of Mentorship (Hersey, 1985; Carder, et al, 1996; Hitchcock, et al, 1995; Carey and Weissman, 2010). Quadrant 1, in which the follower has no skill and the leader provides high instruction and support (Carder, et al, 1996), corresponds to Phase 1, in which the mentoring relationship is initiated (Carey and Weissman, 2010). Quadrant 2, in which the follower has limited skill and the leader acts as a teacher (Carder, et al, 1996), corresponds to Phase 2, in which the mentee becomes the mentor’s protégé (Carey and Weissman, 2010). Quadrant 3, in which the follower has advanced skills and the leader acts as a consultant (Carder, et al, 1996), corresponds to Phase 3, in which the mentor releases the mentee (Carey and Weissman, 2010). Quadrant 4, in which the follower can be trusted to act independently (Carder, et al, 1996), corresponds to Phase 4, in which the mentee and mentor enjoy a lasting friendship (Carey and Weissman,
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creating a structured environment and opportunities to apply what employee have learned and firmly delegate authority will lead viable outcomes in productivity. Managers utilizing situational leadership will have the platform to change their style to meet the workers’ needs and allow for growth and professional development to meet the operational needs.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
Tannenbaum, R & Schmidt, W 1973, ‘How to choose a leadership pattern’, Harvard Business Review (p. 298 of Robbins et al Management: The Essentials)
In the twenty first century, leaders are required to build a greater impression in which people believe in strategy, trust in management decisions, and trust in their work. Once people believe in management choice, there will be enthusiasm inside an organisation. Such an environment helps the organisation growing or flourish. A doing well leaders create a surroundings in cooperation inside and outside the organisation. (Subir chowdbhury management, 21c financial times prentice hall (2000)
Those who take this approach assess the current situation by identifying its major factors, then focus and act on those aspects of the situation (McNamara). In his book, “Leadership Management: Achieving Breakthroughs,” K. Barman writes that by adopting the Contingency theory, the manager believes that there is no correct or best way of leading; what works in one situation may not necessarily work in another. Due to this assumption, one can say that contingency theory is similar to situational theory; there is no single, simple, or exact way to handle all situations, and effective management depends on the situation (50). Contingency theory is different from situational theory, however. He writes,
The contemporary era is the time with constant changes and new demands. In view of this point, we can't put unitary leadership into real work. Accordingly, the term of "contingency leadership theory" (also namely "situational leadership") is given rise to by those situational factors. This theory notes that managers can vary their styles to suit different circumstances.
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.
By allowing for employees to be increasingly engaged in workplace activities, they are then given the opportunity to develop new skills. Most leaders also encourage for employees to participate in team building activities so that any employee would be more comfortable and have stronger chemistry when working with other members of their respective departments, and with other employees in the company as a whole. Leaders are capable of motivating their subordinates through a series of actions, such as words of encouragement, acts of appreciation, and allowing for employee involvement in key decision making processes in the company. For instance, leaders who appreciate, constantly encourage and assist in the improvement of the tasks performed by their subordinates will be able to build a strong and healthy employer-employee relationship. This good relationship instils the traits of confidence in employees and motivates them to enhance their performance. Excellent leaders commonly try to develop a dialogue or establish open communication with their subordinates. Employees who are well