Situational Action Theory Essay

Introduction The Situational Action Theory (SAT) by Wikström and Treiber (2009) was developed to overcome and unify key problems in prominent criminological theories in predicting why criminal behaviors occur in society. The analysis will include discussing the SAT as well as how it relates to the terrorism issues currently facing the European Union as well as the current immigration crisis in Europe and the impact of the SAT as it relates to terrorist activities.

Situational Action Theory (SAT) Situational Action Theory (SAT) was developed by Wikström and Treiber (2009) as a means to determine why people commit immoral acts. The SAT model is a theory based out of criminology and suggests that people will be more likely to make moral decisions

German authorities reported that their streets have descended into lawlessness, and that migrant crime in the first six months of 2016 has resulted in 142,500 reported crimes (statistically counted arrests), a 40% increase over (Kern, 2016). This is not only the case in Germany, but is seen across all the EU nations. Law enforcement is clearly overwhelmed; intelligence agencies are not working together and the migrant population continues to

The decisions are based on a combination of settings and situations in the development of action alternatives in life experiences, and consideration of those action alternatives in the final moral action. I will compare and contrast, Wikström and Treiber (2009) SAT by in examining the behavioristic and deterministic aspects of the in the clash between two cultures of Europe with the western cultural views based on Judeo-Christian norms and laws, as compared to the cultural norms of the rising Fundamentalism of the indigenous and migrant Muslim population of Europe. The various aspects of rising extremism are the results of poor integration of the migrants into European culture, as well as combining it with the poor collective efficacy in the existing and growing activity fields (i.e., enclaves, no-go zones, Sharia complaint areas) which have been created by the host nation through their efforts to accommodate and appease the integration-resistant migrant population. The ongoing efforts by host nations to hide rising crime rates and threats of terrorism from the citizenry, thereby minimizing the anti-immigration and nationalist movements, only seems to provoke more violence and radicalization of the Islamists. In considering the use moral actions of migrants in the use of violence towards host nation