Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of literature in personality development
Use of Symbolism
Use of Symbolism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of literature in personality development
Figurative language is used in a lot of writings to pull you more into the words. Figurative language uses the five senses to place a deep picture in your mind of what is actually happening. Metaphors, similes, personification, hyperbole, etc. are all figurative devices used in writing. Without using any of these things writing would be straight forward and not so complicated to understand. When figurative language is used it makes the reader really think about what is being said by the author and what point the author is trying to make. Both "The Iroquois Constitution” and "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” use figurative language but for different reasons.
The whole purpose of “The Iroquois Constitution” was to bring the five nations together as one. Dekanawida used figurative language to do so. Dekanawida also used a lot of symbolism to write the constitution. He stated, “As the five arrows are strongly bound this shall symbolize the complete union of the nations.” So each arrow represented a nation and the binding of the arrows symbolized their coming together. Dekanawida used figurative language when he said, “The thickness of their skin shall be seven spans.” He was referring to the leaders and how they shouldn't let
…show more content…
everyone get to them with their criticism and anger. In Jonathan Edwards' sermon he uses figurative language to make the reader feel as if God is really angry at them.
In his sermon Edward's addresses everyone, the whole congregation. He tells them of Hell and how soon they could be going there, by the end he hopes that everyone will “fly out of Sodom”, or escape wickedness (50). “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” uses many metaphors to get the point across to the reader. Jonathan states, “...and all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you out of hell, than a spider's web would have to stop a fallen rock.” He is saying all those people who think they can escape Hell by themselves have as little chance as a spider's web does by stopping a fallen
rock. Both of these writings have figurative language used in them. One of them uses it to get to your feelings and the other uses it to symbolize and describe the laws of the people. Both use metaphors and similes to help get their points across. The difference between the two writings is that in “Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God”, it places a bigger picture in your mind and a deeper feeling in your heart with the use of figurative language. Figurative language makes it so that what is being said isn't really what is meant. It helps to exaggerate the meaning of the words. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and “The Iroquois Constitution” are great examples of this. While reading these two pieces, the reader must really think about the meaning the author is trying to get the reader to take in.
The Constitutions of both the Iroquois and the United States have similarities and differences between them. The Iroquois constitution came earlier in history than the U.S one did. Some of the same ideas that were in the Iroquois’ constitution were carried over to some of the ideas that we use in our government today. In this paper I will compare and contrast these ideas as they relate with one another. Ideas like Vito Power, When a Leader Gets Sick, 3 Branches of Government, A Bicameral Legislature, and impeachment are portrayed in both of these constitutions.
Figurative language is when you use words or a phrase that do not have a regular, everyday literal meaning and is used by almost all authors in their writings. Authors use figurative language to make their works more interesting and more dramatic. Examples of figurative language include metaphors, similes, personification and hyperbole. Helena Maria Viramontes uses figurative language all throughout her novel Under the Feet of Jesus. In the opening paragraphs of the novel Viramontes uses imagery to set the scene for her readers, she really makes us feel as if we are riding along in the station wagon with Estrella and her 6 other family members. In this scene she describes to her readers reflects on the hardships that this family, and people
What is figurative language? Figurative language is saying something other than what is meant for effect. For example a metaphor, simile, symbol, hyperbole or personification. In the sermon called Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God and the Iroquois Constitution there is a lot of figurative language.
In the passages “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne are both powerful text. Edwards used more of an effective style to get his point through. He used a harsh and blunt tone to prove the God is a powerful man and can strike at any time but does not. This is why his text is better that Hawthornes.
As noted at its conception the constitution was not recorded in a written language, but portrayed through wampum. As time progressed and English was introduced to the Haudenosaunee the constitution was recorded in a written language. The first section contains the history of the people and binds them together, under one creator and tells the tale of how and why the constitution was created. The following three sections contain the type of government to be formed, procedures of the government, how leaders where to be chosen, and how decisions were to be made. It is here where the ideas of representation and equality are expounded upon. It was important to Deganwida that all felt they were a part of the government they were creating and that all would be seen as equals. As such each clan would provide a chief to represent them within the government. This was to ensure all clans of all tribes would be a part of the decision making process. In addition, while it was determined that the chiefs would be male, they were to be chosen by the matriarchs of each clan. This was to ensure that all, men and women, would
1) Jonathan Edwards delivered this sermon during the first Great Awakening, a time of religious revival in Europe and America. During the Great Awakening, christianity shifted its focus from ceremonies and rituals, and began to realign itself with introspection to encourage fostering a deep sense of morality and redemption. Edwards was a key preacher and minister that delivered many sermons preaching about revival and reformed theology.
In these text, “The Minister’s Black Veil” and “The Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the preachers are teaching their congregations a lesson.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Rhetorical Analysis “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards uses imagery and symbolism to persuade the audience to become more devout Christians by channeling fear and emphasizing religious values. Jonathan Edwards was a Puritan minister who preached during the time of the Great Awakening in America. During this period of religious revival, Edwards wanted people to return to the devout ways of the early Puritans in America. The spirit of the revival led Edwards to believe that sinners would enter hell. Edwards’ sermon was primarily addressed to sinners for the purpose of alerting them about their sins and inspiring them to take action to become more devoted to God.
In 1741, Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan preacher of that time, had one thing on his mind: to convert sinners, on the road to hell, to salvation. It just so happened to be, that his way of doing that was to preach the reality to them and scare them to the point of conversion. Sermons of this time were preached to persuade people to be converted and to me it seemed that Edwards just had a special way of doing it. Just as people are being influenced by rhetoric appeals today Edwards used the same method on his congregation. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Jonathan Edwards positively affected his readers using pathos, logos, and ethos, while trying to convince the unconverted members of his sermon to be born again.
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is an eye-opening sermon to many and an even greater eye opener to the unbelieving. Not only is it seen as controversial for the time, but many people disagreed with it. The entire sermon seemed to be based on one or two verses from the Bible, and many thought they were not used in the proper context. There were many emotions during the sermon that need to be explored further.
...able to cast enemies into hell: "so it is easy for us to cut or singe a slender thread that any thing hangs by: thus easy is it for God, when he pleases, to cast His enemies down to hell." Edwards relates our abilities with God's in a way that all may comprehend; consequently, when he returns to this analogy in his application, the same understanding rules: "your righteousness would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you out of hell, than a spider's web would have to stop a falling rock." This time, however, the spider and sinner are depicted as equals.
In the story about Dekanawida who is a leader who founded the Iroquois Confederacy or the Five nations. Dekanawida means “wo rivers flowing together” was born to a mother that was supposed to be a virgin to the people in Canada. The fact that he would ruin his people the mother tried several times to kill him, but he survived. As her grew up he left Canada ad headed south where he met Hiawatha. They bother made a plan for uniting the five nations into one confederacy. The Iroquois Unity is now a model for founders of the Government of the U.S. The message that Deganawida is trying to send out is that all mean are brothers and they should stop killing and make peace and join an alliance of friendship instead of destroying each other.
During the 1700’s people in America were experiencing the great awaking. Many ministers in this period used rhetorical appeals to get across to their congregation. Jonathan Edwards was one of the most well know pastors during this time. In 1741, he preached a sermon-later titled Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God-to his congregation by using rhetorical appeals he got his point across to many unconverted men. Edwards uses rhetorical appeals: pathos, ethos, and logos to create rhetorical appeals. by using these appeals Edwards is able to reach out to his congregation and get them to realize that they are unsaved from the wrath of God, and the fiery pits of Hell.
Taking into account the essence of the sermon,"Sinners in the Hands of God" by Jonathan Edwards, it is evident that his outstanding use of Rhetorical Devices such as Imagery, Analogy, and Simile contributed and greatly influenced the reader to be persuaded and follow through based on the author's purpose. Edwards basically intends to transmit the concept that God is our hero and will lead us to salvation if we on our behalf, believe and honor God. Based on the sermon, the intended audience seems to be people who do not believe in God and are basically when reading this sermon, exaggeratedly given the idea that if they continue to not believe in God, then they will be foreseeing an endless experience in Hell.
The biggest difference from both stories is the religion and the number of Gods that are in each story. In the “Changing Woman and the Hero Twins after the Emergence of people” the Navajo mentions multiple gods when he said, “…Talking God and Calling God might pass in and out…”(38). Usually, when there is more than one God in a story they will be Gods of a particular thing. There being more than one God allows for a deeper relationship between one God and a character in the story. A great example of this is with the twins and their father, the Sun God. This is very different from “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” because the twins are the children of the Sun God, where as in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” there is only one God that is the creator of everything.