Injustice and unlawful incidents happen each and every day all around the world, and civilization has grown so acclimated to them that a word isn’t peeped about it. Many are aware of serious issues happening on this globe, but don’t do a thing about it. This scenario persists in the short stories: “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. “The Lottery” tell a tale of a small farm town’s morbid tradition of selecting one unlucky resident to be stoned to death. “Harrison Bergeron” takes place in a dystopian version of America, where everyone is “equal” from the use of mandatory state-issued “handicaps”. Even though the two stories take place in different times, they both have characters that don’t bother to act against obvious injustice. Tessie from “The Lottery” and George from “Harrison Bergeron” both exemplify humanity’s inability to confront injustice. …show more content…
Firstly, in “The Lottery”, Jackson illustrates Tessie Hutchinson as hypocritical and unthoughtful.
Every year, the small village comes together to participate in a lottery, where the winner gets stoned to death. However, Tessie arrives late to the event, and she starts laughing appearing nonchalant as if it was a regular day, despite the fact that she had a risk of dying. However, at the end of the lottery, her name got called out as the “winner”. When the townspeople started circling up on her with stones, she screamed, ‘It isn't fair, it isn't right,’”. In other words, when Tessie got called to be the winner she shifted her apparent viewpoint from “I don’t care” to “This isn’t fair”. She could have cared less if someone else was picked to die, but the only time she challenged the tradition was when she was picked. The hypocrisy and obliviousness is shared by many humans sadly. They believe that since something wouldn’t effect them, they shouldn’t care. However, the only time they challenge the event, is when they are the ones that are
affected. Secondly, in “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut depicts George as whitewashed and benighted. In an attempt to make everyone equal, the government makes everyone with a “unfair advantage”, whenever that be beauty, strength, or knowledge, to wear handicaps. Since George looked tired one day, his wife suggested that he takes a little weight off the bag padlocked to his neck, however George quickly turned that down: “‘If I tried to get away with it,’ said George, ‘then other people'd get away with it-and pretty soon we'd be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else. You wouldn't like that, would you?’” Even though his wife is only suggesting to take away a few lead balls from the 47-pound bag that was strapped on his neck, George quickly declines. He believed that it would start a slippery slope that ends up with society going back to the “dark ages”. However, the “dark ages” weren’t an anarchic time, it is referring to today’s society. George’s blindness towards the bigger picture portrays society’s. At times, people are oblivious to the real problems, while they stress over problems that shouldn’t matter. Both “The Lottery” and “Harrison Bergeron” recognizes humanity’s inability to confront injustice. Because Tessie didn’t care about the lottery’s repercussions until she was the victim and George couldn’t accept the fact that he lives in an unfair society, both works point towards the mindless obedience in the face of unfair laws and outdated traditions. The silence usually is never broken, either because humans are too scared or whitewashed to speak up. However, if just one person says their minds, it can change the viewpoints of everyone around them.
In the story “Antigone” a loyal sister is demanded to be put to death for the burial of her beloved brother. A law was made against her brother Polynice who had died battling against his very own brother and country. Antigone knew the consequences of disregarding the law, but since she was his sister she did not want to obey the law. She then proceeded to bury her brother anyways to show her loyalty and how much she loved him. Along with the law in “Antigone” being unfair, the character Tessie in the story “The Lottery” also found that it was unfair when her family ended up having the piece of paper with the black dot. Tessie had forgotten about the town lottery so she ended up being late. She claimed that her husband Bill “did not have enough time to select a piece of paper”. When the Hutchinson family, then
Mankind tends to accept and follow old traditions without understanding or questioning the real meaning and benefits of it. “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut depict dystopian societies where the population blindly accept their way of life and follow traditions under the fear of punishments of Gods and governments. “The Lottery” illustrates a village that holds an annual event to randomly choose one of its inhabitants to be stoned to death as a tribute to have a good crop and maintain the order of their community. Vonnegut depicts the United States in the year of 2081 where people were made equal in all possible ways due to the Amendments to the constitution, with use of devices to weaken the population abilities to think and move, strictly enforced by government officials. The major similarity between both stories is cruelty being normalized in both societies. Differences can also be found in both stories, the villagers’ Blind acceptance to a tradition in “The Lottery”, and freedom of thought. While in “Harrison Bergeron” the population was forced to obey the rules and forbidden to think or rebel against the government.
In Chris Abani’s story, a thief gets chased down by a mob as he runs towards the center of a market. At the center of the clearing was the elders who has the most authority in the community. They are the highest council in the community. “In the center of this sacred space, the sole elder to stand up and call for tolerance was booed…” (Abani 26). Although, the elders had the most power in the community, they got ignored. Moreover, the people ignored the system they were living under. A man from the mob set the thief on fire. “If you burn here, you won 't burn in hell” (Jackson). His justification for setting the thief on fire is that the thief won’t burn in hell if he burns on earth. There are many ways to punish criminals, and, yet, the mob chose the most painful way possible. The person who “won” the lottery in Shirley Jackson’s story was Tess Hutchinson. She tried to risk her daughter’s life to save her own, but failed. Furthermore, it is heartless how she is willing to risk one of her children’s life just so that she can live. It is brutal to get stoned to death. There is no instantaneous death, unless there’s a fatal blow to the head. Thus, Tess must have died very
Shirley Jacksons short story The lottery and Kurt Vonnegut’s short story, Harrison Bergeron are both dystopian texts. They demonstrate a way of life that violates our sense or rightfulness but are found acceptable and ordinary to the characters. A dystopian world is often propagandized as being a utopia and has a futuristic totalitarian or authoritarian government that exerts complete control over the public which results in the loss of individuality and freedom. Even though both texts have entirely dissimilar concepts the reader can still recognise the depraved and immoral lives the characters believe are essential to their way of life. The societies portrayed in both texts are illusions of utopian worlds, even though the reader views the characters lifestyle to be revolting, dehumanized and sickening. The authors also caution the readers of the extreme dangers associated with the blind acceptance of their lifestyle just because of tradition and society’s acceptance.
Almost all books have dozens of themes and elements in play that are open to interpretation, but a skillful reader will often be able to pull out a common theme between many different writers and their stories. Although they have very different plots with vastly different characters, a shared idea is cleverly intertwined by the authors of the following stories. “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut narrates a world where no one is allowed to excel in anything, everyone is made equal by scarring natural advantages such as beauty or intelligence, and the government imposes this austerely. “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson shows the story of a town preparing to conduct an age-old barbaric tradition, even though the reasons for the tradition are neither unknown, nor beneficial. The townspeople are determined and compelled, to follow this ritual through. The poem “Harlem,” by Langston Hughes, a profound statement about what happens to dreams when they are put on hold. “Harrison Bergeron”, “The Lottery”, and “Harlem” all share a common subject which is the danger and the burden of conformity is this: If an unjust system prevails with the support of the masses, the tyranny by the majority rules.
In The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, the people of the village are consumed by a tradition. Every year in the month of June, they conduct a lottery to determine who will be stoned. The unjustified killing of a human being is widely viewed as an iniquitous act. Although surrounding communities have ceased the tradition of the lottery, this society continues the tradition. The idea of not practicing the tradition has been brought up numerous times within the community but “the subject was allowed to fade off ” (351). The community was conscience of the tradition being unethical but because it was a part of their heritage and believed to determine the success of their harvest, no one would do anything about the lottery. Once she is picked from the lottery, Tessie Hutchinson notices that the people are not conducting the lottery fairly and decides to stand up against the tradition. It can be inferred that women were not considered equal to the males of the village. Tessie—a woman— had the courage to stand against the tradition. Tessie understood that not all traditions are good. A tradition can be so engraved into an individual that they forget its purpose. In the story...
People with power in society often have the ability to influence the practice of certain traditions. These traditions can affect what a citizen is entitled to do. In today's day and age, life without basic freedoms and rights sounds unthinkable. However, in Shirley Jackson's “The Lottery” and Kurt Vonnegut's “Harrison Bergeron” this is the reality. Old Man Warner and the Handicapper General show that people in positions of authority encourage outdated traditions that ultimately lead to innocent people getting hurt.
Tradition is huge in small towns and families and allows for unity through shared values, stories, and goals from one generation to the next. Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” carries that theme of tradition. The story follows a small town that performs the tradition of holding an annual lottery in which the winner gets stoned to death. It (tradition) is valued amongst human societies around the world, but the refusal of the villagers in “The Lottery” to let go of a terrifying long-lasting tradition suggests the negative consequences of blindly following these traditions such as violence and hypocrisy.
Tessie Hutchinson plays a significant role by displaying hypocrisy and human weakness.She protest against the lottery when her family is endangered, she complains ironically and shouted to Mr. Summers, “you did not give him enough time to take any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasn’t fair!” (pg. 247). Her statement about the fairness of the lottery is ironic because until her family was selected, she does not seem to believe that the lottery is unfair.
Why would a civilized and peaceful town would ever suggest the horrifying acts of violence can take place anywhere at anytime and the most ordinary people can commit them. Jackson's fiction is noted for exploring incongruities in everyday life, and “The Lottery”, perhaps her most exemplary work in this respect, examines humanity's capacity for evil within a contemporary, familiar, American setting. Noting that the story’s characters, physical environment, and even its climactic action lacks significant individuating detail, most critics view “The Lottery.” As a modern-day parable or fable, which obliquely addresses a variety of themes, including the dark side of human nature, the danger of ritualized behavior, and the potential for cruelty when the individual submits to the mass will. Shirley Jackson also addresses cruelty by the citizen’s refusal to stand up and oppose “The Lottery.” Violence and cruelty is a major theme in “The Lottery.”
The townspeople seem to have mixed emotions about the lottery; they fear it yet on a very barbaric level they enjoy it. By standing "away from the pile of stones," and keeping their distance from the black box, the villagers show their fear of the lottery (Jackson 863). However, once they find out who is going to be stoned, Tessie Hutchinson, they seem to actually enjoy the stoning. One villager picks up a stone so big she can barely carry it; someone even gives Tessie’s youngest son a few pebbles to throw at his mother. Their overall attitude about the stoning is summed up by the phrase "and then they were...
Written by Shirley Jackson, “The Lottery” is a short story about a town that hosts an annual lottery that decides which person is stoned by the rest of the town. Jackson slowly and subtly builds the suspense throughout the story, only resolving the mystery surrounding the lottery at the very last moment, as the townspeople surround Tessie with their stones. The symbolism utilized helps demonstrate the overall significance of the story, such as the lottery itself. The lottery shows the way people desperately cling to old traditions, regardless of how damaging they may be. In addition, it can show how callous many will act while staring at a gruesome situation, until they become the victims. Jackson’s story presents the issue regarding the habit
Tessie Hutchinson was angry that her husband had gotten the lottery, so the family drew again. In the final draw, the crowd saw that Tessie had gotten the paper with the black dot. The instant the crowd knew who got the lottery, they began grabbing the stones the boys had piled up earlier. Formerly, Mr. Summers joined the crowd and said “let’s finish quickly” to be in time for noon dinner(Jackson, 7). At this instant, Mrs. Delacroix had “selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands” for the ritual(Jackson, 7). This sentence shows how terrible the lottery is and how extreme it can get. Without delay, Tessie is standing in the middle of the crowd when “a stone hit her on the side of the head” and that was the signal to begin the ritual(Jackson, 7). The lottery is just a cruel thing to the victim and their family who have to watch and be a part
In an agriculture-dominant village, the lottery is practiced as the annual tradition. The “fortunate” lottery winner will be stoned to death by the town after a few rounds of drawing lots. Such flabbergasted ritual is seen as a norm in that village and the villagers even feel excited over this cruel occasion due to the mob psychology of people. The villagers abandon their rationale in demonstrating violence towards the innocent “winner”. When Tessie draws the winner piece, everyone in the village straight up turns on her with stones and pebbles including Mrs. Delacroix, her
Tessie is different from the other villagers, almost defiant. This quality is apparent when she arrives late to the event. Being consumed in simple household chores, like the dishes, she has completely forgotten about the lottery until she notices her entire family is gone. Her late arrival is strange because the tradition of the lottery is of great importance to the village’s culture. Aside from Tessie, all the other people have arrived early and calmly waited for the lottery to begin. Her late arrival not only separates her from the other villagers, but catches everyone’s attention as she proceeds to hurry through the crowd to find her family. After her arrival, Tessie immediately begins to make jokes about her absence. She seems to do this ...