Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A Critical Analysis of Shirley Jackson’s“The Lottery”
A Critical Analysis of Shirley Jackson’s“The Lottery”
Harrison bergeron by kurt vonnegut jr. Critical Response
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Lottery and Harrison Bergeron
People with power in society often have the ability to influence the practice of certain traditions. These traditions can affect what a citizen is entitled to do. In today's day and age, life without basic freedoms and rights sounds unthinkable. However, in Shirley Jackson's “The Lottery” and Kurt Vonnegut's “Harrison Bergeron” this is the reality. Old Man Warner and the Handicapper General show that people in positions of authority encourage outdated traditions that ultimately lead to innocent people getting hurt.
Old Man Warner, an important person in society, advocates villagers continue to participate in the dated tradition of the lottery. The result of this was an innocent citizen in the village getting hurt. While the drawing and calling of names for the lottery is occurring,
'They do say,' Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, 'that over in the north village they're talking of giving up the lottery.' Old Man Warner snorted. 'Pack of crazy fools,' he said. 'Listening to the young folks, nothing's good enough for them. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live hat way for a while. Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.' First thing you know, we'd all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There's always been a lottery,' he added petulantly (Jackson 4).
This is important because it demonstrates that Old Man Warner supports the lottery and what it entails. He feels that the lottery has been around a long time and therefore, there is no need to banish it. This shows that Old Man Warner is reluctant to change. He knows that people in society will listen to him due to his status as the 'wise...
... middle of paper ...
...a Moon Glampers restricts society from progressing by encouraging these practices. Due to her level of authority, the citizens clearly have no choice but to obey her. The end result of these practices are innocent lives like Harrison Bergeron's and the Empresses being taken away and his parents left emotionally hurt and grieving.
People in positions of authority like Old Man Warner and the Handicapper General encourage outdated traditions that ultimately lead to innocent people getting hurt. The aspects of old traditions, people with power and its affects on society are explored. It is clear that living in places with substandard governments with too much control over the people and having to comply with poor established practices, reflects a dystopian society. Citizens can be left vulnerable both physically and emotionally, even when they have done nothing wrong.
Mankind tends to accept and follow old traditions without understanding or questioning the real meaning and benefits of it. “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut depict dystopian societies where the population blindly accept their way of life and follow traditions under the fear of punishments of Gods and governments. “The Lottery” illustrates a village that holds an annual event to randomly choose one of its inhabitants to be stoned to death as a tribute to have a good crop and maintain the order of their community. Vonnegut depicts the United States in the year of 2081 where people were made equal in all possible ways due to the Amendments to the constitution, with use of devices to weaken the population abilities to think and move, strictly enforced by government officials. The major similarity between both stories is cruelty being normalized in both societies. Differences can also be found in both stories, the villagers’ Blind acceptance to a tradition in “The Lottery”, and freedom of thought. While in “Harrison Bergeron” the population was forced to obey the rules and forbidden to think or rebel against the government.
In The Lottery, year after year, even since Old Man Warner, the oldest man in town, was a child, the same ritual has gone on. It is as if the community never learns from its previous mistakes. As long as no one in the town speaks up about such a twisted yearly event, nothing is ever going to change. If Martin Luther King or Malcolm X wouldn’t have raised their voices against the prejudice that they had experienced their entire lives, we might still be living in a segregated world, which was once thought to be “okay.” This is similar to The Lottery, in which the townspeople are brainwashed into believing that this ritual is normal. For example, Old Man Warner is outraged when he hears that the north village might give up the lottery, calling...
Screaming, yelling, and screeching emerge from Tessi Hutchinson, but the town remains hushed as they continue to cast their stones. Reasonably Tessi appears as the victim, but the definite victim is the town. This town, populated by rational people, stones an innocent woman because of a lottery. To make matters worse, no one in the town fathoms why they exterminate a guiltless citizen every June. The town’s inexplicable behavior derives from following an ancient, ludicrous tradition. With the omission of one man, no one in the community comprehends the tradition. In the case of “The Lottery,” the town slays an irreproachable victim each year because of a ritual. Shirley Jackson exposes the dangers of aimlessly following a tradition in “The Lottery.” Jackson not only questions the problem, but through thorough evaluation she an deciphers the problem as well.
The short story ‘The Lottery’ reveals a village of 300 that assemble for a lottery on June 27th every year. The lottery has been held this day for years and years, and has become a classic tradition. The lottery itself is holy to much of its residents, like Mr. Watson, who states that the village in the north is a pack of young crazy fools for removing the lottery. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know, they’ll be wanti...
Tradition is huge in small towns and families and allows for unity through shared values, stories, and goals from one generation to the next. Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” carries that theme of tradition. The story follows a small town that performs the tradition of holding an annual lottery in which the winner gets stoned to death. It (tradition) is valued amongst human societies around the world, but the refusal of the villagers in “The Lottery” to let go of a terrifying long-lasting tradition suggests the negative consequences of blindly following these traditions such as violence and hypocrisy.
Shirley Jackson’s “Lottery” satirically creates a society that puts the importance of tradition above even the life of the members of the community, as indicated by Old Man Warner’s response to Mr. Adams stating, “‘[O]ver in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery.’ Old Man Warner snorted. ‘Pack of crazy fools … Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them … There’s always been a lottery,’ he added petulantly” (413). Here Old Man Warner defends the tradition of their society, though notably without justifying the tradition. Rather, he focuses on the people of other villages and the tradition as self-evident, both logical fallacies. The first argument he makes in favor of continuing to have a lottery is an ad
The older village inhabitants did not want this practice extinct because they illogically believe that the practice maintains society stability. Old Man Warner, the oldest man in town, has participated in seventy-seven lotteries and is a staunch advocate for keeping things exactly the way they are. He dismisses the towns and young people who have stopped having lotteries as “Pack of crazy fools,"”. Generational and moral conflict about the lottery practice results because of varying perception of the readers. The year 1948 was the post-war era (2nd world war) and this may have influenced the culture in relation to capital punishment.
At the end of the story, whoever wins the lottery has to be stoned to death. “ Old Man Warner snorted. "Pack of crazy fools," ”. The whole entire village, including old man Warner, who has done it for 77 years, is completely blind that this crazy old tradition is completely horrid. What old man warner believed and said was crazy, made the truly demented behavior routine, because their ignorant feelings and what they think about the tradition or what they’ve always done has no dimension to it. They don’t think they just go and do, rather than deepening their understanding of why other village’s don’t do it, or how much nonsense it is.
There are regions in parts of the globe that take part in normal activities that, here in the United States, would be considered completely abnormal, even inhumane. Yet, traditional ties sewn into a cultural realm deems certain events, such as “the lottery”, to be well within the bounds of socially acceptable. Old Man Warner epitomizes the relevance of the power of tradition in this short story, and the symbol that takes shape from it. A veteran of seventy-seven years in the lottery, he snorts at the idea of giving it up. “Nothing but trouble in that… Pack of young fools,” he says when it is mentioned that some towns have given it up. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work anymore…” he spouts off, illogically. The lottery was so steeped in the town’s traditional makeup that even the barbaric physical act of killing someone with stones was not the least bit
Why would a civilized and peaceful town would ever suggest the horrifying acts of violence can take place anywhere at anytime and the most ordinary people can commit them. Jackson's fiction is noted for exploring incongruities in everyday life, and “The Lottery”, perhaps her most exemplary work in this respect, examines humanity's capacity for evil within a contemporary, familiar, American setting. Noting that the story’s characters, physical environment, and even its climactic action lacks significant individuating detail, most critics view “The Lottery.” As a modern-day parable or fable, which obliquely addresses a variety of themes, including the dark side of human nature, the danger of ritualized behavior, and the potential for cruelty when the individual submits to the mass will. Shirley Jackson also addresses cruelty by the citizen’s refusal to stand up and oppose “The Lottery.” Violence and cruelty is a major theme in “The Lottery.”
Similarly, a boy from the Watson family was nervously drawing for his mother and himself. This is where the tension and the suspense of the story begin to build, as the reader can tell that the characters are growing increasingly worried as more names are called. Mr. Adams and Old Man Warner discuss the north village, a town contemplating abandoning the lottery. Old Man Warner calls them “crazy” (Jackson 294), and that “there’s always been a lottery” (Jackson 294). This is another example of the rigidness of the townspeople when it comes to their old traditions, as well as beginning to show that the lottery isn’t exactly a positive event, as many towns are dropping it.
In conclusion, traditions can be beneficial, or they can be hurtful. The tradition of the lottery may not be the best, however, it has happened many times before and traditions are difficult to let go. In “The Lottery”, the reader is able to see how the villagers feel about the lottery through indirect characterization. Also, Jackson uses symbolism to reveal that the villagers do not want to change anything about the lottery. Finally, situational irony takes a substantial role in how the reader understands the short story. Jackson's “The Lottery” represents the reactions of people when they know that a tradition is not worth keeping but they do not want to do anything about it.
Next thing you know, they 'll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work anymore, live hat way for a while. Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon. ' First thing you know, we 'd all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There 's always been a lottery(Jackson, 4)." In this quote, Old Man Warner refers people who are giving up the lottery as fools and barbarians. Ironically, the lottery which he is doing right now is the real barbarian action. This is another ironic part Shirley Jackson gives out in this story. People who criticize others doing barbarian actions are the one who are actually executing the real barbarian action. “The Lottery” takes the classic theme of man’s inhumanity to man and gives it an additional twist: the randomness inherent in brutality. It anticipates the way we would come to understand the twentieth century’s unique lessons about the capacity of ordinary citizens to do evil—from the Nazi camp bureaucracy(Franklin, 2). 1948, three years after World War II, Shirley Jackson wrote this story which is full of irony and sarcasm. In addition, this village is surprisingly similar with NAZI Germany. They are all brained wash by the custom that was determined by someone and follow it blindly as same as what the villagers do in the lottery. "Warner" is suppose to be a character that
Old Man Warner is the oldest living member of the community in The Lottery. When prompted with the idea of another existing community giving up the lottery, he declares them crazy and says, “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves….There’s always been a lottery,” (Jackson 27). The tradition of the lottery is so ingrained in the town’s history, that it seems ludicrous to give it up - to go as far as to say someone who thinks differently about a practice that has become utterly normal is unacceptable. Following tradition and fitting into society’s idea of what is ‘acceptable’ is how people in a community identify each other, but if a person is isolated from the group, or doesn't pass for normal, they can become a target for members of the community; reinforcing the community’s bond and belief of what is normal, but harming the individual in the process.
“The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is a short story about a society in which it is a tradition for the population of a town to gather together in the middle of town for a random drawing with the prize of the individual being stoned. Mrs. Hutchinson was late to the raffle, protesting the whole time how it was unfair, and in the end was the individual that was chosen. This sequence of events and using literary element analysis leads the reader to believe that the so-called “random drawing” is actually controlled to target certain individuals that are threatening their tradition. Therefore, the central idea of “The Lottery” is that if one goes against tradition, society will be violent.