Both The Christians and Molière’s Tartuffe explore themes of religion and understanding, although the former takes a more serious approach, while the latter is more light-hearted and satirical. These themes were emphasized in each performance through spectacle, characterization, acting, and their connection with each other, all of which contributed to my understanding and enjoyment of the plays.
The three-quarter thrust stage of the Paul Green Theater was transformed for both plays into a wooden cross, making very clear that both plays would revolve around religion, particularly Christianity. The stage settings for The Christians, designed by Alexis Distler, helped to tell the story of the play by focusing it within a church. The settings were
…show more content…
displayed to look like we were within an actual church, with stained-glass windows, a pulpit, and a choir section. Even the scenes that were not happening within the church, such as the scene where Pastor Paul (Joey Collins) and his wife (Nemuna Ceesay) are discussing his controversial sermon in bed, were occurring on church-like stage. Instead of changing the settings to look like a bedroom, for instance, leaving them sitting on the same settings emphasized the point that these characters’ lives are centered around their religion and this church; their beliefs define who they are and how they interact with others and the world around them. However, while Tartuffe occurred on the same stage, the settings, also designed by Distler, were of a home, rather than a church. Nevertheless, cross imagery was still prevalent on stage, particularly noticeable in the backs of the chairs, which added to my understanding that religion plays a large role in this family’s lives as well. Also, the white and gold color scheme of the stage settings, typically colors associated with purity, contrasted sharply with the dishonesty occurring within the home throughout the play. The different stage settings in both plays highlighted their certainly different settings and plots, but the similarities of the crosses allowed me to see the connection between the themes and subject matters of both plays. In The Christians, personally, the costumes, designed by Robin Vest, did not stand out to me in any particular way, except for the fact that everyone is dressed in formal church attire, which did contribute to making me feel a part of the play.
I will also mention that I noticed that Pastor Paul was not wearing a tie, while Associate Pastor Joshua (Alex Givens) was, which could be interpreted to reflect their differing personalities. Paul was becoming more free and radical in his beliefs, which was reflected in him only wearing a dress shirt and coat. Joshua, however, was constrained and stricter in his beliefs, which was reflected in his wearing of a tie and an arguably more formal suit. For Tartuffe, however, the costumes, designed by Anne Kennedy, were striking because of their synthesis of modern and old-fashioned styles, emphasizing the idea that hypocrisy, specifically religious hypocrisy, is not just a thing of the past. As Joey Collins announces at the end of the performance, “Molière is gone, but Tartuffe is still here.” Moreover, one particular costume that aided my understanding of the play was the title character’s, as portrayed by Joey Collins. Tartuffe’s outfit is gray, but later in the play, he reveals what is under his suit- a bright red mesh tank top. Because of this costume design, I could tell both physically and metaphorically, how, on the outside Tartuffe appears to be simple and non-threatening, but underneath he is hiding his true wicked self, like a …show more content…
devil undercover. For me specifically, the lighting in The Christians, designed by Oliver Wason, was the most influential of all the elements, as the lighting helped to highlight the varying moods of the play, revealing Paul’s emotions throughout the course of the play. For example, at the very beginning of the show, when Pastor Paul was thrilled about his newly debt-free church, and the mood was carefree, you could see the reflections of the stained-glass windows on the stage, as if light was shining through them. The soft, rainbow colors of the lights helped to call attention to the bright and cheerful mood of this particular scene, and also contrasts with the lighting of later scenes, as if it serves as the calm before the storm. The next major lighting change occurs when everyone leaves the church and, consequently, Paul himself. Although they once lit up the entire stage, individual lights begin to go off as each character or group of characters leave, until it is quite dim and the only light is shining on Paul. This highlights the loneliness and hopelessness of Paul, as every “light” in his life- his friends, his congregation, his choir, and even is wife- are quite literally going out around him. Finally, in the scene where Joshua comes back to the church to speak with Pastor Paul, the lighting turns a cold white, as opposed to the warm white lights of previous scenes, to the point where it almost looks blue. In this scene, Joshua, Paul’s adversary, is returning, and he is bringing devastating news. The lighting highlights the coldness of the relationship between Paul and Joshua in this scene, pointing out how the “distance between” the two former friends has become “insurmountable,” leaving them at odds with one another. For Tartuffe, the lighting, again designed by Wason, was not as impactful to me, but one particular lighting choice that stood out the most occurred in the scene where we meet the title character for the first time. All of a sudden, the cross at the top of the stage was lit with a red glow, and then the whole stage was filled with the same red light, as Tartuffe rose from the floor. This emphasized the devil-like qualities of Tartuffe, and contrasted it with his pious mask, while also adding to the comedy of the play, as the color red is stereotypically evil. The sound design, conceived by Palmer Hefferan, was able to contribute two things to my understanding of The Christians and Tartuffe.
First of all, in The Christians, the music helped to simply add to the feeling of being in a church, specifically by placing the titles in a “church bulletin” inside the program. Also, by having an actual choir (from the United Church of Chapel Hill when I was there) sing the songs, I was able to more effectively believe that I was actually a member of Paul’s congregation. But probably more importantly, the songs themselves showed the audience’s reaction to the events on stage. For example, the prelude hymn, “God’s Unchanging Hand,” is a contrast to what is about to happen in the play. God’s hand may be unchanging, but the beliefs of everyone in this church and what it stands for are about to be turned upside down by Paul’s sermon. Another example of the impact of the music comes with the third hymn, “I Feel Like Going On,” which is sung after the split between Paul and Joshua, when many of the members are leaving, or starting to wonder if they should join those that have already left. The choir sings what the congregation is experiencing; they “feel like” maybe it is time to “go on” too, that Pastor Paul has really just been using them the entire time. In Tartuffe, the most memorable music occurred in the scene transitions that were not in Molière’s original play. The loud, modern French music (combined with the bright, colorful lights), are
reminiscent of a club, and helped to bring the show and its themes into today’s world, while still remaining true to the original French setting. Another sound element that contributed to my understanding of Tartuffe occurred in Act II. When Loyal (David Fine) rings the doorbell to bring bad news, we do not hear the familiar doorbell sound. Instead, the opening notes of Beethoven’s foreboding Symphony No. 5 sound out. This tells us that Loyal is not bringing good news of reconciliation, as Orgon (Ray Dooley) hopes for, that he is instead bringing bad news, as well as adding to the comedy of the scene.
Tartuffe is the embodiment of the seven sins masquerading as the exact opposite. His gluttony is on display in scene four when Dorine informs Orgon of his overconsumption. Tartuffe has blinded Orgon to his nature and made him disregard his wife’s wellbeing. Lust and Envy are most likely his greatest follies, leading to his ultimate downfall. Tartuffe accepts Orgon’s daughter as his bride and lust after his wife. Tartuffe makes no attempt to deny the engagement which was conscripted because of his position to Orgon. Tartuffe under the guise of making sure Elaine stay pure reporting her every movement to Odom uses the opportunity to confesses she is his “peace, my solace, my salvation on you depends my bliss-or desolation.” (3.3.79-80) He demonstrates his pride when attempting to seduce Elmire comforting her concerns by telling her “if Heavens is all that holds you back, don’t worry. I can remove that hindrance in a hurry.” (4.7.95-96) Tartuffe so entranced with getting what he wants, he makes the same mistake as Lucifer, calling for action against Heaven. Tartuffe is the embodiment of sloth, acting indifferent towards others in his pursuits; from Elaine being ill to feigning defense of Damis. Tartuffes’s final stop on the “how damned are you” show culminates with wrath and greed. When he is confronted by Orgon after lusting for his wife, Tartuffe divulges his intentions to acquire all Orgon’s
Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe during the beginning of the Age of Enlightenment. One of the main characteristics of the Age of Enlightenment was a push towards using reason over emotions to make decisions. The leaders of the enlightenment truly believed that the world could be made a better place if people did this. In Tartuffe, when the characters use their emotions to make their decisions they find themselves in undesirable situations. While those who let their emotions rule them find their lives spinning out of control, there are other characters in the play who try to approach them with reason and logic. Out of these characters the lady’s maid Dorine stands out as the voice of reason.
Phaedra, a tragedy written by Jean Racine, tells the tale of forbidden relationships and the consequences of following one’s passion rather than abiding by the neoclassical virtue of reason. The comedy, Tartuffe, written by Molière also displays a set of forbidden relationships and the consequences of pursuing passion. In each play, there exists a father/son relationship that is either saved or broken by the actions of the characters in the play. While the father/son relationships in Phaedra and Tartuffe are similar in that each son battles with forbidden relationships that they want to exist and ones that they do not, the sets of relationships are more different in the following: one son attempts to preserve his father’s pride, the father
Big hair, bright colors, and denim helped to establish the time period the play was set in. Each actress’ outfit gave the audience an idea of her character’s personality. For instance, Clairee wore pant suits and looked the part of a sophisticated, classy former mayor’s wife. On the other hand, Ouiser wore comfortable clothes; often sporting a pair of jeans and a flannel shirt over a t-shirt showing her practical and simple lifestyle. The use of jackets and scarves portrayed the change in season and helped establish the different time frames from scene to scene. The costumes reflected each character well and were fitting for the time in which the play was portrayed.
Moliere’s Tartuffe assumed set of social conventions were shaped by all the characters within the play, however the authoritative figure was established depicted by the father, Oregon. Oregon’s character assumed the role of king or lord of his household. He believed that as the head of household, he had the right to rule over his kingdom as he saw fit. His kingdom had to run smoothly in order for it to be effective. No matter how harsh, unfair and painful it was for his, wife daughter or servants.
A significant aspect of the play is the acting and wardrobe, because it helps demonstrate the personalities of the characters.
Out of the plays that we could have chosen to produce, I have decided to go with Molière’s, “Tartuffe.” This play is a comedy that comes from 17th century France and is heavily influenced by two large sources of experience for Molière. Those sources are the rules and structure for a play put in place by the French academy and the lessons of improvisation taught by the Commedia dell’Arte. This piece is written in fives acts that are in a unique alexandrine style of verse which have 12 syllables in a line and usually ends with rhyming words. The reason I chose this play is because, in my opinion, things like television, movies, plays, and other forms of media and entertainment are meant to transport you away from all the bad things happening in real life and focus you on something fun and/or interesting. I find this play to have a lot of fun moments that can be mined for even more comedy and I think it has the good chance to keep a large audience entertained for a long period of time. To accomplish my goal I will use elements of situational comedies, France in the 1660’s, and one of Molière’s plays, “A school for girls.”
It is in the duality of Orgon, the believing subject, and Tartuffe, the manipulating hypocrite (or impostor), that Moliere takes his digs at the extremes of enthusiastic belief. Tartuffe plays the role of a man whose greedy actions are cloaked by a mask of overwhelming piety, modesty and religious fervor. Orgon is the head of a household who has taken Tartuffe in. We laugh at Orgon because everyone else (except his mother) knows that Tartuffe is a fake. All of Orgon's relatives warn him of Tartuffe's gluttony and of the false nature of his pious proclamations.
The music and sound effects are in the same pont with what the author nedded to say in that play. In the smok and sword fight on the first act we thought will be a play where every body is confusing and fight each other. The phone ringing all the time and this help the actors to play around in the hury and action come up with rehearsal process. The purposes of the phone is any time we heart that something is going to happen, so we expectin to change the sequence in the play. Ringing the phone open a problem, hanging up the phone close the problem. Opening and shoutting the door of dressing room as a slamming it create for the audience understanding the flow of the show and leaves the flexibility as we see white and black to the performance. Crying with tears make the player dramatic, but afraid of discover which it trying to keep things together laughting and
The play "Tartuffe", by Moliere, is a work that was created to show people a flaw in their human nature. There are two characters who portray the main flaw presented in the play. Both Madame Pernelle and Orgon are blinded to the farces of Tartuffe and must be coaxed into believing the truth. The fact that Orgon and Madame Pernelle are too weak to see the truth is an important theme of the play.
Madame Pernelle shows the family trait that she shares with her son when she states: "He's a fine man, and should be listened to. " (I, i, 44), while speaking of Tartuffe. Although they share this trait throughout the play, Orgon's eyes are finally opened at the end of the play while his mother is still held by the farce of Tartuffe. Although Tartuffe is portrayed as the main character of the play, Orgon is the character who should really be paid attention to the most. As suggested in an essay on "Tartuffe" audiences who concentrate on the character who titles the work may miss the author's point: ".vitriol and spleen vented on one man suggests that Moliere's satire of Orgon, nevermind Tartuffe, was steeped in truth.
In Tartuffe, Moliere creates a play that is interesting in so many ways. His comedy reflects a lot on the role of men and women within a family. During this time, it was common for the man to be the head of the household and women to be submissive to the men. Men held the power in the family and made all the decisions. In this play, a man's point of view is the only view that matters. All else do not serve an importance. His lack of trust and awareness for other people's feelings and needs has caused great conflict in his family. The actions taken by Orgon and his family members express how this play views marriage and relations between men and women. It is a extremely different view (in some cases) of marriage today in average American family.
So we see from the very beginning that this play is about the struggle between god and man, and about whose law comes first. But this play also can wash over us too quickly if we do not stop to see whether or not the characters truly act in accordance with what ...
Moliere rocked the 17th century French world with his comedy "Tartuffe" in 1664. Although, religious factions kept the play banned from theatres from 1664-1669, "Tartuffe" emerged from the controversy as one of the all-time great comedies. Tartuffe is a convincing religious hypocrite. He is a parasite who is sucking Orgon, the rich trusting father, for all he is worth. Orgon does not realize that Tartuffe is a phony, and caters to his every whim. For instance, he reneges on his promise to let his daughter Mariane, marry Valere. Instead he demands that she wed Tartuffe, whom she despises. He also banishes his own son, Damis, from his house for speaking out against Tartuffe and all of his son's inheritance is promised to Tartuffe.
In comparing the two productions together, one must look at the evolution of the play from the sixteenth-century to modern-day. One aspect is the cultural views. As discussed before the sixteenth-century view of Jews greatly differ than that of modern-day. It is because of the influence of World War II that many perspectives have changed. Radford’s production resonates with the tone of sympathy were as Shakespeare’s echo with rightful justice. There is a grey area that Shakespeare leaves and Radford teeters between his modern interpretation and the classic take.