Socrates: Misunderstood Civil Disobedience

756 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Tyranny in ancient greece

PHIL 160 Essay
Yuting Fu
Professor: Daniel Sanderman
Socrates and Civil Disobedience Many people, especially scholars, might believe that Socrates had committed a civil disobedience. But it seems to be the exact opposite to me. Before I explain my reasoning behind my claim, let’s first understand what civil disobedience truly is, and what exactly did Socrates do to cause the trouble. Civil disobedience is being disobedient to certain laws in a peaceful, but active manner. So the person who commits civil disobedience must actively rejects to follow certain laws of government and peacefully accept the consequences. For example, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is a typical example of modern civil disobedience. He actively rejected to follow …show more content…

The first one is the charge of impiety. The second one is the charge of atheism. In the ancient Greek, people did not really care about what exactly you put your faith on, but they did care a whole lot about whether you have put your faith on something and acted piously accordingly. And according to Socrates, both of the charges were not true, because, as claimed by himself, he was on the mission that the god of wisdom gave him. Other than what he has been charged for, Socrates also mentioned and admitted that he had defied the orders before. The first time was for the trial of the generals. Socrates believed that have the generals on trial as a group was a violation of law, and therefore he voted against it. The second time was during the ruling of the thirty tyrants. This time, Socrates rejected the government as a whole and denied the power that the government had. It will seem like Socrates might be civil disobedient due to what he had been charged for, his arguments on court, and what he had done in the …show more content…

For what Socrates did on the court, I do not think they should be accounted toward civil disobedience. Because all he did is to defend himself in a lawful manner. He was actually defending against the ideas that he was being unlawful (impiety and atheism). Because, as we all know, Athens’s law required its citizens to be pious of what they believe. Socrates claimed that he was on the mission given by the God at Delphi, and it would be ridiculous to say that he should be charged of atheism or impiety. And I think his defense was successful and persuasive. And therefore he was not being civil disobedient on the court. What about his past? For the two cases in the past, Socrates was either rejected the government as a whole, or the majority excluding him was being unlawful. I will start with the thirty tyrants. Socrates was rejecting the orders that were given by the government of thirty tyrants in a peaceful manner. But instead of rejecting part of the laws and obeying others, Socrates rejected the government as a whole. Therefore Socrates was not being civil disobedient by definition. In the case of the ten trial generals, it is clearly documented that Athens’ law requires having generals in cases like this put into trials separately. Yet the majorities voted for having ten generals put into trial as a group. Socrates voted against it and defied against the orders by the majorities. Socrates was trying to protect and follow the

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Socrates

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates refuses to disobey the law. He believes in the correctness of the cities laws. He believes it is never right to act unjustly. He thinks that if you do not agree with the laws of the area that you are living at, then to leave and go somewhere else. He argues that the government could be seen as “his parents, also those who brought him up,” (Crito, 51e), since he has lived there his entire life and when you live somewhere for so long you should “persuade us or to do what we say,” (Crito, 52a) or leave. Socrates tells Crito that

    Read More

  • A Just Man Should Fear No Death in the Apology by Plato

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. One way consists of a description of Socrates’ motivation and method, which he hopes will explain to the jury why some people, including his prosecutors, dislike him. The second defense consists of Socrates responding directly to the two charges brought against him: “corrupting the young” and impiety, or more specifically, “not believing in the gods in whom the city believes” (p. 28). I’ll address these two lines of defense in turn.

    Read More

  • Socrates Was NOT Guilty

    1660 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates was not guilty as charged; he had done nothing wrong, as seen in the Apology. Not even a priest could tell Socrates what he had done wrong religiously, Euthyphro wasn’t even able to give Socrates a precise definition of piety. It is then questioned by Crito why Socrates would remain to face a penalty for a crime he did not commit. In the Crito, it is explained why, although innocent, Socrates must accept the penalties his peers have set upon him. It is his peers that will interpret and enforce the laws, not the law which will enforce it. Even if the enforcers don’t deserve attention and respect because they have no real knowledge to the situation, Socrates had put himself under their judgment by going to the trial. Therefore, Socrates must respect the decisions made by the masses because the decisions are made to represent the laws, which demand each citizen’s respect.

    Read More

  • Civil Obedience And Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    Civil Disobedience occurs when an individual or group of people are in violation of the law rather than a refusal of the system as a whole. There is evidence of civil disobedience dating back to the era after Jesus was born. Jesus followers broke the laws that went against their faith. An example of this is in Acts 4:19-20,”God told the church to preach the gospel, so they defied orders to keep quiet about Jesus,” In my opinion civil disobedience will always be needed in the world. The ability to identify with yourself and knowing right from wrong helps to explain my opinion. Often in society when civil

    Read More

  • Does Socrates see himself as the most important teacher in the city?

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology of Socrates, Socrates has to defend himself to the city of Athens. The city of Athens is at odds with Socrates’ philosophy; it contradicted several Athenian beliefs. The city believed that Socrates was an atheist, that he was responsible for corrupting the youth, and that he made the weaker argument the stronger. Socrates believed that he was the most important teacher in the city therefore he continued to defend his actions and beliefs even when his life was on the line. He saw himself as the most important teacher after his visit to the oracle. He believed it was his mission to change the Athenians viewpoints, and he was willing to die for what he believed in. Socrates forced the Athenians to think and to question how they lived their lives. He was a great philosophizer and he knew how important he was to the city.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Socrates And Thomas Hobbes

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    If Socrates was such a constant critic of the government, then why did he never question the Athenian government what his rights as a citizen were? Socrates’ claimed he was “gadfly” who “was attached to this city by the god” (30e) but he never critiqued what the implications of the relationship between the government and citizens were. In Socrates’ perspective, if one chooses to live in Athens, then one is implicitly agreeing and abiding the Laws of Athens (52b.) Although Hobbes’ may agree with this point to some extent, the sole intent of a covenant in which “every man should say to every man ‘I authorize and give up my right of governing myself to this man’” (109) was to protect oneself from harm/death. For Hobbes, the relationship between government and citizens was mutual; the government would acquire power and authority only if citizens were guaranteed protection and defense. For Socrates, the relationship between government and citizens was one-sided; the government should have complete dominance and citizens should blindly obey the government’s commands if one is unable to persuade the government on how to rule. For this reason, Socrates’ had no care for his self-preservation as he was only concerned with the government’s best

    Read More

  • Socratic Methods Of Civil Disobedience By Martin Luther King, Jr.

    1134 Words  | 3 Pages

    refuses to remain silent despite being jailed. In Birmingham, he utilizes civil disobedience as a technique to bring the city to a place of negotiation. King feels that this is the most effect tool, because “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension” that white clergymen in Birmingham are unable to avoid the situation (King 37). This effect, is the way King defines civil disobedience as a series of non-violence actions to call attention to an important movement or necessity for change. By use of civil disobedience, King hopes that it will “open the door to negotiation” and to cause Birmingham “to live in monologue rather than dialogue” (King 37). Since King sees nonviolent resistance as a method to open discussion about the truth, it is clear why he feels that Socrates is a proponent of civil disobedience. In fact, there are parallels between the way civil disobedience creates tension in an environment and how Socrates created “tension in the mind so that individuals could” break away from ignorance (King 37). Additionally, King notes that Socrates had an “unswerving commitment to the truth” which is a result of his mission as a philosopher and shows how King deeply respects the ideas of

    Read More

  • Rawls and King on Civil Disobedience

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Theory of Justice by John Rawls, he defines civil disobedience,” I shall begin by defining civil disobedience as a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”.

    Read More

  • Plato's The Crito

    981 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many instances in Plato's the Crito where Socrates gives reasons for himself to stay in Athens and face his death. Arguments range from that of him being too old to run, to the common response two wrongs don't make a right. The reason I intend to argue against is one Socrates expresses in regards to his obligations to the city he has lived in all his life, and thus the rules that he has subsequently followed throughout that time. In Athens just like any other city, one follows the rules that the respective city has laid down because he/she believes in those laws, or does not and keeps silent. In the stand Socrates takes, he argues that since he has lived in Athens all his life, he is required to stand his ground and take what's thrown his way, even if that punishment is death, "do you think you have the right to retaliation against your country and its laws?" (Crito, 53) Socrates was a master of words. It is easy to say that his intellect allowed him to make anyone see all sides of an argument. Even Crito at times is confused about his decision to free his friend, think that he is making the right decision, "or do you think it possible for a city not to be destroyed if the verdicts of its courts have no force but are nullified and set at naught by private individuals."(Crito, 52) Socrates’ words are very convincing, but what he is not thinking about is the fact that this whole predicament was not meant to be. Socrates was supposed to be in all ...

    Read More

  • Socrates's loyalty to athens

    866 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...isleading and confusing. There is also a problem with his argument involving the agreement. If one agrees go the statement of the social contract as told by Socrates, there’s still room to question the other side of the contract. Along with citizens having obligations to the law, the law also has obligations to the citizens. The agreement is broken if the obligations are not met by the law. And if the agreement is broken by one side, isn’t the other side then free from its obligations to sustain its side of the agreement? Consequently innocent Socrates is free to escape an injustice, if that’s his choice to. It’s as if Socrates didn’t take into consideration the other side of the agreement; his loyalty to Athens blinded the other side. His loyalty to his city and the jury is to be admired; however, his arguments are not well put together, and rather hard to accept.

    Read More

  • Crito's Argument

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    	Thus, in conclusion I believe that Socrates was correct to disregard the opinion of the majority. Socrates accepts his fate, for this reason alone he is not a coward. Socrates disagrees with retaliation and has faith in the government of Athens. Although Socrates may not agree with the decision of the assembly to put him to his death, he realizes that he was done wrongly by the assembly rather than the laws of Athens themselves. I believe Socrates feels this way because he has lived under the laws of Athens for 70 years and he has raised his children under the same principles. Socrates accepts the fact that being a member of society demands a certain respect and obedience. Without the rules and punishment system Athens would not be able to function properly. As Socrates decided to become a citizen of the state of Athens he also takes along with him the responsibility of being a citizen of that state. In following the more reasonable people I believe Socrates is merely following the path in which the Gods intended.

    Read More

  • Socrates: The Charge Of Corruption

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    As a result of his reflection however, he places more value on the opinion of “he who understands justice and injustice”( (Plato, The Crito, §48a). Through his questioning and encouragement of examination, the defendant does not attempt to undermine the majority, but rather believes that the opinions of examined men carry more weight than those of a simple majority. This does not, however, prove Socrates’ innocence completely. As I see it, the greatest display of the defendant’s commitment to upholding the democracy and the majority rule is his strict adherence to the laws of Athens. In the aforementioned case of the ten generals, Socrates opposed the majority in court advocating for the legal cause, but when a verdict was reached he accepted it. Further, Socrates strengthened the institution of the majority rule when he refused to flee to save his own life. Regardless of the value Socrates places on the opinion of the majority, his actions uphold the central values of the democracy in obeying it, even when faced with death. These actions outweigh his criticism of the majority. Thus, the plaintiffs charges of corruption are unfounded and the defendant is innocent, even upon questioning the majority rule the defendant remains loyal to the law, and this example carries to his followers as

    Read More

  • socrates

    660 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first one is that there is a “social contract” between the citizens and the Law. This contract has been validated since the birth of an individual. Socrates claims that by running away and not facing the verdict of the court Socrates is to breach the contract He further goes on to explain that he has been happy with the Athenian way of life up till now and breaking the contract now would make him an outlaw who would not be welcome in any other civilized state for the rest of his life.

    Read More

  • Socrates As Depicted In Plato's Apology

    341 Words  | 1 Pages

    Socrates had many beliefs but one of the utmost values he believed in was honor. In Plato’s, Apology; Socrates last speech before he is condemned to death shows, his dignity he had for himself. He believes that “he would much rather die as the result of this defense than live as the result of the other sort” (Plato 248). Socrates is on trial and this is his last speech, he says that he’d rather die than, defend himself in any other way. He believe’s that he is right and thus will not give into tyranny. The judges and the critics are all tyrants. Furthermore, he knows that the judges “would have liked to hear me weep and wail, doing and saying all sorts of things which i regard as unworthy of myself, but which you are used to hearing from other

    Read More

  • Plato And Socrates Essay

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    One historical figure that loved Socrates’ ideas was Martin Luther King Jr. In King’s famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail, he mentions Socrates by name several times, commending his provocative thinking. He says, “Isn’t this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries precipitated the act by the misguided populace in which they made him drink hemlock?” The idea of civil disobedience is one that has permeated through generations. Dr. King suggests that Socrates is one that sparked this movement of asserting rights by defiance. He says, “To a degree, academic freedom is a reality today because Socrates practiced civil disobedience.” Even the father of the Civil Rights Movement found inspiration in Socrates’

    Read More

More about Socrates: Misunderstood Civil Disobedience

Open Document