Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drama of king lear
Character analysis of lear in king lear
Summary of king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare that illustrates his journey as a tragic hero seeking redemption for his mistakes as a father to his daughters and as a king to society. The contemporary film, A Thousand Acers directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse, revisits the classic tragedy of Shakespeare through a modern-day approach. Similar to Lear’s resigning of power to his three daughters, Goneril, Regan, and Cordilea; Larry Cook divides his land and power to his three daughter, Ginny, Rose, and Caroline. The parallelism of both story lines shares many similarities and differences. Both story lines are able to develop themes such as compassion, reconciliation, and appearance versus reality; but still differentiate in some aspects of those themes. In both literature works, King Lear and A Thousand Acres, illustrate the diverse characterization of parallel characters through, Lear and Larry, and Cordilea and Caroline. Lear and Larry different characterization not only shows the difference personality in both character but as well as the results in different …show more content…
illustration of themes such as compassion and reconciliation. In the play King Lear, Lear is seen as a very egotistical, blind and foolish man that puts him in downgrading situations. However, Lear matures and learns self-effacement throughout his journey of redemption in the course of the play. Lear’ humility is seen when he asks The Fool, “Come on, my boy. How dost, my boy? Art Cold?” (Shakespeare, III, ii, 66). When Lear asks The Fool about his wellbeing it shows an ironic yet strong change in his egotistical character. Moreover, we again see the change in Lear’s character when his daughters, Goneril and Regan, put him out in the storm. Lear then begins to reflect upon the poor and the homeless for he too now is dispossessed with no protection but only The Fool as a companion: “Poor naked wretches, whereso’er you are. That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm. How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides… Oh, I have ta’e. Too little care of this!”(Shakespeare lll, IV, 28-30). Conspicuously, Lear’s change in his arrogant and egotistical nature is evidentially replaced by compassion and humility, by showing concern for others. In addition, the reconciliation of Lear and his daughter, Cordilea, is established upon the theme of compassion. At the end of the play, the audience witnesses Cordilea’s forgiveness to Lear by saying “No cause, no cause” (Shakespeare IV, VII, 73) in respond to his admission that she hates him. Evidently, as the audience we are able to analyze Lear’s character change through compassion which allows him the ability to reconcile in time of misfortune. Furthermore, the character of Larry Cook, from A Thousand Acres, differentiates from Lear’s compassion and reconciliation by not changing or humbling himself through the course of the film. If anything, Larry Cook remains audacious and arrogant, rejecting redemption of incest and mistreatment to his daughters, Ginny and Rose. Moorhouse highlights the compassion for Ginny and Rose, when the audience comes to realize their sexual abuse as children by their own father. Rose tells Ginny: “Daddy's always had rages. You don't remember how he used to come after us, do you... I don't mean when we got strapped or whipped. I mean when he went into your room at night… He was having sex with you”. (Moorhouse) Because Larry lacks remorse and compassion, it leaves him with no true reconciliation or redemption with his children. He then turns into a madman, and fails to recognize Caroline when they are at court. Even though Larry is capable of physically seeing his daughter, he proclaims, “She’s dead!”… Caroline! Caroline’s dead! I think those sisters stole the body and buried her already” (Moorhouse). At the end of the film the audience observes Larry’s non-changing arrogant character falling apart along with no signs of any reconciliation and redemption for him and his daughters. Therefore, the theme of compassion and reconciliation is illustrated in both storylines, but through distinction of Larry’s character to Lear, who both experience different outcomes. Additionally, the characters, Cordilea from King Lear and Caroline from A Thousand Acres, both depict the theme of appearance versus reality.
The theme of appearance versus reality in King Lear is a theme that reoccurs throughout the play. In the beginning of the play, Lear falsely believes in the proclaimed love that Goneril and Regan have for their father. Lear’s egotistical character brings the false flattery as truth and blinds him from the ability to distinguish the actual truth. Ironically, Lear banishes Cordilea for speaking the truth about her honest appeal to Lear’s love. Even though Cordilea does in fact truly loves her father, she refuses to flatter him unlike Goneril and Regan by saying: “I love your majesty according to my bond, no more nor less” (Shakespeare I, I, 91-92). Again, because of Lear’s egotistical blindness, he lacks the ability to distinguish between appearance and
reality. However, in A Thousand Acres, there is difficulty to Caroline’s character when dealing with the idea of appearance versus reality. In the film Caroline is seen as the ‘picture perfect’ daughter of the three daughters. Like Cordilea, she did not take any part of the power or wealth when she questioned the division of the farm; however, unlike Cordilea, Caroline, is not the ‘picture perfect’ daughter she portrays to be nor does she uphold pure love for her father. The only reason she is capable of loving her father, Larry, freely is because she is protected from his dark side of abuse. Although the county sees Larry as a successful farmer and a well-respected man, he is actually an erroneous person who has sexually abused and mentally abused his two eldest daughters Ginny and Rose. Caroline on the other hand is pleasurably ignorant of her father’s wrongs and poor judgment about Ginny and Rose when Ginny says to Caroline, “We did everything for you! We saved you from daddy” (Moorhouse); Caroline then responds with, “Did I really have to be saved from Daddy? From my own father?” (Moorhouse). Caroline criticizes Ginny and says, “I realize that some people are just evil.” (Moorhouse). Clearly, Ginny and Rose continue to keep up the appearance that everything is all right to protect Caroline from the reality of their father’s ill repute doings. The development of the theme appearance versus reality is seen through Caroline’s character and highlights the importance of the role of appearance in the film. In both narratives, the theme of appearance versus reality is seen throughout the action of both daughters Cordilea and Caroline. In Conclusion, the parallelism between characters in King Lear and A Thousand Acres, allows the development of themes such as compassion and reconciliation and appearance versus reality. The similarities and differences in both narratives found in King Lear and A Thousand Acres serves as reminder that time passes by, but the relationships that we have with one another will never change unless we push to change and fix our wrong doings as people
They are parallel in how the characters that are mentioned earlier intentionally try to appear different to achieve something; where in The Wars, Robert wants to be like a soldier, and in King Lear, Goneril and Regan want to appear as loving daughters. However, their reality and where it leads them is what differentiates them. Where in The Wars, Robert regains his true, noble and compassionate self, but in King Lear, Goneril and Regan’s true selfish personality leads them to oppose each other and eventually
The theme of dishonesty is demonstrated from the start of ‘King Lear’ during the ‘love trial’ when Cordelia dislikes her sister’s “ponderous” words which suggest how dishonest both Goneril and Regan really are. The adjective “ponderous” determines that her love for Lear cannot be measured with words. Cordelia refuses to take part in the contest and Lear comments by saying: “so young and so untender”. The word “untender” suggests that Lear hopes for something that makes him feel valued as a king and father, however this works against him as ultimately both his other daughters better themselves by flattering themselves into trying to get the Kingdom. Arguably in this instance, flattery is a form of dishonesty and although Lear asks for it, their words begin the downward spiral of the tragedy....
Lear's dialogue with Cordelia on "nothing" introduces yet another theme in the play's imagery, echoing, among other scenes, some of his later conversations with the Fool (I.iv.130 "Can you make no use of nothing, nuncle?") and others. Indeed, King Lear is, in many ways, about "nothing." Regan and Goneril seem to offer much in the beginning, but after whittling down the number of Lear's knights, they leave him with nothing, and in the end their "natural" affection comes to nothing as well. Lear is progressively brought to nothing, stripped of everything -- kingdom, knights, dignity, sanity, clothes, his last loving daughter, and finally life itself.
Lear, like any king, Pagan or otherwise, would have been seen as the godhead on earth and therefore a man of exceptional power who implemented the gods' will on earth. Such a figurehead should surely command absolute respect and obedience. Yet Cordelia displeases her father, and Goneril's and Regan's actions following Lear's abdication can only be described as shocking, even to a contemporary and more liberal-minded audience. Act one, scene one represents the first emergence of filial disobedience, starting with Lear's vanity demanding that his daughters say how much they love him in a meaningless ceremony. Cordelia, his youngest and favourite daughter, will not be drawn into this.
Shakespeare, William. "King Lear: A Conflated Text." The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York:
The focus in this scene is to show that Lear has so much pride that it made him blind to Cordellia’s love and the reason to why he loved. His pride made him think that flattery is love thus he gave everything to Goneril and Regan. This was his biggest mistake, leaving him completely dependent upon his two hateful daughters. He kicked Cordellia out so there is no hope of him being helped now.
When Jane Smiley wrote A Thousand Acres, she consciously made the story parallel to Shakespeare's King Lear for several reasons. The novel's characters and basic storyline are almost direct parallels to King Lear, but Smiley's dissatisfaction with the traditional interpretation of King Lear is showcased in her modern day version (Berne 236).
When the audience is first introduced to Lear, he is portrayed as a raging, vain old man who can not see the purity of his daughter Cordelia's love for him from the insincerity of her sisters Goneril and Regan. In his fiery rage after disowning Cordelia, Lear commands to Kent, "Out of my sight!" (1.1.156). Kent fittingly implores the aging king to "See better, Lear; and let me still remain / The true blank of thine eye" (1.1.157-8). Kent recognizes love in its most noble form in the person of Cordelia, and is able to see through the hypocrisy of Lear's other two daughters. In beseeching Lear to "[s]ee better," Kent is, in effect, asking Lear to look beyond his vanity and inward pride to see the honesty of Cordelia, who refuses...
Only the truth is irreconcilable with the demands of Lear’s ego. When Cordelia doesn’t say what Lear wants to hear he breaks out in anger by a violent oath, disclaiming paternal care of Cordelia: “… by the sacred radiance of the sun, The mysteries of Hecat and the night; By all the operations of the orbs From whom we do exist and cease to be” . Lear casts Cordelia from his heart referring to her as a “barbarous Scythian.” His hatred surpasses the notion of equality in love, it shows self-centred love that asks more of the other then of oneself. With Lear’s actions we can see that he can’t recognise treachery and loyalty and falsehood and truth, and no one can tell him about it. Here his lack of self-knowledge is the biggest in the play.
... destiny of each holds. Goneril is similar to Lear through the theme of blindness and madness combined together. Regan, on the other hand, is like Lear because they both experienced as ill-fated destiny that their own loved ones committed to them. Lastly, Cordelia is said to be parallel to Lear because of their imperfection as human beings and also their illustration of Christ and Mary in Christian viewpoint. In the end, every characters involve, possess a likeness, whether it is in good or bad way.
Once Goneril and Regan took complete control of the kingdom, it was evident that King Lear’s power and authority was tarnished. Goneril and Regan abuse of power lead to the madness and the crisis Lear experienced. For example, while Lear was outside in during the storm, he basically questioned who he was not only as king, but as a man. "Doth any here know me? This is not Lear: Doth Lear walk thus? speak thus? Where are his eyes?" (I..IV.218-222). this quote just shows the depth of Lear’s troubles and blindness. Now that Lear has lost all his power to the evil actions of his two daughters, he’s essentially in an identity crisis, and unable to see who he truly is anymore with the title of “king”, which all play a part in his tragedy and eventual
This new Lear is certainly a far cry from the arrogant king we saw at the beginning of the play. Shakespeare has transformed Lear from an ignorant old king into some sort of god, using a seven stage process: resentment, regret, recognition, acceptance and admittance, guilt, redemption, and optimism. Lear’s transformation can be simply described as a transition from blindness into sight, he did not see the value in listening to others, but in the end he gained a sense of optimism and idealism. There is no doubting that Shakespeare has portrayed Lear as a flawed figure, who, through his misfortune and suffering, goes from a contemptuous human being to one who has been purified into an omniscient, godly type character, proving that ignorant people can truly change to become caring individuals.
Shakespeare, William, Barbara A. Mowat, and Paul Werstine. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: Washington Square, 1993. Print.
Lear's relationship with his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia, is, from the beginning, very uncharacteristic of the typical father-daughter relationship. It's clear that the king is more interested in words than true feelings, as he begins by asking which of his daughters loves him most. Goneril and Regan's answers are descriptive and sound somewhat phony, but Lear is flattered by them. Cordelia's response of nothing is honest; but her father misunderstands the plea and banishes her. Lear's basic flaw at the beginning of the play is that he values appearances above reality. He wants to be treated as a king and to enjoy the title, but he doesn't want to fulfill a king's obligations. Similarly, his test of his daughters demonstrates that he values a flattering public display of love over real love. He doesn't ask "which of you doth love us most," but rather, "which of you shall we say doth love us most?" (I.i.49). It would be simple to conclude that Lear is simply blind to the truth, but Cordelia is already his favorite daughter at the beginning of the play, so presumably he knows that she loves him the most. Nevertheless, Lear values Goneril and Regan's fawning over Cordelia's sincere sense of filial duty.
The first flaw in King Lear is his arrogance, which results in the loss of Cordelia and Kent. It is his arrogance in the first scene of the play that causes him to make bad decisions. He expects his favorite, youngest daughter to be the most worthy of his love. His pride makes him expect that Cordelia’s speech to be the one filled with the most love. Unfortunately for King Lear’s pride, Cordelia replies to his inquisition by saying, “I love your majesty/According to my bond and nothing less';(1.1.100-101). Out of pride and anger, Lear banishes Cordelia and splits the kingdom in half to the two evil sisters, Goneril and Regan. This tragic flaw prevents King Lear from seeing the truth because his arrogance overrides his judgement. Lear’s arrogance also causes him to lose his most faithful servan...