Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frankenstein character development
Frankenstein character development
Character development in Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is a fine line between sane and insane monsters in people. Sometimes, it is a mental issue, other times it is just one simple thought that provokes the monster inside of people. Just one thought could change a person and their actions entirely. Just one person’s doings could make someone else feat evilly upon them. Just one sight, feeling, or a wrong message. Just one mistake. Just one. Just one incident or thought can change a person and their actions. With textual evidence and examples from “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, “Suffer the Little Children” by Steven King, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe, the monsters inside of the characters will emerge with a provoking element.
Just as a thought can
…show more content…
change a person, a feeling can as well. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, the antagonist, General Zaroff feels that hunting animals “had become too easy” (26). The General faces all kinds of animals, including some of the most destructive, and had success, too much success, stating that “there is no greater bore than perfection” (26), he wants to fight against an animal that has the instinct to defend itself. Zaroff traps vulnerable sailors on his island, where he then charms them into a ‘game’ of hunting. Zaroff creates “a new animal to hunt” (26), that acquitted animal is the sailors. Consequently, when a more intellectual hunter, Sanger Rainsford, is confined and forced to hunt, Zaroff is dumbfounded because, to his surprise, Rainsford applies intelligent tactics to outwit the general, instead of killing him. The big game hunter sees Zaroff’s game as murderous, however Zaroff visualizes it as a rational act because he thinks that people should be strong enough to survive. Why does this make him an insane monster? The general is insane by society’s standards: he slaughters people because he perceives them to be strong enough; he captures people and puts them in biased hunting conditions; and he believes himself to be unbeatable in his own game, putting his importance before other’s lives. Zaroff is malevolent like a devil, he simply does not possess a moral perspective for killing innocent humans; he is only uninterested in hunting animals. Another character that possesses similar characteristics of an insane monster would be Miss Sidley in “Suffer the Little Children”.
However, she is aware that she is mentally absurd by uttering to herself, “it was all in your mind, Emily” (6). Miss Sidley is a 3rd grade teacher who is quite wise and uses her skills prudently. She uses the reflection in her glasses to distinguish what undertakings the students commit behind her back. Miss Sidley has one student in particular that is relevant in creating her inner-monster, that student is Robert. Miss Sidley notes that she saw a “glimpse of Robert’s face changing” (2) which is the first sign of her viewing her students as fiends, she believes that Robert’s face actually morphed and melted into a monstrous creature. Her thoughts make her ponder that Robert and the rest of the children are horrors. Robert then gives her another sign of the class being monsters by telling her “there’s so many of us” (5), making Miss Sidley to ruminate that all of her students are immoral beings, even though she has only witnessed Robert changing into a beast. She makes the judgment to eradicate the ‘monsters’ she continues to generate in her mind. Therefore, she creates a “special test” (6) where the test takes place in another room, she transports each student into a different room. The room permits no noise to be received outside of it, giving her the opportunity to shoot each of 12 students with her brother’s gun, with no one hearing it. What …show more content…
makes this insanity and monstrous? Miss Sidley is psychologically crazy, the kids were not actually monsters, and it all rests in her mind. This builds the monster inside her, making her murder twelve guiltless children. Although she thinks the kids are the monsters, however in reality, it is her. Finally, insanity also acts in the deranged, revenge seeking, Montresor from “The Cask of Amontillado”.
Poe gives this villain features that allow him to be viewed as sane or insane due to the fact that Montresor acted in retaliation. Fortunato, a friend of Montresor, insulted him, giving Montresor a motive. However, even though he has a motive, he torments Fortunato, which is an inhumane characteristic. Montresor desires more that to just kill Fortunato, he yearns for making him agonize. While at a carnival, Montresor forages wine to Fortunato, tricking him into following him into the catacombs. With Fortunato intoxicated in the undergrounds, Montresor “fetters him to the granite” (10) leaving him there to distress. Finally, after “the yells of him [Fortunato] clamored” (11), Montresor built tiers of plastered stone, keeping a barrier between Fortunato and the aboveground. Leaving the reader with uncertainty of what happens to Fortunato, Poe later gives the statement from Montresor “in pace requiescat!” (12) reassuring the reader that he commits homicide to Fortunato. How does this make him a monster? He does not want just revenge, he wants to make Fortunato suffer for his doings. He can be perceived as sane mainly because of the reason behind it; making one feel for his faults. However, he can be perceived as insane because he imprisoned a man to make him deteriorate and slowly rot in the
crypts. In all of the suspense, short stories, these reasons give the characteristics of an insane monster for each of the antagonists: they do not attain reasoning that is logical or ethical; they are all ruthless and execute people that do not deserve those horrid acts; and they each believe that it is reasonable, they do not think it is psychotic, irrational or cruel. The character’s souls as sinister as a dark, eerie alley. In conclusion, everyone has monsters inside of them that are waiting to be provoked by thoughts, actions, or feelings. Some people choose to act in violence, while others choose to be rational and communicate.
It is constantly seen that people take revenge on each other in the real world so it comes to no surprise that Montresor is taking revenge on Fortunato. Specifically in this story Montresor will feel better if he “not only punish but punish with impunity” (108 Poe). But further on what I found to even more realistic was that this wasn’t normal revenge, this was pure mastermind torture. Montresor knew that Fortunato was sick with Montresor saying “…but the severe cold with which I perceive you are afflicted”(109 Poe) regarding that he didn’t want Fortunato to come down to his vaults, but Montresor true intentions were wanting Fortunato to fight Montresor request of not coming, and it worked. Montresor also knew how well Fortunato was at differencing wine “I was silly enough to pay the full Amontillado price without consulting you in the matter” (109 Poe). By Montresor exploiting Fortunato’s sickness and skill of wines, Montresor knew that he could get Fortunato in the vaults where he could execute his revenge. At a first glance this may not seem lifelike because there’s an assumption to be made that people aren’t this immoral. But the truth is that the revenge that Montresor conducted is seen constantly in our culture. It’s undeniably real of the monstrosity that was made by Montresor when comparing it to the wicked
Montresor is a man who feels pride in himself and in his family, so when Fortunato—an acquaintance of Montresor— “venture[s] upon insult,” Montresor “vow[s] revenge” against him (1). Montresor hastily decides that he must kill Fortunato, even though his use of the word “venture” implies that Fortunato had not yet insulted him, but nearly did. Montresor’s impulsive need for revenge causes him to formulate a plan to murder his acquaintance. He keeps Fortunato intoxicated by “presenting him…[with] wine,” he “fetter[s] him to the granite,” and he “plaster[s] up… [a wall of] new masonry” to trap Fortunato in the catacombs (39, 71, 89). All of these acts are signs that the need for revenge has made Fortunato insane. A person who has any sense of morals would not commit crimes such as Montresor’s. His impetuous decision to exact revenge caused him to lose his
Montresor does have some disconnect or mental problem. He wishes to kill Fortunato for insulting him, but he never specifies what insult it was. He also states he has borne a thousand injuries. This is an exaggeration- Montresor only says this because he needs a reason to kill Fortunato. If Fortunato has done anything to deserve a painful death, he would certainly know, but Montresor does not let fortunato know what he has done and states "neither by word nor deed had [Montresor] given Fortunato cause to doubt [his] goodwill." Montresor's madness is also made clear by his method of killing Fortunato; he suffocates him in a wall built in f...
Edger Allan Poe’s short story “The Cask of Amontillado” talks about how Montressor feels like he was insulted by his friend Fortunato. Also Montressor’s family motto is “Nemo me impune lacessit.”(Allan Poe 362), which means “No one insults me with impunity.”, and Montressor doesn’t want to let his family motto down so he uses it as a reason and make his revenge on Fortunato as a goal that has to be accomplished. Montressor tricks his friend Fortunato which was drunk at the moment, by asking him to follow him to his house and to check an expensive wine that he just purchased to be sure that he didn’t get tricked. Fortunato follows Montressor to his house and went down to the down stairs of Montressor’s house. When they get to the catacombs, Montressor chains up Fortunato and places him in a niche in the wall, and started to build a brick wall leaving him sealed inside to die in the catacombs.
He shows absolutely no remorse or any true interest in the effect that his actions will have. Even to go as far to make jokes at the expense of the future murder of his so called “friend.” Like Dr. Stout said, sociopaths can lead people to their impaling doom with much ease. The sheer ease of his master plan of revenge unfolding. His use of reverse psychology on people to have them ultimately do his true bidding. Playing with Fortunado’s trust to his own satisfaction and gain. He exhibits many traits of a sociopath throughout the story. Edgar Allan Poe is well known for doing this in many of his works as seen in classic works like The Black Cat, The Tell-Tale Heart. The protagonists of these stories are also sociopathic, insane, vengeful and blood thirsty people who in reality are in fact the true antagonists. In each of their minds they believe they’re rightfully exacting justice and don’t see any error in their actions or just simply don’t care. They’re also cold, unfeeling, persuasive, and sinister murders who escalate small issues out of proportion. A sinister character is a recurring theme in Poe’s work and Montresor is surely no exception to this
With a premeditated motive to commit such an act, the culprit, Montressor, thinks, constructs and orchestrates a presumed murder against his insulter, Fortunado. “Poe begins by describing, in characteristically precise and logical detail, Montresor’s (and Poe’s) idea of perfect revenge. At the same time, he needed to end his story by telling how his revenge had affected him. When Fortunatosays, “For the love of god, Montresor!” and Montresor repeats, “Yes, for the love of God,” Poe is indicating that Montresor is already experiencing the closure he sought”(Delaney 39) Unbeknownst why he wants retribution, or what it is that his victim has done to compel Montressor to kill him. What is given is a recount of the night under discussion.
Poe uses the aspects of dramatic and verbal irony, foreshadowing and symbolism to shape his tale of revenge. Fortunato's fate is death and Montresor tries to make his intentions seem honorable. His intentions were not honorable, just evil. He does however, manage to get what he set out for, revenge.
What type of person do you think Fortunato is? In this story, Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allan Poe, Montresor is seeking revenge on Fortunato. Fortunato makes himself an easy target because he doesn't think he has done anything wrong to Montresor, he drank too much wine, and he was very interested in the wine Montresor supposably had for him.
Because Montresor narrates the story in the first person, the reader is able to perceive his thoughts and understand his motivations and justifications for his ruthless murder in a manner which a third person point of view would not allow. Montresor’s personal narration of the events of the story does not justify his crime in the audience’s eyes, but it does offer a unique opportunity for the audience to view a murder from the perspective of a madman killer. It is Poe’s usage of this unique angle that causes the story to be so captivating and gruesomely fascinating. As the story opens, Montresor explains why it is necessary that he “not only punish but punish with impunity” to avenge for Fortunado’s insult to him. This justification for his crime is a piece of information that the audience is able to learn only because they are permitted inside the mind of the protagonist. In the final scene, when Montresor is carrying out his murder pl...
Montresor is the main character who is narrating from the viewpoint of someone in the story that is being told. This gives bias towards Montresor because the audience feels the need to root for him since he is telling the story. Montresor, in the beginning, is able to justify the acts he is about to do, while we are not able to hear Fortunato defend or explain what he has done to Montresor that would cause him to take those actions. “…but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge.” (Poe 108). Since it is told through Montresor, the readers are also able to hear what his thoughts are. This adds an extra layer to the story by giving not only what he is saying to Fortunato to get him to do what he wants, but also his true intentions and thought processes while he is executing his master plan. He explains to the readers that he manipulated his servants into leaving his house for the night so that no one would witness Fortunato at his home. “These orders were sufficient, I well knew, to insure their immediate disappearance…” (Poe
Fortunato “takes possession” of Montresor’s arm, for which he suffers (716) in order to carry out his plan. Poe’s use of possession and suffer give the impression that Montresor is being afflicted again by Fortunato. Once Montresor reveals this meeting at this evening is no coincidence by divulging he made sure none of his attendants would be home. By giving the direct orders to be home. Poe shows us that Montresor was not respected or feared by his servants’ actions. The servants’ leaving after being given a direct order to stay does give credence to the fact that Montresor must be very methodical and unyielding to his schedule. Only once Fortunato to the catacombs does he betray his own premise. Montresor refers to Fortunato as his “poor friend” (716). At this point Poe has depicted this instigator of a “thousand injuries” as a drunken jester that can barely catch his breath at this point in the story. Now Montresor is showing some sympathy towards him. At this point the transition is complete. Where the two men stopped at the entrance to Fortunato’s tomb, this is the moment that leaves no doubt that Montresor is the villain and Fortunato is the
In the beginning of the story, Montresor appears to be vindictive within the first paragraph. Fortunato insults Montresor by doing something that remains unidentified. Montresor states he “must not only punish, but punish with impunity.” Montresor feels he must do this because he wants to be done with Fortunato and his insults. He also feels that he must live up to his family motto, “Nemo me impune lacessit,” which means, “Nobody attacks me with without punishment.” Because Montresor is single-minded, he is able to plan his scheme so thoughtfully that he knows there is no chance of getting caught. Montresor’s need for revenge continues throughout the story. When Montresor says, “Then I must positively leave you,” he is showing that there is no turning back. Fortunato is stuck indefinitely. Montresor shows that he is not remorseful by his actions while he is walling in Fortunato. “The noise [vibrations of the chain Fortunato is locked in] lasted for several minutes, during which, that I might harken to it with more satisfaction, I ceased my labors and sat upon the bones.” M...
The author Edgar Allen Poe shows his crazy character by by making him wear a jester's hat, and by making him little drunk. In my Mind It is kind of hard to believe that a character like Fortunado with bad intention had malevolent insulted Montresor. To me Fortunato seems to me like a chill guy but yet again, Fortunato had insulted Montresor by telling him he had almost forgotten about his family heritage and there is was no possibility of montressor being in the Freemason society. Montresor is sadistic, deceptive, cunning, manipulative and vengeful.
The major characteristics of the narrator and main character, Montresor, are anger, hatred, and revenge. In the story, he is angry with Fortunato because he believes that Fortunato has wronged and insulted him many times by saying, “thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could…he ventured upon insult…” (Poe). In addition, Montresor’s hatred for Fortunato goes so far that he believes he must kill Fortunato. He mentions this in the story as, “[y]ou, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat” (Poe). He seems to say that his soul is made of hatred and goes on to say he must give Fortunato the utmost punishment: death. Montresor even shows traits of revenge when he says, “…but when [Fortunato] ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.” and “...I would be avenged…” (Poe). He is saying that he will get revenge on Fortunato, whom he is angry with and hates for being insulted by.
His superego is telling him all the things that could go wrong, but his ego is telling Montresor to go through with getting revenge by murdering Fortunato. Kevin J. Hayes states in his book The Annotated Poe, that the motivation for Montresor to murder Fortunato was Poe’s own desire to get revenge on a former friend, Thomas Dunn English (Hayes 351). Montresor, like Edgar Allan Poe, felt like he has been wronged and needed to punish that person. Fortunato shows up wearing a motley, similar to a joker’s attire. Scott Peoples says in the book “Social and psychological Disorder in the Works of Edgar Allan Poe” that his belief is that Montresor is committing this murder out of an act of jealousy. Also, Montresor has created an enemy to place all of his disappointments and failures upon (40). According to Montresor it is accurate because the joke is on Fortunato. Fortunato does not have a clue what is about to happen to him in the catacombs. He thinks he is just showing Montresor the difference between Spanish sherry and Amontillado; he is too drunk to even consider that this is a death trap. After seeing Fortunato’s attire, Montresor decides to go ahead with the murder plan. Montresor is dressed in all black and fits the attire of the carnival, but his clothes have another meaning. Criminals dress in black to blend in with the night. To avoid the victim’s