Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poem analysis
Poem analysis essays
Research paper on poem analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“A Barred Owl” and “The History Teacher” are two poems that show how adults lie to children in order to protect then and their innocence. Both poets use imagery and symbolism to show that adults occasionally lie to young children, but that these lies can have very distinct consequences. “A Barred Owl” also uses personification to explain the message, while “The History Teacher” uses irony to convey the meaning. Both poets use imagery to portray their messages. In “A Barred Owl,” Wilbur describes the young child in her “darkened room” when “the warping night” brought in “the boom.” This imagery helps show the idea that they young girl is alone in the dark when she hears a frightening noise, but is then calmed down by her parents who “make …show more content…
[her] terrors bravely clear.” The imagery helps to show that there are many frightening things that a young child cannot understand, but a simple, although possibly untruthful, explanation can confront them. Similarly, Collins uses imagery to portray the meaning of the poem, but in this case, the meaning is that lying to older children fosters ignorance in their society. Collins describe the kids at the playground in detail, as they “torment the weak/and the smart.” The description of the children illustrates the irony of this poem. The teacher was “trying to protect his students’ innocence,” but in reality he was creating ruthless kids who did not empathize with one another. This helps the poet make his point that lying to older children about serious, significant parts of life is detrementional to their development. Although both poets used imagery to portray the meaning of their poem, they each described a unique meaning. Wilbur used imagery to depict the fears and terror that were scaring the young girl, while Collins described the children harassing each other at the park, which shows how the teacher’s lies were creating ignorant children. Symbolism was also used by the two poets in order to show their message.
In “A Barred Owl,” the “owl’s voice” symbolizes fear and lack of understanding that children have. The young girl was frightened by an everyday item, which shows that young kids can have irrational fears because they don’t understand the world. This helps convey the message because there are many things that kids don’t understand, and therefore they fear, which also brings a necessity for adults to comfort the kids and help them understand, even if this means telling them a few small, white lies. Collins also uses symbolism to make his point. The various lies that the history teacher tells his students, such as that “the Ice Age was really just/the Chilly Age, a period of a million years/when everyone had to wear sweaters,” symbolize a broader range of fabrications that many adults tell to kids, even when they should be telling the truth. The children in “The History Teacher” aren’t being taught about many of the dark, yet important, parts of history and therefore don’t learn how to treat one another with respect and kindness; they become ignorant people who spend their time at the playground tormenting one another. The lies and ignorance of the children symbolize that if adults keep deceiving kids on a variety of topics, society will become less understanding and more unaware of how to treat one another. Symbolism is used to both poems to describe different meanings. The general fear kids have is …show more content…
symbolized by the owl in “A Barred Owl,” and the negative consequences of misleading children is symbolized by the history teacher’s lies in “The History Teacher.” Wilbur and Collins also use unique literary devices in order to make their point.
In addition to imagery and symbolism, Wilbur uses personification to convey the message. The noises heard in the child’s room are personified into a question of “‘Who cooks for you?’ and then ‘Who cooks for you?’” which helps show that parents can easily transform the fears of young children into something they can understand. The personification helps the poet make his point because the simple lie allows the child to go back sleep, without causing any real harm. On the other hand, Collins uses irony in order to make his point. While the teacher is trying to preserve the innocence of his students by telling them lies about important historical events, he ends up creating ignorant kids who, when they interact with their peers, “muss up their hair and break their glasses.” The insensitivity of the students that comes from the misinformation demonstrates the dangers of lying to older kids, who need to hear the truth in order to become responsible citizens who have a solid understanding of the world around them as well as all parts of history, whether desirable or
disturbing. Imagery and symbolism are two important literary devices that help portray the meaning in the poems “A Barred Owl” and “The History Teacher.” The imagery used helps describe the fears and lack of understanding that young kids have in “A Barred Owl,” and it shows the dangers of lying to kids in “The History Teacher.” In “A Barred Owl,” symbolism is used to show that there are everyday fears that adults are used to, but kids don’t yet understand and in “The History Teacher,” it is used to show that lying to children on a broader perspective will lead to a more ignorant, heartless society. Personification is also a tool used in “A Barred Owl” which allows the fears of a child to be converted into friendly animals. “The History Teacher” utilizes irony to portray the negative outcomes of lying to older children.
In her poem “The School Children”, Louise Gluck uses imagery by applying an extended metaphor to show how going to school is similar to going to battle and by describing the mothers’ actions through the use of vivid verbs to portray the disconnection between children and their guardians, despite the sacrifices that mothers make.
The two stories “War” and “About Effie” from Timothy Findley’s Dinner Along the Amazon are both told by the same child narrator, Neil. In each of the stories Neil attempts to make sense of a mystery of the adult world. In “War” Neil tries to understand the adult world of war, and explain why it seems that his father has betrayed him, and in “About Effie” Neil tries to understand the mystery of Effie’s strange need to wait for a man in a thunderstorm. Neil reaches an understanding of each of these mysteries in a similar way: through observation of non-verbal clues from adults. However, Neil’s own attempts to communicate non-verbally through his behaviour are unsuccessful. Taken as a whole, these two stories show how very important non-verbal communication is in child-adult relationships.
Because many people who read this poem were once in a student’s role, they start to relate more and more as the poem continues. The speaker talks of “sweating the final” and “reading disorganized essays” (Lines 9 and 11). Much like any school-goer, the scenes depicted in this section of the work are humorous because almost everyone can relate to them. The speaker mentions “the boy who always had his hand up” (Line 14). Everyone has had the geeky poindexter know-it-all kid that sits in the front of the classroom, eager to answer all of the teacher’s questions. “While he seldom makes actual puns, his wit is of the punning kind: he makes idioms ridiculous through inflation, hyperbole, and repetition” (Kirsch). Kirsch also says that , “...part of Collins's talent is knowing when to stop”(Kirsch). Collins does not overdo his puns and witty remarks ,which could become quite cheesy to some readers, but he knows how to make them work. Through the use of humor, Collins brings a lightheartedness to the work that appeals to readers.“The poem also alternates between humor (jokes about teachers and students) and pathos (sad aspects of some students’ later lives or some teachers’ later lives)” (Prinsky). He even goes on to make a reference to Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter. By using this analogy, Collins touches on the social crowd platform. He says, “The A’s stroll along with other A’s” and “The D’s honk
The short story, “The White Heron” and the poem, “A Caged Bird” are both alike and different in many ways. In the next couple of paragraphs I will explain these similarities and differences and what makes them unique to the stories.
Are adults overprotective of their children? To what point do we protect children? Where should the line be drawn? Along with those questions is how easily children can be influenced by these same adults. Two poets, Richard Wilbur and Billy Collins, express the ideas of how easily children can be manipulated and how sometimes adults think they are protecting their innocent children, when in reality they are not. Wilbur and Collins express these ideas in their poems through numerous literary devices. The literary devices used by Wilbur and Collins expose different meanings and two extremely different end results. Among the various literary devices used, Wilbur uses imagery, a simple rhyme scheme and meter, juxtaposition of the rational and irrational, and a humorous tone to represent the narrator’s attempt to “domesticate” irrational fears. Conversely Collins uses symbols, historical interpretations, imagery, diction and other literary devices to depict the history teacher’s effort to shield his students from reality. In the poems, “A Barred Owl,” by Richard Wilbur, and “The History Teacher,” by Billy Collins, both poets convey how adults protect and calm children from their biggest, darkest fears and curiosities.
With the use of irony and a free rhyme scheme, Collins’ poem vocalizes his opinion on how lying to children about significant facts can only serve to make them ignorant. The way he communicates this to us is by ironically emphasizing events by understating them. He shows how important an event is by mocking the teacher’s portrayal of the event. One example of how he does this is how the teacher tells his students that the ice age was just the “chilly age, a period of a million years when everyone had to wear sweaters.”(3-4). Collins does this several times with other important events in history, such as the Spanish Inquisition, where “[It] was nothing more than an outbreak of questions.”(7-8). The teacher’s interpretation of events, when compared to the actual events themselves creates a sense of unease, as the lies stray far away from what actually happened, and brings up the question of whether or not these lies should be told. Collins uses events that involve death and destruction to accentuate how big the contrast between the teacher’s explanation and reality is. After the class ends, the children leave the classroom to “torment the weak and the smart” (15-16), while the teacher is oblivious to it all. Note that Collins puts “and the smart” (16) on a separate line from “torment the weak” (15). The children in the class aren’t smart because they did not learn about the true events in history. This distinction emphasized the ignorance of the children. This contrasts with Wilbur’s poem, as the lie told there served to soothe a child’s fear, rather than breed ignorance. The rhyme scheme is different as well. Collins’ free rhyme scheme is used to create a sense of unease, whereas Wilbur’s rhyme scheme creates a child-like feeling to his poem. Unlike the parents in “A Barred Owl”, the teacher is portrayed as an ignorant man, unaware of what happens around
When the poem is read aloud, the explicit rhyme and rhythm of the lines becomes extremely obvious. In fact, the bouncy rhythm is so uplifting, it occasionally makes the audiences feel like it is too predictable and straight-forward. An example would be “bright with chrysolite”, the word “chrysolite” feels like it is forcefully implemented for the sake of the rhyme. This is somewhat similar to a children’s tale. Most children’s tale as we know it, conveys messages straightforwardly and are easily understood by children, it also has an amiable tone and a merry mood that engages the children 's attention. Similarly, the rhyme and rhythm of this poem is very obvious and explicit, creating a delightful, casual mood that appeals to a young audience. Even though the legend dealt with deep insights about parenting that are intricate and puzzling, the father delivered it in such a gratifying, simple manner that made even the most dark and dreadful matters: like the description of precarious beasts and vicious monsters to sound like a blissful adventure of friendly animals. The sole purpose of this contradiction between the tone and message is to make this seemingly strong and serious topic more tolerable and captivating to the son of the father. Unsensible, impulsive youth is very similar to restless children, a long insipid lecture about deep insights is very difficult for them to buy into. In the same time, a harsh, threatening warning will only make them obey unwillingly, and creating a doubtful relationship will make them uncomfortable to communicate or appeal to their parents. Clearly, the percipient father recognized the ineffectiveness of these unsuitable parenting methods. Instead, he conveyed the message in a uncomplicated, friendly way that made his son to accept his teachings more comfortably. A
In his poem “The History Teacher,” poet Billy Collins sends a strong message of those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Collins uses dramatic irony to reinforce this theme by having the history teacher downplay tragic events, lie to his students and create an unrealistically rosy picture of the world. The teacher thinks that he is “trying to protect his students’ innocence” (Collins 1), by shielding them from many horrific things that have happened in the world. The reader realizes that an ironic situation is unfolding in which the students are acting terribly even though the teacher has tried to shield them from the historical rotten things that have taken place.
When it rains, it makes some people feel joy and calmness, and it makes others feel sad and gloomy. It is fascinating how the exact same thing can affect two different people in 2 different ways. This same statement applies the way ignorance leads to innocence and vice versa and how that affects people, as seen in the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and the book The Boy in the Striped Pajamas by John Boyne. In both books, the authors used the characters Lennie and Bruno to show that ignorance is often mistaken for the many kinds of innocence and that innocence and ignorance are interchangeable in a way.
...t is arguable that the birds fight is also a metaphor, implying the fight exists not only between birds but also in the father’s mind. Finally, the last part confirms the transformation of the parents, from a life-weary attitude to a “moving on” one by contrasting the gloomy and harmonious letter. In addition, readers should consider this changed attitude as a preference of the poet. Within the poem, we would be able to the repetitions of word with same notion. Take the first part of the poem as example, words like death, illness
Poems have the ability to express thoughts into words. They convey messages and stories for the audience to interpret, and emotions for the audience to feel. Gwen Harwood, one of Australia’s most highly regarded poets, demonstrates sophistication and provokes emotions from the audience with descriptive use of imagery and inspiring messages in her poems. Harwood uses different methods to portray the themes of innocence, death and rebelling against authority in her poem Barn Owl. These ideas are clearly depicted through the use of literary techniques such as onomatopoeia, alliteration, imagery, direct speech and metaphors in the poem.
The children couldn’t accept what they thought was so horrible. There was a lot of ignorance and carelessness portrayed throughout this short story. The theme of ungratefulness was revealed in this story; The author depicted how disrespecting someone can inturn feed you with information you may wish you never knew and how someone can do one wrong thing and it immediately erases all the good things a person did throughout their
Poe utilizes a gradual change in diction as the poem progresses. Initially, he begins the poem with melancholic diction when the narrator is falling asleep: “while I pondered, weak and weary,” “nodded, nearly napping,” and “of someone gently rapping” (1-4). The utilization of alliteration in these lines supply a song-like rhythm, which is soothing to the reader. This usage of diction conveys a mellow tone. Further into the poem, when the increasingly agitated narrator becomes vexed at the raven, he lashes out at the bird. Here, he states, “Get thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore! / Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken! / Leave my loneliness unbroken!--quit the bust above my door! / Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!” (98-101). Here, his uses archaic words and phrases such as “thee,” “Night’s Plutonian shore,” and “thy soul hath”. This usage of unorthodox language creates a theatrical, dramatic, and climactic effect, which leads to an impassioned tone. By presenting both tones, Poe is able to show the contrast between the two. This transformation from a tone that is mellow to one of frustration and anxiety represents the spiraling downward of the narrator’s mental state.
The speaker in the poem uses images to help to support the theme. For example the statement that "sometimes the woman borrowed my grandmother's face" displays the inability of the children to relate the dilemma to themselves, something that the speaker has learned later on with time and experience. In this poem, the speaker is an old woman, and she places a high emphasis on the burden of years from which she speaks by saying "old woman, / or nearly so, myself." "I know now that woman / and painting and season are almost one / and all beyond saving by children." clearly states that the poem is not written for the amusement of children but somebody that has reached the speaker's age, thus supporting the idea of the theme that children cannot help or understand her or anybody of her age. In addition, when the speakers describes the kids in the classroom as "restless on hard chairs" and "caring little for picture or old age" we can picture them in our minds sitting, ready to leave the class as soon as possible, unwilling and unable to understand the ethics dilemma or what the speaker is feeling.
In the poem, “The Chimney Sweeper” by William Blake, the author attempts to educate the reader about the horrors experienced by young children who are forced into labor at an early age cleaning chimneys for the wealthy. The poem begins with a young boy who has lost his mother but has no time to properly grieve because his father has sold him into a life of filth and despair. The child weeps not only for the loss of his mother and his father’s betrayal, but also for the loss of his childhood and innocence. Blake uses poetry in an attempt to provoke outrage over the inhumane and dangerous practice of exploiting children and attempts to shine a light on the plight of the children by appealing to the reader’s conscience in order to free the children from their nightmare existence.