Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on 19th century English novels
19th century novel and novelists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on 19th century English novels
Human degradation due to unjust, socially inequitable practices is a great share of what proves a strong comparison between the text Nineteen-Eighty-Four by George Orwell and the film V for Vendetta, directed by James McTeigue. By boldly choosing to work with the theme of human degradation in their works, both Orwell and McTeigue have the ability to connect with their readers on the level of ideas, experiences, values and beliefs. Though life today is not the same dystopian nightmare that both Nineteen-Eighty-Four and V for Vendetta were set it, some aspects of the stories are still relevant and relatable. Properties such as the matter of paranoia, unfair restrictions, family structure and sexuality, are credible examples of the human degradation that still occurs in this very day and age and assist in creating a solid connection to the reader or viewer.
The distinction in the way that conduct is controlled in the two societies varies significantly between Nineteen-Eighty-Four and V for Vendetta, although the laws that are imposed are not all that different. In Nineteen-Eighty-Four, the civilians
…show more content…
of Oceania are extremely fearful of doing absolutely anything that is not routine. Even altering their path to work is reason enough to be detained for thoughtcrime. The commandments are so meagre that the paranoia that is attained by the people of Oceania and Airstrip One is colossal. In contrast to V for Vendetta, the city of London stood by incredibly strict laws that were taken very seriously. The restrictions that the citizens had to abide by made it easier for them to know when they would be in trouble if they decided to break these orders, and they were made well aware of the consequences that their actions would produce. The most prominent example of this custom was the curfew imposed on the general public, disallowing them to leave their homes after a certain hour at night. The readers could feel a somewhat deep connection to these themes as quite a few of them would feel the burden of the heavily imposed laws today. In both societies displayed in V for Vendetta and Nineteen-Eighty-Four, the police always appear and the law is essentially enforced at night. By looking into this further, it can be seen that this is also an invasion of privacy towards the innocent citizens. In today’s day and age, people go home at night and feel safe in their own homes, they have the freedom to do whatever they are doing in their own space, and feel comfortable doing it. In addition to this breach of privacy, nighttime is the time is often when people are most vulnerable, because it is generally the time of day in which people sleep, and get a good night’s rest in preparation for the next day. When readers, more specifically teenagers, notice that they too might have a curfew in which they need to be home which is imposed by authorities such as their parents. Others may relate to the idea of somebody having a close eye on them, such as Big Brother does in Nineteen-Eighty-Four, which is also a violation of privacy. In Nineteen-Eighty-Four chastity is very strongly promoted, and in V for Vendetta “normal” heterosexual families intact, and unlike Nineteen-Eighty-Four, homosexuality is mentioned and is not permitted. In Nineteen-Eighty-Four families consisted of no more than an accepted marriage and the children that they were anticipated to produce for the good of the nation. These children were instructed throughout their lives to be questionable everyone, not matter who it was, even if it was their own parents. It was expected that they would turn in whomever they alleged to be a thoughtcriminal. On the other hand, in the movie adaptation of V for Vendetta, McTeigue does not go into depth about gender normalcies, although in the short clips shows of the “standardised” families, there is no exposition of homosexuality or anything outside of mother, father and children. This topic can connect with the reader on many levels of ideation, experiences, beliefs and values as homosexuality is still a heavily disputed topic in which many have struggled with on both sides of the tug-of-war. In Nineteen-Eighty-Four, Winston is committing thoughtcrime by having his secret diary which he knows is not allowed but does it anyway, and in V for Vendetta, V is committing violent crimes and emitting demolition in the means of justice.
Committing crimes is an enormous theme displayed in both variations, although shown very differently at that. V is a very fierce and hands on person who finds creative ways to prove his point. He also finds ways to murder the guilty in a fair way for the good of humanity. Winston Smith on the other hand, is not physically violent, but commits thoughtcrime by withholding his diary, which he knows is well beyond legal in Airstrip One. This can be related to readers in the way that they could feel a strong connection to both characters here and sometimes wanting to break the rules for their personal beliefs, because that is how humans
are. In Nineteen-Eighty-Four, Winston end up dying, figuratively, leaving behind everything that he once stood for. He feels a strong adoration towards Big Brother and is compelled to follow the rules. Whereas in V for Vendetta, V sticks by his morals and does so until his very death. Alike Winston Smith’s admiration for big brother, V falls in love with the heroine of the story, Evey Hammond. He died fighting for what he believed in the connection with the readers is shown on the premise of them believing in what they think is right and arguing, doing something about their case until they physically can’t anymore, until they reach their limits. Through the topics of laws and restrictions, the police and privacy violations, homosexuality and family structures, crimes being committed, and deaths, Orwell and McTeigue connect with the experiences, ideas, values and beliefs of their readers when exploring human degradation due to these unjust, socially inequitable practices.
Between the poem, ¨ No one died in Tiananmen Square¨ by William Lutz and the novel, 1984 by George Orwell there are multiple similarities. Subjects such as their government, their denial of history, and the use of doublethink and re-education are all parallel between the novel and the poem. For instance, both the governments have a highly strict government. Their governments are so controlling of their people that they use brute force in order to help re-educate them. For example, in 1984 the main character, Winston Smith was trying to go against their government, The Party, and because he tries to do so, he is placed in The Ministry of Love and brutally beaten by the man whom he assumed was a part of the Brotherhood, O'Brien. O'Brien claimed
Destruction of individuality is an idea both authors explore to expose the broad social wrong of an oppressive society. Both Orwell and Niccol use their protagonists to demonstrate how dictatorial governments that destroy any semblance of individuality are inherently wrong. Orwell uses third person narration, which directly follows his protagonist as he fights to maintain his individuality in a society driven to eliminate the capability of “love, or friendship, or joy of living” by making him “hollow”. By employing the use third person narration Orwell portrays to the reader that even an individual with powerful intent to remain different can be broken down and made to believe that “2+2 = 5”. Similarly, Niccol uses extreme close up shots focusing on Vincent’s cleaning process and the motif of constant DNA checks to reinforce how authoritarian societies can demolish all sense of individuality. Vincent, an “in-valid” must take extreme measures to overcome the prejudices of soc...
The book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and the movie V for Vendetta both take place in a dystopian future. Each one very different, but similar dystopian societies with many similar aspects such as luring citizens into false happiness, censoring citizens from different forms of literature, and characters who can really see behind the government’s façade and tell what is wrong with society. Similarity between the two ranges from meek things such as a similar setting with both societies residing in London, or more intricate things like similarities between the governments. Since the beginning of mankind humans have long since craved for a feeling of belonging and to be a part of something. Over the long history of mankind this same feeling has led to the growth of civilizations and societies. Eventually leading up to modern day societies with governments such as republics, dictatorships, and democracies. Each with its own different ways of
Having studied George Orwell's 'Nineteen Eighty-Four', I intend to discuss the type of Government envisaged by Orwell and to what extent his totalitarian Party, 'Ingsoc', satirises past regimes. I will also discuss Orwell's motive in writing such a piece and how his writing style helps it become clear.The main theme of Nineteen Eighty-Four concerns the restrictions imposed on individual freedom by a totalitarian regime. Orwell shows how such a system can impose its will on the people through manipulation of the press, the elimination of democracy, constant supervision (courtesy of the Telescreens) and more. Orwell also shows how the state has more subtle methods for imposing its authority, such as the manipulation of language and control of the media.
In 1984 and V for Vendetta, the different behaviours of the anti-heroes, Winston and V, illustrate their approach to attaining freedom from the totalitarian government. George Orwell’s 1984 and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta use the anti-heroes’ behaviour to identify their approach to their cause—liberation from the totalitarian government. For example, Winston is the typical citizen who rebels against the government in a quiet and peaceful way, whereas V is a revolutionist in an excited and violent way. This comparison helps classify the key behaviours, which explains the different approaches the anti-heroes took towards liberation.
In 1984, children are exposed to depravation by government ideals, and are taught to expose all insurgence. In Vendetta, children are born into a media-corrupted world, unknowing of deprivation by lacking exposure. These negate the modern belief that children learn beliefs and ideas unbiasedly. Without communication, relationships in 1984 are restricted, thereby maturation is controlled. To mature, Winston used a diary, visited illegal places and engaged in an illegal relationship to grow his confidence in his experiences. In Vendetta, people do not mature intellectually, attributable to controlled communication. V matures his character through illegal practices; by murdering for liberation, and engaging in a relationship with Evey Hammond. In 1984, relationships between people are forced for procreation, or are amicable to government ideals. Winston's desperation for emotion and connection lead him to engage with Julia, who assists Winston’s psychological insurgency. V serendipitously encountered Evey, who dependently aids V’s emotional understanding of a civilian's perspective of his actions. Both females helped mature the protagonists’ critical life experiences, analogously with modern human values to support and love others. The evaluative question, ‘what is the good life?’ is evaluated in 1984, with Winston’s perspective being nonsynthetic food, freedom, real history and the ability of expression. Similarly in Vendetta, V convincingly claimed that society too often, “Appreciate the comforts of everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition”, thus indicating ignorance of governmental corruption. 1984 Londoners are ashen ascribable to the permanent presence of dust, providing an atmosphere of inevitability, where dust asphyxiates Winston's spirit. Working 60 hour weeks and earning little
The dystopian novel “1984” and the movie “V for Vendetta”, share a variety of differences and similarities. Both have a totalitarian government in which they have absolute power over politics, religion and human rights. Extensive speech, critical thinking, thoughtful writing, and voice of opinion has either been restricted or limited in 1984’s Oceania and V for Vendetta’s future London. The protagonists in both novels and films have “resisted” their government. However, the methods used to employ their “rebellion” are quite different.
In dystopian literature, the future of society and humanity is presented in a negative standpoint. Utopian works frequently illustrate a future in which the everyday lives of human beings is often improved by technology to advance civilization, while dystopian works offer an opposite outlook. Examples of dystopian characteristics include an oppressive government, a protagonist, and character nature. Although the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and the film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue display different perspectives of a dystopian society, both share similar dystopian characteristics, which include a government who asserts power over citizens, a protagonist who questions society, and characters who are isolated from the natural world.
Williams, Raymond (ed). Deutscher, Isaac: `1984 - The mysticism of cruelty' George Orwell: A collection of critical essays Prentice Hall Int. Inc. (1974)
In the novel 1984 and the film “V for Vendetta”, the protagonist for both stories are captured while performing various acts of rebellion against the totalitarian government, of which is controlling their city. In punishment, the government tortures them with harsh, inhumane methods that are similar to those used in dictatorships during the 1900s like the USSR under Stalin’s rule. However, both protagonists are tortured by different sides, and by people from completely opposite ends of the political ladder: one a government agent, the other a rebel. Although the themes disclosed in relation to the purpose and meanings of torture are similar, the overall message and final opinion that is expressed and conveyed to the recipients are complete opposites.
The movie and the book are different in many ways but at the same time they have a lot of things in common, the movie doesn't have as much details as the book does but it is a very good movie. In the movie you can very easily see and understand what's going on being you are watching the whole thing with your eyes. The movie also shows you how the students have to fight each and everyday just so that they protect themselves in the streets, the streets is all they know because well they were born and raised in the streets so they learned all about it & are about it. In the movie you can clearly see the struggle they go through, and how the streets are & when they're in school. School is supposed to be a safe place for all kids.
”The values, beliefs and attitudes of George Orwell’s can easily be seen in the novel 1984, as no text is neutral. These values attitudes and beliefs have shaped the novel to reflect socio-cultural context and by the use of certain discourses, ideologies, and historical influences support the idea that) “The explanation of a work is always sought in the man or women who produced it “Bathes Roland (1977).
These examples display the inevitable fact that all over the world subtle but significant events are taking place that appear to signify a shifting toward a totalitarian government, much like the one present in 1984. This is extremely disturbing because most people will agree that the life lived by the characters in 1984, is not one of any value. Though they are “protected” from several of the problems that many of the free world citizens and officials face, they have no control over their thoughts or actions. This leads to unbearable uniformity. It is chilling to know that though George Orwell’s book was written as fiction, portions of it are becoming factual.
After reading the book and watching the movie 1984 there were similarities and differences between the two. The novel is about manipulating people in believing in something that isn’t really there and about erasing history. Both the book and film focused on: authority, government, and war. The book and film follow the theme of conformity to control society.
According to the director of V for Vendetta (2005) a political agenda founded on the idea that people should be free to live as they choose and stand up for their principles without compromise, given there is no negative impact on positive social cohesion, is preferable. Film techniques are employed in the film to convince the audience to embrace this idea. Characters who believe in the ideology are presented as likeable and the film’s heroes resulting in the audience viewing the ideology in a positive manner. Conversely, the antagonists of the film are made to be those who practice a polar opposite ideology causing the audience to associate opposition to the ideology with villainy. While the film acknowledges that the actions taken to advance