For several years, Mississippi has had the highest poverty and lowest income rate. For Mississippians, the high tuition cost makes it hard for majority of families in rural areas to afford a college education. This problem needs to be addressed and looked at carefully. The thought of using tax payer's money to help pay for student's college education is ridiculous to many. It is actually a good idea to have free community college tuition. Mississippi should establish a state lottery that would be used to pay for community college.
In Tennessee, the taxes are taken off the winner's money, this would be used for colleges tuition. Katie Lobosco in "Tennessee Makes Community College Free for All Adults," states "Expanding the free- tuition program will cost about $10 million once fully implemented. But it will be funded by the state's lottery account , just like the rest of Tennessee Promise" (Lobosco).
…show more content…
Most teenagers in rural areas do not have the finances to pay for colleges. It is a struggle for many students to purchase books, online access codes, and other resources they need. By getting a college education, this will allow students to be qualified and apply for more jobs. In this period, a person needs a college or technical degree to get a well-paying job.
Secondly, if a student has a bad situation at home, it can allow the student to get away. Having free tuition would allow students to stay in the college dorms. It could help them stay out of trouble or harmful environment. College campuses allow many more resources that could be used positively. Computer labs, English and math workshops, libraries, and teacher's office hours are all very important things that every student should be allowed to use. By staying on campus, it would allow students to focus on their education instead of problems at
As you can see, there are more drawbacks than benefits to free college tuition once you look past the surface of it. Like I said before, at a glance, it seems perfect, flawless. However, take a deeper look and see all of the things that would need to change in order to sustain nationwide tuition-free higher education. It is not as simple as it sounds, student debt may go down, but how many other people are we putting in debt to make up for the loss of funding going to schools through the tuition that we have
education at a four-year institution" ( 3 ). These types of programs that are able to grant citizens with free community college would need funding for them to operate: one example of where funding could be found is in a states lottery we can see this in motion in the state of Tennessee in a...
According to Trade Schools, Colleges and Universities “Many of America's top-performing high school students never apply to the most challenging colleges and universities even though they have the ability to succeed at them. They often come from minority and low-income households and end up pursuing more affordable, less-selective schools instead.” College can be a burden to many students in a variety of different ways, but the most common reason is due to funds. Making college free for students will help this problem by increasing jobs in the work industry that require degrees, they should be affordable to all people at all cost, as well as the funds should be completely cut off because it would increase jobs and help America's economy grow.
First, free college can encourage students to go to college to get a degree which leads to a high paying career. It can fulfill those students that are having a hard time financially, and fewer students will be in debt. Second, with free college, colleges will be more likely to help students that need the guidance to stay on track and get a diploma. Clayton and Bailey mention, "If we want to significantly improve educational outcomes, we need to make college more affordable so more students can enroll, and make the reforms needed to en-sure community college students can succeed in their courses, complete their program, and grad-uate within reasonable amount of time" (Clayton and Bailey). Finally, free college can help the U.S. catch up to the rest of the countries with higher education. For example, it can help the United States surpass Russia, where more than half of adults have a diploma. Frohlich explains, “More Than 53% of Russian adults between the ages of 25 and 64 had some form of higher edu-cation in 2012, more than in any other country reviewed by OECD” (Frohlich). Although free college is an attractive idea, it will leave the United States in a bigger debt which will be hard to recover from and more students will be unmotivated to
Students who they themselves attend community college pondered on the idea of their tuition being free; one particular student Felipe Bezerra, from the article “As He Promotes It, Some Question Obama’s Free Community College Idea,” stated that the tuition of community colleges isn’t worth being free, financially needy students get the money they need and the other students barely even have to pay $2,000 every year. Students like Bezerra are more concerned about their education following community college, he knows he won’t be able to pay for tuition in university and would rather “all this
which helps pay some or all their tuition depending on their qualification for the aid. It will be best if these aids are given to all students which will pay their tuition making community college automatically tuition-free. Qualifying for aid should not depend on ones income. As we all know most students attending community colleges are from lower-income families. In 2014-15, undergraduate and graduate students received $238.9 billion in grants from all sources, FWS, federal loans, and federal tax credits and deductions” according to the college board. This show that already the government is paying almost 75% of most community colleges student tuition through aids. It will be best if the government pays 100% of all community colleges tuition through the aid the government gives the college and qualification of getting the aid should not depend on student income tax. The obvious argument against my reason is that people will say that if the government funds for free community colleges it will increase taxpayers taxes. If the taxes increase , it will be put into good use to fund community colleges for free which will later benefit the country,because already the government is miss-using tax payers money for unnecessary things that benefits no one. As has been said education is the key for better
Should community college tuition be free? Walter G. Bumphus, the President/CEO, American Association of Community Colleges, believes so. According to him, “The Obama administration's proposed America's College Promise plan stands to increase access to these educational opportunities and is a crucial investment not only in the future of these students, but in the country's future… America's College Promise proposal for “free” community college is not a handout. Rather, it is an investment in education and would have substantial economic and social benefits.” Bumphus states the cost for investing in this proposal would be less than 10 percent of the Department of Education annual budget, and “less than 3 percent of all annual federal expenditures”.
In Jim Crammers opinion he states, “That would simply pour money onto failing diplomas” (Crammer). That is what the workforce is for. If every student goes to college for a degree with the idea to become rich, then who will work at restaurants, go into the air force, or even stay at home in order to take care of kids or love ones. Life would be totally different. How life is right now is how it will always be due to the economy and the odds of being raised in a family surrounded by lots of money or not is just life. Everyone has their own role and everyone is different, so Obama should not be trying to spend all of America’s money in order to make everyone equal. Students would be better off knowing the situation as to why they live in a poor family due to economic issues or financial needs. But money should not be the reason students go to college or not, so this proposal is not worth the time. There are plenty of scholarships and loans out there that are given to certain people for certain reasons and the only reason someone should have to turn down a community college would be because there is a lack of effort on their own part. They make a community college inexpensive as a way to invite the public to come get an education and if they fail or drop out then they are not out a ton of money. College weaves out the students that do not belong there or want to be there, so forcing them to go with the intentions of telling them it is
This makes students pushed harder to focus on any college that will be offered free. Thus, it wouldn’t take them longer than the average 4 years, due to them working full time as well as schooling. With fees out the way, parents don’t have to worry about not making enough savings for their child to be able to attend college. Students will be more focused on any subject in school as they strive for their degrees.
The price of colleges in America; whether it is a four-year school or community college, has been viewed as a major issue to millions of citizens. Numerous people have argued that an education should not cost thousands of dollars. Some have even stated that college in general should be free. Although this may seem like an amazing idea, it could actually have negative effects that people may not have thoroughly considered. As simple as an education may seem, students and parents in America must pay their way through college; for nothing is free in life. In order to keep this country functioning in a proper way, community colleges in America should not be free.
Pell grants. And much of that money would provide a free education to students whose families can already afford it.” It doesn 't make sense to give students that can afford college free college, if the government wants to help low income students increasing the amount of financial aid that is given out each year would be the best thing to do “At age nineteen, only around 20 percent of children from the poorest 2 percent of families in the country attend college. For the richest 2 percent of families, the same number is around 90 percent”(Bruenig). With Free college low income students would have a bigger disadvantage because At public colleges, students from the poorest fourth of the population currently pay no net tuition at either two-year
Some may also ask who is going to pay for these kids to go to college for free. Matt Bruenig is a famous writer that writes on U.S. problems such as poverty. In one of his latest articles he states,” The main problem with free college is that most students come from disproportionately well-off backgrounds and already enjoy disproportionately well- off futures which makes them relatively uncompelling targets for public transfers.” In other words this is saying that those who can not afford college are low-class and are comfortable in their state. It is also suggesting that others should also just be okay with it.The same article also states,” Without understanding and presenting student benefits as welfare handouts...would be at worst destructive and at best totally pointless.” This is saying it is no use in college being free so there is no need to fund it
Community colleges in California should offer two years of free education to students that are responsible. First, by making community college free for two years, struggling low income families can get a two year education at their local community college. By going to a free college people can save money for two years and transfer out to a better college with the money that they have saved. More student will switch from expensive colleges, and come to a less expensive college and acquire their Associate's degree. Next, some of the students will realize that they are going to graduate from an expensive college, and they are going to leave with a diploma and a huge debt in loans. Some people just need an Associate's Degree to get the job that they want and people can get that in two years. For example to become a police officer, people need an Associate's degree, and be twenty one years of age. Last, the crime in the cities will be reduced if community colleges would offer free education. Most people that are in the streets doing bad things are the ones who dropped out of high school because college was going to be too
As colleges’ funds dry up, colleges must turn to the public to further support higher education. By raising state taxes, colleges can collect funds to help improve the school’s budgets. The state provides funds from the taxes for colleges to receive a certain amount for each student currently enrolled. All community and traditional four year colleges collect these funds in order to maintain the school’s budget. As reporter,
The money help many graduate increase quality of education. Also, enjoy benefit increased income and better quality employment a higher education open opportunity for people. It given student the experience and confidence that will be able to use in many life situations. Free college it open up a network of peers that they can continue to work throughout life. The benefits that college graduate enjoy, improved quality more opine mind, more responsible more polite and more consistent and less despot these benefit are also passed along to succeed general. “Not only is higher education seen as a key to economic advancement, but also if all 18-24 year olds were in college, we would reduce the unemployment rate by 2 million people, and fewer people would be in need of governmental assistance. Moreover, a federal program to fund higher education would relieve states of having to fund these institutions, which would free up money for other