Should Community College Be Free Essay

714 Words2 Pages

Should community college tuition be free? Walter G. Bumphus, the President/CEO, American Association of Community Colleges, believes so. According to him, “The Obama administration's proposed America's College Promise plan stands to increase access to these educational opportunities and is a crucial investment not only in the future of these students, but in the country's future… America's College Promise proposal for “free” community college is not a handout. Rather, it is an investment in education and would have substantial economic and social benefits.” Bumphus states the cost for investing in this proposal would be less than 10 percent of the Department of Education annual budget, and “less than 3 percent of all annual federal expenditures”. …show more content…

One of his reasons is college tuition is never free because someone [taxpayers] will have to foot the bill. He also brings up the point “Students from moderately affluent middle-class families attending community college can usually afford the generally modest tuition. Why should a sophomore who is attending a four-year college have to pay tuition, but a similar second-year student at a community college not have to?” He argues “The three-year graduation rate of full-time students is 31 percent; that figure may be understated because of data limitations, but the true dropout rate is almost certainly greater than the graduation rate.” He suggests that if community colleges already have such a high dropout rate, why should it be funded, it would be a waste of taxpayer’s money. Furthermore, according to The New York Federal Reserve Bank and the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, as well as utilizing data from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Vedder says, “Half of four-year college graduates are underemployed — doing jobs requiring only a high school diploma.” Lastly, “Very-low-income students currently have no major obstacle attending community college — indeed, Pell Grants often will cover the entire tuition”, says …show more content…

No, I wasn’t. First off with Bumphus, he does not bring up a counterargument. He should have addressed Pell Grants, and how they are already helping students who wouldn’t normally be able to afford college, but, aren’t helping enough. His article was not fully developed, and I think this is because the America's College Promise is still its brainstorming phase. There is no hard evidence showing that free tuition will benefit the economy. For the most part, all Bumphus has to work with is speculation, and as we know, speculation does not win an argument. Vedder, on the other hand, is on the winning side because he has the evidence to show how community colleges are not doing well. However, he never goes into as to why this is happening to community colleges. Instead, he sets up his article by stating his reasons, then follows up with a question. Vedder claim, reasons, and evidence are not strong enough to do this, largely in part because he hasn’t back himself with strong reasons and solid evidence. An example of this is what he says in his first paragraph, “Students from moderately affluent middle-class families attending community college can usually afford the generally modest tuition. Why should a sophomore who is attending a four-year college have to pay tuition, but a similar second-year student at a community college not have to?”. That’s all the reasoning Vedder’s gives to support himself and then he moves on, and he

Open Document