Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negatives of a participation trophy
The negatives of a participation trophy
The negatives of a participation trophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The negatives of a participation trophy
Imagine walking into a rec center’s storage closet and thinking you walked into a major athlete’s attic on accident. There are soccer trophies lined on shelves, basketball medals hanging from everywhere they can, miniature football statues packed in open boxes, swimming awards in towers along the walls, and tennis posters taped to every space with enough room to hang on. Ever since the middle of the 20th Century, coaches have been giving out participation trophies to every kid who plays the sport. But trophies should only be given to winners because, trophies don’t mean anything when everyone gets one, trophies cause narcissism, and giving trophies to everyone sends the wrong message.
Trophies are supposed to mean something, but when everyone gets one the meaning is lost. For instance, the Iasevoli article states,”’If we give a trophy to everyone then the award has no meaning.’“ The winner who deserves the trophy is getting the same award as the worst player on the team. How is that trophy supposed to hold virtue now? To illustrate, the Merryman article shows,”Trophies were once rare things - sterling silver loving cups bought from jewelry stores for truly special occasions.” Back then trophies were for winners, and they
…show more content…
In fact, the Merryman article states,”‘My children look forward to their trophy as much as playing the game.’“ Giving kids these trophies is boosting their egos - and a little too much. Living rooms are simply filled with trophies from just participation in sports. Furthermore, the Merryman article shows,”In college, those who’ve grown up receiving endless rewards do the required work, but don’t see need to do it well.” These college students don’t see the need to do it well, because they have been assured their whole life that they are great at everything, even when they don’t try their best. Thus, it’s easy to see how participation trophies cause
First, it teaches young athletes you need to earn rewards. In the article “Should Young Athletes get Participation Trophies” by A. Pawlowski it states, “If everyone gets a trophy it would not teach kids to earn or strive for something.” ( Today.com Nov. 2013) In another part of this article it
Every kid on the football field has a trophy. Even the kids who are on the losing team. Kids’ and parents’ faces are bright with smiles, and laughter echoes throughout the field. Kids are showing off their miny trophies, each with a bronze football on them. No one is paying attention to the two feet tall, gold, first place trophy that is in the winning team’s coach’s hand. Everybody is focused on the miniature trophies. Why are these trophies so special? These are participation trophies. Every kid gets one just for participatcuing in a game. Kids started getting participation trophies in the 20th Century. They got the trophies to feel more confident about themselves. Trophies should not be given to every kid because of narcissism increase,
Handing out participation trophies does not teach kids about the real world. O’Sullivan says, “We reward them for having a parent capable of registering them for a sport.” Participation trophies are for registering and showing up the day they hand out trophies, they are not for hard
A solution could be improved by only handing out trophies to those who have earned them. There have been many studies to show the harms of participation trophies and how they can affect a child’s future. One study has shown that “if coaches use trophy presentations as a way to acknowledge each player’s unique effort or contribution, that message can be powerful” (Ross), but the fact is that many coaches will not do this and for that reason participation trophies must be banned from youth athletics. When coaches hand out these trophies they are sending the message that they don’t care and just want the children to always be acknowledged as “winners.” Participation trophies have also diminished the value of true awards, and can make the children who have put in the effort and hard work not feel the reward they should.
“Today on Channel 4 News a child has just committed suicide for not getting a trophy in his favorite sport, soccer. The child had just played a soccer game the day before trying his hardest to win and be the best like everybody else. When his team got beat 8-0 he was already down in the dumps, but then the soccer tournament did not give trophies to the 6 year olds who lost making them feel like total losers. This child was so sad that he was taking a bath and decided to breathe water for 3 minutes rendering him dead,” a statement made by a local newscaster. The debate for whether participation trophies are needed has gone on for many years among parents, and sports/hobby officials. Opposers of the participation trophies believe that they are not needed among children and should be eliminated completely. On the contrary proponents of the participation trophies believe that they help children in many ways and should be kept.
More specifically, Abate argues that trophies will help boost the kids self-esteem. he writes, “ Self-esteem is a big part of one’s childhood. Watching a peer receive a trophy and not receiving one yourself can be degrading.” In this passage, Abate is suggesting that kids deserve something to show that their effort was worthwhile. Moreover, he argues that kids need something to show that their effort was needed to help the team whether they won or not. He writes, “Any kind of honor can make a young kid feel as if he or she meant something to the team, and that could boost the child’s self-confidence -- children today need as much of that as they can get in our society.” In this passage, Abate is suggesting that kids need trophies to boost self-esteem. In conclusion, Abate’s belief is that all children deserve to be rewarded for their work. In my view, Abate is wrong because kids don't deserve a reward for everything they have done. More specifically, I believe that giving children trophies for just playing a sport will make kids feel that they are entitled to things. For example, if a kid has always grown up receiving trophies for their participation they may believe that they deserve a spot on a competitive sports team because they have always been rewarded the same as the other
Trophies were once infrequent in society. You would have to go to your local jewelry store and spend top dollar on a shiny piece of sterling silver or gold. Thus, you didn’t see a whole lot of children running around with new trophies every week. However, with the arrival of the 1960s, many factories that had been once used to produce military goods during WWII would now be available for mass-production consumer goods. Trophies would now be marketed and sold to coaches and athletic departments, or available at your hometown sporting goods store (Merryman). In modern day society, sports participation trophies are almost guaranteed, ensuring every child is a “winner” at the end of the day. These participation trophies are extremely harmful to our youth and should only be given out when deemed necessary.
Trophies shouldn’t be given to everyone because then they lose meaning. For example, in Losing is Good for You by Ashley Merryman, they talk
Why Participation Trophies Shouldn’t Exist? Back when people were children, there were times when they would receive trophies for participating in an activity over receiving the trophy as a reward for accomplishment; The times when your team would win a trophy whether you won or lost. People believe these trophies should be won only by the team or person that rightfully won; other people believe these trophies should be won no matter what.
Getting participation trophies has become a very controversial topic in sports. Many parents think that their kids should be getting participation trophies, while it could be nice for kids to get them, there are many reasons why we should reconsider giving participation trophies. We shouldn't be giving out trophies to kids who don't show up for games or help the team out. Trophies are meant to be given to the kids who have put exceptional effort into their sport and who have made many achievements. on the other hand, giving trophies to kids who haven't done their best and haven't put in all their effort is taking away the value of why we give trophies.
The people that won got the same trophy as the people that lost. Why even keep score if there is no reward for winning or losing? Sports are supposed to be competitive and make people want to push themselves to be better. Participation trophies are taking all of the fun away from
It could be the only form of athletic recognition they ever receive.” Just because kids put in plenty of work drives them to feel like they deserve a participation trophy. This can have unfavorable effects when older because consequently it
When people give out participation trophies it takes away from the accomplishments of the winners. “When awards are handed out like candy to every child who participates, they diminish in value” (Betty Berden). If everyone is getting a trophy then it makes winning and trying your best not mean a lot. It can make the people that won not try as hard next season because they know that they will get a trophy any way. There is also a lot of harm done to kid’s mindsets when coaches or recreational officials give out
On the other hand, some coaches think it's worth a few bucks to put a smile on their kids' faces. Giving trophies to everyone on the team will result in kids not pushing harder to get a trophy. Trophies are losing their meaning. The more trophies we give out, the less each one means. If youth athletes are given participation trophies every season, the awards won't seem as special.
The trophies support extremely bad habits and stall the proper maturity and growth of entire generations that receive them. Cedric Moxey’s debate over the use of trophies reveals that football league officials in Keller, Texas actually felt that participation trophies “... send the wrong message and create bad habits” (Moxey 1). The point that is supposed to come of this is that in the “real world,” where competition decides and defines survival, just participating is not enough to be able to support a family or a lifestyle. The solution to this lies within the youth sports and competitions. Frank Fitzpatrick says that it is important that kids and young competitors accept a loss and see room to grow from it. By opening a young kid up to the feelings of both a win and a loss, they learn how to handle the feelings and how to build on any negative attitudes or outcomes. Life skills such as these are crucial to a child who wants to be able to live on their own in the future. Participation trophies make this sort of growth impossible for the current generations (Stein 1). Ashley Merryman, an author and journalist, said “... when children make mistakes, our job should not be to spin those losses into decorated victories” (qtd. in Fitzpatrick 1). Participation trophies do exactly this. They make a kid who did not win (and needs to accept that) feel as if everything did, in fact, go their way when it did