Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion on discrimination in the military
Sexuality discrimination in the military
Pros and cons of Transgenders in military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion on discrimination in the military
Should transgender personnel be allowed to serve in the United States military? United States government officials believe that transgender personnel that would like to serve in the military or are currently serving in the military, will not be involuntarily removed or denied the opportunity to serve, will not have a devastating effect on work environment/mission, or affect the interactions and dynamics of current Service Members. The purpose of this critical thinking assignment is to discuss the topic of transgender personnel who would like to serve and/or serving in the United States military and the effects it will have in the military environment, including extensions of the military environment, i.e. military families. Current transgendered military personnel and potential military personnel of this nature, should not be granted the opportunity to serve in the United States Military due to the heavy requirements of gender transformations that take place during the gender transition process and its effects on the mission. Here are the pros and cons of allowing transgendered personnel to serve in our military will be discussed, as well as possible obstacles and outcomes of both perspectives.
An official statement by the Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter - “Our mission is to defend this country, and we don’t want barriers unrelated to
…show more content…
a person’s qualification to serve preventing us from recruiting or retaining the Soldier, Sailor, Airman, or Marine who can best accomplish the mission. We have to have access to 100 percent of America’s population for our all-volunteer force to be able to recruit from among them the most highly qualified – and to retain them… Starting today: Otherwise qualified Service members can no longer be involuntarily separated, discharged, or denied reenlistment or continuation of service just for being transgender.” (Carter, 2016). Before the June 30, 2016 transgendered policy emplacement, there has not been protection for transgendered personnel serving in the military; nine percent of transgendered military personnel have reported that they were discharged from service for being transgendered or gender non-conforming (Los Angeles Times, 2017). Secretary of Defense Ash Carter’s statement and action is not unreasonable; currently, there is approximately 15,500 actively serving transgendered personnel in the United States Military and approximately 134,000 transgendered veterans who are alive today, making the United States Military the largest employer of transgender personnel in the country and it will only continue to grow (Campaign, 2016). The policy allowing open service of transgender Service members will be in full effect beginning July 2017, when military branches will be allowed to recruit potential transgendered personnel who would like to serve. To reach beyond transgendered military personnel and remember that America’s Armed Forces is supportive of families, a positive outcome to this policy is that children and teenagers of military families that may be questioning their gender or have already identified that transitioning to a different gender will allow them to lead a happy life, will have the medical support needed to evolve through the transitioning process; parents will have the support and assistance needed to assure their families are taken care of. It is a fact that Secretary of Defense Ash Carters’ perspective and decision has already been implemented by eighteen countries around the world and their forces are stronger than ever (Gross, 2015). Other countries have viewed the topic of transgendered personnel as how these Service Members can serve effectively versus should these Service Members serve their country at all due to their life choices and decisions. Foreign militaries are organized differently in comparison to America’s all volunteer force and utilize a service obligation beginning around the age of seventeen and lasting two to three years (Contact CIA, 2012-2015) . In accommodating transgendered personnel based on service obligations, foreign militaries have found that military effectiveness remains strong – they continue to kill a lot of people and break a lot of things – the mission is being executed (Gross, 2015). While intention regarding implementation of this policy is good, obstacles regarding progression and implementation of this policy at all levels must be noted. “For some people, the application of gender transition policies in the military have fallen short of expectations — primarily by creating a vacuum for prejudice to manifest through vaguely certain worded protocols. This vacuum is prone to exploitation by commanders who may harbor prejudice. Per existing policies, such commanders could stall the progress of a subordinate at many different stages of transition by denying care based on “minimizing impacts to the mission.”” (Inside the Military’s Working, 2016) This behavior is seen often; while, it has lessened over the years due to Commanders and Leaders working diligently to assure that all career positions and opportunities present equality, prejudice still exists and remains an obstacle for transgendered personnel that will directly affect what types of job assignments would be available to them, security clearance denial or revocation, and potential waivers that may be leveraged by transphobic Commanders and Leaders. Another obstacle that will affect all service members is the revolving door of social change in the military with the introduction of transgendered openness, some may view this policy as yet another component of social experimentation.
Historically, this has been seen with desegregation of African Americans and Civil Rights, workplace equality for men and women, the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Policy, it is a safe impression that introducing transgendered openness will face some of the same challenges – hostility, anger, avoidance and isolation, ignorance, superiority, entitlement from individuals and/or groups of
people. Overall, the possible outcome to opening the door to transgendered personnel may prove to be positive as the United States military is not cutting itself short by excluding any category of personnel by implementing this policy – the policy supports the strength of our force, families, mission capability, and the attitude of our country that everyone, regardless of race, religion, color, gender, or national origin will have the ability to exercise opportunity if they are mentally and physically fit to do so. Countering this positive conversation, there are many questions regarding how to implement this situation into every day military life – “Much of the opposition centers on questions of where transgender troops would be housed, what berthing they would have on ships, which bathrooms they would use and whether their presence would affect the ability of small units to work well together. There are also questions about whether the military would conduct or pay for the medical treatment and costs associated with any gender transition, as well as which physical training standards the troops would be required to meet. The military has dealt with similar questions as it has integrated the ranks by race, gender and sexual orientation. In many cases comparable worries have been raised, including whether the changes would hinder small units that often must work together in remote, confined locations for long periods of time.” (Military Leaders Express Concerns, 2015). While it is necessary to now accommodate transgendered personnel and the above instances are fixable, resources and support will be made available; these are minor details in comparison to the huge social shift that will take place in our military culture. Introducing a third gender, if you will, in a stage of such infancy in and outside of the military, will be faced with huge opposition challenges behind closed doors. To mitigate this, the Department of Defense has released an implementation handbook, Transgender Service in the U.S. Military: An Implementation Handbook, as a guide to assist Commanders and Leaders with transgendered personnel covering such topics as how a transgendered person should inform comrades in their units, scenarios that transgendered personnel, Commanders, and Leaders will be faced with, Health Care issues, Harassment and Bullying, and Recruiting just to name a few. In addition to the concerns just discussed another negative perspective that may be taken regarding this situation is character and judgment of transgendered personnel. The example that will be used here is PVT Chelsea Manning, formerly PFC Bradley Manning. PVT Chelsea Manning was a former Military Intelligence Analyst that released thousands of classified documents to WikiLeaks and was found guilty of theft, espionage, and computer fraud and is currently serving a thirty-five year sentence at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas (Manning, 2017). She is currently receiving hormone treatments supporting her gender transition from male-to-female which is being supported by the policies put in place in 2016. President Barack Obama commuted Manning's remaining prison sentence, and she will be freed on May 17, 2017(Manning, 2017). Being that this is the first impression of a new dynamic in our military environment, it suggests that having questionable judgment and character will be excused even though the cost could potentially be the safety and security of our country, lives, and mission success. Ultimately, the offender and the behavior is addressed, but will not be severely punished because it also gives the impression that the military is discriminating against an individual, in this case, that happens to be transgendered – this is not the picture that our Armed Forces intends to paint, but has now become a collateral cost. PVT Chelsea Manning received a pardon because the military now acknowledges openness of transgendered personnel to serve without emphasizing the severity of her behavior militarily at the time – PVT Manning claims her intent of the release was to stir conversation and debate of the information (Manning, 2017). The impression is that she used her questionable state of gender as part of the justification for her behavior; historically PVT Manning suffered behavioral issues such as attacking an officer and being of harm to herself (Manning, 2017). The example of PVT Manning would be justified if she had served her sentence regardless of the fact that she is transgendered – taking responsibility and serving with honor in the face of adversity would have sent a much larger message to the military community, the transgendered community, and our country. What some would view as a large setback for a community of people, could be reduced to lack of life experience and bad decision making – again, character and judgment. In conclusion, it has been discussed that removing the ban on transgendered personnel is a positive move forward because America is not limiting itself with regard to those who are allowed to defend the country regardless of race, religion, color, gender, or national origin and supporting the standard regarding military support of military families. It has also been discussed that the challenges faced regarding implementation of the transgender policy with regard to how Commanders, Leaders, and military personnel will respond to these challenges. In discussion of the support of the argument regarding the concerns with the implementation of the transgendered policy, measures regarding housing and how well small units will work together in remote and austere environments. Lastly, PVT Manning was given an opportunity to uplift her community, both military and transgender, by serving her sentence with honor and dignity for putting America at risk. The military community may remain convicted in opposition for transgendered personnel serving in the military based upon lack of good judgment and character to begin with while this new policy remains in its infancy.
...traight men and women. The three key topics that we need to read and understand carefully are how the military life would change if gays and lesbians were in the military. Also we need to look at the interaction with the gays and lesbians and determine if the cohesion is good or is there no cohesion at all. Lastly we need to take a look at how other countries would view us and see how they would react if we did make the decision to put gays and lesbians in the military.
The great feminist theorist once said “‘Sometimes people try to destroy you, precisely because they don’t see it, but because they see it and don’t want it to exist’” (Mook 195). Support becomes very important for transgender people at the time they transition. Many families support their transgender family members, but society rejects their transition. Many people want transgender people out of their communities.
Another sociological theory that relates to this topic is “the self” by George Herbert Mead. People form this negative idea of transgenders because of the in “the self” we take the opinions of others. For instance, even at a young age transgender children are bullied by even their own peers for acting different. These children who are bullies learn from their parents or society about what is deemed normal and what is
To conclude, I chose this article as I found the discussion point interesting and wanted to bring to more people’s attention some of the underlying discrimination that is embedded in U.S. culture. Although transgender people are in the minority, they are no less than myself. I believe strongly that they deserve the same rights and opportunities that are presented to me daily. This article is relevant to the issues of Cultural Anthropology as it addresses questions surrounding gender stereotypes, gender discrimination, gender performance as well as relationship ties and kinship.
“Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” is the official policy of the U.S. Department of Defense towards homosexuals in the military. Members of t...
Transgendered people in America have made many great strides since the 1990s. They have encountered violence, lack of health care, and the loss of homes, jobs, family and friends. There have been many phases of the struggle of being transgendered in America over the years. The current phase we must be in now is equal rights. There are many variations of discrimination against the transgendered community. In our society we simply do not like what we do not understand. It is easier to discriminate than to try and understand. We are all created different and we should appreciate our differences. The change must come by addressing the views of the public. There is much justification in the unequal rights of transgendered peoples. The Human Rights Campaign has been started to achieve equal rights for all Americans including the LGBQ community. A serious injustice is in the world of sports. Professional sports are one of societies major traditions totally based on rules and regulations that are meant to preserve the integrality of the games, but may not be inclusive to all its players.
In September 2011, the United States lifted the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy (DADT), which restricted gay, lesbian, and bisexuals from openly serving in the military. This was the first time in American history in which people of every sexual orientation could serve openly (“11 Facts About,” n.d.). This was a momentous occasion for some and not so much for others. For those military members that had served in secret and those members that were firmly against gays and lesbians, this repeal had different meaning. Both groups contained members that have served in the military for years and were products of the Former President Bill Clinton’s 1993 “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. For many soldiers of this era, communication issues arose due to a pre-existing mentality, learned rules and regulations in services reinforced for two decades and the general cultural within combat related fields.
Throughout the years, I have seen the nation’s values, and beliefs change. When I first joined the military, it was not ok to be a gay or lesbian Soldier. Then the military’s culture was challenged, and the rules changed to “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which means, I will not ask you, and you will not tell me, or if you do, we will have to take action. Which meant a military
Over the course of this paper, we will take a comprehensive look at information regarding the transgender community issue in reference to four key sociology concepts. First, we will review information highlighting how transgender people come to the forefront of the public eye as well as the bathroom uproar continuously sweeping the nation. Next, we will examine the facts showcasing how transgender people go against the social norm of associating gender with a person’s given birth sex. Thirdly, we will review information showcasing the cultural inconsistencies throughout the nation when it comes to the acceptance of transgender people. Fourthly, the material will showcase the actions transgender people must face in several states throughout
Throughout the years, homosexuals have been the targets of embarrassment, harassment, and criticism from society. The most dominant and publicized way this is shown is by the ban on gays and lesbians in the military. We are one of few countries that forbid homosexuals to serve in their country’s armed forces. Germany, Japan, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Spain, and many other dominant countries in the world allow and encourage everyone in their culture to fight for their country. (Hogan and Hudson 185) We are actually hurting our country’s military by forcing possible volunteers to stay home and watch the news when they could be fighting for our country, just because of their sexuality. It is so ridiculous that letters are sent out to recruit U.S. men to fight in the army, but they wouldn’t accept you if you are not a...
A problem-free world is what people desire. This new world would place an end to violence, discrimination, and racism. However, at the same time society apprehends, this will never be feasible. The nation population is very diverse in-cultures, nationalities, beliefs, and personalities. Some people might consider this diversity a weakness among our nation. However, society will attempt to mold people into what they want them to be. Instead, of letting them be what they wish to be. Among many individuals fighting for acceptance and respected is the Transgender community. Ads for transgender men and women in the District of Columbia reinforce the Equality Law. Moreover, letting Columbian 's know, discrimination will not be tolerated no matter
Injustice at Every Turn: A Report from the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Rep. National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, 2011. Web. The Web. The Web.
Currently the citizens living in the United States are imprisoned within the binary of two genders. It is only acceptable for a person to identify as a male or a female. Depending on the gender the person identifies, as there is an expectation of how that person should look and act. The person identifying as the specific gender, must maintain the gender norms that are in place. These gender binaries are so prevalent in our lives; it is to the point where a large group of Americans are being overlooked. This group of Americans identifies as transgender, which means they do not fit society’s expectations of how a specific gender should look and behave. (gaycenter.org, 2012). The trans population does not fit the expected gender molds that are
Government agencies such as the Affordable Care Act law defines no sexual discrimination including gender identity, transgender status prohibits majority of insurance companies and healthcare providers from refusing to cover transition-related treatments or using incorrect pronouns under the law. However, the greatest effect can only occur when we — as an American society — change our paradigm. What we can do to help to contribute the changes of degrading experience for many LGBT people in healthcare setting are educating ourselves and creating more awareness in general public to ensure that everyone needs to be treated equally whoever they are. We should be more open-minded to create a welcoming and acceptable workplace environment inclusive of all trans people, to prevent transgender from getting reluctance to reveal their sexual orientation or gender identity to their health providers by training on the full scope of this minority group health in medical schools, and to keep fighting for the state-laws to ensure equality in for transgender individuals in the public utilities and services since only almost half of U.S. states discriminating against transgenders is considered
It’s upsetting to know that there are so many trans-phobic people out there who believe gender is natural and bash people of trans simply because they do not conform to society’s gender expectations. It’s important to realize that transgender people are no different from you and I they are humans just like the rest of society. It is also interesting to note a lot of people get uptight and uncomfortable when the topic of transgender comes up .Our society is so ignorant when it comes to the topic of sexuality and