Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Student motivation
Student motivation
Impact of peer pressure on academic performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Student motivation
Students Should Not Be Paid For Good Grades What are the consequences of paying students in exchange for good grades? Paying youth for good grades is no different than spoiling them. Students shouldn't be paid for good grades because if they are, their classrooms would develop conflicts and they would have family issues. In addition, they would have no satisfaction from accomplishing work or having success. Also, they would eradicate their own desire to learn. Is this all worth just a tiny increase in the student’s academic performance? Giving the younger generation money for good grades will crumble their future since their classrooms and family would have complications, they would have no satisfaction in success, and they would lose their desire to learn. To begin with, students should not get paid for good grades by reason of it can lead to classroom problems and family issues. According to an article by the National Educational Association, [NEA] “Many teachers also say paying students for good grades leads to practical problems in their classrooms, including pressure to inflate grades and conflict with students and parents.” This means if paid students earn good grades, there would be conflicts between …show more content…
In the article by “Ginger Ninja” called, “Good Grades: Are You Willing to Pay for Them?” parenting experts claim, “Kids should be satisfied with the warm fuzzy feelings of accomplishment. Success is its own reward.” This means that kids would have no joy in anything they work in school. This results in an inevitable greed for money. They would only be willing to work when a money reward is available. When kids have worked persistently with their school work, they should feel the satisfaction of the payoff. Undoubtedly, kids should feel satisfied with accomplishing something, not with receiving
Students brought up in a system of incentives get accustomed working for grades. So yes. It works for many students to motivate work. But if "working" means learning, these external incentives teach the students the wrong thing to aim at, the wrong reason for doing it, and often the wrong way to do it. If we are hoping our students will be life-long learners, why would they continue learn in the grade-less post-graduation world? (Schwartz, 2011)
According to student reporter Joseph Maneen, “Studies have shown that rewards can motivate students to attend school and that the more kids are in school, the more they learn” (“Cash Courses” 1). Teachers cover topics more in-depth than a school textbook does, so for a student to understand what the teachers are teaching they must be present in the classroom. Some may say that being rewarded with money doesn’t help improve our success in subjects we don’t like, but student Katelyn Vlastaris says, “‘If you reward us with money, it may motivate us to do great in subjects we don’t like, and then we’ll start doing well by ourselves’” (“Cashing In”). Once a student gets involved in a subject they are unsure about, they start to learn about it and understand it better, and the students will continue to grow in that subject area.
If students are to be paid for grades, it doesn’t give them their education which won’t help them in the future. According to Sanford Dornbush, “students who receive money for grades will in the long run, have lower academic performances than the students who
Why should you pay students to study? One of the reasons is the achievement gap. The achievement gap is the difference in academic performance between specific groups of students. The difference can be shown through test scores, grades, and dropout rates just to name a few. In the article, “Achievement Gap” by Susan Ansell, the National Center for Education Statistics’ special analyses in 2009 and 2011 stated that “black and Hispanic students trailed their white peers by an average of more than 20 test-score points on the NAEP math and reading assessments at 4th and 8th grades, a difference of about two grade levels” (pg.2).
Yes, college can be a burden for someone. A college graduate can have plenty of debt by the time that they finish college. But realistically, a college graduate only went to college to be successful. To follow their dreams, to become financially reinforced. If a college graduate follows through with their dreams, their passions, then small amounts of debt shouldn’t be a problem even with starting salaries. If the adult at hand is passionate, ambitious, emotionally connected to their major and/or minor, then paying off a median amount of 30,000 dollars in debt should be only a pebble of an obstacle in their way.
“ Why do adults get paid”? “What about students”? Many arguments and debates are going on about whether or not students should get paid. The essential thing is using money key to benefits kids to learn. Parent and schools are questioning if it is the right way to educate them to learn or not.
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
Eventually they will learn that if you work hard in school or work you will receive rewards and you can take the reward away with them knowing that hard work will always recieve a reward.
Education is free it is not appreciated as much as it should be,anything just given is worth nothing. Students don't take school seriously and expect to be rewarded for minimal effort. The goal of schools is all wrong the goal for school now is to hold students’ hands through high school with an end goal of college. College, because of this is now viewed as a right and the only way to succeed in this world. A student that goes to college feels entitled to receive a job that pays good money right when they get out of school. They are expecting things they haven't shown, they are capable of or earned. Students feel entitled to this because the school mentality is influencing them. The real goal of school should be teaching students the how and why of things and teaching the basic skills of how to be productive in society. Students not being taught how to be productive citizens are crippling the
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
Although some people may argue that performance pay is good, performance/merit pay is bad because it will result in teachers doing much less personalizing of the curriculum, and spending that time doing only what things need to be taught in order to keep their student’s test scores up (so they will get paid more). One of the major cons of performance pay is that teachers would have less time personalising the curriculum, teaching the students what they need to be taught, and teaching other important but non-standardized subjects; then using that time teaching only the things they are required to teach to keep student test scores up so they will get paid more(What Do We Know about Teacher Pay-for-Performance?). This in turn will cause the students to have a harder time learning because instead of the teachers teaching what the students need to be taught and more time teaching what the people who don’t know what the students know think the students should be taught.
Children’s desire for knowledge is rooted with self accomplishment and discovery rather than an expected payment. Knowing a reward is present counteracts the idea of locating a new cognitive finding. Monetary rewarding continues to devalue discovery, therefore Generation Z shall be unable to impede entitlement’s power on educational disinterest. When feeling entitled to a reward, diligence and enthusiasm towards learning fade. The limit for rewards can approach, for when rewards can not continue to build interest, the monetary value of each reward increases to maintain the attention of the child.
Kids now don’t know the value of hard work because everything is being handed down to
My cooperating teacher set up a “mini-economy” system in her classroom. Each student has a job in the classroom such as teacher’s assistant, door holder, or police officer. The students get paid weekly according to their job, but they also have to pay the teacher weekly for utilities and taxes. Additionally, if the student wins a game or behaves well, he or she receives classroom money, but when a student misbehaves that individual owes the teacher money. This is a good system because it teaches the student simple concepts like salary, taxes, and bills. It also provides the teacher with a consistent way to discipline students since, for example, talking is the hallway always costs $10. I could see myself implementing a modified version of this. I love the idea of giving students jobs in the classroom so they take better ownership of it, and I like that it keeps discipline more consistent and objective. However, I do not like that this system teaches the kids to value and work for more and more money. I believe our society already has a problem of overvaluing money so I do not want to perpetuate that view in my classroom. I may still use this same system, but use tickets or points instead of
Lynn Olson argues that there have been studies that suggest “school-to-work can help address one of the greatest problems in education: motivation.” This makes sense and I believe this to be a very accurate and significant argument. Without motivation students will find it very difficult to get things started and to complete their tasks. This not only happens with academics but in life general. Lynn Olson argues, “A majority of American teenagers in national surveys describe their education as “boring.” I can attest to that. Both in high school, and in college I have had to learn about subjects that I can careless about and because of this the motivation factor was extremely low. “Although they think it’s important to graduate, they don’t think that doing well in school matters.” I tend to agree with this. I believe that graduation is the key factor, and this is the reason why kids go to school. School-to-work programs can alleviate some of the boredom that studying out of textbooks can have.