Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reward systems in classrooms are bad essay
The effect of rewards and motivation on student achievement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reward systems in classrooms are bad essay
Students around the globe struggle with the stress of financial needs causing these young intellectuals to focus less on school and more on opportunities to pay for their education. The students start failing subjects that constrict them from qualifying for AP classes and scholarship opportunities, which will help them decrease their finical problems. When the idea of getting paid for good grades comes to the attention of students, they take advantage of the opportunity because the money would help immensely. However, rewarding students with a check for having good academic grades and behaving properly in school kills intrinsic motivation, resulting in students to feel pressured, and destroys the skills necessary for their future benefits. …show more content…
Most often, students result to cheating in order to obtain the grades required to qualify for the money, which in turn causes “conflict with students and parents” (Flannery). For example, when students cheat off each other, it causes disputes that escalade into violence. Followed by, teachers and parents to get involved. The typical punishment of cheating is a failing grade for the assignment or in worst case scenarios, suspension. The objective of earning money was to help enhance students’ desire to learn, yet the money is the cause of students braking school policy. According to Chris Spoonamore, a teacher, in an article by Mary Ellen Flannery parents “rip teachers” because of their child receiving a bad grade. Teachers are frequently accused of intentionally changing students’ grades based on the teacher’s personal bias of the student. Despite the despicable accusations, teachers give each student the grade her or she has earned. On the contrary giving money to kids would be beneficial because it helps the students “in poor communities where a dollar really makes a difference” (Flannery). The students in poor communities don’t have much, but with the money added into their pockets, it could get them items they’ve never had before. Nevertheless being pressured to achieve money makes one feel that cheating is the best way to achieve and ensure …show more content…
When the money is given to the kids “it sends the message that the reasons to work hard in school is to enrich your wallet rather than” (McCready) enriching important skills such as honesty or self-reliance. If self-reliance is not learned, students rely on other opportunities, which will most likely require the student to break the law, causing the students to drift away from their goals and feel ashamed of their actions. Also, without honesty students tend to be untruthful causing conflicts that could result with horrible consequences. On the other hand it could help by showing that hard work gets you a reward such as a check “just like in the real world” (Flannery). Even so, lifelong skills are not earned from money but just gives the feelings of being “entitled to a payout”
According to student reporter Joseph Maneen, “Studies have shown that rewards can motivate students to attend school and that the more kids are in school, the more they learn” (“Cash Courses” 1). Teachers cover topics more in-depth than a school textbook does, so for a student to understand what the teachers are teaching they must be present in the classroom. Some may say that being rewarded with money doesn’t help improve our success in subjects we don’t like, but student Katelyn Vlastaris says, “‘If you reward us with money, it may motivate us to do great in subjects we don’t like, and then we’ll start doing well by ourselves’” (“Cashing In”). Once a student gets involved in a subject they are unsure about, they start to learn about it and understand it better, and the students will continue to grow in that subject area.
To begin, with, school should not pay students for good grades because they are constrained to earn good grades. Evidence from the NEA article claims, “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems in their classroom, including pressure to inflate grades.” This leads to kids trying to get good grades, which can cause stress because if they have one dreadful grade, they will worry a lot about not getting as much money. The effect of this is students will be distressed about grades that they won’t have any fun and won’t rest their brains. Clearly, students are pressured to earn good grades if they are getting
Many high school students have a job that they go to after school which takes up their time that they could be using for homework and studying. If we were to pay these students for their good grades then they would no longer have the need for a job and could get even better grades and would even be able to take harder classes because of the extra time they would have to study and for homework. With the extra time that students would receive they could progress their education even
Amidst the trials of adversity, the delicate interrelationship between individual and collective experiences is unveiled, demonstrating the transformative influence of personal beliefs, ethical decisions, and communal dynamics on the fates of those involved. In establishing the theocratic microcosm of Salem, Arthur Miller's Modern Tragedy, The Crucible, emerges as a timeless allegory for the 1950s McCarthy era. An era paralysed by the forces of fear, mob psychology and its hegemony that paralyses individuality. The recontextualised egocentrism elicits an understating of the individual experience of resistance and identity through the augmenting nature of characters. Moreover, Miller plumbs the depths of the disquieting "weight of truth" within domains steered by fervent
People may say it is a bad idea to pay children for good grades . In some ways, this could be true like…. Kids will never just want to learn to be successful, their main focus will be to do the best they can and get rewarded. Another reason why some people disagree is because they
All the students rush out the door as the school bell rings, taking out their extravagant and expensive phones. Everyone leaves, and just by the sight of the empty hallway, there are calculators, textbooks and more electronics that are worth a great amount of money. Students are not responsible for their belongings. In fact, they are not responsible at all, losing them, leaving them in the hallways and change rooms unattended, dropping them. They will never entirely understand the value and responsibility that is put forth for them to have that phone. However, they would understand if the phone was bought with their own money. This leads to why students should be paid for having good grades in school. Students should be paid for good grades due to these three reasons: it encourages students to work harder, it will help expand and grow the economy and finally, they will understand the importance of responsibility.
The article “should kids be paid for good grades?” written by Amber Angel (2012), she discussed the disadvantages of should kids be paid for good grades. The author tone is philosophical and she supports the disadvantages because through the strategy which to reward students based on their result is not effective, it is only for a short period. It is not an effective motivator. Other than that, the students are being taught the wrong character that caused and confused themselves.
In contrast, there’s people who have pondered the question why do kids cheat in school? Some students blame family, coaches and teachers for pressuring them to do better and maintain a C plus average (Maecovitz 70-71). Some kids cheat because they want good grades, but are too lazy or busy with work to take the time to study with the teacher or to learn the materials (D’Aray 1). Other students cheat because they don’t kn...
If students are to be paid for grades, it doesn’t give them their education which won’t help them in the future. According to Sanford Dornbush, “students who receive money for grades will in the long run, have lower academic performances than the students who
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
The programs can teach children to work hard for money or work hard for success. In Chicago, Roland Fryer developed a program that helped 3,750 high school freshman in 20 schools. The CEO, Arne Duncan, had a fear that there would be a high rate of students who would drop out in ninth or 10th grade. Fryer’s program stated that at the end of every 5 week grading period, students had the chance of earning $50 for every A, $35 for every B, and $20 for every C in English, math, science, social studies, and physical education. Duncan had found a way to “keep high school students in the classroom” while working to improve the curriculum that they learned (“Cash for
Modern students face many pressures for academic success. They are often unwilling to disappoint their parents or spouses. Some fear that not cheating will weaken a student’s ability to compete with their peers. They rationalize their unethical behavior, unwilling to accept a poor grade, consequently justifying cheating as the only means to that end.
Academic knowledge is the basis on which future prosperity, and financial security has been determined. As a consequence, students feel inclined to perform above average in school. Now, as students perform less and less, they sink to obtain good grades by cheating. This method to acquire the desired grades will only harm the student, instead of the imagined result. Prompted by a child’s inability to perform basic tasks throughout his education , academic cheating spawns numerous negative consequences.
Cheating on academic work is a serious issue that most students admit to doing at some point in their academic career. Elite students are surprisingly the culprits of cheating, but hide it well. (Romm, para 5) Cheating is such a large issue that “70% of students from a sample of 1,800 from nine campuses said they had cheated at least once during their college careers.” (Schneider, para 9) Students cheat on academic work because of different, ongoing pressures in their lives. Understanding the student’s motives and pressures are essential to preventing cheating from occurring in the future. Students cheat for different reasons specific to them regarding their priorities, pressures and because of how easy it has become. Even though eliminating cheating will not happen, there are actions that educational professionals can and should take to prevent most of it from happening so often. Therefor cheating problems are minimized and have a positive impact on the student’s education and understanding of concepts.
The educational process allows various opportunities for students to receive good grades and excel. In order to meet these accomplishments of success, some students feel encouraged to take shortcuts. The most common shortcut that educators see some students take is cheating. Many students view cheating as a crime, while others feel cheating is necessary and cannot imagine passing their exam without the help of someone else or notes. The effects of cheating are long term, but the causes and effects of cheating vary. Cheating in schools is caused by a variety of factors and can have negative effects on the student’s success in the future.