Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physical education programs in schools
Physical education programs in schools
Physical education programs in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physical education programs in schools
Do you ever feel like the environment of your lunch stresses you out? I think lunches at Wellington-Napoleon High School need to start earlier, last longer, and have better quality to give students more time to digest food, have more time for socialization, and be more relaxed. There are many students at Wellington-Napoleon High School that take classes directly after lunch that require physical activity. If students get physical directly after eating, it could cause them to throw up. That is why I believe we should get more time at lunch. It gives the students more time to digest food before having to work out. As you should know, most teens are really talkative and energetic, but when they don’t get to let off some steam, they get really stressed. Here at Wellington-Napoleon, teachers are all business. Students get in trouble when they get caught talking to their peers. The only time we really have the freedom to talk is …show more content…
First let’s start with quantity. This is why students are depressed. They get starved. I believe students should get what they paid for. If they are going to make us wait till 12:30 to eat, we should at least get enough food to fill our emptied bellies. Now for the quality. The food I give my pets and the food that goes in my mouth should not look the same. They could at least starve us with food so good you don’t need more. If we got better food, I bet the amount of food wasted would be reduced. 0/20 students said the quality of the lunch food on average is great.(ELA-Hour6) Now I do believe our school does serve some good food sometimes, it just needs to happen more often to satisfy the minds of students. Overall I feel like with a few changes to our lunch, students would be more satisfied. Not too many changes are really necessary I hope this makes you think a little bit. If you were in control of a school like this, what would you do about the environment of your
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
According to NPR it says that if kids get 20 minutes, they eat 35% less than kids with 25 minutes to eat. “Dedicating to little time for lunch leads to rapid eating which is not good for your health as doctor Patrick Serog told Le Figaro the French newspaper “when we eat quickly we don’t have time to feel satisfied.”
Lunch time is a time to take a break from the day and recharge for the rest of the day. In elementary schools it is also a time to meet up with your friends and socialize. Lunch time is not only time to eat. It is important for the mental, social, and emotional health of the children as well. Children need them chance to unwind and destress, which is promoted by socializing with friends. “Lunch should be an enjoyable part of the school day for students, offering a break from classroom work and a place to relax, socialize, and become nourished.”("The Cafeteria: Creating a Positive Mealtime Experience", 2013) Lunch time should be done in a setting where
To solve this problem, we need the cafeteria to be open more hours. If it is because of the need of workers in those other times, it is a big change that even students won't mind to work in the cafeteria to have it open for longer hours. Another idea would be to have longer hours open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Even if it is not open for the whole day, longer hours might allow more comfort ability for everyone. We know that with out food, one cannot concentrate in their studies, nor perform their work well.
We should not have longer school lunches. Longer school lunches has a great impact on everyone in school, it makes this issue worse. Students need what is best for them, which they already have. Short school lunches helps improve learning skills and lets students comprehend better. Our lunches are good as they are right now. We should not allow students to leave during school lunch.
students’ performance. Serving hearty food at lunch is a step in the right direction for the
Imagine yourself as a student waiting in a long lunch line. When you finally sit down to enjoy your delicious meal, then the sound of the lunch bell rings and everyone departs to their next class. Every student in Conroe High School should be able to enjoy their meal without feeling rushed. Because of this, students believe it is a great idea to extend the lunch period. It will give students a longer time to eat, socialize, and it will give students a break from classes.
Many cafeteria workers and staff members in 49 states have said many students do not want the governments new school lunches. Almost 7 out of 17 schools with have been seen with students throwing away some or all their fruits or vegetables, even the cafeteria workers are suffering under these new standards. About 60.3 percent of school districts want flexibility to be given to all schools to improve their ability to provide and give good nutrition without harm to any instructions and school district operations. Schools should know by now what is good for students and what is not, but they should not go overboard with the wheat and whole grain items. Another example that shows that schools should be responsible for providing a nutritious lunch is knowing that there are a variety of ways to make healthy foods taste good for school students. Healthy tasty food that will risk diabetes and obesity .One of the biggest reasons people do not eat healthy foods is because they feel it as if it will not taste good. The problem is, if your health food does not taste good, you are eating the wrong health food. Just because something is good for you does not mean it has to taste nasty, boring, or completely gross. There are plenty of ideas out there for eating healthy without making sacrifices on taste. “It is silly that people are worried about kids throwing things out. There are many ways to make
As I mentioned earlier, school food is not appetizing. Most of the lunches are served everyday. There is not much variety to choose from either. This is when going off campus would be good. Students would be able to get better food with more options to choose from. There are also the students who go home for
School lunches are to provide nourishment for students so they can excel in the classroom and on the field, not leave them broken down and tired for the rest of the day. Poor nutrition standards allow for school lunches to offer the minimum requirement to students. The quality of food is diminished with pesticides and other harmful chemicals, which also does not provide enough nutrients for students’ brains and bodies to grow and mature at a healthy rate, and finally the amount of food given to students is not adequate for every student, because every person is different, the amount of food given to each student should be different as well. Once these things are addressed, school lunch can change for the better and provide the nutrition needed for every student to achieve greatness and someday be a future leader of
The school's food isn’t filling and a great deal of the students think it’s disgusting. A majority of the schools give students a little scoop of the main choice and a little scoop of the side servings. Each student pays roughly $2.60 for one full serving (School Meal Trends & Stats). From talking with other students, they pay anywhere between a $1.25 and $1.50 for each extra serving. Basically, a student needs to spend about $5 on lunch, which is three servings, in order to be satisfied for the rest of the day. Paying $5 for three servings isn’t even the worst part. Most of the food being served, students don’t even enjoy eating. It’s either not cooked fully or they just don’t like it. Instead of forcing students to pay $5 for lunch they don’t even like, let them go spend it at a fast food place in town.
Although some of the food that gets served in most high schools is decent, wouldn’t it be great if students had another choice? High school students should be able to have off-campus lunches and there are many great reasons: it would allow for fresh air and a break from school, kids could choose a more nutritious, filling meal of their choice, and it would help students manage their time and become more responsible. Students would love to have the option of off-campus lunches, it would benefit all schools for the better.
Alas, it is very important that students are fed and have enough energy throughout the day, especially if they are in after school sports. Consequently, it can be very dangerous for students not to eat lunches and then go and do their sport. Lack of energy can cause you to faint, be extremely dizzy and other serious side effects. Even though the snacks in the school store are delicious and can fill you up for a few hours, they lack nutrition and won't give you the proper energy you need to stay focused in school. I don’t know how this would affect the school in a negative way, except that student may be tardy. Tardiness is a problem but so is not getting enough (or anything) to eat at lunch. The school could make a two strike rule, first tardy is a warning second is a detention. In conclusion, I think that the smartest option for our school is to allow its student to have open
Why is this a problem? Cafeteria food is often cheap, bought in bulk, high in calories, malnutritious, and microwaved. Student polls and opinions prove this. Therefore, this leads to a suggestion: Healthier, tastier foods and a better, more advanced lunch system should be implemented. First of all, students aren’t motivated to eat unhealthy, not-tasty food.
Much of these processed, closed, sealed school meals are heated and reheated at any time for the children. I, myself, see the same food two or three days in a row at my school cafeteria. One way to improve school meals would be to have a chefs/cooks to cook fresh and healthy meals daily. The National School Lunch Program “ provides nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to children each school day” (National School Lunch Program). This program assist public, nonprofit private schools and child care institutions with the annual value of around $11.6 billion.