Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why should parents be responsible for their children's behavior
Parents responsible for child's actions
Holding parents responsible for their kids' poor behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should parents be responsible for graffiti all around the world?, in several cities such as Santa Ana, CA. Cities do not like the fact that there is spray painted alley art graffiti on there walls, buildings, and even shipping trucks. Lots of people think that parents are responsible for the cities things being vandalized. Lots of parents just let their children roam wherever they want, and give them a little too much freedom. Their children could have been vandalizing things for all we know. They think that their parents should be responsible for what they have done, well they shouldn’t be right? I think that parents should not be responsible for their children’s actions, because most children should know better, and should be responsible for their own actions. Why should you blame their parents, most children should know better, and be a respectful person like they should. If children don’t have that kind of respect they will pay for their misbehavior, I think that vandalizing things is very unacceptable. Graffiti art is a waste of time, and yet people still do it because one day they are gonna screw up and they will be punished for what they have done. Say your child were to steal something such as a diamond ring, that is considered theft if they get caught should parents be …show more content…
Parents look to social media, video games, and even T.V. to blame their children for their actions, and in some cases that can be very well true. Parent should be held responsible for their child, because legally parents have to feed, cloth, and have a place for them to live. If you were a parent and your child robbed a bank they would probably ask you why you didn’t know where your child was. For that being said your child would mean everything to you and you would do anything for them. Sometimes it is the child’s fault, it’s the child’s brain they were probably trying to fit in with the people they hang out
When children commit a horrible act such as a school shooting their parents often look for someone or something to blame rather than looking at what role they, as parents, may have had in the tragedy. The often targeted entertainers, video game developers, teachers, drug companies, and writers are rarely, if ever, responsible for such tragic outcomes and, unfortunately, often become victims as a result of lawsuits filed in an attempt to place blame on them. The parents of dangerous children must be scrutinized and sued alongside every other entity being blamed for the heinous crimes that children commit.
Kids should be subjected to the measures of punishment that our judicial system is giving to them. Kids who show lots of enmity should be tried as adults. It is the only way to protect the innocent children. These kids know right from wrong, but they choose to do the wrong things and violence is wrong. As the laws have gotten stricter on discipline the kids have gotten wilder. When we let society tell us how to discipline our children then violent children is the result.
"Graffiti-Art Exhibit Is Artless to Police Commissioner Bratton" by Pia Catton covers the opinion of a police commissioner about graffiti art being portrayed as vandalism. Police commissioner Bratton views graffiti as a destructive force that has defaced the streets and subway cars of many neighborhoods and considered to be vandalism. Needless to say that Bratton doesn't even think that it's appropriate for kids to see, because according to him it's an atrocious depiction of what art is supposed to be. On the other hand for graffiti, Susan Henshaw Jones only intended for graffiti to be looked as a form of art "not to glorify vandalism". From the different standpoints of the article, graffiti can be a beautiful piece of artwork or inappropriate vandalism. The form that graffiti takes when on the streets doesn’t make it art because it was placed without permission.
In today’s society there is a lot of crime going on that involves minors and the first thing that some people do is blame parents for the misbehavior. What if the minor lives in the home with an alcoholic mom, and a drug addict father, and the minor feels as though he/she is in the world alone. The definition of a minor is “an infant or person who is under the age of legal competence”. (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/minor) The minor starts hanging with the wrong crowd to feel wanted and decides to rob a bank, he goes to jail, and is sentenced to prison. Now there are clearly things that contributed to the way the minor committed this crime but it does not make it okay either. He was not getting any attention at home so he
Multiple surveys have proven that 65% of the most ridiculous mistakes made by an adult were made in their teenage years. Adolescents are known to make mistakes, but when punished correctly, instead of repeating, they learn. Most people believe the harsher the punishment the less likely a child will act out again, but through research and analysis of the brain this was proven to not be true. When a teenager goes as far as committing a crime, judgement should still be based on the fact that he or she is still a minor. As a juvenile, doing something wrong , no matter the severity, should be resulted in a punishment that requires them to learn from their mistakes. Charging them as an adult does not have the same effect as sending away an adult to do jail time.
Even though there is a fear of getting caught, this is what artist usually consider the very core of graffiti culture. Many critics have argued that graffiti is vandalism and should be removed. However, “someone painted over your house and, of course, you’re not too happy about it. No one has the right to do that without your permission and, without even looking at it, you can pronounce it vandalism. But would you feel the same way if you saw a really breathtaking piece of graffiti art on an otherwise dull wall in the city?” (Kordic). Yes, by definition, graffiti is “an action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property”, And we can not really argue that graffiti often ends up someone’s walls, we do have to think about if it really is “destruction”, and if, perhaps, we have been asking the wrong question the whole
...ople must learn to take responsibility for their own actions and parents will need to take greater responsibility for the proper raising of their children. If these conditions are never met, society will move from one scapegoat to another until every personal freedom we have is lost to restrictions and regulations.
To me a child's reasoning makes sense, if I can get away with a crime once why not try it again or better yet, something of a higher extent. Kids are arrested for assault or robbery and are let go after a slap on the hand. This I believe makes them think they can solve their problems by illegal and cruel acts. Looking into this deeper there is still no explanation for what caused this way of life to begin with. Most say what people say every time we are talking about youth: How were they raised? As Barry Siegel calls it, "A long history of Anti-social behavior," causes dysfunction in youth. (Siegel 1) Was there lack of attention due to a parent working two jobs, or maybe staying out all night at the bar? Is this what causes these latchkey children which turn into criminals? This might be one answer, but it certainly does not apply to all youngsters who are in trouble.
According to the law, children ages 7-15 legally do not know what is wrong or what is right to do. Children who do not know what is wrong or right can commit a crime without knowing how bad the consequences can be. Immature children do not know most factors the way regular human beings know and can commit more errors by accident than other human beings will commit on purpose. Immature children should not be sentenced to life because they rarely know the rules of life and unlike most adults; they do not know what is good or bad about it. For example, “juveniles are different from adults in terms of brain development and maturity levels” (Corrington 1). Crimes children or immatures can commit include killing someone in a fight, choking someone out, or running over someone by accident. Arguments can also build in by saying teenagers should get sentenced to life for being immature and doing things immaturely. If a young teenager runs over another teenager or children and kills them, of course the parents are going to want the responsible driver to pay for what they have done. Sometimes jail is not enough and the parents or family members of victims want to kill whoever was responsible for the disgrace that happened. A big percentage of people do not understand that young children do not know what adults are capable of doing if it was
Children do not know any better than to follow the actions of what they see other people doing.
Approximately 2,500 children who are under the age of 18 are sentenced to life every year. Most have committed crimes like murder, robbery, armed robbery, and other heinous acts. However, people want to justify their actions just because they don’t know better or their brains are underdeveloped compared to that of an adult. That’s not correct, but true. The state, judges, and jurors should hold kids who commit heinous acts accountable for their actions.
Most humans tend to live by example and studies prove that our behavior is learned, but how do we explained the bad behavior of those that have good parents that are excellent role models. Some people would said that the parents are too flexible and the kids take advantage of them in the other hand when parents neglect the kids and are bad role models for their kids we easily find the answer to the problem. As a society we contradict ourselves for example; sometimes we tell parents to not be too flexible with our kids but at the same time we do not want parents to discipline their children too harsh. The question of why juveniles commit crime does not have an exact answer. Some juveniles commit crime because of peer pressure, anger against life, and others might be just do it for fun. Even though the question does not have a conquer answer to why juveniles commit crime we know that different factors contribute to the issue. In the book True Notebooks Mark the author did not only explain his personal experience as a volunteer teacher at the juvenile hall, but also what he learned from his students and how his perspective change regarding the juveniles as he spend more time with them. Mark also discover that even though he was not aware of it he was making a positive change on some of them and the fact that he was willing to teach them a writing class meant so much for some of the students, and most important Mark present on the book the different reasons juveniles commit crime.
Murals and graffiti are both used for self expression to help teenagers cope with their emotions. The difference between these two is that murals are seen as a beautiful piece of art that is illegal but not viewed by others as a harmful environment while graffiti is viewed as a harmful environment which commonly spreads negative messages,images,and tags being displayed on walls, buildings, and subway cars. Graffiti is very common and still continues to be a huge vandalism problem that we deal with today in our
Vicarious liabilities of parents, for crimes committed by their children are like a double edge sword. You get in trouble if you do and you get in trouble if you don’t. In the state of North Carolina a 16 year old, can be tried as an adult. I would like to share a juvenile case in the news this week. Two young juvenile ages 16& 17 was arrested in connection with armed robbery and attempted armed robbery. The victims reported that they approached them on two different occasions and pulled out a gun and asked for money. I just cannot believe that kids this young are committing crimes. It’s not their parents fault, because no one told them to go rob and steal from people but, I do hold the parents responsible a little, because at 10:40 p.m. on a school night they should be at home.
The problem with painting over graffiti is that it is seen as a sign of order in an area that, implied from the original act of vandalism, has seen social backlash and feel the need to voice that opinion.(Graffiti Can Actually Be A Good Thing For Cities) This leads to heightened tension between the people and government. The response typically involves a multitude of cases of graffiti in the targeted area.(Graffiti Can Actually Be A Good Thing For Cities) The local government’s general opinion on the subject is to eradicate it, but it is quite evident that in the majority of places, their efforts are futile.