Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socio economic status and academic achievement
LOW income and academic performance
Extracurricular activities motivation essay for students example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socio economic status and academic achievement
It’s the last day of sixth grade and Jimmy has been expecting money in return for the hard work that he has put into his grades. He has mostly A’s on his report card and is figuring out how much money he will get and what he’s going to buy. But will Jimmy want money for doing what is expected from him, instead of being motivated intrinsically by the value of hard work? In the future Jimmy may have trouble with simple tasks because he has not learned how to motivate himself without money. Providing monetary rewards for grades to students for something that is expected can be detrimental to oneself. Providing monetary rewards to students for their grades, when good grades are expected can be detrimental. Intrinsic motivation is key when looking …show more content…
It is easier for students to pass the courses without getting paid. Grading changes are on the rise nationwide. They are becoming easier to pass like Maryland’s Prince George County that limits failing grades to show that at least the students tried their best. Another is a new policy in Virginia’s Fairfox County where no middle school or high school student can receive lower than a 50 percent if they made a “ reasonable attempt otherwise they can retake or redo the assignment or test. (Balingit, p.a. 1)This means that students don’t need to get paid because it has already become easier for pass their classes without trying as hard as they can. The change in the grading system has become a problem for many. Many feel that teachers are losing the tools to properly get students ready for college when they are paid with monetary rewards.(Balingit, p.a. 1) Students who don’t know the information in a class can fall behind because the grading is masking their true knowledge. Students performed no better on tests score if they received a monetary reward or if they did not receive one according to a Harvard Economist Study(Zhang p.p.6) They took better to other rewards that cost significantly less than actually giving money for good grades. A study from Vanderbilt showed that paying students did not change how well they did on tests or receiving higher grades when they were put into three different groups. One group got $100, the next one got certificates and, the last group got nothing. The study showed that students take better to certificates because they can show off to their friends and parents. (Balakit, p.p. 8) Students who got paid did no better than those who did not get paid. However the certificates turned out to be success with students. The certificates cost a lot less than giving other
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
In a world in which a person is not compensated for his work, he would no longer work as diligently. Often times, a person will work in order to receive a reward. This reward then helps him to gain more rewards in the future. This can be seen in a game of rummy when a player must play each hand carefully in order to benefit himself in later hands. This is precisely what occurs when students receive GPAs that have been weighted; so, as a result of the extensive amount of work required to receive the same grade in an Advanced Placement (AP) course as in a base level course, the students of Saint Bernard deserve to benefit from a more accurate representation of and award for their work: weighted GPAs.
According to the author of “Cash Courses”, “The monetary rewards motivate many kids, especially those from underprivileged families, to come to class when they would otherwise stay home” (“Cash Courses” 1). Students who come from families who do not have a lot of money, will want to attend school to earn extra money to use for themselves to buy basic necessities. Rewards motivate students to attend school; therefore, they obtain more knowledge given by the teacher
Did you know that schools in some places are actually giving kids money for good grades? If schools wish students to be self-motivated and have a desire for learning because it’s valuable to them, then schools should not pay students for excellent grades. Paying students for good grades can lead to kids having pressure to earn good grades. In addition, the students who are payed will not succeed academically in the long run. Also, they are not self-motivated so when they are not getting paid they will stop trying. From pressuring to get good grades, not succeeding academically in the long run, and not having self-motivation, there are several negative effects of paying students for marvelous grades.
Amanda Ripley’s Time magazine article “ Is Cash the Answer “ presented a serious problem in the American public educational system. First of all, in the college you may find a teacher who want to dump you. My solution for this problem is Create premium for teachers whose class will have the highest grates from one level, when a student came to another student get during study. Also need to say students about some thing, if they study some knowledge how they’ll use it on your future job or even life.
In today’s society we feel the need to be graded in order to learn. The topic of the grading system has sparked three essays, by three different authors, about the pros and cons of the grading system. First, Jerry Farber, professor at University of California at San Diego, wrote A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System (333). Next is Steven Vogel, professor at Denison University, who wrote Grades and Money (337). The last two authors in this compilation are Stephen Goode and Timothy W. Maier. They both are journalists for Insight on the News. While each of these authors have their own point of view on the grading system, all three essays talk about how being graded affects learning.
The student life focuses mainly on education where students have to go to school, perform well in high school and get the grades to go on to their desired college/university in Canada. The schooling that a student gains in the first 25 years of their life is used to get a job in the future and make a living; however, some students might not be motivated enough to ace their education. The benefit of excelling in education is not easily sought out for some students; hindering their future aspirations and limiting their success. Grade 12 is where all marks are imperative and having the best marks will allow the student to pick what he/she wants to do. If students were rewarded with cash, in a sense, would they not be more motivated thus achieving higher grades?
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
Paying students for their good grades is, an appalling idea due to the fact that there chances for cheating increases highly, it may cause conflict within the teachers and students, and the money may seem like bribery to the students. Paying students is an awful idea due to the fact their chances of cheating increases highly. Students start to cheat off their peers or classmates because they want money too. In addition, it’s not fair for the other students that have good grades because they would be working so hard while they’re being copied by the other students who have lower grades. As a result, the more the learners cheat, the more consequences there would be.
This habit can follow the student home for example when a student goes home and does his or her chores they will expect an award due to the cash for grades program this gave the student the habit of being rewarded. Students should be learning for the sake of learning in the article “why you shouldn’t pay children for grades” Mcready states “they will reap greater rewards from learning important life lessons about responsibility than from any cash payout” (Mcready). On the other hand the contrary may state, paying students for good grades will reward the student and encourage them to work harder while this may be true this will let the students get in the habit of receiving an award. The cash for grades program kills the student’s intrinsic motivation by taking rewards away from students only making students less motivated.
You can also use paying students for good grades to teach them a lesson using the money. Also, paying students can help improve attendance/graduation rates. From improving graduation rates to learning about work, to making kids smarter, there are many positive effects of paying students for good grades. First of all, students should be paid for good grades because it can help resist the lure of gangs and resist committing crimes to make money.
The best idea hers is for students to get paid so their school can increase in knowledge. The test scores would increase by studying harder. Also if the students are in more classes, they would still maintain the average grade. Average grade is passing so, the students would pass the class their being paid in. For example, author Quinonez says, “A child with no desire to learn will only learn because of the reward offered.
This also meaning decreased drop out rate. This information can be found on “Good Grades: Are You Willing to Pay For them?GingerNinja” Here is a quote from the source, “One study by Johns Hopkins University researchers demonstrated that paying students for good grades seemed to increase attendance rate.” This means getting paid makes children want to come to school. The effect of this is children going to school and actually learning.
Schools suggested on paying students for good grades. Paying students to get good grades is a terrible idea because it will kill motivation,cheating will increase,and money can not buy smarts. Schools with low attendance,or bad grades are trying to come up with a solution to their problems .Schools want student to get better grades and attend more. Schools around the world do not want to be viewed as a good graded school and want to be looked up to. So schools try to come up with a solution.