Should college athletes get paid more money? There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly football players, should get paid. “In 1988, the Nebraska legislature passed a bill that would allow the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later vetoed by Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (O’Toole etal. 2)”. . The dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the players themselves arguing that universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes do not receive any money from that. Some officials think that it is not appropriate to be paying college athletes because of scholarships, equality, and other areas …show more content…
Would pay be different per sport? Would they also receive scholarships? There are valid points to the debate, but both sides can be supportive of whether or not college athletes should be paid for their performance.
“Only 7% of all high school athletes move on to play in college.”(Martinez 1/1). “Out of that 7% that make it to college, less than 20% get a full ride scholarship.”(Wilborn 1/1). Athletes who get a full ride scholarship to a University must have good academics but also need spectacular athletic ability and skill. Those that get any scholarships to play a sport they love can be considered very lucky, but how lucky can a college athlete become when it comes to money? Many think that because there is so much attention drawn to college sports and its very popular, almost as popular as major sports leagues, believe that in return the athletes should be receiving. “In a survey 69% of the people asked said they think the NCAA should pay their athletes.”(Martinez 1/1). However, in order to make a fair system, they would need to be able to find a way that benefited all athletes of all backgrounds. “Scholarships include tuition, room, meal plan, and book money.”(Dorfman 1/1). For there
…show more content…
It is brought to attention within the argument that college athletes may spend more of their time focusing on their sport and not their academics.Student-athletes face many of the same pressures as their non-athlete counterparts academically. Many carry a full course load that is tightly regimented by someone other than them and they are unable to drop below 12 credits otherwise risk losing their NCAA eligibility. For many student-athletes the time they put into a sport is comparable to having a 30-40 hour a week job. A student-athletes daily schedule (when in season) may consists of attending classes, practice, weight training This can cause issues because it can put players on academic probation, they could lose their scholarship, or worse. If an athlete is not doing their part by keeping up with studies, then the situation seems to be taken for granted. Though they are brought to school for a spectacular experience because of their athletic ability, school has to come first in order for them to be able to keep doing the sport they love. There can be conflict if an athlete is not doing as well with their academics as they were suggested to, so time between studying and playing has to be not only equivalent, but appropriate for the standards of being a college
On a podcast from virginiaforusa.com the speaker Doug Merril said " colleges give most of the major athletes huge sums of money through scholarships some of these scholarships can be worth up top 200,000 dollars."Colleges shouldn’t have to pay athletes if they already get money
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
Everyone has experienced some type of stress in their life. Whether it has been from work, school, or troubles at home, stress is stress. If anyone had played sports in high school, you know the challenge of balancing school and sports. Imagine that stress, then multiply it exponentially. Everyone knows that college is a much more rigorous version of high school. The only reason some athletes made it to college is due to scholarships for their performance on the field. If they don’t perform well on the field, that scholarship might get cut. This makes practicing the athletes main priority. However, college athletes have to concentrate on their grades so they don’t drop out of college. These athletes know they may not make it to the pro’s, so they know they have to have a back up plan. This back up plan is called a college degree. So college athletes have to concentrate both on sports and classes. Sounds kind of challenging. This is why I believe student athletes should be allowed to miss classes occasionally due to their sport. Athletes are under much more stress, are required to attend practices and classes, and complete their homework. This is simply impossible to do, at least for a human. I believe that this is an important topic because it affects all college athletes.
Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a different way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the talent to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offering them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you produce for them. It’s all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don’t have money for other necessities. The NCAA doesn’t want friends or boosters to offer athletes jobs because they ...
Playing a sport in college is equivalent to working a full-time job (Thomas). There are rules that allow major-college football coaches to only demand twenty hours of the players time each week (Wieberg). However, studies show that those athletes are doubling those hours per week during the season (Wieberg). Other sports are putting in the equivalent of a full time work week (Wieberg). Some NCAA officials are concerned with the amount of time spent stating that beyond forty hours is inhumane (Wieberg). Most of the athletes compete and do whatever it takes to succeed, so they enjoy spending countless hours on sports (Wieberg). Many athletes even have struggles in the classroom because they do not have enough time to study. Student-athletes at top Division I schools think of themselves as athletes more than students (Wieberg). Less than one percent of college athletes actually make it professionally (Wieberg). That means these kids should focus more on their education than on athletics. In reality, these official...
The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many people who are in favor of the change.
Many people believe that College athletes have it easy, and who wouldn’t think that? A free education, free living; getting to travel and play the sport that many people would love to still be able to. Student athletes also get to pick classes earlier than a regular student and have the ability to be excused from classes to go to games and special events. The life of a student athlete sounds like an enticing thing for many people; especially those who are not student athletes on scholarships or walk-ons to a college team. The rising cost of attending college has made the younger athletic population work just as hard to receive a scholarship to play a sport, because they may come from poverty where they can’t otherwise afford to attend school, which is beneficial to them. Understand, that college is a place where academics comes first, and everything else is second; this includes athletics. But are these athletes treated fairly and given all the right things they need to succeed in life, let alone college?
College athletes are some of the hardest working Americans and yet they are not allowed to be fully rewarded for their hard work. The NCAA denies them of being paid to play sports which is simply wrong. These athletes are being cheated by big business and there needs to be a stop to this sometime in the near future. These student-athletes put in countless hours of work in the classroom and on the field and all the while they have to pay tens of thousands of dollars a year to do this. That's just wrong and needs to be fixed, the NCAA needs to allow for college athletes to be paid.
I strongly absolutely do not think that College athletes should not get paid. College students should focus more on their education other than handling hundreds of thousands of dollars. College athletes should not get paid because if the athlete gets a scholarship for playing sports, then they are already getting paid from the free college tuition. People are saying that College athletes should get paid because some of the best college athletes do not earn a penny from the colleges. First of all, College athletes receive some sort of payments from colleges.
The argument for not paying athletes is simple and easy to understand. If athletes are getting paid it is unfair for the students that are not athletes. They put up with different struggles that could be potentially harder for them as opposed to the student athletes. Another argument, which is the argument of the NCAA, is athletes in college still fall under the umbrella of “amateurism”. This is because they are in a “self bettering” league that students are participating in voluntary, therefore they should not be
The whole reason people go to college is to receive an education ( Hobson & Guskinso, 2017, p. 2); therefore, to receive a free education at a place where education is the prime focus is a great opportunity. College athletes also receive other benefits such as meals, tutoring, and room and board. According to Rick Burton, “Many top players receive tuition, books, tutoring, housing, meals, clothing,
However, as this essay explains that so many challenges student athletes have to go through just to get an education they are promised in their contracts. One example, is the UNC paper classes where student athletes take these paper classes for 18 years and “advisers funneled athletes into the program to make them eligible” (Ganim & Sayers, 2014). These paper classes are made to keep star players on the field or court, which is just an easier way then actually educating the students. Also with the limited time student athletes have to study it is hardly possible for them to gain an education. Penn Schoen Berland presented a study that showed more than half of student athletes agree that they do not have the time to study tests (Penn Schoen Berland, 2015).