Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should college athletes be paid
Why college athletes shouldnt get paid essay
Sports and academic achievement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should college athletes be paid
I strongly absolutely do not think that College athletes should not get paid. College students should focus more on their education other than handling hundreds of thousands of dollars. College athletes should not get paid because if the athlete gets a scholarship for playing sports, then they are already getting paid from the free college tuition. People are saying that College athletes should get paid because some of the best college athletes do not earn a penny from the colleges.
First of all, College athletes receive some sort of payments from colleges. Like, athletes get fame from playing college sports. So they get endorsements from companies and they earn money from being in ads and being sponsored by companies. Also, some athletes get grants worth 100,000 dollars from their college. (Bagaria, 2012) Which isn’t too much money to handle. Speaking about handling money, it is very hard for 20 year olds to handle hundreds of thousands of dollars. “More Money More problems”(Bagaria, 2012) the problems with having too much money as a college student is you focus more on handling money and not on education. Education is much more important than sports. In addition
…show more content…
When he was a 20-year-old sophomore from Hawaii he helped the school earn millions of dollars through ticket sales, advertising, and TV deals. But like all college athletes, Mariota didn’t earn a penny. (Zissou, 2013) Even though this is true, Marcus Mariota had a full ride Scholarship and he earned lots of money from doing endorsements with companies. He got his fame from playing College football. Marcus Mariota was also a first round pick in the NFL draft because of him playing in college. Like I said in paragraph 3, 15% of college athletes said that they wouldn’t be in college if it weren’t for sports. So maybe if Marcus Mariota didn’t get a scholarship with the University of Oregon than he would not have of even went to
While in college, football players live like normal college students. Most college athletes are rewarded scholarships for playing sports. This doesn’t make them different from other students though. They go to class, and live like every other college student on campus. This differs very much from life in the NFL. While in the NFL players make millions of dollars, and become celebrities. Unlike college football players, NFL players don’t live like regular people. They usually live in mansions, and have an abundance of riches. Because of this, it is easier for fans to relate to college football players.
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote is regarding a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact that college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid to play for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income they bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Paying College athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association over the years. Many have strong opinions about this topic, and the opinions vary. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed Fab Five became a household name in the United States. The Fab Five is arguably the greatest recruiting class of all time; all attending the same school (Baxter). The Fab Five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. Nike even made billions by copyrighting their famed black athletic socks, black athletic shoes, and baggy shorts that they made famous throughout the nation. The question over the past several years has become a general and trending topic of argument. College athletes should not be paid for their performance or to perform for their universities because they are there for an education, questions will be asked, and universities would not make as big of an income off the games.
Which makes time also very limited during the day for student athletes to get a real job to pay for the extra expenses that they need. Also, most of the time coaches will not allow the student athletes to work, because of their conflicting schedules with practice. A football prodigy will choose a school best fit for him regardless if he gets a bigger bid. For example, if the football prodigy had a choice to go to a school where they had a better business program because he wanted a backup plan incase he did not get drafted or there was something unfortunate to end his football career, he would choose a school instead of a school that presented a bigger amount but did not have as a business program as the other school.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
Dr. John Acquaviva compares the advantages that college athletes get compare to regular college students. He does a good job of saying how college athletes should not get paid because not only do they get a free education but they also have benefits like their own special meal plan, workout facilities, and medical care. Acquaviva states, “For example, a full scholarship over four years can range between $30,000 to $200,000 depending if the institution is public or private.” Another thing he mentions is that most college athletes are on some type
There has been an extensive debate over the years about college athletes being paid and I honestly don’t see why there is a debate about it at all. The NCAA has strict rules about players receiving benefits from the school in forms of helping players and their families in the form of paychecks or even helping pay bills. College sports bring in an enormous amount of money for the schools every year and are expected to be given nothing in return. Sports do not only bring in money to schools but also more students and fans. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) have taken several players’ records and rewards from them for the simple fact of getting benefits from the school and that is just not acceptable (Allen 115). Athletes are just like every other student in the way of having to pay for housing, food, bills, and more. Having to balance school and sports gives athletes no time to have jobs which means they do not have a way to bring in money to pay for the essentials of going to
The scholarships given to college athletes are not sufficient enough to sustain them throughout the year, which is why I believe they should get paid and receive benefits. Student athletes, especially football and basketball players, play a major role in generating revenue for schools, businesses, coaches and the players do not see a penny. College athletes often do not have money in their pockets for extra food, clothes, housing and extracurricular activities. They also can potentially get dropped from their teams due to injury, leaving them incapable of paying for college. College athletes should be treated like every other employee because they work hard, and make everyone but themselves a lot of money.
Howard-Hamilton, Mary F., and Julie Sina. "How College Affects College Athletes." New Directions for Student Services (2011): 35-43.
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
Should College Athletes Get Paid to Play? Forget about the game-winning touchdown, forget about the cheerleader girlfriend, and forget the pageantry. What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see and earn? In the world of college sports, it's win or go home, and to the winners go the spoils. Most successful college sports teams rake in millions of dollars in revenue.
“A scholarship doesn't equal cash in a player's pocket. Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke” (Hartnett). Being an athlete in college is as demanding as a full time job. They also have to put the time in to be a full time student as well. That is a lot of time they have to commit for their university. Additionally if the student does not come from a wealthy family or a family willing to give them money, he or she may also have to add on a part time job on to that if they ever want to do something fun on a day off or get some food from somewhere other than the dining halls. Even when a student athlete has a job, it is almost impossible for them to keep it during the season because of their demanding schedule, ...
There are many different ideas and plenty of controversy about if a college athlete should or should not get paid while playing for them even though they already have a scholarship. Many people believe that the athletes shouldn't get paid because its can take away from their competitive edge or even cause legal trouble for the school. I believe they deserve to be paid because they bring in tons of revenue for the school and it would also overcome some of the issue they face while being an athlete. In the NCAA right now they don't pay the athletes anything extra besides their scholarship because of the principle of amateurism.
Parents cannot always support their children financially, there comes a time when they need to be independent adults who can support themselves. During the course of trying to prove their independence, athletes may take out student loans, which put them in a financial dilemma. Paying athletes would make them far less dependent on their parents and take give them a little bit of familiarity and skill in terms managing money. After all, Art students can sell their paintings to the famous museums, science students can publish and sell their findings, and journalism majors can have their articles published in top name newspapers. It is the same situation when someone is able to produce a marketable talent for a school’s athletics department.