Should Animal Testing Be Allowed

454 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should animal testing be banned

“The polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 27 cases in 2016 because of animal testing.”(World Health Organization). Animal testing should be allowed.
Like Lindsey Andrews says in her article “pros and cons about animal testing” Animals are actually treated with care, in order to get the best and accurate results animals have to be very healthy. Animals are taken good care of by specialist and vets. If the animals are stressed or overcrowded the results will be considered inaccurate, So people try and do there best to take care of them. They are also provided a space for themselves along with toys water and healthy food choice. Some people actually say animals are treated better in the lab than in pet stores. They are also cleaned and washed regularly. So if you think about it animals are provided a “home”.
Animal testing also saves many lives, “ American women use an average of 12 personal care or makeup products each day, so product safety is of great importance for women who use these products”(Testing), If these products aren't tested …show more content…

If we used different testing subject,(that is a big risk)The results could be inaccurate and unsafe for humans; So animals are our best testing subject. And animal testing is to see if medical treatment would be safe and effective. Some people refuse medical treatment that has been developed through animal medicine, but that would mean almost all the medical treatments there are. People may say to get rid of everything that has been tested on animals and never do animal testing again, but that means throwing out most of the medical treatments that exist and letting people suffer through their pain instead of taking medical treatments. And it would also mean getting rid of most makeup and care products that women use

Show More
Related

  • Ethical Treatment Of Animals: The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the past couple of years many companies of these cosmetic products released that they are against animal testing including LUSH Fresh Handmade Cosmetics, The Body Shop, and many others. There are still companies that still do test with animals; over 250 on PETA’s website. A large percent of these are well-known companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Estee Lauder, Procter & Gamble, L’Oreal, and others that may surprise the consumer. The majority of these companies are producing the same products yet using different animal testing results. This causes the number of test subjects to be substantially larger than what is needed. The number of tests being conducted could be reduced if these companies either become anti animal testing or share results with other companies. This idea might seem like a long-shot since sharing information with their competitors seems ridiculous. If you take a step back from looking at each individual company, you’ll see that they are all conducting similar tests with similar products. Sharing results of these tests with other companies potentially selling similar products, with the same ingredients, will result in a large drop in animal testing (Search for Cruelty-Free

    Read More

  • Sabin's Article: Why Animal Testing Is Not Wrong?

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical sciences are required to keep us healthy when there are diseases spreading and animal testing is a key part of this research. Animal test is not wrong because it is the only way to keep ahead in the arms race against disease. Disease keep changing and evolving so scientist must keep researching and making stronger, more potent medicines to combat them. Thus we must use living creatures as test subject for the medicines.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: An Unjust Practice in Modern Laboratories

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many alternatives for products and cosmetics other than animal testing. Some scientists in the U.S. are moving away from animal testing because it is generally inapplicable to

    Read More

  • The Necessity of Animal Testing

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    The roots of animal experimentation began in the early 1600s when the world expressed in interests on the functions of animals and their uses in human life. However, it wasn’t until the incident regarding the drug thalidomide in 1960 did the government make it a requirement for drugs be tested on animals. During the incident, millions of women took the medication believing that it would be a source of relieve from morning sickness, not knowing however that it would cause irrevocable effects on their unborn children (Watson 4). Although the ruling seemed to provide a sigh of relief to some, the very idea of placing animals in strange uncomfortable environments and experiencing pain and euthanasia angered many. According to the American Anti-Vivisection Society, commonly known as AAVS, It is wrong to treat animals as objects for the purpose of scientific research, and to cause them pain and suffering (“Animal Research Is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary”). Although the arguments against animal experimentation seem credible, animal testing on medicines and products are necessary in order to insure the safety of human beings.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    “If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” -Ellen DeGeneres. Although I probably should be agreeing with Ellen, I feel that animal testing is a good thing. Yes, that may make me sound cruel, but animal testing can bring many benefits to a lot of people. I’m not trying to say that animal testing isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but I’m saying that it’s an important thing that we have to do in society to keep us healthy. “About 20 million animals are experimented on and killed annually, three-fourths for medical purposes and the rest to test various products.” -Santa Clara University, Claire Andre and Manuel Vasquez. Obviously, that’s a lot of animals that are being tested on. Yes, I do feel that maybe scientists are going overboard and testing on a few too many animals. But, I still feel that animal testing is a strong factor in human health.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons: Should We Stop Testing On Animals?

    2093 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Unfortunately, neither side pleases everyone- including the general public, government and scientists. Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for many different reasons; finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medication. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer, HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. Scientists usually use animals for testing purpose because they are considering similar to humans. Animals have their differences, and are also similarities. This is what comparative medicine is about: researches use both similarities and differences to gain insight into the many complex human biological systems.

    Read More

  • Synthesis Essay On Animal Testing

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, animals used for research are checked regularly by trained people. “Animal research has been regulated by the Federal Animal Welfare Act since 1966. As well as stipulating minimum housing standards for research animals (enclosure size, temperature, access to clean food and water, and others), the AWA also requires regular inspections by veterinarians” (Source E). Animals are protected by special laws, stating that their treatment should be regulated. In addition, animals are regularly checked by veterinarians for mistreatment. Finally, despite animal testing benefiting humans, it also benefits the animals that are being tested. “If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus” (Source E). If it weren’t for animal testing, many animals would have died from these diseases, as well as

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no

    Read More

  • We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Allowed Analysis

    574 Words  | 2 Pages

    Can animal testing be stopped? Geoff Watts believed it could be stopped. Geoff Watts questioned whether it was really necessary to continue animal testing. He argued that most of the desired knowledge needed could be acquired without the need for animals. Many of the experiments that were done had little or no use to them at all. “... they did these studies solely because they had to - the data themselves were of no practical use (Watts, para 4, line 15-17).” Some researchers stated.

    Read More

  • Pros Of Animal Testing

    434 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years animal rights groups and organizations have frowned upon animal experiments. Animal testing has been thought to be inhumane and cold-hearted to animals. Because of these accusations medical researchers have to suffer threats from individuals and the media. If animal testing weren’t allowed would that be a drawback in advancement in medical research? Animal testing is beneficial to people because these trails lead to improvements in medical research. Animal experiments have led to finding new cures and vaccines to fatal illnesses. Because animal experiments are helpful in making vaccines to prevent these sicknesses, these trails are the reason so many lives are saved. Animal testing is very necessary and useful to people, but animal rights groups believe that these trails doesn’t benefit humanity. According to Ellen Paul, “Breakthroughs in treating injuries, like practically all medical advances, depend upon experimentation on animals.” Animal experiments have given way to many new instruments to fight against diseases like cancer (Paul). For example, mice and other rodents contributed to scientists developing new tools for fighting different forms of cancers (Paul). Animal testing has helped science in many ways, but animal organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) believe that these experiments are cruel to animals. Even though most animals endure some sort of pain during these experiments, the results are very beneficial to people.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Using animals as testing models for scientific research has become one of the serious issues in the world. According to Procon.org, almost 26 million animals are used for scientific testing every year in the United States, and more than 10 thousand animals died in those testing experiments. Many scientists believe that animal testing is necessary because it can help humans to develop more scientific research. However, the truth is that many animal testing experiments usually fail when they are used in humans. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because human’s DNA is not similar to animals, there have better ways, and animals have right.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should Be Banned

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    In research, scientists test on innocent animals when they could be testing on actual people that owe society a debt. Animal’s bodies are very different from humans. One difference is in digesting food animals digest food ten times faster. An animal's digestive system can break down chemicals that humans cannot. Drugs that scientist have proven to work on animals has failed in humans as in HIV drugs and cancer.

    Read More

More about Should Animal Testing Be Allowed

Open Document