Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influences that affect children and young children's development
Parents influence on child behavior
Distinguishing features of the notable short story of shirley jackson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Charles”
Short along with sweet; those two words could have been used to describe Laurie a preschooler, however, faster than a speeding passenger train, those two characteristics changed when Laurie started kindergarten. The short story of “Charles” was written by Shirley Jackson. The misbehavior of Laurie was influenced by his lack of attention from his parents due to the presence of another child. Laurie just happens to be the older sibling of the older brother of an infant sister, with no other known siblings. Throughout the story of “Charles”, Laurie is attending kindergarten. Laurie travels between school as well as home in this story taking place during the 1950s. The story circulates around the fact Laurie is not adjusting to attending kindergarten. Following the progress of Laurie in both dialogue along with the text in the story “Charles”, the reader is able to learn about his personality along with the impact of not
…show more content…
having a parental figure look out for him majority of the time. Rapidly, kindergarten began to impact Laurie momentously; Laurie speedily changed from an innocent preschooler to a ruthless kindergartener.
Within the first few lines of the short story, we learn about the changes of Laurie in the bridge from preschool to kindergarten. The reader was able to learn Laurie was quick to pick up the groove of kindergarten when the text states, “my sweet-voiced nursery-school tot replaced by a long-trousered, swaggering character who forgot to stop at the corner and wave good-bye to me” (Jackson 345). Laurie hurriedly adapted, or changed to accommodate the characteristics of a kindergarteners; therefore, changing is a character trait that follows Laurie throughout the tale of “Charles”. Laurie soon began to refer to a classmate with the name of Charles. Supposedly, Charles was a troublemaker who could not seem to figure out the way teachers were to be treated. No one other than Laurie was aware of who Charles was, yet the figure of Charles was significantly impacting the way Laurie adapted to
kindergarten. The figure which Laurie is referring to as Charles in his dramatic kindergarten experience actually happens to be Laurie himself. Each day as Laurie returns home for the midday meal from school, he often used rude, disrespectful explanations of the actions of a classmate, Charles. Charles’s actions often involved obnoxious wrong doing. The text, which is told from the mother’s point of view, describes “Charles bounced a see-saw on to the head of a little girl and made her bleed, and the teacher made him stay inside all during recess. Thursday Charles had to stand in the corner during story-time because he kept pounding his feet on the floor. Friday Charles was deprived of blackboard privileges because he threw chalk.” (346) in concern that her son’s education is being affected by this Charles figure; little to her knowledge, Charles is actually Laurie. Events such as the one listed above help us infer Charles is a troublesome young boy. All of the wrong Charles performed at school sprung upon his actions at home. The table manners of Charles started to deteriorate, yet his parents failed to think twice about it for they were focused on Charles’s infant sibling. Lack of attention allowed Charles to become a troublemaker at an intensely fast rate, little to the knowledge of his side-tracked parents, Laurie was actually the mischievous child Charles. Laurie’s family had heard many stories for multiple weeks in which he attended kindergarten, just enough time for the parents to be blatantly unaware of Laurie’s actions at school. Shirley Jackson has cleaver ways of incorporating context clues to slow that Laurie is Charles such as “Charles was an institution in our family; the baby was being a Charles when she cried all afternoon; Laurie did a Charles when he filled his wagon full of mud and pulled it through the kitchen” (348). As readers, we are able to identify Laurie as a troublesome, yet cleaver kindergartener for he was able to think up Charles as a cover story. Every day, not only did Charles’s actions became progressively worse, in addition Laurie thought up a cleaver cover story to tell to his parents to make them believe the Charles figure was not him. Laurie’s parents slowly started to notice a change in the behavior of their son, sparking interest in meeting the mother of Charles, yet the attention which their youngest child needed kept them from being able to attend a Parent-Teacher Association meeting at which she may have been able to meet to mother of the troublesome Charles figure. Within a short amount of time, Laurie’s parents would realize what Laurie had been up to during his lunch-time story telling from the past few weeks. The cause of Laurie’s misbehavior seems to be tied to his lack of parental attention in the presence of his infant sister. Laurie cleverly covered his misbehavior by referring to himself as a problem student with the name of Charles. Under his cover name, Laurie expressed to his parents all of the wrong he had performed throughout the school day. After about three weeks in kindergarten, the parents of Laurie began to suspect Laurie’s classmate, Charles, may be influencing Laurie’s behavior at home. The initial problem in the story was the fact that Laurie was having an excessive amount of trouble adjusting to kindergarten. In the end, Laurie’s teacher solved Laurie’s corrupt behavior by making him this the teacher’s assistant. As the story drew to a close, Laurie’s mom was finally able to attend a Parent-Teacher Association meeting. It was there she finally was informed, there is no Charles in kindergarten; Charles just happened to be her son, Laurie.
“You can’t Judge a book by its cover,” but you can judge it by its content. In the two stories: “Charles” which was written by Shirley Jackson, an American writer, who’s prominence was in the late 1940’s through the early 60’s and “The Open Window” which was written by H. H. Munro, also known as “Saki,” who was born in the United Kingdom and made his mark in the early 1900’s, took fairly different approaches to establishing a similar suspense and ending to their stories. This could possibly be attributed to the era in which the stores were written or may be variations in the author’s personalities or even geographical location, but at final conclusion Charles was the better story. The story Charles
... reader. Throughout the book, Charlie unfolds secrets and truths about the world and the society that he lives in; secrets and truths that cause him to grow up and transition into adulthood. He also makes a life changing decision and rebelled against was he thought was the right thing. This reflects his maturity and bravery throughout the journey he travels that summer. Charlie eyes suddenly become open to the injustice that the town of Corrigan demonstrates. He also comes to face the issue of racism; not only shown towards his best friend Jeffrey and the Lu family but to Jasper Jones as well. He realises the town of Corrigan is unwilling to accept outsiders. Charlie not only finds out things that summer about the people that surround him, but he also finds out who he is personally.
As the book opens, the reader learns about Charley’s disability. The author mentions about Charley’s peg leg, and then goes on to talk about how he came about to losing his leg. The lost leg can be interpreted in a very symbolic way. The loss of his leg signifies imbalance in his life. The fact that he lost it because of a gun beneath a “Rose” can also be interpreted as: the reason for his instability is his dead love, Rose. The character seems alienated, and Green uses Charley’s misfortunes to draw sympathy from the reader. Also, the author’s intention of mentioning that the bus and the passengers were departing could be to reemphasize Charley’s isolation. The author tends to list out Charley’s struggles and the events from the war to increase the effect left on the reader, emphasizing the grief in Charley’s life. As the passage progresses, the reader learns about the child who Charley ignores initially. However, the spatial description of Charley and the boy come to be very metaphoric. A key scene in the passage is that o...
Charlie’s whole life is included in this book. The book revolves around Charlie’s power. It’s so powerful, that her parents can’t even try to control it.
He comes home with stories of a boy named Charles, who is supposedly in his class and has terrible behavior. Some of Charles’s infamous feats are hitting the teacher, yelling in class, and saying bad words. Laurie also starts to exhibit these behaviors at home, and his parents are worried that Charles is a significant influence. As in turns out, after Laurie's mom goes to a PTA meeting, she finds out that there is no such student as Charles and that Laurie is Charles. Jackson plants a handful amount of clues throughout the story to hint the reader that Laurie is making up Charles and that it’s actually him. At the beginning of the story Laurie’s mom thinks,”my sweet-voiced nursery school tot replaced by a long-trousered, swaggering character who forgot to stop at the corner and wave good-bye to me.” This quote shows that Laurie is exhibiting impolite and “I’m just too cool” kind of behavior, similar to Charles behavior. This is foreshadowing because the author hinted the reader that Laurie is lying without actually revealing it.
One of the biggest challenges Francie faces while growing up is loneliness. As a young child living in a Brooklyn slum, Francie has no friends her age. The other children either find her too quiet or shun her for being different because of her extensive vocabulary. Betty Smith describes how most of Francie's childhood days are spent: "in the warm summer days the lonesome child sat on her stoop and pretended disdain for the group of children playing on the sidewalk. Francie played with her imaginary companions and made believe they were better than real children. But all the while her heart beat in rhythm to the poignant sadness of the song the children sang while walking around in a ring with hands joined." (106). Francie is lonely, and longs to be included. As Francie matures, she begins to experience a different kind of loneliness. Betty Smith portrays her feelings as she observes her neighborhood: "spring came early that year and the sweet warm nights made her restless. She walked up and down the streets and through the park. And wherever she went, she saw a boy and a girl together, walking arm-in-arm, sitting on a park bench with their arms around each other, standing closely and in silence in a vestibule. Everyone in the world but Francie had a sweetheart or a friend she seemed to be the only lonely one in Brooklyn without a friend." (403). Loneliness is a constant challenge for Francie but it is through her loneliness that she finds a new companion in her books. Francie reads as an alternative for her lack of friends and companions. It is through her love of reading that Francie develops her extensive, sophisticated vocabulary. Her books lead her into maturity and help her learn to be independent and overcome her many hardships.
Soon however, Charlie would encounter challenges he never faced with the intelligence of a 6 year old. Before his surgery, Charlie had great friends in Miss Kinnian and the bakery workers. After the surgery, the relationship between Charlie and everyone he knew would take a drastic turn. A growing problem for Charlie’s is his extremely mixed emotions toward the opposite gender. He starts a serious relationship with Alice Kinnian, his former teacher.
Shirley Jackson was born on December 14, 1919 to Leslie and Geraldine Jackson. Her surroundings were comfortable and friendly. Two years after Shirley was born, her family with her newborn brother moved from San Francisco to Burlingame, California, about thirty miles away. "According to her mother, Shirley began to compose verse almost as soon as she could write it" (Friedman, 18). As a child, Shirley was interested in sports and literature. In 1930, a year before she attended Burlingame High School, Shirley began writing poetry and short stories. Jackson enrolled in the liberal arts program at the University of Rochester in 1934. But after periods of unhappiness and questioning the loyalty of her friends, she withdrew from the university. For the next year Shirley worked night and day on her writing. In doing so she established work habits, which she maintained for the rest of her life. After a year of becoming conscientious and disciplined writer, Jackson thought she better return to college for more schooling. In 1937, she entered Syracuse University. At first she was in the School of Journalism, but then she decided to transfer to the English department. For the next two years, while at Syracuse, Shirley published, fifteen pieces in campus magazines and became fiction editor of "The Syracusan", a campus humor magazine. When her position as fiction editor was eliminated, she and fellow classmate Stanley Edgar Hyman began to plan a magazine of literary quality, one that the English Club finally agreed to sponsor. (Friedman, 21) In 1939, the first edition of "The Spectre" was published. Although the magazine became popular, the English department didn't like the biting editorials and critical essays. But inspite of the department's constant watch over the magazine, Leonard Brown, a modern literature teacher, backed the students and the publication. Later, Jackson was always to refer to Brown as her mentor; and in 1959 she dedicated her novel "The Haunting of Hill House" to him.(Oppenheimer, 45) But in the summer of 1940, since Jackson and Hyman were graduating, it was announced the "The Spectre" had been discontinued. "Apparently hard feelings on the part of school authorities lasted for quite some time and may have been one of the reasons why neither Miss Jackson, even after becoming a successful author, nor Mr. Hyman, a known critic, was named as a recipi...
Laurie, the obnoxious boy, had a daily routine of going home and telling stories about the rude boy Charles in his class. In fact, one story that he recited was, “Charles was so fresh to the teacher's friend he wasn’t let do exercises.” This is included because it is conveying that the truth about Charles is right in front of them, who he is, what he does, and how he acts. Although, this is not exactly authorities trying to find out the truth about the murder it is still demonstrating the theme, the most obvious clue about who Charles is, is right in front of them, they just need to open their eyes. Eventually, the next parent night comes up, Laurie’s mom is anxious to meet Charles and his mother but what she finds out there is no Charles it is a astonishing surprise. “‘Charles?’ She said. ‘We don’t have any Charles in the kindergarten’” This is helping us infer the ending, that Laurie is actually Charles. And Charles was right in front of them the whole time, once again in arms reach but they did not realize it, they figured out the obvious in the end however, in Lamb to the Slaughter they never found out who it was. The sweetest person to them, really was the one who was disobedient. In conclusion, although, the plot in “Charles” was different, they still demonstrated the same theme through events that happen.
Shirley Jackson was born in San Francisco on December 14, 1916, a year prior to the U.S. entering World War I. It was a very tumultuous time in the world and especially influential in Ms. Jackson’s life as she developed through childhood. Events of the time that may have influenced Ms. Jackson’s view of society when growing up included the introduction of prohibition, the Roaring 20’s, women’s suffrage, and the advent of the Great Depression. Women were beginning to exercise their independence and more exciting opportunities to develop creativity as a female finally seemed a real possibility.
None other than little Charles Wallace demonstrates the first example of love being expressed in this novel. During the dark and stormy night that starts the book, Meg becomes afraid of the wind and the thunder, and decides to go downstairs for a cup of cocoa. Charles Wallace is already awake and has warmed the milk for the chocolate. However, this is not the only thing done by little Charles Wallace. ""You put in more than twice enough milk." Meg peered into the saucepan. Charles Wallace nodded serenely. "I thought Mother might like some"" (L'Engle 8). He even makes sandwiches for both Mrs. Murray and Meg. Charles Wallace is only five years old, yet he knows when his sister is in need of companionship, and is happy to do things for Mrs.
Born in San Francisco, in the year of 1916, Shirley Jackson had an inauspicious entrance to the world, despite the chilling nature of her writing. She moved two years after she was born to Burlingame, California, where she resided for most of her childhood. When she was 17, she began to attend the University of Rochester, she only spent a year there, as after a time of questioning her friend’s loyalty and long periods of unhappiness, she left the school for a year, practicing writing almost religiously, with a minimum of one thousand words every day. In 1937, she entered Syracuse University, at first pursuing a degree in journalism before transferring to the English department.
The characters in a short story are vital to understanding everything that the author has put into her work. Most of Shirley Jackson’s characters in “The Lottery” adapt as the story goes on, revealing their true opinions and behaviors. Her characters are also true to life, which establishes realism in her stories. Tess, Old Man Warner, and the women of this story all provide outlooks and opinions that shape “The Lottery” into the constructive story it is.
He has grown up relatively normally up until the day his Aunt Helen died, that is when his life changed. He distanced himself and constantly put himself in the hospital. When the book begins, Charlie is about to start his freshman year in high school. Charlie’s writing letters to someone he does not know, and these are what make up the entire book. Within the first few chapters you learn that he does not enjoy being in high school, though he makes two new friends, Sam and Patrick.
When Charles was nine years old, his father had enrolled him into Shrewsbury school in Shrewsbury, England. He did not enjoy most of the curriculum in which the sch...