Sherman Alexie Should Not Be Banned In Schools

639 Words2 Pages

Growing up many kids were told consistently to read. That books were valuable and beneficial to education. However a woman by the name of Meghan Cox Gurdon challenged this idea by expressing her opinion in the article “Darkness Too Visible” (The Wall Street Journal). She spoke about many books including The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie, about how the novels were too dark to be read in school by teenagers and that it wasn’t right for many to read such depicting descriptions of events. This is not true. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie should not be banned in schools because it is relatable, educational, and it brings attention to subjects that would otherwise not be spoken about. …show more content…

Alexie discusses bullying, abuse and racism. Junior deals with bullying everyday in the novel. Racism is tied into that also. Many people at Junior’s new school bullied him because he was indian. He dealt with that not only there but everywhere outside of the reservation. Sherman Alexie wrote about the reason behind his books in his letter responding to Ms. Gurdon’s article, “now I write books for teenagers because I vividly remember what it felt like to be a teen facing everyday and epic dangers.” (Alexie, par. 27). He narrates these stories to relate to teenagers and their struggles.

However his stories also could provide teens with the opposite, giving them ideas that they didn’t previously had. If a teenager was depressed and read about another teen that was also depressed, who then committed suicide, it might cause them to think about commiting suicide. But at the same time “reading about homicide doesn’t turn a man into a murderer; reading about cheating on exams won’t make a kid break the honor code” (“Darkness Too Visible”, Par. 6). While the novel may give teenagers a new viewpoint on sensitive topics it also doesn’t “make” or force them to do

Open Document