Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Shawshank Redemption Movie Analysis Essay
The shawshank redemption analysis essay
The shawshank redemption analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Shawshank Redemption Movie Analysis Essay
The genre that Shawshank Redemption fits into the closest would be a mix between mystery and film noir, because it isn’t fully mysterious but it does leave you wondering what will happen next. The film fits into a mystery category but is a flexible genre because it allows for adaptation of the film because there are not any film’s that are about prison life from a third party point of view that involves redemption but not in the way you would expect it. The Shawshank Redemption is more of a sub-genre film, not fitting into any particular genre film. Also it is a film noir which a “Film noir literally means "black film" in French, and applies to stories treating dark themes, shady characters, and more often than not, physically dark settings with much of the action occurring at night. Low–key, high–contrast lighting and strong use of diagonal, expressionistic patterns and odd camera angles are common in noir films.” (Goodykoontz, & Jacobs, 2011, Ch. Mysteries & Film Noir).
Application of at least one approach to analysis and interpretation
The symptomatic content that can be used is the Marxist approach which “would examine how the plot and characters in a film reflect Karl Marx’s sociopolitical views on class conflict, labor vs. management, oppressive governments, and more. Typically a Marxist approach will identify instances of everyday people struggling to survive in the face of some unsympathetic authority.” (Goodykoontz, & Jacobs, 2011 Ch.10.3). Contextualist and structuralist seems the most appropriate to use when analyzing the Shawshank Redemption. The way that contextualist is appropriate is because one of the approaches that is used is the dualist approach. The dualist approach “tries to identify pairs of opposites in a ...
... middle of paper ...
...cting the key points that were discussed were if the director shows technical competence and interior meaning and if the director’s point of view was evident. For Impact we have went over if the film made you feel like you were escaping your own life, as well as were there any scene’s that were censored. In genre we went over which category of genre or sub-genre the film fits closest in and why. While analyzing this film we discussed what approaches to analysis seems the most appropriate to use.” (Formalist, contextualist, structuralist, auteurist, realist, generic).” (Goodykoontz, & Jacobs, 2011 Ch. 10). I hope that if you have seen this film that you also felt all of the different emotions that this film is capable of provoking. If not one can only hope that when you do walk away from this film you will stop to think and realize that maybe your life isn’t that bad.
Braudy, Leo and Marshall Cohen, eds. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.
Shawshank Redemption is quite the intriguing movie when pertaining to sociology. This particular movie focuses on socialization, as well as desocialization and resocialization.
The movie Shawshank Redemption depicts the story of Andy Dufresne, who is an innocent man that is sentenced to life in prison. At Shawshank, both Andy and the viewers, witness typical prison subculture.
Juror #1 originally thought that the boy was guilty. He was convinced that the evidence was concrete enough to convict the boy. He continued to think this until the jury voted the first time and saw that one of the jurors thought that the boy was innocent. Then throughout the movie, all of the jurors were slowly convinced that the boy was no guilty.
The Shawshank Redemption is a 1997 drama film which takes place in a prison during the late 40’s. The film focuses on Andy Dufresne’s transition from his old life as banker to becoming a prisoner in the Shawshank penitentiary. The life shown in the Shawshank penitentiary is similar to that of normal society such as norms, economic transactions, and functions both prisoners and the officials. The roles the prisoners and officials take shows that Functionalism does not only take place in a normal functioning society, it also takes place in a total institution such as the prison shown in the film.
John Gibbs and Douglas Pye (2005) Style and meaning : studies in the detailed analysis of film. Engalnd: Manchester University Press, pp 42-52.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Frank Darabont (writer-director-producer) in 1999, returned to the director’s chair for the first time in five years. Darabont, who not only directed Shawshank Redemption, but adapted it from a Stephen King story, followed the exact same path with The Green Mile. The film was released by Warner Bros. Pictures, and Produced by Castle Rock Entertainment, Darkwoods Productions, and Warner Bros. David Valdes is the producer, David Tattersall, B.S.C. is the director of photography, Terence Marsh is the production designer, and Richard Francis-Bruce is the film editor.
In his essay, “It’s Just a Movie: A Teaching Essay for Introductory Media Classes”, Greg M. Smith argues that analyzing a film does not ruin, but enhances a movie-viewing experience; he supports his argument with supporting evidence. He addresses the careful planning required for movies. Messages are not meant to be telegrams. Audiences read into movies to understand basic plotlines. Viewers should examine works rather than society’s explanations. Each piece contributes to Smith’s argument, movies are worth scrutinizing.
One can learn from Tony’s mistakes. One can learn that family comes first. Society can also learn that taking shortcuts in life sometimes lead to a dead ends with no u-turns. This film showcases the time line of how a drug lord could rise to power from nothing. This film also shows how that same power one gets from becoming a drug lord could be taken at any time. Studying how to analyze a movie has definitely changed my perspective on how I view movies. I actually look at all the detailing in movies. I look at the camera angles and how they affect the scene. I even start to question why the director did not use a different angle for certain shots. By using film theories and criticism one can generate enough ideas in order to understand the movie better. When a film is being captured the director focuses on certain angles and lights to get the meaning of the scene to the audience. Just like everything in life has a meaning, everything in film also has a comparison meaning. This course has widen my intellect on how movies affect our societies. Movies can play a major role in how we act or how laws are even created. Movies has the same power as music. I say movies has the same power because one can look at a movie and want to become whatever he or she saw in the movie. One major skills that I developed in this course is being able to focus. Before this course, I could not focus on anything at all. I was the type to focus on three or
...r, with investigation into the visual elements of this film, meanings of this film expand beyond the literal dialog and -- existing in the film.
The film’s story does not simply shines forth, but is also the foundation of the plot. The film’s plot makes the traditional guidelines applicable...
“Entertainment has to come hand in hand with a little bit of medicine, some people go to the movies to be reminded that everything’s okay. I don’t make those kinds of movies. That, to me, is a lie. Everything’s not okay.” - David Fincher. David Fincher is the director that I am choosing to homage for a number of reasons. I personally find his movies to be some of the deepest, most well made, and beautiful films in recent memory. However it is Fincher’s take on story telling and filmmaking in general that causes me to admire his films so much. This quote exemplifies that, and is something that I whole-heartedly agree with. I am and have always been extremely opinionated and open about my views on the world and I believe that artists have a responsibility to do what they can with their art to help improve the culture that they are helping to create. In this paper I will try to outline exactly how Fincher creates the masterpieces that he does and what I can take from that and apply to my films.
How do movies affect our brain? Is the movie culture directing our thoughts in a certain path? Do movies change our behavior? Do movies carry a certain message? Perhaps a warning? These are all questions that we don’t normally give much thought to when we watch a film. However, it is important to employ our critical thinking skills when we analyze a movie we just watched.