Shared Leadership Paper

830 Words2 Pages

The article “Nurses’ views of shared leadership in ICU: A case study” by Kristina Rosengren, Terese Bondas, Lena Nordholm and Gun Nordström (2010) is chosen for this paper to study share leadership. In the article, authors illustrate that a new management method was developed which called shared leadership. This management model means there are two managers work together and share jobs and duties for one department. It was used in Sweden’s ICU and after that, authors done a 72 item questionnaire for registered and assistant nurses to measure their attitudes towards social and organisational issues especially this new model. The shared leadership gained a positive response and well influenced employees’ confidence. However, as a new leadership …show more content…

It provides every staff the right to join the process of decision-making. The advantages of shared leadership could help to improve work environments, increase job satisfaction and reduce turnover rates. By using shared leadership in physician’s area, jobs of nurses could be improved by share ideas with others, cooperation and gain respect from each other. George (1999) and Walker (2001) created the new shared leadership model and encourage this model to be used in nurses’ work. It is true that in ICU department, shared leadership could be seen as a good strategy to define and solve problems. Good relationship building is an important strategy for shared leadership. However, this article came up with some negative points for shared leadership model. According to George et al. (2002) the barrier of the model are lacking of cooperation, responsibility and insufficient manage, increasing demands of work, high turnover which lead to a non-responsive working environment. The authors also suggest that it takes time for staff to adapt themselves to the immature model. This model is an ongoing and developing process which requires organisations to do sustaining evaluations (Jackson, …show more content…

They choose a certain unit in Sweden’s ICU which includes 81 employees (49 registerd nurses ,32 assistant nurses). From the perspective of the choice of location, authors chosen a warm which had been used shared leadership model for 3 years to provided questionnaire with a relatively stable and mature environment. Period of three years is a reasonable time for the ICU in Sweden to find out the advantages and disadvantages for the share leadership. From the choosing of certain nurses’ backgrounds, all the sample nurses came from the ward where implement shared leadership process. All the 81 caregivers were employed no less than 3 months and worked as a minimum 50% full time employees. This could ensure all the samples had enouth time to work under shared leadership. The questionnaires were sent to the mailboxes of the certain sample staff and ensure them would not be identifiable. There are 72 items under 6 dimensions: organisational culture, social interactions, work satisfaction, leadership,shared leadership and work motives. In addision, four questions concerning the shared leadership and eight background variables were added in the questionnaires. The authors used median and range to calculate statistics and the result about shared leadership was positive. It was most described as support, justice and empowerment. However, there were some difference between registered nurses and assistant nurses, male

Open Document