Shakespeare And Oedipus

267 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Oedipus the king by sophocles essay

Shakespeare’s view of fate seems similar to that of Sophocles in Oedipus because their characters’ fates are connected to prophecies while their different views are expressed through the characters responses. For instance, Shakespeare and Sophocles views of fate seem loosely based on scripture, “…all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be” (NIV Ps.139:16). Also, both prophecies are negative, resulting in death. For example, in Shakespeare’s play, Caesar tells Brutus about his wife’s dream: CAESAR. She dreamt to-night she saw my statua, Which, like a fountain with an hundred spouts, Did run pure blood: and many lusty Romans Came smiling, and did bathe their hands in it: (Shakespeare 2.2.1055-60) And

Show More
Related

  • Oedipus the King

    461 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the play, Oedipus the King, blindness is used metaphorically and physically to characterize several personas , and the images of clarity and vision are used as symbols for knowledge and insight. Enlightenment and darkness are used in much the same manner, to demonstrate the darkness of ignorance, and the irony of vision without sight.

    Read More

  • Oedipus The King

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Undoubtedly there has been a tremendous amount of speculation and dissection of this play by countless people throughout the ages. I can only draw my own conclusions as to what Sophocles intended the meaning of his play to be. The drama included a number of horrific and unthinkable moral and ethical dilemas, but I believe that was what made the play so interesting and that is exactly the way Sophocles intended it to be. The play was obviously meant to entertain and portray the author’s own insight. The underlying theme to the play is that no man should know his own destiny, it will become his undoing. This knowledge of things to come was presented to both Laius and Oedipus in the form of prophecies well in advance of it coming to be. The prophecies told of things that were so morally disturbing that they both aggressively did everything in their power to try and stop them from coming true. The story begins with Oedipus at the height of power as King of Thebes. His kingdom has encountered rough times and he has sent his nobleman Creon to seek help from the god Apollo to restore his land. Creon tells Oedipus that he must find the murderer of the previous King Laius and by finding this man and banishing him, his land will be restored. The murder occurred some time ago and King Oedipus sends for the seer Theiresias with his powers of prophecy to aid in the search for the murderer. Sophocles cleverly projects his feelings on wisdom and knowledge through Teirsias when he says “Alas, how terrible is wisdom when it brings no profit to the man that’s wise!”(23) Teirsias knows that this terrible prophecy has already been set into motion and the damage has already been done. There is really no point in telling it to Oedipus because it will only cause more harm than good. Oedipus provokes Teirsias into telling him the prophecy, “ Í tell you, king, this man, this murderer-he is here. In name he is a stranger among citizens but soon he will be shown to be a citizen true native Theban, and he’ll have no joy of the discovery: blindness for sight and beggary for riches his exchange, he shall go journeying to a foreign country tapping his way befor him with a stick.

    Read More

  • Comparison of Oedipus and Hamlet

    1320 Words  | 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast Oedipus and Hamlet. Is Oedipus more a man of action? Or is he more a man driven by whim and sudden, rash decisions? Which character is more selfless? Does Hamlet show any signs of selfish motives in his actions or inactions? Which protagonist seems more learned? wiser? more religious? more loving? more incestuous? Which seems to be a better murder investigator? Does Oedipus have any of Claudius' motives when he kills the king, Laius? Then which murderer is more blameworthy--Oedipus or Claudius?

    Read More

  • Oedipus the King

    547 Words  | 2 Pages

    Aristotle defined a tragic story as the adventure of a good man who reaches his ultimate downfall because he pushed his greatest quality too far. Sophocles advocates the definition in the tragic play Oedipus Rex. He develops the play with the great polarities of fame and shame, sight and blindness, and ignorance and insight to show Oedipus’ experiences in search for knowledge about his identity. Through his search, Oedipus pushes his quest for truth too far and ultimately reaches his doom. Oedipus’ reliance on his intellect is his greatest strength and ultimate downfall.

    Read More

  • Oedipus And Othello

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    rapidly, it may not be indicated by the script that it has changed, and was most

    Read More

  • Oedipus the King: Oedipus And The Gods

    2182 Words  | 5 Pages

    The idea of fate has existed for a long time and exists even today. Fate revolves around the idea that people's lives are predetermined and that no matter what is done it cannot be changed. With the gods it was used to explain events that seemed strange. Sophocles expands on this idea by introducing Oedipus' fate. The thought of fate is strong considering no matter how hard he struggles he still receives what was predetermined. As a baby he survived the elements on Mount Cithaeron. As Oedipus was destined to live, it shows the dominance of fate. Having fate play such a large part of the play is certainly an insight into the Greek's idea that fate controls us no matter how hard we struggle against it.

    Read More

  • Relationship Between Prophecy And Oedipus

    236 Words  | 1 Pages

    The relationship Sophocles establishes between prophecy and Oedipus’s actions is Oedipus attempted to escape Apollo’s prophecy, but by doing this he accidentally fulfilled Teiresias's prophecy that he would kill Laius.

    Read More

  • William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sophocles' Oedipus the King

    1377 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sophocles’ Oedipus King and Shakespeare's Hamlet both contain the basic elements of tragedy, although the Shakespearean tragedy expanded its setting far beyond that of the ancient Greek tragedy. The tragic hero of Hamlet finds himself burdened with the task of avenging his father's death from the start of the play, and is not himself the source of the pollution of regicide, while Oedipus is of course the unwitting fashioner of his own doom, which is unveiled to him through recognition and repentance.

    Read More

  • Comparing Oedipus and Job

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Oedipus The King, Sophocles presents a view of life fixed by fate. This fate, predetermined by the gods, is the sole factor in deciding human destiny. Tiresias expresses his understanding of the unchangeable fate of Oedipus, laid out by the gods, as he argues with the King about revealing the truth of all the Theban troubles. When Oedipus, frustrated by the lack of cooperation, insults Tiresias, he responds "I pity you, flinging at me the very insults / each man here will fling at you so soon."(322) Even more telling of the fated existence of Sophocles' characters is Jocasta's revelation of prophecies given before Oedipus' birth which foretold all that the gods had in store, which had indeed come to pass (332).

    Read More

  • Free Will vs Fate: A Study of Oedipus Rex

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Fate is the belief that a person's life is being controlled by destiny while free will is the belief that a person's life is being controlled by themselves where they choose how to live their life and without an external force. Although this topic has divided people for many centuries, many famous poets and authors have used this to their advantage. One example of fate versus free will is Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. Oedipus Rex should be considered to be categorized as a free will drama because of several events that happen that shows Oedipus free will, such as the example of the messenger telling Jocasta the good news, 2“MESSENGER: The people of Isthmus will choose Oedipus to be their king. That is the rumor there.” (1061-1062) The Messenger

    Read More

  • Sophocles Ideals Between Prophecy And Oedipus The King

    236 Words  | 1 Pages

    The relationship Sophocles establishes between prophecy and Oedipus’s actions is Oedipus attempted to escape Apollo’s prophecy, but by doing this he accidentally fulfilled Teiresias's prophecy that he would kill Laius.

    Read More

  • Oedipus Rex Fate Vs Free Will Essay

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    When analyzing “Oedipus Rex”, the concept of Fate vs. Free-will is incredibly prevalent. Even though free-will could potentially have contributed to the outcomes of the situations presented in the story, Sophocles wrote “Oedipus Rex” as commentary to the Greeks' lack of regard for the fate bestowed upon them by the gods. This is exhibited throughout the play in many cases, most notably when Teiresias, the blind, noble prophet, and speaker of the truth is condescended upon simply because Oedipus is unhappy with the repulsive events to which he has been made aware of, Oedipus's constant need for justification as to why the oracles are false and correlational occurrences are mere coincidence, and Jocasta and Oedipus’ blatant ignorance of the oracles and the evidence of the prophecies being accomplished ultimately ruined them.

    Read More

  • Free Will In Sophocles Oedipus The King

    293 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the Greek tragedy, Oedipus the King by Sophocles, Oedipus’ prophecy and hubris bring the epic downfall of his character. While it is impossible to avoid fate, the way one responds to fate is a matter of free will.

    Read More

  • Sophocles Oedipus The King-Fate Vs Free Will

    461 Words  | 1 Pages

    The play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the theme of the tragedy is will vs fate that by the decisions that one make, one can change our fate or, start our predestined destinies. The theme will vs fate in the play involves in many events that led to the tragedy by the characters' will on prophecies and start their fate.

    Read More

  • Oedipus and Tiresias

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    Oedipus and Tiresias, characters of Sophocles' play "Oedipus Tyrannus," are propelled to their individual destinies by their peculiar relationships with truth. Paranoid and quick to anger Oedipus, is markedly different from the confident and self-assured Tiresias. In the dialogue between the two men, Oedipus rapidly progresses from praise of Tiresias as a champion and protector of Thebes in line 304, to blatantly accusing the blind prophet of betraying the city in line 331, to angrily insulting him in line 334. Rather than be intimidated by the protagonist's title and temperament, Tiresias draws strength from what he knows is true and is able to stand his ground.

    Read More

More about Shakespeare And Oedipus

Open Document