Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of globalization on bollywood films in india
Globalisation and indian cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of globalization on bollywood films in india
In the pre 1990s in India, the injustice of the nation state caused directors and producers to release movies like Sholay where the hero gets introduced to fight the injustice that are shown towards the lower class. The hero uses vulgarity and uncleanness to fight he system. However, in the post 1990s, Bollywood movies were introduced and Karan Johar films (KJo) attracted many social classes and members of the diaspora creating emotions and memories of the homeland. He introduced Shah Rukh Khan using the clean and more family oriented movies that reflects the “Indian Culture” in the diaspora. KJO films not only use the homeland to film these movies, but he also started using many exotic places and sceneries like the US, London and Australia. The South Asian Indian Diasporas followed these KJo films, to fulfill their nostalgic memories to define Indian identity. The Indian nation state approved of these films due to the revenue and the NRI that were investing in the India. KJo films started to become popular in Bollywood by creating urban cosmopolitan romances and family dramas starring Shah Rukh Khan.
Shah Rukh Khan has been the star in the Bollywood, representing the post liberalization of India. He has starred many movies including movies that were played in the diaspora. He is also known as the contemporary star in Bollywood. “Through a diaspora assessment of Pardes, Dudrah foregrounds the centrality of Shak Rukh khan as a contemporary star in Bollywood.” (Thakur, 125) This is because he offers desires which intercedes in the homeland and diaspora through on and off screen performances, using his body to articulate and adapt particular kinds of social and economic desires. By viewing his performances it helps us to understand ...
... middle of paper ...
...n persona and helped transform the actor into brand.” (Chopra) Chopra, supports that Shah Rukh Khan’s popular is widely known not only through his films but as well as many of his advertisement. Shah Rukh Khan continues to be wooed and praising by not only the older generation but as well as now because of his character both on screen and off screen. He came this sensational model for the diaspora and as well as those living in the homeland, India.
This argument is important to make that Shah Rukh Khan in fact shows that it is possible to be both Indian at heart whole embracing different culture around the diaspora. We do not need to choose between the Indian culture versus another, but Indian culture can still be carried around the world, and Shah Rukh Khan in his movies show both the articulation and the motility that can be done in the diaspora and the homeland.
The film Jindabyne, is a story about death, marriage, and race in an Australian town in New South Wales called Jindabyne. In the film, four men go fishing, and one of them discovers the dead body of a young indigenous girl. Instead of reporting what they found to the police immediately, they decide to stay and continue fishing. They decide that there is nothing they could do for her, so they tie her legs to a tree and continue with their fishing, reporting the death only when they return home. After they are done with their weekend of fishing and report the incident, conflict starts, as the men are criticized for not respecting the dead. Through the story of the town’s reaction to the four fishermen’s response to the dead girl, the movie shows Australia to be fragmented and divided over white-indigenous relations.
Murderball successfully conveys the emotion and mentality of people with disability. In this movie, Mark Zupan and Joe Soares prove that disability may put them at a disadvantage, but as long as they have a will they can make something out of their life. Their competition is a huge indicator of their mentality of not giving up. However, there are some contradiction to how actors are portrayed. In the beginning Zupan is referred as an “asshole” and a “jock” by his friends, but later he is seen attaching to Keith Cavill- a new quadriplegic patient who is in denial of the accident- at emotional level and giving him motivation to accept his life and move on. Similarly, Soares behaves like he
fragmented by the interruptions of song and dance, lending a sense of unreality. I believe Mira Nair successfully achieved her aim to make a Bollywood film on her own terms. As a director, she effectively combined the techniques of sound, editing, costume, colour and location to produce a fairly unique Bollywood film. Her message of the continuing modernisation of India, and her criticisms of both the societies she illustrates in the film comes across clearly, as do the more controversial points she brings up that Bollywood, as a film industry, does not typically address. Its appeal and effectiveness can be measured by the huge range of global audiences it has attracted, both Western and Eastern, which indicates that she accomplished her goal of making a realistic movie, breaking the traditional Bollywood mould.
In addition to, the main actors in the film looked the part and associated with the main idea of the culture of an Indian family. For instance, Samir’s appearance showed he had drifted away from his family’s culture and developed a professional understanding and love for the cooking industry. Farida’s appearance showed she was highly involved with her
becomes a connection to the ideal Afghanistan, the Afghanistan lost after so many years of war. Afghani expatriates seek connections that link them to their homeland, Rahim Khan becomes Amir’s connection to both his homeland and his inner self.
There were similarities between how the family dynamic operated in the film versus the text. The kinship system is similar to the U.S. system used today, which is bilateral, meaning both sides of the family of the parents are recognized. The nuclear family is the basic social unit composed of the mother, father, and children. Polygamous marriage was common among arctic people involving a second wife that was generally the sister of the first. Arranged marriages were also common between men in their late teens and women near puberty.Marriages were essential for survival due to the harsh environment.The film portrayed many interactions between family members involving husband and wife, father and son, mother and child, and between siblings. In
Dubey,A.P. (2008). Modernity and the problem of cultural identity. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre Publications
Religion and human nature combined tend to create a superiority complex among those who perceive themselves as having better, or more, faith. Religion is generally perceived as singular, but humans choose to dynamically express their faith, whether that be by love or war. Gandhi, depicted the movie Gandhi directed by Richard Attenborough, in the face of Muslims protesting Hindus, declared: “I am a Muslim and a Hindu and a Christian and a Jew and so are all of you,” and that perception of himself and others influenced a mass ethnic and religious revolution that enlightened India. Gandhi opened the world to revolutionary ideas -- the strength in tolerance, the pluralism in religion, and the unification of all mankind.
There are numerous methods to store and present information, each with their own benefits and drawbacks. As a result of this, whenever a creative work is adapted into a new medium, the source material is altered to optimize the communication of the original ideas. After reading the novel The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini and analysing the merits and faults of the film adaptation, it can be concluded that the adaptation deserves praise. This assertion is based on the success of three elements employed by the filmmakers when converting the novel to film, notably, the exclusion of unnecessary plot, the representation of Afghan culture, and the interpretation of major scenes. While there are several reasons to hold this film in high esteem,
Since the creation of films, their main goal was to appeal to mass audiences. However, once, the viewer looks past the appearance of films, the viewer realizes that the all-important purpose of films is to serve as a bridge connecting countries, cultures, and languages. This is because if you compare any two films that are from a foreign country or spoken in another language, there is the possibility of a connection between the two because of the fact that they have a universally understanding or interpretation. This is true for the French New Wave films; Contempt and Breathless directed by Jean-Luc Godard, and contemporary Indian films; Earth and Water directed by Deepa Mehta. All four films portray an individual’s role in society using sound and editing.
The reason India came second is due to criticism of the characters extent knowledge of English, which contrast the paradigm of the movie, therefore only increased in profit once the Hindi version was released. Nevertheless, the movie was highly valued by many critics and audiences in the world. Ratings sites such as Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a 94% and world renowned film critic, Roger Ebert, gave the film 4/4 stars and describes the film to be a “phenomenon” due to its “dazzling cinematography, breathless editing, driving music and headlong momentum..”. Many were able to agree with Mr. Ebert however there were certain elements of the film that left the Indian public unsatisfied with the portrayal such as Amitabh Bachlan,
In this way, Salman Rushdie presents the derogatory picture of India throughout the novel preferring the superiority of what is European and inferiority of what is not. By presenting the orientalist perception of India, Rushdie attempts to attract the western readership. In spite of the fact that he himself is an Indian, he could not avoid the attraction of western readership. For this reason, sometimes, his position becomes ambivalent.
The film Maharaja Gemunu is based on the story of King Dutugemunu (161 BC to 137 BC) and King Elara (205 BC to 161 BC) who invaded Sri Lanka from Chola (South India). This is a film which represents the ancient Anuradhapura Kingdom and cultures of Sinhalese and Tamils of Sri Lanka. In this film 1500 clothes have been made which has to be stitched and almost 3000 people have been costumed with a budget of sixty-eight lacks. Mr.Aruna priyantha, Telephone interview , 22.04.2016
Kapoor.” He is the man who will attract the audience to the film as he
Performance artist Hetain Patel asserts the importance of having a strong understanding in one’s own culture and of embracing cultural differences. He first questions us, “How do we decide who we are?” in his TED talk, "Who am I, Think again". His artw...