Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biological factors influencing sexual orientation
Sociological theories behind sexual offending
Theories for sexual offenders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Biological factors influencing sexual orientation
offenders, as well as whether deviant sexual interest is the purpose for offending, or based on other internal links of criminality.
In addition to this, behaviour of offenders can described as sexual deviant arousal. Becker (1998); Lalumiere and Quinsey (1994) state that individuals who are able to maintain a sexual relationship or feelings with unsuitable stimuli, such as, animals, objects or children, are more likely to commit crimes of sexual assault based on their sexual desires. The behaviours of sexual offenders can be interlinked with (Pavlov 1927; Skinner; 1932) role of classical and operant conditioning to suggest behaviours of sexual offending and deviant sexual arousal. Self-regulation behavioural factors can inhibit deviant sexual
…show more content…
Furthermore, besides behavioural theorists, the regulatory of mood states can also influence deviant sexual behaviour. Anxiety, depression and low self-esteem can reinforce sexual activities due to the inability to cope with strong emotional stressors, causing offenders to use sexual stimulation to regulate their mood and hormones efficiently, most commonly known as a coping strategy (Maletzky, 1993).
Furthermore, societal issues can influence and contribute to a fundamental factor related to the reasons behind committing sexual offences. Clarke and Cornish (1985) propose that although there is a rational choice framework implemented, the decision making process can differ depending on which type of crime offenders choose to commit. Clarke and Cornish (1986) further research stated that the theory should be
…show more content…
Moreover, sex offending can also be argued that paedophilia is seen as a sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is an innate response of prenatal factors that influence the sexual orientation of individuals through development and environmental processes (Dresher and Zucker, 2006). Bailey (2002) concludes that sexual orientation is also influenced by prenatal factors and biological and neuroanatomical responses are highly significant to paedophilia. Whereas, Marshall (2008) social construction of paedophilia can be associated with poor relationships formed with adults, suggesting a stronger level of communication and interaction is formed with young adults or children, although individuals may be unaware of their intentions in the first instance, sexual interest in children can be discovered as early as in their adolescents, however, Marshall (2008) also states that paedophilic preferences can differ over time. Furthermore, Marshall (1997) conducted a study to examine offender’s pre-post arousal to children, it was reported that offenders showed greater interest to children, as opposed to adults, the result of this study identified that offenders were clinically assessed and diagnosed with paedophilia. Whether this examination was ethically conducted accurately, (Hari, 2001) statement differs from this and states that paedophilia is a complex issue, as there are a
Worling, J .(2012). The assessment and treatment of deviant sexual arousal with adolescents who have offended sexually. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(1), 36-63. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2011.630152
Many etiological theories exist attempting to explain the root causes of sexual offending. Although few provide substantial evidence and no definitive conclusions have been made, the social learning theory has been proposed to account for sex offending behaviors. Specifically, the social learning theory, or victim-to-victimizer theory, suggests sexually abused children learn these behaviors and are much more likely to perpetrate abuse when they’re older (Seto & Lalumiere, 2010). The following studies have provided substantial support for the social learning etiology. Through the use of a meta-analysis, Seto and Lalumiere (2010) concluded that sexual offending is tied to prior sexual abuse. Burton, Miller, and Shill (2002) discovered significant differences between sexual offending and nonsexual offending adolescents in the areas of sexual abuse. Lastly, Burton (2003) determined that sex offender’s methods of abuse mimicked that which was done to them. The introduction, method, results, and discussion of each study is addressed and the link between prior sexual abuse and future sex offending behaviors become apparent.
This theory asserts that pedophiles see themselves as children, and in turn feel most comfortable with children (Batrol & Batrol, 2014, p. 394). McaPhil and colleagues (2013) found that high emotional congruence with children was most strongly associated with sexual pre-occupation in which sex was used as a means to cope with negative emotions as well as deviant sexual interests and cognitions that support child molestation. Loneliness and social rejection were also found to be associated with emotional congruence with children. In support of previous theories, emotional congruence with children was also associated with problems in sexual self-regulation. Moreover, Stinson et al. (2008) found that self-regulatory deficiency was a significant causal predictor of both sexual deviance and anti-social
It is a common stereotype that all sex offenders have some form of psychopathy, and therefore they cannot be treated, however most sexual offenders do not have major mental illness or psychological maladjustment (Ward, Polaschek and Busch, 2006), therefore it is not impossible to treat them. Finkelhor’s (1984) precondition model was made with the assumption that the psychopathology of an individual will only take us so far in explaining sexually abusive behaviour, Finkelhor states that 4 stages of preconditions must exist before sexual abuse can take place, these are; Primary motivation to abuse a child sexually, overcoming of internal and external inhibitions and dealing with a child’s resistance to sexual abuse, for each subsequent precondition to occur the previous one must be achieved. Finkelhor argues th...
Sex offenders come across every race, age, gender, socio-economic status, and mental health status (CSG, n.d.). According to CSOM (n.d.) many scholars do not take into consideration the age, gender and socio-economic status as far as the criminal behavior itself, however many scholars look at factors that may have caused these sexual deviant behaviors. These theories or factors are attachment, sociocultural, intimacy, behavioral, and biological (CSOM, n.d.). It is also worthy to note, that the difference between juveniles and adult are there recidivism rate. According to CSOM (n.d.), juveniles are more likely to reoffend than adult sex
There are many topics nowadays that are still hard to talk about openly. Though we’ve opened the door on many controversies, some of the simplest parts of life can be the hardest to discuss. For most of us, sex in particular can be a taboo topic, which may be the reason why so many children and teens are misinformed on the inner workings of sexual relationships and how they develop as we grow and mature. For some adolescents, this can lead to an unhealthy fixation on the concept of sex, and in some cases, lead them to take action on a situation they do not fully understand. Sexual offenses are perceived as some of the most heinous crimes, but how could our views be affected if those acts were performed by a teenager? We may sometimes consider that they are the same as adult sex offenders; however our judgment can often be clouded by our lack of understanding. Adolescent sex offenders are different from adult sex offenders, are treated in a different way, and often have very different circumstances of their crime.
There are several identifiable psychological factors that increase the likelihood an individual will demonstrate deviant sexual behavior. One of the most important contributing factors is physical or sexual abuse endured as a child. According to Becerra-García, García-León and Egan (2012), sex offenders are twice as likely to report being sexually, emotionally, or physically abused as a child in comparison to other offenders. There are also other factors besides abuse that must be taken into consideration. A recent study on female sex offenders by Roe-Sepowitz and Krysik (2008) states, “the data reveal that many of the 118 female juvenile sex offenders came from chaotic and disorganized families and had poor parental supervision and serious school and mental health problems”. As Becerra-García, García-León and Egan (2012) discuss further, there are also personality traits that sex offenders are likely to possess, which makes it possible for psychologists to distinguish general characteristics of sex offenders. These personality traits can be identified using the Five Factor Model, which scales an individual’s level of neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.
Sex offenders are one of the most reviled criminals by the public. Their actions cause extensive harm and trauma to many innocent victims as well as victims’ families and offenders families (1). According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, it is estimated that 25-33% of adult women and 10% of adult men have been sexually abused as children (1). Just like substance abuse offenders, sexual abuse offenders incline to deny the actions of their offense, and additionally, deny the seriousness of their offense (Hanser and Mire, 2011). Denial is a psychological defense process to protect against unpleasant feelings of anxiety. In addition, denial may also be a normal, conscious action to avoid internal or external consequences
The National Center on Sexual Behavior of Youth at the Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Initials. (2003). what research shows about. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, Retrieved from ncsby.org
Seto, M. & Barbaree, H. (1999). Psychopathy, Treatment Behavior, and Sex Offender Recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 14, pp.1235-1248
Biological theory is the concept that focuses on certain biological characteristics that are thought to be associated with an increased risk of engaging in criminal or deviant behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early biological theories tended to focus on the physical appearance as a distinguishing trait of criminals, whereas modern theories primarily argue that biology is one of many factors that contribute toward criminal behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early rape theorist included that of Johan Lavater, Fran’s...
However to contradict this factor, certain characteristics and traits may not substantially contribute to specifically sex offending behaviour, as sex offenders may have symptoms that are unrelated to deviant sexual interest but often share very similar characteristics with non-sex offenders that
Having a distorted belief that such pleasure cannot be obtained via other means 3. Having no concern or understanding of the repercussions the behaviour results in, to both victim and perpetrator 4. Lack of control over the desire to commit the act Statistics Research related to sex offending focuses on males as the perpetrators and females as the victims (Marks & Nelson, 1993; Pryor & McKinney, 1995). It is until recent years that research started focusing on females as the perpetrators (Wayne, Riordan & Thomas, 2001). Regardless, women as sex offenders are underrepresented, which could be due to the fact that female perpetrators are viewed more positively than male perpetrators (Baird, Bensko, Bell, Viney, & Woody, 1995; Gutek, Morasch & Cohen, 1983).
A sex crime is defined as a crime involving sexual assault or having a sexual motive. These types of crimes are very common, unfortunately although not reported all the time. Individuals who commit these types of crimes are labeled as sex offenders. Sex offenders are one of the most despised groups in society. Can we point one out if we see one?
When someone is young they are unaware of some of their decisions and are unaware of the things that will scar them for the rest of their lives. In the article by Margo Kaplan, she discusses what pedophilia actually is, the laws that are currently in place, and how a child’s wellbeing is at risk. This article is highly credible considering that the author is a well-known researcher in the field of criminal law with a concentration in sexual crimes. Pedophilia’s recursive nature is to perform harmful acts to children; while pedophiles can put a child in the physical harm they are also prone to psychological harm (Kaplan 43). Kids are the main victims of these heinous acts, but there is no precaution to those that cause the harm resulting in them hurting more children than necessary in the process. While the following article is not that credible seeing that there is no clear citing from where they acquired their research, they were able to assemble a valid point about pedophiles going against a kid’s desire (Duke 5). According to the author, Judith Levine, in the same article, parents have the proper say about whether a child is being molested or not. While this relates to the previous article by Kaplan, it does so in the nature that puts the