Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's role in religion
Gender roles through RELIGION
Comparison of religion gender roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women's role in religion
“Separate but Equal” in Christianity and Islam
Although the similarities in the role of a woman in Islam and Christianity stem from the same idea of anatomy and psychology of one’s sex dictating their role, the means in which this belief is used to treat women varies for either religion. Thus helping us understand the idea of women being “separate but equal”. The complexities of christianity through a feminist lens can be explored through Pope Francis’ view on the role of the woman. His beliefs lie in the idea that the human biological sex and the anatomy and psychology that corresponds with each sex dictates one’s role in society. He does not believe this notion serves as a means to establish or justify male supremacy. Instead He links the
…show more content…
In Elizabeth Johnson’s She Who Is, the language used in the bible as well as other important figures in religious community to demonstrate the inherent inequality there is within the sexes. She speaks about how the assumption that God is male, despite the absence of God’s gender in Biblical texts in itself perpetuates an idea of patriarchy. She explains: “Yet the literal association of God with maleness perdures even in highly abstract discussions, as exemplified in the statement, "God is not male; He is Spirit."6 The assumption of divine maleness comes to light in the cognitive dissonance set up by marginalized speech” (Johnson, She Who Is). When one thinks of God, the greatest being, claiming that a woman cannot be reflected in that, that she is not capable to be viewed in that light might be the root of that invisibility Francis was discussing with Rabbi. The bible does not assign a gender to god, then the assignment of maleness implies that male is the only one capable. Francis views the role of a woman as different but of equal important-- to complement the man. To be a complement however, means one cannot exist without the thing to complement. While he clarifies that he does not view the woman as lesser than the man because of her duty--there is a paradox with that and with the idea that woman was made for the man. In a meeting with UISG about women as deacons in Early church he says: “The Church is woman ... she is a woman married to Jesus Christ, she has her Bridegroom, who is Jesus Christ... . And a woman's consecration makes her the very icon of the Church and icon of Our Lady. We men cannot do this.” (Pope Francis, UISG). Here he dismisses the idea of women in Catholic leadership by sugarcoating the
Gender inequality has been a major issue for many centuries now. Societies insist in assigning males and females to different roles in life. The traditional stereotypes and norms for how a male and female should present themselves to the world have not changed much over time. But individuals are more than just their gender and should have the right to act and be treated the way they want. The novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston
In her book Feminism and Religion, Rita M. Gross provides readers with an introduction to the need for, and benefits of, androgynous scholarship in the field of religious studies. Gross strives to make readers aware of the dangers of androcentric, Eurocentric scholarship. Moreover, she advances the claim that, “properly pursued, the field of religious studies involves study of all major religions found in human history” and an equal representation of both men’s and women’s religious experiences (Gross 1-4). Because androcentrism has permeated both religion and scholarship for the greater part of history, Gross strives to correct and augment this perspective with illuminating examples of what she deems “proper” religious scholarship – scholarship that includes the experiences of women. Ultimately, Gross believes that “feminist scholarship requires the study of the actual lives and thoughts of women” (Gross 81) and that “the diversity within feminist theology and spirituality is its strength” (Gross 49).
Until the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., his life’s work was dedicated to the nonviolent actions of blacks to gain the freedoms they were promised in the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 by Abraham Lincoln. He believed that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King, 1963). These injustices had become so burdensome to blacks that they were “plunged into an abyss of despair” (King, 1963). The nonviolent actions of the sit-ins, boycotts, and marches were so the “individual could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths…to help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism” and ultimately lead to “inevitably opening the door to negotiation” (King, 1963). Not only was King’s approach effective with the older black generation, it was also successful with white people. They did not feel threatened when approached by King. White people gained a sense of empathy towards the plight of black freedom as King’s promise of nonviolence did not threaten their livelihood. Malcolm X viewed the world similarly to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., however; his beliefs to changing the status quo were slightly different from his political counterpart. Malcolm X realized that “anger could blind human vision” (X, 1965). In realizing this, X knew that in order to achieve racial freedom blacks had to “forget hypocritical politics and propaganda” (X, 1965). While Malcolm X was more so an advocate for violent forces against white people than King, X merely used force when it became necessary for defense. According to X, “I don’t go for non-violence if it also means a delayed solution. I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to American black man’s problem” (X, 1965). However, this le...
...an, Monica A. "Must I Be a Womanist?" Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 22.1 (2006): 96. Print.
Discussing the contemporary sociological perspective of modern feminism to ‘divine’ wisdom should involve a brief overview of the theology’s focus. McGrath suggests that ‘Feminism is a global movement, arguing for gender equality and a right understanding of the relationship between women and men to be affirmed by contemporary theology and practice’ (McGrath, 2011: p.88). Thus, when discussing wisdom in the scriptures the feminists are observing how gender is represented and the effect of this representation upon helping or hindering a ‘right relationship’ between the genders.
It is difficult to predict what the future holds for the women of the Catholic Church. Although they have found success in some areas in their fight for equality, the Vatican has remained consistent in its refusal to allow the ordination of women into priesthood even into the present day. It is evident that no matter what decisions are made in the future, this will continue be a topic of constant debate and tension in the Catholic Church.
Individuals in modern society often treat symbols - religious, cultural and otherwise - as absolute, often ignoring or forgetting the representative aspect of them. When combined with the patriarchy dominating and influencing our society, this is where the primary problem with symbols starts. In feminist theology, religious symbols and their respective associations, pose a great problem not only to the advancement of women’s right, but to the struggle for the equal representation of their voice, and rightly so, their experience. The role of feminist theologians in the recovery of an authentic God-language can only be achieved if there is a significant change from the male dominated religious symbolisms.
Russell, L. M. (1985). ‘Authority and the Challenge of Feminist Interpretation’. In: Russell, L. (ed.). Feminist Interpretation of the Bible. Oxford. Basil Blackwell. pp.137-146.
As readers approach the texts of different religions it’s important for them to have their own techniques and strategies towards understanding it. As one reads about women in religion it’s necessary to keep their techniques in mind to understand and formulate one’s opinion regarding the role of women in religion and society. As a reader, I feel my best approach towards interpreting women in religion is as an analytical hermeneutics of suspicion that questions the point of view, the originality, and the culture surrounding the text. I think my reading habits stems from my future profession.
A woman's place in the home and the church has changed a lot from what it used to be. Women now work, advocate, and serve as bishops; however, it didn’t always used to be this way. Women were told to stay in the home, get married, raise children, and grow old. This is what will be explored, how women’s role has changed throughout history especially in the last century, popular beliefs on what a woman’s role should be in the home and the church, and personal thoughts and beliefs on this subject.
It is the women that bring life into this world, raise them and teach them the value of life. In one our reading by Braude “Women are the Backbone of the Church” she states” Women raised money for churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques through bake sales, community suppers, and sewing circles. They embroidered altar cloths, taught Sunday school, prepared festival meals, played the organ, and directed the choir. Perhaps most important, they took their children to their places of worship and educated them in their beliefs.” It is roles such as these that have been overlooked by men in particular that play such a huge role in why religion is still standing
#286 – “She is the woman whose heart was pierced by a sword and who understands all our pain. As mother of all, she is a sign of hope for peoples suffering the birth pangs of justice. She is the missionary who draws near to us and accompanies us throughout life, opening our hearts to faith by her maternal l love. As a true mother, she walks at our side, she shares our struggles and she constantly surrounds us with God’s love.” When I read this and I recall during the Papal transition we were experiencing a young girl in one of my 5th grade faith formation class, asked why can’t girls be leaders in the Church. My co-catechist’s face went pale, and I took a deep breath. What came afterwards was truly the Holy Spirit. I asked her a question: “What is the single most powerful human weapon God uses to defeat and guard us from evil?” She answered Jesus. I went on to tell her that God chose a young girl to be his most powerful weapon against evil and her name is Mary. Mary our Mother is the Queen. The most important thing she did was say “yes” to God. Girls are blessings that God uses in the church in many ways. Mary is the greatest example of a human leader in our faith, and yes she is a girl. Our Popes ask her for prayers and guidance, so you see we do have female leadership in our Church. The young girl smiled. I am grateful to our Mother for her love and her strength. She exemplifies the feminine genius God
The pope also stated that the feminine presence could be seen through, “…theological teaching, the forms of liturgical ministry permitted, including service at the alter, pastoral and administrative councils…”
Is religion made for human or only for man? Religion is often the most vital and considerable aspect in most of the people’s life throughout the world but often plays a negative role for women empowerment. Women are suppressed, disregarded and abused by every religion in the world. Most of the religions consider women as the second class human that refers men are the first who will be benefited by the religion (Tanzim). The patriarchal society is structured in such a way where women actually have less power to raise their voice against the society which is dominating them and always being an obstacle in their way of freedom and prosperity. However, surprisingly, it is conspicuous that comparatively women are more religious and involved in rituals and religious activities than men (Crandall). In return, the religion itself or by taking the name of religion the patriarchal society restricts women from doing development works which may open the path of women empowerment. A gendered perspective on religion and development simultaneously draws out the aspects of religion that are problematic for women while also pointing to its importance in many of their lives (Bradley). Therefore, religion becomes an imperceptible hindrance for women empowerment whereas, some of them are happy with their status in the society. Even though there are positive religious arguments and evidences which stand for women empowerment and give them equal rights as men but most of the time those are hidden by the pressure of patriarchal society. The patriarchal society never wants women to have power and therefore, they do all possible things to stop women from having authority. They never acknowledge women’s contribution and power in the history. Arguments whic...
First, the crowning work of God’s creation is in that he made them male and female. As a result, gender in humanity “ought” to be viewed as a gift and an expression of God’s goodness.