Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Portraiture in the Renaissance topic
History of portraiture, how it has been changed and challenged within photography
Portraiture in the Renaissance topic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Portraiture in the Renaissance topic
The variety one can find in art is vast, from graphic design to portraiture, art takes place in almost everything. Packaging, architecture, website design, all these things have come from different walks of art. Portraiture however is one that has lasted throughout the history of art. Portraiture gives the viewer an insight into the person who is being portrayed, even if some of it will be false in some aspect.
A portrait is normally a commissioned piece of work or a self-portrait. Often times the painting or other medium of a portrait shows the subject in their best refinery, perhaps a little more attractive than they usually appear. A person, no matter the time period, get’s a portrait done of themselves as a status symbol or to present
…show more content…
to others how they would liked to be viewed. In the past particularly people would get an idealized version of themselves painted to present to others. The artist painting choses to show the best parts of a person to the viewer depending on the commissioners wants, and if it’s a self-portrait its what the artists wants people to view them as. Jean Honoré Fragonard’s piece The Love Letter, although it may seem to be a portrait I believe it leans more towards a scene than a portrait. I believe it’s a scene because there is an action taking place, she is looking at the viewer as she smiles about a love letter she has recieved within a bouquet of flowers. The woman depicted within this piece wears a beautiful dress, not just the dress itself but the masterful way it is painted, such delicate brushwork to make the gown. The dress looks as if made from blue satin, trimmed with simplistic lace. This time periods dress is simple but beautiful. The artist wanted to make sure the viewer got how well made and expensive the garment was. The woman, although nameless, most certainly comes from a place of wealth. Not only does her gown and bonnet help depict this but also her surroundings, the well groomed dog sitting beside her, to the carved work desk she sits at. I believe this work of art might just in fact be depicting a stereotype, the high class woman who belongs to another man receiving love letters from the man she truly desires. No matter the purpose there was meaning behind this piece one way or another. An example of a portrait is El Greco’s Cardinal Don Fernando Niño de Guevara. This is what I would declare to be a portrait, a depiction of a person doing little to nothing, just sitting as if waiting to be drawn. This piece itself is very flat, 2D, it’s as if he has no legs underneath the robe he wears. The artists attempts to make it look more realistic with intense shading in places but there is not enough mass under the robe to show that there is an actual person within. The Cardinal himself looks like the type of man who tries to be extremely serious but ends up coming off as somewhat of a goofball. At his feet sits a discarded piece of paper that looks like it has his name written on it, perhaps it’s a letter giving good news in which he is trying to hide the smile on his face which is why I feel he might be a bit of a goofball. In the background it looks as if there is an armoire next to him with an intricately designed wall paper behind it. The Cardinal himself was depicted in to what appears to me as worn robes, he has been in a Cardinal for some time. As to his hands I believe there is some type of authority trying to be depicted while the matching rings on both hands show some sort of wealth to him. This work is a perfect example of a portrait. Another good example of a portrait is Rembrandt van Rijn’s Self-Portrait. This is basically a shining example as to what a portrait is. A simple composition of Rembrandt from the waist up. When an artist paints themselves they try to capture themselves as best they can, me as an artist can relate to the difficulty of trying to capture oneself into a piece. I feel Rembrandt stayed true to his appearance, a man growing old through the times. One can see the wrinkles on his forehead, his hair turning from brown to gray, the bags under his eyes from old age, it’s clear to see he painted himself a true portrait. He was most likely trying to capture himself as best as he can because painting oneself is one of the most difficult tasks, it’s extremely hard to be happy with the way it turns out. I would like to think the lighting was chosen to be where it is to capture his best features or signs of old age that were more noticeable. His background is simple, making him the main focus point which he should be. To the lower right hand corner of the background we get to see Rembrandt’s signature. Meanwhile he depicts himself in a less than luxurious way, yes there is some detailing around the collar but besides that everything is simple but skillfully painted, it’s clear to see that his focus behind this piece was to capture his face. This is yet another great example of a portrait. Last but now least Adélaïde Labille-Guiard’s, Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Mademoiselle Marie Gabrielle Capel (1761-1818) and Mademoiselle Carreaus de Rosemond (died 1788), which I have a difficult time deciding whether or not this piece is a scene or a portrait.
I think it’s safe to say it’s both. The artist unlike Rembrandt decided to portray herself in her best outfit, a lady of higher standing. She is clearly showing she has status with her outfit, it’s satin or silk fabric trimmed with bows and lace, a beautiful hat placed on top of her head. Her outfit versus her students is vastly more detailed, most likely to distinguish that she is the more experienced artist who has a greater wealth. But to point out that she is important enough to have students she made it clear that she had any by painting them into her own portrait. The artists depiction of herself painting is lovely, beside her on the footstool one can see her other art supplies while behind her you can see the rest of her studio. If the viewer were to look closer you they may see her signature on the back of her eazl, personally I love it’s placement it’s as if she had it there to begin with on the back of it so no one would be confused as to which eazl belonged to who. This amazingly detailed piece is a must
see. Portraiture is staple in art and it’s history. Even today most people of wealth will commission a well known artist to get a portrait from. They are some of the best works in existence and should be looked at as great examples for artists to come when trying to capture the likeness of someone.
It is art fulfilling its role in society. It is art that brings the moral issues. It is art that makes us human.
Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet and Marie Marguerite Carreaux de Rosemond was done Adelaide Labille Guiard in 1785. It was done in Paris, France and the medium is oil on canvas. Adelaide Labille Guiard was born in 1749 and died in 1803. She was one of few to practice and master at miniatures, pastels and oil paintings. Due to male dominance in these practices, women were not accepted as pupils, due to society perception that women are not able to follow instructions as easily as men.
On the contrary, other portraits tend to be more veristic in style, humbling the subject. Their portraits tend to call to attention their service to the state and faithfulness to the constitution of the republic as opposed to their individual greatness or divinity. This was shown through their crude images of wear and tear in their expressions. For example, in the portraiture of the unknown republican shows him balding and toothless, aged and wrinkled. His character reflects that of a grim and haggard state from the agonies and stress of a Roman civil war.
If I were to ask you what is art, and how can one find it? What would you say? Well if it were me being asked those question, I would simply say that art to me is a form of a picture; a visual painting or model of some design and it could be found all among us. You may define it differently only because art could be defined in many ways. I could simply say that art to me is a form of a picture; a visual painting or model of some design. Well according to an article written by Shelley Esaak, an art history expert she mentioned that art has a way of stimulating different parts of our brains to make us laugh or incite us to riot, with a whole gamut of emotions in between. She also mentioned that art gives us a way to be creative and express ourselves. [1]
Some people may have the same or similar interpretation but as a whole group of people, it is different. The artist whom took painted or drew the piece most likely had a different perspective than the audience. Every moment is different from the present or past. When an artist is creating their artwork, their interpretation can be different than their views a few years ago. Capturing the picture at a certain point in time can be powerful because it shows what the feelings, interpretations, emotions that were expressed at that time. These emotions translate to what the artist chooses to put in their piece, which can be very powerful. In this short essay, “Every Portrait Tells a Lie” by Debra Brehmer, she says “The portrait, in the choices the artist makes, alludes to the fact that who we are involved selection, interpretation, and chance.” (386) Brehmer makes an excellent point that the artist has the control to choose what goes into their piece. The artist can choose to include what they want into their piece, like a person, a plant, and etcetera. In the book The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde, the artist, Basil Howard claims that another character, Dorian Gray, is his muse. Basil paints a portrait of Dorian and this indicates how much power Basil has over the portrait. Basil has the power to choose what goes into the painting and how Basil wants to paint Dorian. Taking or painting a photo shows how much power the artist has because of their interpretation when taking the photo and their decision of what goes into the photo. The choice is completely up to the artist, which makes taking photos such a powerful
Alice Neel's most talked about painting, a Self-Portrait of herself, shocked the world when she painted herself in the nude at the age of 80-years-old. Neel, a 20th Century American Portrait Artist, painted models for over 50 years before turning the attention to herself (Tamara Garb). Neel wasn't a pinup girl and had depicted herself as the complete opposite (Jeremy Lewison). Unlike Neel, women avoided self-portraits of themselves, and nude self-portraits barely made it to canvas (Tamara Garb). Because of these reasons alone, Neel's Self-Portrait attracted scrutiny (Jeremy Lewison). Though Neel declared the painting to be frightful and indecent (Ibid), it still directed its focus on femininity, and the challenges women had to endure in our
The essay How You See Yourself by Nicholas Mirzoeff discusses the evolution of art. The author discusses the use of art to represent changing identities over the years including cultural practices and societal expectations. The selfie, according to Nicholas Mirzoeff’s essay, is the equivalent of a self-portrait in the previous centuries preceding the technological development required for the present day selfie. The essay explores the different periods and the significance of art, particularly self-portraits, the selfies of the time, and their development over time. The author focuses on different themes including heroism, gender definition, and the focus of an image. Mirzoeff effectively provides examples illustrating and reinforcing the themes he highlights in his essay.
Each respective piece of art is no doubt a self portrait, but how each artist is represented in the two pieces is where the contrasting elements come into play. In Portrait
The portrait. A single person immortalized forever on canvas. At first glance, you only see the subject. With a more analytical eye, though, you not only see the image but you begin to hear the voice of the painter and of his time. This is what I hope to do, to feel and understand the mind of the painter Ingres when he painted Louis-Francois Bertin and Reynolds when he painted General John Burgoyne.
The Renaissance Period is widely known for the abundance of amazing portraiture that circulated around Europe. During the Renaissance, Albrecht Dürer, a German artist painted a self-portrait in 1500 that had qualities that differed from the usual style of artist in that time (Chauhan). Jean Clouet also painted a portrait for the King of France and became the official court painter. Both artists had a talent for portraiture, while their styles were quite different. King Francis I wanted to be seen as a powerful man, and appointed Clouet to paint him in a classically renaissance way that highlights his wealth and authority. Dürer, described as a cocky, self-centered man, painted himself in a light that is unique and puts him on a ‘holy’ pedestal (Stokstad 356). In this essay I will show how although both paintings have clear differences with their style, both men in the compositions are conveyed in a great and very powerful sense.
With the portrait, Durer's highly self-conscious approach to his status as an artist coveys his exalted mission of art more clearly than in any other painting. He seems to be "less concerned with himself as a person than with himself as an artist, and less with the artist than with the origin and exalted mission of art itself." (Strieder 13).
A self portrait is normally a painting of the painter itself. The painting is a tangible piece of art because it is
We encounter art everyday. Art is paintings and sculptures, music and dance, film and photography. It is also fashion designing and architecture, novels and magazines. These seemingly different things have one thing in common – they are all ways in which humans convey themselves. For thousands of years, humans have used symbols to tell a story or describe a struggle. Art is the use of these symbols, symbols that represent us in some distinct way.
In "This is a Photograph of Me," inspite of the easy assurances of the speaker that we will see her picture, it is clear as the poem develops and the speaker reveals her true identity as a dead person that the clarity she seems to promise never emerges. The challenges in establishing a sense of identity are portrayed in the speaker's description of what the viewer will see as they look at the photo to begin with:
Throughout the ages art has played a crucial role in life. Art is universal and because art is everywhere, we experience it on a daily basis. From the houses we live in (architecture) to the movies we see (theatre) to the books that we read (literature). Even in ancient culture art has played a crucial role. In prehistoric times cave dwellers drew on the wall of caves to record history. In biblical times paintings recorded the life and death of Christ. Throughout time art has recorded history. Most art is created for a specific reason or purpose, it has a way of expressing ideas and beliefs, and it can record the experiences of all people.