Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A short note on self improvement
A short note on self improvement
A short note on self improvement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A short note on self improvement
Self-Monitoring Self-Regulated Intervention Strategies
Self-monitoring is a self-regulated process intervention strategy that involves an individual systematically observing their own behavior and documenting whether the targeted behavior occurred, the number of times it occurred, or it did not occur at any time. Self-monitoring regulated intervention strategies (SMRS) assist students in becoming aware of their own behavior. “For more than two decades, educational researchers have successfully used self-monitoring interventions within the context of special and general education settings to increase students’ academic engagement and productivity” (Rock, 4). Moreover, these interventions have proven to be effective for increasing and decreasing behaviors in children and adults of various cognitive levels of functioning. To address this topic further I explain why a teacher should implement a self-monitoring intervention strategy, when to implement self-monitoring, steps of implementation, and available self-monitoring strategies that encourage the student to monitor effectively.
Why Implement Self-Monitoring Strategies?
Researched-based self-regulating processes include self-monitoring, self-instruction, self-talk, self-evaluation, self-correction, and self-reinforcement. These self-regulatory intervention strategies are useful and adaptable with students that experience academic and behavioral problems. Also, they allow students to become more independent as they learn to identify positive targeted behaviors required for success in the classroom. Therefore, teachers practice self-monitoring to encourage independent learning to improve students' achievement results. According to Zimmerman (2011), studies have identified several sel...
... middle of paper ...
... with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED EJ869682).
Rafferty, Lisa A. (2012) Self-monitoring during whole group reading instruction: effects among students with emotional and behavioral disabilities during summer school intervention sessions. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED EJ967960).
Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing Self-Regulation Skills: The Important Role of Homework. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED EJ919059).
Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without exceptionalities. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED EJ806870).
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED EJ788053).
.
Skinner, Ellen A. Perceived Control, Motivation, & Coping. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 1995.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In: Lester FK (ed) Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 1051–1098
... they can trust, it will cause them to feel safe in their environment and give them a greater sense of self-worth. (Caldarella, P., Page, N., & Gunter, L., 2009) In order to enforce the use of this program, teachers must be calm and in control at all times. That is why the first step of Conscious Discipline is training teachers in the “basic powers of self control” (perception, unity, free will, love, acceptance, and intention) along with the “seven basic skills for discipline” (composure, encouragement, alertiveness, choices, positive intent, empathy, and consequences). (Caldarella, P., Page, N., & Gunter, L., 2009) These skills will cause teachers to be more conscious of themselves and able to control their emotions appropriately. It will also encourage them to be proactive instead of reactive in difficult situations. (Caldarella, P., Page, N., & Gunter, L., 2009)
...lating their own behaviour as they have had lots of practice doing so (NSW DET, 2003, p. 13). By most students demonstrating their ability to self-regulate throughout the lesson, it leaves the teacher the opportunity to better manage challenging behaviours such as Ray’s ADHD/ODD, Michael and Kendall’s tendencies to defy or be oppositional and refuse to engage and Bens’ inclination to withdraw. Strategies such as using the trust tree and taking time to self-regulate outside or in the quiet corner, coloured cups to display moods or a sense of urgency, social stories/scripts to assist with difficult and new situations, labelled praise and positive reinforcement or extrinsic motivation, extension activities of interest, ignoring minor inappropriate behaviours and redirecting when possible are used to help manage these behaviours (See lesson plan and Appendix A and B).
A personal change I would like to make is my approach and the response I display to my teammates and the organization. I am a very independent person at work, I tend to be a controlling person in every aspect. However, I am trying to overcome this debilitating trait by learning new techniques and reflecting on the other person’s ideas, comments, efforts and suggestions without taking control. I do complete my task with little or no assistance, but it causes me to be detached, indifferent, and uninvolved from my teammates causing conflicting issues. I do sense a distance between myself and my teammates, but I continue to work hard and remain focus.
The teacher facilitates tracking of student progress on one or more learning goals using a formative approach to assessment.
People’ self-regulation differs by individual and its development depends on different styles of parenting during childhood. According to Higgins and Silberman (1998), there are parents who consistently focus on encouraging children to behave desirably to achieve positive outcomes, rewarding children when they reach a goal and those who primarily focus on preventing children from creating negative outcomes by teaching children how to avoid potential dangers and punishing them when they behave undesirably. The former parenting style makes children think more about the ideal things they would and would not do whereas the latter parenting style makes children think more about things they ought and ought not to do. The consequences of these parenting styles are the differences in children’ desired goals and in their favorable means to attain those goals (Higgins & Silberman, 1998). On the basis of these parenting styles, Higgins (1996) presents the regulatory focus theory which proposes two separate self-regulatory orientations of individuals: prevention and promotion. Individuals with stronger promotion focus in their goal pursuits concentrate on accomplishment, advancement and aspiration. They are sensitive to attainment so they prefer an eager strategy as it can ensure they could gain and ensure against the presence
“Self-concept consists of knowledge, views and evaluation of the self, ranging from miscellaneous facts of personal history to the identity that gives a sense of purpose and coherence to life” (McCrae and Costa, 1996). With self-concept, we learn who we are by observing ourselves and using our cognitive processes to judge and evaluate our behaviour. However, with self-regulation, we are able to use this knowledge and judgment and apply it to future situations and so predicts behaviour and says a lot about our personality. If we are willing to cognitively analyse past situations and apply it effectively to future situations, this means we are changing our behaviour, thus changing our
...motivation. However, SCT recognise the importance of social interactions and their influence of motivation. Furthermore, SCT is a social cognitive expectancy x value approach to motivation, reflective of Eccles and Wigfield’s (2001;2002) model of expectancy value theory. Similar to attribution theory, SCT determines that motivation is influenced by the environment and interactions with others and how these influence learners’ attributes and judgements. Conversely, SCT is unique as it determines that motivation and behaviour is influences through observation and cognition, disregarding Blooms (1956) domains of affect and psychomotor. Self-regulation is a recent development in SCT. Like SDT, self-regulation comprises of two categories, with learners being self-regulated or not. According to this theory, underachievement occurs when a learner is (Woolfolk et al. 2013).
Erik Erikson composed a theory of psychological development that was composed of eight stages. Erikson’s theory focuses on how personalities evolve throughout life as a result of the interaction between biologically based maturation and the demands of society. According to Erikson, “Each stage of human development presents its characteristic crises. Coping well with each crisis makes an individual better prepared to cope with the next.” (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2013, p. 314) According to Erikson’s eight stages of development, I have only been through six of the eight stages.
Classroom management, involving all the strategies used by teachers in order to provide order in the classroom, can be regarded as an essential for effective teaching and learning. According to Davis (1981), “basic classroom management is just plain good sense. Yet, it can be as personal as your private lifestyle” (p.79). One of the biggest challenge teachers face day in and day out is dealing with behavior of children and young pupils in classroom. Therefore, the classroom practice of individual teachers would be the key aspect of improving the behavior of pupils in schools (Hart, 2010). One of the significant attribute of promise to teaching, especially in classroom behavior management, is teacher’s sense of efficacy. According to Woolfolk-Hoy (2000), development of self-efficacy is essential for producing effective, committed and ardent teachers, Moreover, teachers who are trained to be more effective in meeting both academic and non-academic student needs create a positive and successful classroom environment for all students (Alvares, 2007). The importance of self-efficacy in behavior management has been highlighted by Martin, linfoot, and stephenson (1999) who proposed that teacher’ responses to misbehavior may be mediated by their beliefs about their ability to deal with behavior, as well as their beliefs about the causes of student misbehavior.
“Self-discipline begins with the mastery of your thoughts. If you do not control what you think, you cannot control what you do. Simply, self-discipline enables you to think first and act afterward.”
Every now and then we don’t meet our own expectations, whether it was not getting the score you wanted on a test or getting the promotion you wanted at your work. Was it because your IQ wasn’t high enough to reach your expectations or was it because you lacked self-discipline. Contrary to the popular belief that IQ determines academic performance some people have, self-discipline exceeds IQ in predicting academic performance. The purpose of this paper is to define self-discipline, discuss the statement that self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance and provide strategies to maximize self-discipline in a tertiary learning environment. First, this paper will define self-discipline. Second, it will discuss the statement Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance. Finally is will provide strategies to maximize self-discipline in a tertiary learning environment
Students should be given the opportunity to direct their learning in a supportive environment by not only regulating their performance but also selecting individual learning goals as the first thing. Regardless of the fact that self-managed learning’s are highly used in higher education, there is little direct evident to the strategies that enhance their efficiency as well as the factors that influence the engagement of students in self-management. When indoctrinating self-managed learning in higher education, teachers should always keep in mind that the starting point is definitely the student and thus respect should be given to his/her interests and visions of learning. In this, the teacher perceives the student and his/her world as a resource to be leveraged for classroom learning and teaching. One of the main characteristics of self-managed learning is that students usually take significant responsibility for personal learning beyond and above reacting to instruction. This implies that their teacher have an important role in assisting them acquire the necessary skills for self-managed learning. To do this, they have to clearly understand the perception of self-managed
First, teachers should be able to understand their students when they are speaking. Teachers should collaborate with the SLP to find out common sounds that are confused and create a topic board (Watson, Bellon-Harn 2013). These topic boards can help prevent communion frustrations for the student (see Appendix A for an example).