Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concepts and nature of psychology
Concepts and nature of psychology
Concepts and nature of psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concepts and nature of psychology
The other day, I stumbled across The Selective Attention Test video produced by Brain Game, a TV show on National Geographic that popularizes psychology. I have always liked the TV show, so I decided to watch. At first, I thought the video would be a little silly, but as I watched, I found myself being pulled in. In this video, Dan Simmons teaches people about selective attention. Simmons has assembled a studio audience to witness a dance performance during which a normally distracting man in a penguin suit traverses through the dancers unnoticed by the audience. I thought that the idea of selective attention was made up, and that I would have no problem seeing all the detail on the stage, but just as the audience missed the penguin, I did …show more content…
The creator accomplishes the goal of educating people by having two audiences. As Dan Simmons, the stage announcer, explains the effects of selective attention, he states, “If you didn’t notice the penguin going through, don't feel bad. This says nothing about how intelligent you are, or how much effort you're engaging. It turns out that about half of the people missed these unexpected events, in the studies I have done.” The penguin maybe a random example, but driving is not as random, so Simmons goes on to say, “Do any of you happen to ride motorcycles? One of the most common kind of motorcycle collision with a car is one in which the car turns left in front of the motorcycle. A driver of the car is looking for other cars, and they literally don’t see the motorcycle even though they can direct their eyes right at it. Just as you were looking right at this 6ft penguin” (33:08-33:42). Notice how Simmons slips in facts about selective attention while keeping the audience members engaged. He uses general statistics, in two different situations, to educate the audiences, and does it in a casual manner in order to not lose the audience's focus. The use of this statistic not only informs the audience that this mistake is common, but also that it can be made in trivial events, like a dance, and more serious events, like driving. (?)The creator uses Simmons to inform the studio audience, so that the screen viewer to receive the information in an indirect way. The creator also uses a video narrator to accomplish the goal of educating the screen viewer when the narrator of the video examples(?), “For anyone who still missed it you're not alone over fifty percent of the audience did too” (32:45-32:53). Notice here how the narrator of the video uses a statistic that is occurring as the screen viewer is watching. The creator does this to educate the viewer watching that he or she isn’t alone
What prompts him to write this essay, is from constantly having to deal with the same types of drivers that cause him to get angry, or rage. He was living in Miami whilst writing this, which is a city of a large population, with lots of traffic. The immediate audience targeted would be other drivers, as reading this would get his points out and maybe they’d stop doing certain things he mentioned. The secondary audience would be future drivers, as they would now know what they should maybe sometimes avoid doing. Like when he mentions “-the aggressive young male whose car has a sound system so powerful and the driver must go faster than the speed of sound at all times-”. Future drivers may read this and think twice about doing it.
A video is put on, and in the beginning of this video your told to count how many times the people in the white shirts pass the ball. By the time the scene is over, most of the people watching the video have a number in their head. What these people missed was the gorilla walking through as they were so focused on counting the number of passes between the white team. Would you have noticed the gorilla? According to Cathy Davidson this is called attention blindness. As said by Davidson, "Attention blindness is the key to everything we do as individuals, from how we work in groups to what we value in our classrooms, at work, and in ourselves (Davidson, 2011, pg.4)." Davidson served as the vice provost for interdisciplinary studies at Duke University helping to create the Program in Science and Information Studies and the Center of Cognitive Neuroscience. She also holds highly distinguished chairs in English and Interdisciplinary Studies at Duke and has written a dozen different books. By the end of the introduction Davidson poses five different questions to the general population. Davidson's questions include, "Where do our patterns of attention come from? How can what we know about attention help us change how we teach and learn? How can the science of attention alter our ideas about how we test and what we measure? How can we work better with others with different skills and expertise in order to see what we're missing in a complicated and interdependent world? How does attention change as we age, and how can understanding the science of attention actually help us along the way? (Davidson, 2011, p.19-20)." Although Davidson hits many good points in Now You See It, overall the book isn't valid. She doesn't exactly provide answers ...
After watching March of the Penguins I was browsing the internet while I was trying to figure out which direction to take the essay in, because there were too many possibilities for the topic. Soon I found myself watching Monty Python, when the perfect sketch to start this paper on comes on. A newspaper reporter comes on saying "Penguins, yes penguins what relevance do penguins have with the furtherance of medical science? Well strangely enough quite a lot" He moves into a joke about research not being accidental. Then he picks up of the penguins "Nevertheless scientists believe that these penguins, these comic flightless web-footed little b@$#ards are un-wittingly helping man to fathom the uncharted depths of the human mind." The news cast flips to the scientist who introduces himself then states "...having been working on the theory postulated by the late Dr. Kramer that the penguin in intrinsically more intelligent than the human being." From there a multitude of science spoofs lead to the confirmation of this theory of penguins being smarter, even though it is clearly pointed out that the penguin's brain is smaller than of a human being. This causes the penguins to rise up and take over the roles of humans. After careful consideration I decided to discuss this clip as there really is no better way to introduce how animals are used in film as entertainment. Whether it is a crazy Monty Python sketch or the heartwarming love story that is March of the Penguins both were created for many reasons, but the most influential was the desire to earn money. For now just keep Monty Python on the back burner it will have significance later, lets shift to dealing with the questions being posed about March of the Penguins. How did March o...
It is within those years that they discover the different ways that imagination and humanity can alter the way you think. Halberstam brings up this point within a lengthy analysis of the movie March of the Penguins. At first view this film is simply documentary of a group of penguins as the mothers leave to find food and the fathers stayed to protect the eggs. At first glance, this is true. But Halberstam presents a second interpretation. She states that “Most often we project human worlds onto the supposedly blank slate of animality, and then we create the animals we need in order to locate our own human behaviors in ‘nature’ or ‘the wild’ or ‘civilization’” (275). This idea changes the way we think about most man-made documentaries, showing how we don’t just document the animals, but we add our own human narrative to them. Enforcing ideas such as authority, gender roles, and even heterosexuality. That may seem like a stretch to some. But Halberstam states that we use these animals to study these ideas. To directly quote “Animated animals allow us to explore ideas about humanness” (276). What exactly does she mean by this statement? She uses the term animated to describe these penguins. But to any movie-goer who has seen this film know that it follows a group of real live penguins. Her use of the word animated in this case describes what it is like to be
Did you know this film features three different outsiders? The Penguin, Batman and Catwoman are all characters who do not fit into the society of Gotham City. Burton particularly works with The Penguin to bring across his point of teaching us about the outsider. The scene of his birth occurs at night time, as all good gothic tales do. The baby is put into a black basket to be thrown into the river, as compared to the white one of the other couple the parents pass. This suggests that while other babies are pure and clean, The Penguin is bad news, and is a dark being. As the basket travels further into the sewers, big sharp shadows of the basket are cast up onto the walls, creating a chiaroscuro effect of light and dark. This effect makes The penguin seem sinister, as his dark scary shadow is making its way through the sewers. This prologue sets us up with ideas of evil things. Later on in the film, The Mayor of Gotham is helping The Penguin to become the new mayor. In order to be welcomed by the town, people try to give him makeovers, and change who he actually is. People give him a new name, Oswald Cobblepot, to help him fit in. While for a little while he goes along with it, he eventually becomes unhappy and rejects his name. Here, Burton is particularly interested in the idea that trying to fit into a society you don’t belong in will only make you upset. These techniques help him to deepen the understanding we have of our world and the
people who are in a line. The 5 people all have a ball; all the balls
Processing capacity is a very broad and flexible category according to many researchers. In fact, the quote above mentioned suggests that we often fail to notice things that happen just in front of us (unexpected events that are often salient) either because we were completely absorbed by something else or because we had so many things to do at the same time that we couldn’t pay attention to it. We have all at least once failed to see a friend who was waving at us while eating in the cafeteria or walking in a crowded street. The primary question that we should ask ourselves is: how many things can we attend at the same time? The truth is that we didn’t perceive this friend because of a phenomenon called “inattentional blindness”. The problem is that the richness of our visual experience leads us to believe that our visual representation will include and preserve the same amount of detail (Levin et al 2000). In this paper we’ll see the different theories of inattentional blindness, and the classical theories demonstrating this paradigm.
Through December 5th through the 7th, I performed in Thornton Wilder’s play of Our Town. The only sets or props that the actors or actresses used where folding chairs for us to sit in, umbrellas to hide Emily (Julie Dumbler), and flats on both sides of the stage to hide the people behind them. The reason for the lack of set is so the audience can use there imagination of what the town of Grover’s Corner, New Hampshire looks like. All the rest of the props that the actors had to use were pan mimed and acted out to the fullest to make it look real. The only other experience with no set was with Miss Henery in Neodesha and it was a disaster so I didn’t know how well this was going to work out. But with the help of our director Peter Ellenstein and the rest of the cast, the pan miming was very successful. Our performance space was a modified thrust stage. The shape of the stage served us well for this play, but the back stage was horrible. All of the chairs that we had to use were folding chairs that made a lot of noise even if you hardly touched one. One neat thing about the play is that all of the sound affects were made by our backstage manager (Lisa Mitchell) or other members of the cast. In exception for the clock chiming at the end of the play. People who have seen the play tell me that it is a very heart moving play. I did not get that feeling because I was always backstage or onstage. Ether way I didn’t get to watch the play so I couldn’t see what was so moving about it. The only humor I got was from lines and the funniest person I heard was Professor Willard (Gary Mitchell). The audience is led through the entire play by the Stage Manager (Cory Venable). He literally talks to the audience between every scene explaining what is going on in the story. I thought Mr. Wilder did a good job in having a Stage Manager do this. The Stage Manager tells and shows us a story a young girl growing up and facing death, even after death. He show us how Emily Webb (Julie Dumbler) first gets to know her future husband George Gibbs (Eric Cole).
The films effective use of statistics undoubtedly enhances its credibility. For example, the film states that one in every four college students will not make it to their sophomore
“My audience is smart. They are real people who lead whole lives,”(“Kenny Chesney”) explains Chesney. He believes his audience to be, in essence, like himself: those who feel the deeper meanings of life. When explaining the audience of a performer, it could be as straightforward as the people who fill music venues around the world to hear his music. In this case, it is more than that. It is the people who hear his music and don’t shrug it off as typ...
As a result, the audience is given the same information and may very well be a
Throughout the story, the perfect penguins would get frustrated with Tacky whenever he doesn’t get the cheer right, messes it up. The parallel between the story and today’s time can be seen, if you consider the school’s situation. People tend to be frustrated easily whenever someone doesn’t “understand” or follow up at the same
These comparisons occupied my mind as the actors continued on with their scripted story telling, thus allowing me to enjoy the act. In hindsight, I was a bit bored with the lack of movement among the stage; and given that the room was filled with shades of serenity, I lost attention to the orated version of the Simpsons episode. Once the act ended, I was prepared to watch the rest of the play with the same characters with hopes that there would be more physical action for the audience to
An analysis of factors that determine the allocation of attention was composed by Khaneman (1973) in which cognitive systems were formed and held responsible for allocating cogniti...