Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Security is more important than freedom
Role of religion in society
Role of religion in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Security is more important than freedom
Think back to your childhood. Was it one filled with happy memories? The majority of us can say yes to this question. Most of us grew up in a innocent, carefree world. Being free of adult responsibilities, we could play all day without having to deal with the issues of the adult world. Back then, we had the security of our parents. They were always there making our decisions for us. We were told when to go to bed, what to wear, and what to eat. Just like the first time we learned how to ride a bike, we knew that our parents were just a step or two behind, protecting us. Were we happier back then with less freedom and more security? Consider the life of an adult: they possess absolute control, only to be constantly stressed with the responsibility of adult decisions. This freedom of choosing our own path, does that bring happiness? Are we happier when we have more freedom, but less security? It is not freedom that is related to human happiness, but security. I believe that when humans have a prominent source in their lives that deliver a sense of security, that will undoubtedly lead to more happiness than freedom is capable of.
In The Grand Inquisitor, the conflict between freedom and security is one of the main reasons for Ivan’s dissent from Christianity. The difference between Jesus Christ’s point of view and the Grand Inquisitor’s is the value that each places on freedom and security. The way that Christ responds to the three temptations is assumed to display the importance and beauty of our ability to make decisions for ourselves. The rejection of comfort in our lives is represented by the bread. Jesus should have eaten the bread and given us freedom from hunger instead of choice. The need for faithfulness is represented b...
... middle of paper ...
...the lives of children and adults, which should now seem like the obvious choice for happiness? Obviously the child. The lives of children is so beautiful and wonderful. Having the security of your parents constantly, without a single stress in the world is unbelievable. That is why children are much happier than adults. They might not have all the freedom of an adult, but who cares when you can live your life everyday without being having a single worry in the world. The Grand Inquisitor wanted Jesus to be our parent. He wanted Jesus to make the decisions for us. Why would a parent just allow their child to run free in the world making all the wrong choices? We need Jesus to be that divine figure that unquestionably reigns dominance. That strong sense of security, always knowing that it will lead you in the right path will undeniably bring happiness into our lives.
Newman and Randy J. Larsen’s article “How Much of Our Happiness is Within Our Control?” claims that we have much less control over our happiness than positive psychologists uphold. This shows that you let things that happen in your life control if you are happy or not. These psychologists argue that you cannot make yourself happier. This is saying you can never attain everlasting bliss and that you get used to all the negatives factors in your life. I do not believe this statement is true because I think you can always put a positive spin on every negative factor in your life and that your positive factors in your life can last as long as you want them to. Therefore, I disagree with Newman and Larsen because I believe you are the only one that has complete control over your own happiness. They state that the influential environmental variables in our lives are just as uncontrollable than our genes. However, the reactions to the uncontrollable environmental variables is what controls your mood and happiness. Although there beliefs are different they still have some common ground. The authors of both articles agree that the people who are happier tend to always have particular behavioral characteristics such as gratitude, kindness, positive relationships,
According to Forbes, a site that consists of the world happiest countries, countries like Norway favor freedom, fair health, education, and political systems. The general welfare, rank high in the happiness rate whereas countries like Chad, Congo, Central African Republic, Afghanistan, and Yemen. Who only focus on individual needs showing that they have one of the lowest happiness rates due to them showing greedy behaviors or having no proper education. So, did the happiness rate go up when people from nowadays preferred general welfare than the individual needs? Yes, because general welfare which provides freedom, peace, health system, education, etc.make people delighted. General welfare is more important for a democratic government to
Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky was among those philosophical thinkers who grappled with the task of explaining why evil exists in a world created by a perfect god. Despite the powerful influence of Christianity in his early childhood and throughout his life, Dostoevsky encountered difficulties in answering this question, which he described, “Nature, the soul, God, love – all this is understood by the heart, not by the mind” (Gibson 1973, 9). Nevertheless, Dostoevsky not only felt obligated to discover a solution to the problem, but also “responsible to his fellow believers for its success or failure” (Gibson 1973, 169). This quest for a solution to the problem of theodicy ultimately led Dostoevsky to write The Brothers Karamazov, a novel that attempts to explain the need for evil in the world. In posing his solution to this problem, Dostoevsky explains the necessity of suffering for the realization of human redemption, as well as the role of Christ’s atoneme...
Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a reminder that books can provide answers to questions we never asked, but yearned to know. For that reason alone, The Death of Ivan Ilyich should be considered a work of art. However due to the many subtle hints and clues pointing at the underlying Christian nature of the book, it deserves to be added to the list of great modern Christian literature.
Christian faith adamantly states that the belief in one God will set you on the path to inner peace and true happiness. Christians, Ancius Boethius and Susan C. Stark, agree that the acceptance of God and his teachings is the only way to achieve peace and happiness. Boethius writes about his own wavering path to happiness in The Consolations of Philosophy. Lady philosophy, like Jesus, teaches Boethius what the true “goods” of the world are, that God has complete control and knowledge, evil has no real substance and ultimately, that through God, he can attain true happiness. Susan C. stark parallels these teachings in her article, Where peace comes from. The many interrelating ideas of Boethius and Stark’s works shed light on the Christian values, teaching and essentially, the path to happiness.
Happiness has always been a desirable goal throughout our lives, but each actions we take might just affect the happiness of others. When humans seek happiness, we always seek for things that make us feel alive, or things that brings us the greatest comfort. Our contentment comes with the act of selfishness since we choose to prioritize our happiness above all other. We willingly classify happiness in two different types of meaning, both physical and mental happiness. People ought not be in title to happiness because it is classified in general as a physical desire by many people. Contentment is always known to be a physical satisfaction in life instead of a self-inducing satisfaction for life.
First off, happiness has always been seen as a factor that is solely dependent on ourselves. In reality however, the world around you and the people within in it are a big factor in whether or not we have an inner peace or not. Mill agrees: “Those only are happy (I thought) who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness; on the happiness of others, on the improvement of mankind…” (Brink 89), focusing on objects or things other than ourselves yields more happiness for us in the long run.
2. Orthodox Christianity has a history of trying to deceive humanity. In her book, Ellerbe proclaims that: "Orthodox Christianity fostered humanity's shift towards a world view that pays little heed to the idea of divinity." (Ellerbe 165). In addition, the Grand Inquisitor "...claims it as a merit for himself and his Church that at last they have vanquished freedom and have done so to make men happy." (Dostoevsky 1081).
In the chapter titled Rebellion (or his book title), Feodor Dostoevski’s character, Ivan Karamazov, demonstrates that his angry and resentful attitude is the by-product of his very choosing. The fundamental principal of our own humanity is God’s acknowledgment of our expression of free will. Found between the boundaries of man’s ownership of worldly acts and thoughts, which can lead him to an eternity of joy or damnation, is that critical choice of what attitude we will wrap ourselves in for our finite time here. The extreme, and perhaps somewhat all too common, result of this human choice between simple joy and compounding suffering is presented in Ivan. As highlighted in Genesis account of Gods’ pure joy and pleasure of man, and His authoritative command for man’s dominion over all of His creations, it is impossible to imagine our Creator desiring our willing choice for suffering.
To begin, happiness is viewed as the ultimate goal in the life of an individual and highest good, Aquinas believes that no human can achieve higher wisdom and happiness during their time on earth due to the fact that man’s ultimate happiness would only be achieved by passing on and being in the presence of the lord, or as he terms it: “Along with natural happiness, there is a supernatural happiness of comping to “see God as he is”. (P.77) by living a just and moral life, we will eventually know true happiness in the next life. In fact, he goes on to argue that our happiness during life is bound by what God reveals to living souls, and thus, drastically limited. While our human faculties provide some happiness, only in our heavenly vessels will
One reason described to be a cause of happiness is income. Don Peck and Ross Douthat indicate how, “National income appears to be one of the best single predictors of overall well-being, explaining perhaps 40 percent of the difference in contentment among nations” (352). With this statement, comes the explanation of how income can influence happiness in adults who strive to earn a living. Research illustrates how, “For individual countries, with few exceptions, self-reported happiness has increased as incomes have risen” (Douthat 352). While these two statements provide sufficient evidence for the reason of income bringing happiness, income itself is not relevant.
Ivan wants “to live and not to suffer,” and the inner voice asks, “To live? How?” with the reply to “live as I used to – well and pleasantly.” Ivan’s problem now arises with the idea that maybe his life wasn’t so “pleasant” after all. Quickly understanding that living a life of simplicity and mediocracy is a worthless life, Ivan is forced to battle the internal thought of, where did I possibly go wrong? Possibly this life he was raised to believe as proper was just “a terrible and huge deception which had hidden both life and death.” This conviction of sin remains with Ivan up until the point where he is being forced into a black sack struggling “to get right into
For Aquinas the last end of happiness can only be with God because he is perfect goodness and is the only one capable of fulfilling our hearts desire (Van-Nieuwenhove & Wawrykow, 2005).
To prove this thesis I will compare the lives of Jesus Christ and Yakov Bok and trace back through the events of life that show the most similarities. I will also study the development of Yakov’s belief and compare it to Jesus Christ’s beliefs and values. I will prove the points that the Christians assert, that they are moral and non-violent, are ironic and hypocritical. I will show that the actions and values of the Christians are opposite to what they preach.
What is happiness, and how can and should we achieve it? The answer to this is something that humans have been trying to figure out since the beginning of time. We all experience happiness in our lives. What I have researched is how much our governments and world leaders are in control of our lifespan and happiness. Elected and unelected officials have an undeniably large role in all of our lives, all over the world. My goal was to study how much effect they have on our happiness/lifespan, and how their influence can be improved. I believe that happiness is something that we are all entitled to, regardless of our countless differences. Our governments