Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis for the development of nationalism and sectionalism
Transition from nationalism to sectionalism in the early 19th century
Thesis for the development of nationalism and sectionalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the 1800s, America was a young country going through many developments, one of such was nationalism Vs Sectionalism. But at the end sectionalism overcome nationalism to dominate the economic and political culture.
At the beginning of the 1800s, the people indulged in nationalism and the era of good feeling. However, people do admit that the U.S is one nation when dealing with foreign policy but can have the ability to become divisive in internal affairs. In a toast given in Norfolk Virginia 1816, Naval officer Decatur said “In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but our country right or wrong! (D1)” He’s saying he hoped the country will be headed in the right direction but even if it doesn’t, it is still
…show more content…
According to the congressional record of 1816, the south overwhelmingly voted against the tariff of 1816 by 34 to 28 (D7). Meanwhile the Middle States and New England vote majority for the tariff. This demonstrates the clashing ideology of the slave-farm base South versus the industrial heavy North. Furthermore, Henry Clay admitted that the tax purpose is only to enrich American industrial complex by saying in his speech to congress in 1824 “ The sole object of the tariff is to tax the foreign industry with the view of promoting American industry (D4).” If the tariff only aims to grow American industry and the North are the only industrial complex based region, the tariff would only benefit those who live in the North. Meanwhile, the South is left in an economic depression as a result. This lead to resentment and further development of sectionalism as Souther struggle to find common ground with Northerner. They are divided economically, taxes, and politically, …show more content…
Before the Missouri Compromise, there are unofficial unanimous agreements to not deal with slavery among legislator because it will break the union with it divisiveness. For example, Thomas Jefferson compares slavery to a “firebell” that filled him with “terror” (D6). Another example is John Adam saying in his diary “ If the union must be dissolved, slavery is precisely the question upon which it ought to break (D5).” This shows the strength of slavery to kill the union with it divisiveness. After the Missouri Compromise, no one was happy. To the north, the compromise did not stop the spread of slavery. To the South, the government does not have the right to regulate slavery. This lead to more violent action by both sides to promote their
Tempers raged and arguments started because of the Missouri Compromise. The simple act caused many fatal events because of what was changed within the United States. It may not seem like a big thing now, but before slavery had been abolished, the topic of slavery was an idea that could set off fights. The Missouri Compromise all started in late in 1819 when the Missouri Territory applied to the Union to become a slave state. The problem Congress had with accepting Missouri as a slave state was the new uneven count of free states and slave states. With proslavery states and antislavery states already getting into arguments, having a dominant number of either slave or free states would just ignite the flame even more. Many representatives from the north, such as James Tallmadge of New York, had already tried to pass another amendment that would abolish slavery everywhere. Along with other tries to eliminate slavery, his effort was soon shot down. The fact that people couldn’t agree on whether or not slavery should be legalized made trying to compose and pass a law nearly impossible.
The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...
One huge issue that led the country to sectionalism was slavery as some people wanted to support and allow slavery, whereas others didn’t. Sectionalism became more noticeable during the Missouri Compromise as the government didn’t allow slavery above the 36’30 line. As a result, the Northern and Southern region became more defined as the North wanted to abolish slavery, but the South wanted to keep it as the country expanded. When America added the Mexican te...
The “Era of Good Feelings,” beginning after the war of 1812 and lasting into the 1820s, is typically represented as a positive time in American history full of nationalism. However, in considering this time period, one remember to examine both the positive nationalistic perspective and the negative sectionalist perspective. Socially, after the war of 1812, the American morale was strengthened and nationalism grew. Politically, the collapse of the Federalist party after the Hartford convention lead to a more united voting population, having only one viable party to vote for. Economically, the national bank expanded its power and protective tariffs were issued, which were looked upon negatively in the south, causing division
At the time the American economy was in a recession and on track to eventually succumb to a depression, so many wanted a tariff to protect their domestic goods from foreign imports. It is important to note that a moderate protective tariff was already in place and most of the debate revolved around the severity of the overall amount. Moreover, the tariff to some seemed that it was directly benefiting northern Industry while making southerner’s pay a higher price. Henry Clay advocated for a relatively high tariff and believed that it would eventually lead to creating a cornerstone market for the United States similar to the one that was in many European countries. Furthermore, Clay asserted through numerous orations that by having a high protective tariff it would bring the nation closer together and consequently become more interdependent. One way in particular that Clay tried to urge the American people to his side was by keying in on their fears of the current state of the economy, which was actively influential to a plethora of individuals. Conversely, Andrew Jackson also similarly supported a protective tariff, however it was for dissimilar justifications and not to Clay’s full extent. Jackson’s primary reasoning related to the need to stimulate the production of defense materials as well as the need to decrease the national
South Carolina’s decision to invalidate the federal law and deem the tariff unconstitutional was the first blatant disregard for the centralized government. The United States, under Jackson’s presidency, did not unite and support one another in the face of the economic tariff and hardships. Instead, the states nullified (South Carolina in particular) and the individualistic ideals and motivations of the states were exposed. State opinions, such as that of South Carolina were focused solely on their own personal benefit and how they would survive the hardships of the tariff. During the Age of Jackson, there was no unification between the states. The ideals of Jacksonian America were flawed by the growing sectionalism and individualistic ideals. The total equality and unification that Jacksonian America attempted to create was no longer an option. Jacksonian America failed, and in result, did not promote the unified democracy in the United
Document A supported that after the War of 1812 the government was losing a sense of purpose. Unlike before, farmers are losing money. In contrast manufacturers are making more money. The Tariff of 1816 increased the amount of manufactures. Served to raise revenues to operate the national government and to protect U.S. manufactured items from overseas competition. This brought up serious issues as there were many different ways everyone wanted to run the government. This also gave people different views on how congress should regulate commerce and handle taxes. Document F talks about the Missouri Compromise. Missouri was thought to disturb the thoughts on slavery. The Missouri Compromise was done in order balance of power in Congress between slave and free states. Missouri was a slave state while Maine was a free state. This shows sectionalism as this thought on slavery distinctly separates the nation into Southern beliefs and Northern beliefs. This Compromise shows the gap between the north and
Sectionalism and the Breakup of the U.S. Throughout the early 1800's the country was split in many areas over many issues. Some of the more severe clashes between differing groups resulting from such issues as slavery, expansion, and internal improvement. With all of these controversial topics to worry about along with the vast diversity in the nation, causing separation and tensions throughout the country. The most prominent of the previous topics was slavery.
In early America between the years of 1825-1850, America was rapidly changing and reforming the way people lived. Societal problems and major discrepancies that had previously been overlooked began to rapidly gain awareness. The main idea of the reforms in the United States at this time was the relatively new sense of Democracy. Reform sought to maximize these benefits in light of Democracy and for this reason came up with many changes in which greater good can be found through freedom, justice, and equality of all people.
4. America’s foreign policy followed and promoted the idea of nationalism between 1825 and 1825 by making a treaty with Great Britain to trim down the number of military fleets at the Great Lakes. Also the Rush-Bagot Treaty made America and Canada remove all their troops from their shared border. John Adams also held the convention of 1818, which made a compromise with Britain to share the Oregon territory.
As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state entering the union as a free state. After this compromise any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union. In 1821, he wrote, ”All, I fear, do not see the speck on our horizon which is to burst on us as a tornado, sooner or later. The line of division lately marked out between the different portions of our confederacy is such...
American foreign policy during the 1890s was based on many factors that each acted as an individual justification for our country’s behavior as a whole. Racism, nationalism, commercialism, and humanitarianism each had its own role in the actions America took against other nations.
The years after the civil war left one half of America, the north, satisfied and the other half, the south, mostly dissatisfied. Therefore the last third of the nineteenth century, 1865-1900, was a time period in which America was mending, repairing, improving, reshaping, and reconstructing its society, economy, culture, and policies. Basically it was changing everything it stood for. This continual change can be seen in the following events that took place during this time. These events are both causes and effects of why America is what it is today. These are some examples: the reconstruction of the south, the great movement towards the west, the agricultural revolution, the rise of industrialism, the completion of the transcontinental railroad, and America's growth to gaining world power. All of these are reasons and events that characterize America as being an ever-changing nation.
The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.
At this time Americans resorted to nationalism which is as Merton E. Hill stated in 1931