Scott Momaday And Dee Brown

888 Words2 Pages

Scott Momaday's and Dee Brown's descriptive essays of the Oklahoma plains clearly contain opposing views. This is evident in their different uses of tone and imagery. Momaday reveals his personal satisfaction with the hidden beauty in the land, while Brown means to curse the land by showing its desolation and lack of life.
Momaday and Brown use opposite tones in their passages to relay their attitudes to the audience. Momaday immediately establishes a personal connection in the first two sentences. He writes about a knoll that "rises out of the plain", and he "For my people, the Kiowas, it is an old landmark". By saying "my people," he shows that he has a personal connection with these Plains. The line "rises out of the plain" brings life to the landscape, and a lively tone to Momaday's essay. In his concluding sentence, Momaday writes "your imagination comes to life... where Creation has begun". These phrases …show more content…

Momaday writes about "great green and yellow grasshoppers... popping up like corn". His vivid description of the grasshoppers adds life and color to the landscape, and he also personifies their movement by saying how they pop out of the grass. Momaday also describes turtles that crawl "about the red earth, going nowhere in plenty of time". By talking about the turtle's slow pace, Momaday demonstrates the relaxed atmosphere of the Plains. Brown also writes of "great whirlwinds of grasshoppers were flung out of the metallic sky to consume the parched sky". His description of the grasshoppers is similar to the Bible story of the plagues of locusts in Egypt. The locusts in the Bible story consumed all the vegetation, leaving it dead and uninhabitable. Brown says that the grasshoppers on the Plains have also consumed the grass, leaving the Plains desolate and dead. In their essays, Momaday and Brown use similar descriptions to depict completely different

Open Document