School Uniforms The issue of whether or not school uniforms are a necessity in today’s society has been a long standing debate. However, it did not come onto the national scene until 1996 when then President Bill Clinton spoke of the matter in his annual State of the Union Address. Citing the Long Beach city school district in California, Clinton spoke of the positive effects of uniform implementation, including: decreased drug cases, sex offenses, violent crimes and fights. Jessica Portner, a writer for Education Week, agreed with President Clinton in her February 14, 1996 article entitled “Uniforms Get Credit for Decrease in Discipline Problems.” Using statistical evidence from the aforementioned Long Beach school system grades K-8, Portner creates a compelling argument pro school uniforms. In a study of the 83,000 K-8 students, the rates of assault and battery decreased 34%, fights 51% and there were 32% fewer suspensions. What about those who argue that uniforms are an infringement of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America? Well, the Long Beach city school district allows parents to exempt their children from the uniform requirement. However, only 500 parents or guardians have done so. Why? For one because of the above statistics argues Portner and also because it prevents the association of gang colors, whether accidental or purposeful. Portner also states that uniforms allow students and faculty to determine who does not belong in school and could pose a potential threat to the peaceful environment the district is attempting to foster. And perhaps most importantly, Portner interviewed some students who strongly felt that uniforms improved their self-concept because “peopl... ... middle of paper ... ...l still burn on. In summation, I don’t feel that school uniforms are necessary at this juncture in time. Sure, one school district has seen positive results, but can these results be contributed to a single factor called school uniforms? Extremely doubtful in my mind. Besides, school uniforms while making everyone look alike and boosting esteem in this manner, do not eliminate the socioeconomic differences between students. Therefore, there will always be a distinction between students. Uniforms may decrease the distinction but individuality is what makes America the land of opportunity. Individuality is what America is all about. If you can’t find who you are and express yourself for the entire world to see while living or spending time in America, you are doing something wrong. Preventing this would be a horrible national crime; it would be un-American.
In the last 10 years, the global population has increases from 1.6 to 1.7 billion and the worlds economy has increased increases by over seven times. Biodiversity is a major resource for many different industries and companies which govern the world economy (Mondal, 2016). Essentials such as fuel sources, food supplies and medical supplies are provided and supplied as a result of Biodiversity. Forestry, hydropower and almost all vital ecosystem industries and services depend on the conservation of biodiversity. Through natural chemical removal, food distribution and many other processes biodiversity has provided over $2.9 trillion in annual benefits worldwide (Florida, 2011). It is clear that biodiversity is essential and exceptionally benefits for the world and its
Ever wonder what it would look like to have all students wearing the same white polo shirt, black pants, and a district sweater walking in the hallway? Nowadays, public school and many districts are discussing the possibilities of enforcing the uniform policy. In most places, many private schools already require students to have their mandatory uniforms; however, there are only a few public schools adopting this mandatory school-uniform polices as one of their enrollment requirements. The reason why not all public schools participated was because people believe that they are violating the freedom of choice when enforcing this mandatory uniform policy; yet problems such as bullying and segregation, emerged in these schools. Some people still think uniforms have no benefits at all. However, all public school students should be required to wear uniforms because it would improve the academic performance, reduce the violent behaviors based on appearance judgment, and provide less stress for both parents and students.
When President Clinton pointed to Long Beach, California, where the uniforms were already in place, the school said that their fights, weapons offences were reduced by half and sexual offences went down by three fourths. Since his speech in 1995, uniform use in the school district has shown amazing results, as the crime in the district decreased by 91%. Suspensions dropped by 90%, sexual offences were down by a staggering 96%, and vandalism waned by 69% after the uniforms were in place. With these amazing results, it is no wonder many other schools in the country have followed in their footsteps. A study done in 2010, based on the School Survey on Crime and Safety, found that schools with a mandatory uniform had fewer instances of drug and alcohol abuse.
Until President Clinton called attention to the issue in his State of the Union address, mandatory public school uniform policies were sporadic local occurences. A few school districts had been quietly experimenting with uniforms for years, but the issue caught President Clinton's eye after the Long Beach, California school district released some numbers suggesting that after only one year, its mandatory uniform policy had not only brought about significant decreases in vandalism and fighting, but had also led to higher test scores. Now that the President's endorsement has elevated school uniforms into the realm of federal education policy, a question needs to be answered: Are uniforms a good idea?
“The Manual on School Uniforms”, printed and issued by the United States Department of Education, noted that Long Beach, California, reported a decrease in crime, fights, sex offenses, weapons offenses, and vandalism after they adopted their uniform policy (4). Contrary to government findings, The National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 discovered that school uniforms have had no real effects on behavior, drug abuse or attendance; furthermore they also came to find that uniforms actually have negative effects on the academic achievement of the students (Brunsma and Rockquemore 54). If school A is emphasizing that school uniforms are conducive to the learning environment, yet school B down the road has higher testing scores but no uniform policy, then their stand is no longer valid. This proves that uniforms have no effect on the learning process.
In society today, school-age children are under tremendous pressure to fit in with their peers and still perform well academically. I believe that school uniforms at pre-K through high school levels are an excellent way to help children succeed not only in school, but to prepare them for college and the “real world.” Three reasons why I believe school uniforms should be used in all schools is first, they are economic, next, they reduce distractions and finally, they help with social equality. To begin, school uniforms are economic. When schools have a uniform policy, it makes it easier on the children and parents.
In the 2009-2010 school year, nineteen percent of public school principals reported requiring uniforms, from being twelve percent a decade earlier. As of right now, the percentage of public schools who reported the enforcement of strict dress code rose from 47 percent to 57 percent during the decade. Many people will argue that school uniforms are a benefit to students due to the fact that it could possibly decrease bullying or that the uniform will increase work ethic. Instilling school uniforms can actually be a large distraction in a public school. Attending a place of education where the norm for dress code is sweatpants and hoodies quickly turns to khakis and polos, can change from being a step in the right direction to a major step in
Requiring uniforms would help reduce the victimization of students (Tatu and Palochko). This clearly shows how uniforms have a huge impact on kids and uniforms make it harder for them to pick on others based on what their wearing. Shelly Bartolacci, a learning support teacher at Easton Area High School addressed that, “Uniforms would put everyone on an even scale, although it takes away the freedom of how students want to dress” (Tatu and Palochko). Shelly’s statement explains that uniforms would cut
At the beginning of the 20th century almost no parent or faculty had any concerns with how students dressed to attend school. Nowadays, though, this is a giant concern among students, parents, and school board officials. Many arguments have been made over the matter saying uniforms should be required and enforced in schools. But, uniforms should not be required as they ultimately eliminate freedom of expression, promote conformity over individuality, may have a detrimental effect on students self image, emphasize the socioeconomic divisions they are supposed to eliminate, and lastly, school uniforms in public schools undermine the promise of a free education by adding an extra expense for families.
How will school uniforms affect the learning environment? Will it make it better or worse? Will the amount of bullying decrease in the school. If the bullying is reduced, will it make it easier to identify intruders? Is it going to help make the school a safer place for the students? What does the type of clothing the students wear say about the school? Would school uniforms provide a better representation of the school? Would having a required uniform benefit the school systems? The answers to all of these questions will explain why school uniforms should be strictly enforced in all public
In conclusion public schools should be able to require uniforms for their students in result of all the benefits that have been collected from uniforms research. Uniforms benefit the school, family and kids. Kids wearing uniforms help prevents bullying by not having the children judge each other on social standing. By being easier to choose they save time in the morning for both parent and children. Even with all the self-expression controversies, uniforms really help the students learn and experience different way to show themselves through new things. uniforms have a positive effect on most aspects of a daily life, starting with time in the morning and ending with the student working on some new project to better express themselves.
In the past few decades school has shifted its focus from education to fashion. Students are judged upon their shoes or jeans instead of what they know. Uniforms in the public education system could be a nice plan, not only is it cost effective, also it provides the students an opportunity to focus on their studies and not have to be compelled to worry about what to wear tomorrow. Also the crime or violence rate normally drops in schools that have a uniform policy, and people that don't belong on the schools property are noticed quicker and easier. Private schools have already taken in this concept, as well as some schools in England and Australia. Early morning or late evening fights over what's allowed to be worn to school may come to an end if uniforms are issued within the public school system.
School uniforms are a boiling conversation point these days. There are so many well-built points of view about what route parents, students, and superintendents wish to go in. It has been disputed that school uniforms have the potential to make a school safer, that uniforms reduce harassment or self-esteem issues, and that uniforms return the focus to the students' learning. I disagree. I, in fact think that school uniforms do not help make our schools a more secure place, I think that they do not revisit the center of attention to student's education - they just shifted where the attention was previous, and that they won’t help cut down on harassment or self- esteem issues in school.
As the world has recently passed through the global financial crisis that begun in 2008 in the USA with the banks’ collapsing, analysts are giving different opinions and making new economic hypothesizes about the origin of, as well as the process of different countries escaped from the crisis. Among all these new “theories”, the case of Islamic banks is interesting in terms of its nature and consequences. In my essay, I will try to highlight the basic principles of the Islamic finance, the reasons of the restriction of interest, the most important tools used by Islamic banks in economic activities and brief explanation of them, and finally my view point of the probable future improvement of the Islamic financial system.
Since the 1990 's schools have reported amazing results by mandating a school uniform policy. Konheim-Kalkstein, Y. L (2006) write: “ School uniforms, proponents have said, can lead to improved discipline and classroom behavior, increased school attendance, respect for teachers, better school performance, higher student self-esteem and confidence, lower