Walking to the cafeteria is like walking, or running, in a marathon. If I could make a significant change to the structure or appearance to my school, I would add a cafeteria hallway for the middle school. First, students and staff members would not have to walk as far to eat lunch. Most staff and students have to walk down the stairs just to go get their lunches. Second, staff members and students would have much longer lunches. Some schools have longer lunches, like the high school. Last, the middle school and the high school would be separated from each other. Most schools are not together like we are. As can be seen, I would definitely change is I would add a cafeteria hallway. First of all, the students and most of the staff members have to walk pretty far to eat lunch. One reason is the middle school cafeteria is on the high school side in the school building, so the cafeteria hallway would be in the middle school. A second reason is the students that have ISS do not have to walk all the way to the high school just to get their food and walk back to the ISS room. A final reason is the cafeteria hallway would be closer to more staff members, so if a student gets signed out of school they do not have to walk that far to go to the front desk. After all, all of the students and staff members would not have to walk far just to eat their lunches. …show more content…
One way is all of the students and staff at the end of the line gets to eat more and longer than they do now, and it does not help the kids who eat slowly in the first place. Another way is it will not take long to get to the cafeteria, so everyone, students and staff members, gets to eat lunch. A final way is there will be much shorter lines because there will be more lines and more places to sit down and eat. All in all, staff members and students would have much longer lunches due to the cafeteria
For the majority of high school students having the option to go home for lunch or to go somewhere to eat would be the ultimate dream. High school students do not think about the dangers and worry that open campus lunch would cause for staff and parents. They do not think about the small sum of students who would spend that time doing drugs or making messes at local businesses. There would also be an amount of students who would not return, or they may be late returning to school due to traffic at fast food places. Faculty would also have the fret of an increase of car accidents caused from the limited time students would have to go wherever and get back before their next class. On the other hand, students would learn responsibilities and time management. Parents would be forced to give their children money to eat out. Along with the money on their school lunch accounts, or they would be apart of the free lunch school program. Schools cannot have open campus lunches
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
Limited, restricted, and restrained. Are you having enough time to fully demolish your food in lunch? Do you have a problem enjoying lunch knowing you have to rush? Longer lunches for everyone will be extremely beneficial in many ways. I’m assuming that most of you will argue that expanding lunch isn't harmful. You'll probably agree that longer many periods expose pros. However they're cons included such as a decrease in time to get for filled with education. Although that's horrible students need a break some times. Administrators need to extend lunch to one hour.
One reason our school should get a new lunch menu is many students do not like the food served. For example, a survey was taken and of the 31 students 100% said they disliked the food. As student Bryan Huang said, “The lunches are horrible, they need better choices and more choices.” In other words, the food is not delicious and there are not many choices. Also, when children don’t get proper nutrition they have trouble focusing in school. Most students do not buy lunch because they feel it is unappealing and do not like the food served. Many students go to other kids and ask for food. In addition, many students do not eat breakfast so they rely on lunch to fuel them for the day. But, if they do not like the food served they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can
To solve this problem, we need the cafeteria to be open more hours. If it is because of the need of workers in those other times, it is a big change that even students won't mind to work in the cafeteria to have it open for longer hours. Another idea would be to have longer hours open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Even if it is not open for the whole day, longer hours might allow more comfort ability for everyone. We know that with out food, one cannot concentrate in their studies, nor perform their work well.
Lunch is one of the most important meals of the day and is consumed mostly in school cafeterias for children and adolescence. Wholesome lunches are vital in maintaining a healthy metabolism and give children energy for the rest of the school day. Children are advised to eat healthily but do not always do so because the choices of tastier, fatty foods offered in school cafeterias. The National School Lunch Program, NSLP, which is a federally assisted meal program operating in public and nonprofit private schools set nutritious guidelines for lunches served in school cafeterias (USDA). However, school campuses still offer foods high in fat as well as selling candy, chips, and soda in their vending machines, as well as their school shops. In order
For my research I used Berkner High Schools B lunch, on Thursday January 5, 2017. The cafeteria is very big, and is filled with many tables, and seats. At the front of the cafeteria students line up in different lines to get their food. A lot of the time in the back of the cafeteria clubs, sports, and other school related organizations advertise or give information about what is going on at the school in the near future. There is also staff such ad principles, janitors, and police officers walking around checking on the students, to make sure there are not any unnecessary disruptions.
First, longer school lunches will cause classes to be shorter, resulting in less learning time. The students will not gain information quickly, and would have less time to ask teachers questions. Teachers would have to stay at school longer. Teachers already have to stay after school to grade assignments, and bring work home as well. They will have to plan lessons and grade. If they do this, they will be extremely tired and will not be attentive in class. If they are tired, they could fall asleep in class, and might not teach the best that they can. Students already having less learning time will get terrible teaching and information, and then they will not be smart. Non-intelligent students might not get into university or college, and would have to work without a degree, earning little money. Longer lunches will have an impact on teachers, and students' futures. The school district should not agree to have longer lunches, as it will be awful for students.
open campus lunch would give them relaxation, freedom, and more concentration to come back more focused on their school work. Open campus lunch will aid in students dedication to want to come back to
With the implementation of the “Healthy Kids Hunger-Free Act” schools are not serving as many lunches and participation is decreasing. According to the Government Accountability Office (GOA), “Nationwide, student participation declined by 1.2 million students(or 3.7 percent) from school year 2010-2011 through school year 2012-2013, after having increased steadily for many years”(sec. 1). The school lunches became more distasteful and bland; the combinations of foods did not make sense, and the portion sizes decreased significantly. In order to support the cafeteria
All kids need to eat lunch there for, getting lunch ready can and should be a blessing for children of all ages. Asking kindly what they want for lunch is wonderful. After that, getting the food out will be helpful. Being quick at lunch will help the incapable
The cafeteria is not merely a place for small children; now that I am in college, I spend more time in the cafeteria than ever. Living in the dorms, I have no kitchen or any other place to cook. Instead, I have a meal plan that offers me fourteen meals each week at the Stanford/Hecht cafeteria. I eat lunch and dinner there as my two meals on most days. But, I do not and cannot go to the cafeteria and just get food. I get much more.
All cafeterias at all of the different schools are different from each other. One cafeteria can be loud and one could not or one could be big or one can be small. These are a few example of different types of cafeterias in the United States. Cafeterias have changed in some ways but not many changes are obvious to people. Some of the changes school cafeterias should make are having a longer lunch period, make it more appealing, and healthier food options.
One way in which students develop this means of personal space is through the location within the dining halls that they choose to sit at. The arrangement of seating varies throughout each dining hall, with each embodying its own unique style. What Wilsbach, Mills, and Hulbert all have in common is that the kitchen and dining or eating areas are very distinct. The one exception of this rule would be “my kitchen” in Mills. “My kitchen” is a room located off of the Mills central dining area, and is a place where students can cook and prepare their own food if they so choose. I sat and did observations within “my kitchen” in order to better understand how students utilized that room. Some students would simply come into the room, prepare themselves a plate of food, and then leave to continue sitting in the central dining area. Other students would come into the room, prepare their food, and then pick out a seat at one of the tables if one was available. In some cases, a student or a group of students would bring in the standard, staff prepared food into “my kitchen” to sit and eat without preparing any food at all. This interested me, so I made sure to speak with some of the students who did this to try and see why they preferred eating in this room instead of the main dining area. I had specific interview questions for these students such as, “Do you always choose to sit
Second of all, the time, I must say, is awful we do not get enough time in between classes to get into class on time. Teachers say that we need a different binder for each class I do not see why but it is understandable that is why we need more time at our lockers. I believe that having a full sized locker that would help cut down on tardiness. After all, the lockers size could use an upgrade I am sure many others