Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should students have an open campus lunch
Should students have an open campus lunch
Why an open campus lunch is bad
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When I was in high school, several Juniors and Seniors had their own cars to go wherever they wanted. However, the school administrators and school district were very strict on students skipping class, leaving school for lunch, and family or friends bringing food for students to eat during lunch time. In this day an age, a lot of teens are mature enough to drive, vote if they are 18, hold down a job, watch R-rated movies, and even marry in some states. Since teens are trusted with doing those factors they should be trusted enough to leave campus for lunch and decide whatever food they want to eat. Therefore, open campus lunch should be allowed because it allows for students to develop into mature adults, students will appreciate a varied diet, …show more content…
and students will be helping the local economy. Furthermore, students leaving campus for lunch allows them to be mature and independent at the same time.
Students would be mature enough to go to whichever restaurant of their choosing and independently pick whatever food choice that they want. Most teens like I did crave that independence of being able to do something if given the chance. For example, after school my friends and I would often get together to go eat at a restaurant of our choosing. Which helped develop our independence and maturity since we were not being dictated by anyone on what we needed to eat, how long we had to eat, and where we were assigned to eat. In addition, there are several parents and school administrators who believe open campus lunch puts students at risk of not coming back to the school and commit risky behavior. However, risky behavior is being committed every second of every day by more adults than teens in high school. When students are already permitted to stay on campus all day sitting down in chairs wearing out their bottoms for hours it makes them want to leave campus. Allowing open campus lunch would give them relaxation, freedom, and more concentration to come back more focused on their school work. Open campus lunch will aid in students dedication to want to come back to …show more content…
school. Moreover, several teens do not enjoy cafeteria lunch because of the poor food choice and often prefer a better varied diet. Open campus lunch would allow for students to make the decision whether they want a salad, fast food, or several other food choices. Students would not be subjected to eating all the unhealthy pizzas, cheeseburgers, Mexican taquitos, or other unhealthy foods and snacks often served at school during lunch time. However, there is often the constant argument from parents and school administrators that students will be more engaged in eating unhealthy food off campus.
however, they often forget there is plenty of unhealthy food on campus such as, the foods I mentioned earlier and the vending machine snacks all over the schools. Several high school students participate in athletics such as, Football, Soccer, Volleyball, Tennis, and Basketball. All of those activities encourage a healthy diet in order for students to perform at an elite level. Therefore, school administrators should trust that those athletes will continually pick nutritious food choices off campus and influence their friends not in athletic activities to do so as well. Furthermore, open campus lunch helps the local economy since students would often eat at restaurants, cafes, and bistros. Open campus lunch would actually help these businesses boost revenues and sales keeping the local economy strong and vibrant. Although school administrators would argue that students leaving campus for lunch would reduce school revenues. However, schools still can fall back on students spending money on snacks at the vending machine and there are a handful of students who still prefer school lunch because it might be more expensive to eat at restaurants than at the
school. Overall, open campus lunch should be authorized in all schools because it will aid in adolescent maturity, offer varied nutritious food choices, and promote local businesses. Most parents, school administrators, and teachers want to see students succeed down the road. So, allowing students the freedom to leave campus and choose what meal they want all while promoting the economy benefits everyone in the end. However, there should definitely be restrictions upon time provided and repercussions put in place if students do not abide by open campus lunch rules. Whether it be detention or losing the privilege to eat off campus because teens need to learn that there are repercussions for not abiding by the rules.
Also if Oak Creek High School has off-campus lunch, the school would save more money. By letting the student body have an open campus lunch, the school would be required to spend less money for clean up supplies, equipment, and for maintaining the cafeteria. The less that’s spent and the more that’s saved will allow more money to be available. There could be more money for extra-curricular activities, sports, and clubs. The money could be used t...
First, there is a lot of benefits for open campus lunch. Open campus lunch gives all of the students an opportunity to learn responsibility. It is also a great way to teach them how to interact with the real world. It can make all student better adults in the future. They will learn from open campus lunch to not make big mistake.Once they get used to having open campus lunch, when they graduate they will know what to expect, because
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
On the other hand, having open campus lunch would force students to learn time management and teach them what future responsibilities for college and employment. Students would have thirty minutes to get where they would choose to eat and back while remaining punctual. Some students would receive tardies, some would be early, some would be right on time, and some would not return. Since high school prepares students for college, having open campus lunch would be a great thing for students to get
Today, La Mirada High School has a “closed campus” lunch policy. A closed campus lunch policy means that students can not leave campus to eat and are forced to eat food provided by the district at a price rate which the school chooses. Each year La Mirada and other High Schools alike sell hundreds of lunches a day totalling in thousands of dollars in sales. Money is most likely a major factor in why most schools don’t have an “open campus” lunch policy. Is it right that schools only provide one alternative to bringing a sack of lunch to school when it comes to feeding students at school? To me, a policy such as closed campus lunch is unjust and needs to be revised.
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
Recently closed campus has been an argument at our school lately. Should a student have the choice to leave campus? Yes it’s a great idea but lately the school board has been putting it in our heads that that is a bad idea. Students love an open campus it gives them variety. They hate the idea of eating the same unappealing meal every day. Lunch gives students a moment to blow off steam and have some free time. Open campus gives students the time to learn to be more responsible.
Dining facilities, especially the main on-campus food facility, Gibbons Dining Hall, need to remain open later to accommodate everyone. By giving students more time to eat, more students would opt for the more costly meal plans and not have to load up on snacks and other items from off campus stores such as Wal-mart. The less students go off campus, the more likely their revenue is to stay in the university. The addition of dining hours would certainly benefit everyone involved in the university.
Students will be able to eat wherever they please and they will be able to leave the school during lunch.
One reason our school should get a new lunch menu is many students do not like the food served. For example, a survey was taken and of the 31 students 100% said they disliked the food. As student Bryan Huang said, “The lunches are horrible, they need better choices and more choices.” In other words, the food is not delicious and there are not many choices. Also, when children don’t get proper nutrition they have trouble focusing in school. Most students do not buy lunch because they feel it is unappealing and do not like the food served. Many students go to other kids and ask for food. In addition, many students do not eat breakfast so they rely on lunch to fuel them for the day. But, if they do not like the food served they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can
If they ban students it can cause parents to be mad because their kids are not being able to eat lunch there. It can also cause the business to lose 75% of its customers. Also kids need a good lunch to be able to go back into class and be able to focus.
School boards have dealt with complaints and issues in regards to letting their students leave school for lunch, which is their “free time” of the day. Certain teachers say the so-called "solution" of closed campus during lunch is the work of district officials who aren’t trusting students during the only time of the day that students can socialize and be free from schoolwork and lecture. If a closed campus will “eliminate” problems such as attendance rates and low budgets for lunch, the lack of freedom will create more problems like rebelling underclassmen and misconduct among the students. There aren't even any significant reasons to enforce it. It would just be a big hassle for the students, and an equal hassle for the teachers who have
The student can now have a mental break. Lunch is a period of time not meant to be crowded with friends, food, school work, and everything else. It is a break to relax and do what the student would like to. Students can have extra time to eat now. The typical lunch period currently is around thirty minutes. Humans were not built to wait in a line to then devour food before having to leave. With an open campus lunch period the student can have some extra time to eat. Students can have a meet together or eat at a certain place together. Also students can choose varied foods, allowing them to have what is appetizing to them at that time. Or if the student want to leave school but not spend money they can eat or cook at home. Allowing the family to save money by not having to pay for school lunches. Plus the benefits are not just for
Why is this a problem? Cafeteria food is often cheap, bought in bulk, high in calories, malnutritious, and microwaved. Student polls and opinions prove this. Therefore, this leads to a suggestion: Healthier, tastier foods and a better, more advanced lunch system should be implemented. First of all, students aren’t motivated to eat unhealthy, not-tasty food.
Not only do students save time, but now students have the benefit of having a variety to choose from. Having multiple private food vendors on campus gives students a variety to choose from rather than just the usual. Students typically get tired of eating the same food. For instance, eating the same old breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day can make eating dreadful. Just like when a mom feeds her child last night 's leftovers. Eating just isn 't the same which is why students need a variety on campus. Now that there is a diversity of foods students are likely to stay on campus, which is beneficial if a student has back to back classes. Also, now that students have a variety to choose from, students can replenish their taste buds and keep themselves pleased. One other perk to having a variety is students can have a place they really enjoy. For instance, everyone has a favorite place to go to that is impossible to get sick of, it is very possible