Schlesinger's Canon Vs. My High School's Canon

1048 Words3 Pages

In school, whether it be at the high school or college levels, there are

usually lists of books thought as being essential reading. Arthur M.

Schlesinger, Jr.--a Pulitzer Prize winning historian--calls this list in his

book The Disuniting of America, a "canon" or "canonical literature." A problem

exists with this canon, at least Schlesinger claims there is. He states that

the canon is being used "as an instrument of European oppression enforcing the

hegemony of the white race, the male sex, and the capitalist class…" From my

high school experience, I believe this is not true. At my high school, teachers

encourage students to read not only standard English literature, but also to

study the great writers of other cultures.

There is a great deal of European influence in American society and in

American education. Some people, like the Afrocentrists, feel that this

influence is too heavy and that schools should also be teaching about other

cultures in their classes. Schlesinger states in his book that he "believes in

the importance of teaching Americans the history of other cultures—East Asia,

Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, Polynesia." Since we live in a

multicultural society, we should be teaching a multicultural curriculum.

At my high school, I feel as if I received this type of education. The

teachers encourage students to read not only standard English literature, but

also to study the great writers of other ethnicities. My high school is a

private college preparatory institution in San Francisco. Some authors whose

works we read in our English classes consisted of Shakespeare, Mark Twain, Jane

Austen, Ovid, Maya Angelou, Chaim Potok, John Steinbeck, Amy Tan, Chinua Achebe,

and C. S. Lewis.

This curriculum is not at all what Schlesinger claims to be the current

"American literary canon: Emerson, Jefferson, Melville, Whitman, Hawthorne,

Thoreau, Lincoln, Twain, Dickinson, William and Henry James, Henry Adams, Holmes,

Dreiser, Faulknner, O' Neill." We touched on most of these people also, but

not nearly as in depth as we did the other authors. Schlesinger's list seems to

point out his fact that the canon is being used for European oppression and he

deliberately chooses to add to his list only those "white male" authors. But

they are not the only authors we study, at least at my school. He deliberately,

or so it seems, to neglect current successful authors, like Maya Angelou- who is

both female and black- whose books, like her autobiography "I Know Why the Caged

Bird Sings," are being used in English classes all around the country.

Chaim Potok, another current author we studied is also neither European nor

More about Schlesinger's Canon Vs. My High School's Canon

Open Document