Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion and medical ethics
Issue on reproductive rights
Abortion and medical ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Abortion and medical ethics
In Sallie Tisdale’s We do Abortions Here: A Nurse’s Story, the author struggles with the morality of working at a clinic where she helps perform abortions as a registered nurse. She wrestles with wanting to help the scared women who come into her clinic while also being destroyed by the sights and cruelty of aborting babies. She battles back and forth throughout the entire essay and remains relatively undecided on where she lies ethically on the issue, stating on pages 715 and 716 that as she cleans out baby remains out of jars, “.. I imagine a world where this won’t be necessary, and return to the world where it is.” This shows how she is traumatically affected by her work, but she believes it is a necessary evil for the women walking into …show more content…
Tisdale conveys the mother as helpless with no other option than for her unborn baby to end up in “another basin.” The author’s suggestion that the baby and mother will go through initial hard times due to her addiction is true, however, Tisdale fails to mention, throughout the entire essay, options for the futures of the babies ranging outside of abortion. In this specific example, Tisdale never attempted to communicate to the young mother that keeping the child could force the mother to get on the right path. Or that the mother could reach out for governmental assistance, assistance that helps pay for food, shelter and other needs of parents and the child. There are thousands of infertile couples who would love for a chance to adopt an unwanted baby. I have a cousin who works in the baby ward of a hospital in Columbus and she has loads upon loads of stories with women who were addicted to drugs, had a baby and were able to turn their life around because of the responsibility they felt. These stories are heartwarming, but also contain lots of examples of how the government and other aid groups are more than willing to help needy mothers. But Tisdale’s only assistance to the girl is to, “utter another kind phrase of reassurance.” The author often makes referrals to the naive …show more content…
Growing up with 4 younger siblings and many cousins has taught me that all babies can turn into wonderful people. By killing a baby and preventing its development into a full person is the ultimate undervaluing of a life. To take the life of a future being, especially in the horrific way of abortions which is essentially tearing and vacuuming a fetus out of a pregnant woman, would wreak havoc on anyone having to witness it day after day. The author’s battle inside of her heart would not exist if she taught these women and couples about the many alternative options that did not end in their baby dying. Amidst discussing this ethical battle, Tisdale states, “Each basin I empty is a promise- but a promise broken a long time ago,” and is speaking of the women’s unpreparedness to raise a child and the large number of women who fall victim to failed contraceptives. It is easily argued that the promise, made with the decision to have sex, of the mother to her child should be stronger than the promise of two mates. Even Tisdale correctly says on page 713 that, “If the human bond to a child were as primitive and unflinchingly narrow as that of other animals, there would be no abortion,” showing that these women and couples value a newborn life less than a wild animal would value its offspring.
Margaret Olivia Little’s “The Moral Permissibility of Abortion” much like that Judith Jarvis Thomson’s agues over the decent and indecencies of abortion. She comes to a similar conclusion that, “no abortion in early term is ever unjust, though they can be indecent.” Little covers the impact on women throughout a pregnancy and when abortions are sought ‘for the sake of the undeveloped human, and concludes that, “a potential
This quote stood out to me because it offered a new perspective to the controversial issues on abortion. After reading this, I realized how abortion was always tied to the women, which not only isolates them in this problem but also unconsciously reduces them to their reproductive functions. The
In her essay, “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thompson outlines the most common arguments that people defend, and explains her views regarding each of these. She shares numerous examples and situations that she believes will support her views. One of her most prominent arguments is that of whether or not a fetus has moral standing as a “person.” She highlights the so called “battle” between an innocent life, the fetus, and the bodily rights of the mother. Within this argument, Judith outlines for us several situations which can provide people with a different outlook regarding abortion. Throughout Judith’s essay, she does not truly give a clear stance, but rather allows her readers to choose for themselves.
...e essay she says “but I don’t feel all one way about abortion anymore, and I don’t think it serves a just cause to pretend that many of us do”(629). This quote lets the reader identify with it being okay to feel conflicted about abortion. It seems that often people feel they have to choose sides in the abortion debate. However, Quindlen allows her audience to find comfort and acceptance and not really knowing what they would do if ever faced with this decision. She uses a balance of real life examples that she has experienced and witnessed. Most of her examples touch the reader deep down inside so that they are left feeling as if they were a fly on the wall when these things were going on.
Our culture has a stringent belief that creating new life if a beautiful process which should be cherished. Most often, the birth process is without complications and the results are a healthy active child. In retrospect, many individuals feel that there are circumstances that make it morally wrong to bring a child into the world. This is most often the case when reproduction results in the existence of another human being with a considerably reduced chance at a quality life. To delve even further into the topic, there are individuals that feel they have been morally wronged by the conception in itself. Wrongful conception is a topic of debate among many who question the ethical principles involved with the sanctity of human life. This paper will analyze the ethical dilemmas of human dignity, compassion, non-malfeasance, and social justice, as well the legal issues associated with wrongful conception.
...e open to all women at any point of pregnancy, and that the woman reserves the right as a fully conscious member of the moral community to choose to carry the child or not. She argues that fetuses are not persons or members of the moral community because they don’t fulfill the five qualities of personhood she has fashioned. Warren’s arguments are valid, mostly sound, and cover just about all aspects of the overall topic. However much she was inconsistent on the topic of infanticide, her overall writing was well done and consistent. Warren rejects emotional appeal in a very Vulcan like manner; devout to reason and logic and in doing so has created a well-written paper based solely on this rational mindset.
When the smoke clears and the dust settles, only the women who experienced such events in their lives should speak on the psychological effects of abortions. However, I do know, as the poet so puts it (Banh, 2014) that, I knew them all though faintly, I loved them all and I will always have an open space in my heart for all my un-born children.
Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus. While I regard the moral status of the foetus as important, it is not the central issue that determines the moral justifiability of abortion. The foetus may be awarded a level of moral status, nevertheless, such status does not result in the prescription of a set moral judgement. As with many morally significant issues, there are competing interests and a variety of possible outcomes that need to be considered when making a moral judgement on abortion. While we need to determine the moral status of the foetus in order to establish the type of entity we are dealing with, it does not, however, exist in a moral vacuum. There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus. Furthermore, I assert that moral status should be awarded as a matter of degree, based upon the capacities of sentience and self-consciousness an entity possesses. In a bid to reach a coherent conclusion on the issue, the moral status of both foetus and woman, along with the likely results of aborting a particular foetus, must be considered together. Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.
As said in Sarah's article "Med student was all for abortion, until he watched one happen", Sarah Terzo had received a message from an anonymous Med Student saying that a Med student was shadowing an abortion as his experience for his training but didn't take into consideration what the abortion would involve. He explains in his anonymous tip that he was very liberal and pro-choice, and Sarah read that, before, he only viewed the fetus as "a mass of cells." (Sarah, Page one). He was used to the thought of abortion and didn’t take on the thought that he would be disturbed by this performance, in fact, he saw this opportunity as something "new, edgy and exciting." This writer includes the full description of what the student observed. There was
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
In today’s world abortions are being used as a gateway for unexpected pregnancies that are caused by many reasons, searching for a solution women tend to believe that an abortion is the easiest way to get rid of these undesired situations. In Sallie Tisdale’s essay “We Do Abortions here: A nurse’s story”, she describes the emotions and the rules that she as being a nurse in an abortion clinic has to deal with every day. Tisdale uses paradox, her point of view and metaphor to make the reader understand that choosing abortion, either way, will not have a happy ending.
Being a mother is a lifelong job that requires copious time, energy, and money. There are myriad different reasons in which a woman would consider getting an abortion. The decision is often tragic and painful for the mother. It is one of the biggest choices a woman will make. Many people have strong beliefs about abortion, and if a mother makes a decision that they do not agree with they sometimes turn against the mother, and enkindle egregious feelings about their decision for the rest of their life. Indeed a woman may not get an abortion for selfish reasons or out of convenience, but out of a desire to protect certain important values such as her own health or a decent standard of living for the other members of the family. Additional intentions for having abortion include rape, financial difficulties, obligation by family members, or danger to the baby’s health (Roleff
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”
It is saddening to see humans of the female gender, who find themselves in a situation that requires introducing a new life into the world; to abort such a precious gift. Many may wonder how these poor, innocent, unborn children are then discarded after the abortion procedure. One cannot fathom the reason of these gruesome murders that happens within these medical facilities. Babies are disposed in the red waste bins of these facilities, and later incinerated. Some may either be flushed down garbage disposals or even be sold off for research purposes. The issue of abortion is not just a social one, but also a human rights issue among the unborn children. I believe if the human rights of these children has been violated, then all other rights of humans are certainly meaningless.
Most people agree that abortion should be a rare procedure. To accomplish that ideal, our society must proactively, by providing resources and support, offer pregnant women the hope that carrying their babies to term is not the end of their plans and dreams. Then their difficult decisions would really be true choices vice acts of desperation. After all, it is just as much “pro-choice” for a woman to take charge of her life and courageously carr...