Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book and film comparison
Books and movies similarities and differences
Compare and contrast the plot of a book and a movie made from the same book
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and film comparison
Salem’s Lot written by American author Stephen King, is a horror novel that is about a writer named Ben Mears who is writing about the Marsten House, which is a house that he had a bad experience in as a child. He has returned home to face the fears of his childhood, only to come and find out that he has a new set of fears waiting upon him. Ben goes back to the town of Jerusalem’s Lot (or Salem’s Lot), which is located in Maine. He had lived in Maine from age 5 to age 9, so this town wasn’t new to him, but it has been awhile, he has returned when he was 25. He had realized something was oddly different this time back around. The residents are becoming vampires, and he knew something wasn’t right. After so much has gone wrong during his visit, he flies to Mexico to recover from the horrific trip. A year later, he returns once again, with a plan to destroy the Marsten house and the entire town once and for all. He had started a brush fire in the woods near the town of the residents, because there was way too many vampires to take out. …show more content…
There’s 2 different versions, one was released in 2004 and directed by Jeffrey M. Hayes. The version made in 1979 which was directed by Tobe Hooper, and starred David Soul (an American-British actor) and James Mason (an English actor). Both the movie and the book are about the same thing, has the same story, but they do have their differences, whether they be major or small. Mostly every book and movie are not going to be 100% the exact same, for the reason being, when written, stories are told with more enthusiasm, emotion, and told much more deeply, rather than in movies, you might not get all of the details and feelings you do in the
This is my view on the movie and book. I likes the movie better the book because the
The characters make a big difference in the movie and the book. One thing they both have in common is that Otis Amber and Berthe Erica Crow get married. And that Edgar Jennings Plum and Angela Wexler get engaged instead of Doctor Denton Deere. Also Jake Wexler is a gambler instead of being a bookie.
First of all in the book it gives much more detail than the movie. The book written by wilson rawls is much more heartwarming than the movie that was made in 1974. The book had a lot more detail than the movie, the movie has missing events that were in the book. For example in the book Billy had three sisters in the movie
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
The film is a fairly faithful adaptation of the book. The amateurish style of the book gives it some appeal as a more sleek and sophisticated style wouldn’t evoke a sense of angst’ desperation and confusion that the novel does.
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
...rtrayed differently in the movie. Lennie is shown as being very mentally challenged, whereas in the book he is just a little slow and has a mind of a young child. Although some changes are made in the movie to make it flow better, it is still based on the same story as the book. The movie has the same plot line and characters, and some of the scenes are told in the exact same way as they are in the novel. As well, the movie and the book give out the same themes. This story is about how all the people in the Great Depression were trying to escape their unhappy, lonely lives, but weren’t capable of doing so. The movie stays very true to the book even though some things are removed or added. Everything that is added or changed still works very well and captures the film perfectly.
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
The Salem Witch Trials were a scary time but the director of this movie made it seem action packed. The actors made it seem like they actually lived in that time. The wardrobe in the movie also had a huge impact on how the movie appeared and it also told the viewer how to be emotionally. I would give this movie a thumbs up for many reasons. Now I am going to tell you about the characters and the directors perspective.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
Imagine a scenario in which the characters of Grimm’s fairy tales become intertwined into one storyline, but with a modern twist on the idealism of fairy tales. Moreover, such an instance comes to life with “Into the Woods.” Furthermore, the film adaptation of the Broadway play bolsters the dark but satirical tone through its whimsical yet grimy sets, and its mysterious lighting, and generally impressive special effects. Additionally, the social status of the characters is often told through the costumes they wear. The songs in this musical, many of which were based on the play, were supported through the background music, of which helps to establish the emotions during said songs.
Both directors made an excellent motion picture film capertering the brilliant moments described in the book. I think Jack clayton's 1974 version of the novels film did a fantastic job
In the state of Maine, an extremely talented writer in the genre of horror was born. This man is Stephen King. “King performs another rite common in contemporary bestsellerdom: he breaks social taboos” (Herron). Stephen King often produces novels that do not comply with the norm. “King reworks traditional material to the delight of the horror fan” (Herron). The idea of vampires that are capable of corrupting the majority of the town and the idea of a “haunted house” are both a classic ideas for a horror story and simply are “social taboos” (Herron). Characters in King's 'Salem's Lot such as Susan Norton and Father Callahan