SWOT Analysis Of IKEA

1715 Words4 Pages

IKEA
Introduction
 From early 1940’s IKEA has gone through the history of development from the woods of southern Sweden to a major experience in retails industry in over different parts of the world.The first furniture showroom was open in Almhult, Sweden, in 1953. The founder Ingvar Kamprad was born in a small village in Sweden, as a young boy Ingvar had ideas to develop a business. The key component of its success is finding the right manufacturer for the right product.
Some facts and figures about the company

The Firm specific advantages of IKEA is that when most of the other furniture industries were localized concentrating on the domestic market ,and the Swedish industry crowned themselves as the best in the industry and that is when IKEA entered into the global industry.
• Their products were shipped after un-assembling the parts in order to reduce the cost incurred in shipping. Its cost-effectiveness was used to target the market in US later.
• Another pioneering move was to include customers in the value chain for radically reducing the cost .They did the assembling themselves at home.
• Its expansion in various countries was due to its successful culture.
• It did not turn to be successful in USA because there they ran into a few culture clashes and the tastes of furniture was totally different. Moreover intense competition , Swedish law and Long period in shipment also made expansion into US difficult
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTH
• In the Global market place IKEA has a strong leadership position. It has a very successful marketing strategy.
• The competitive advantage of the company is its competitive prices.
• This cost effectiveness concept is taken into consideration from the beginni...

... middle of paper ...

...t the best products with competitive prices.

Since market and profit advantages are continuously eroding by time, company has to be innovative and should be continuously competitive.
Always products from countries with a very positive image tend to be evaluated favorably and also vice versa. All these risks should be taken into consideration while developing the strategy of entering the new market. In both these cases both the companies have a strong Brand name and this is a competitive advantage for both the companies while entering a new market but IKEA need to be more innovative and adaptable to the new market trends and develop and market designs accordingly. Same with Sony Rivalry and competition in this industry is very high and they need to be innovative and they need to improve their R&D in order to meets the consumers demand or attract their demand.

Open Document