Unveiling the Paradox of Stolen Slaves

559 Words2 Pages

As I researched the Runaway slave advertisements it came to my attention that not all of the slaves were “runaways”, and that many of them had been stolen. It made me wonder, were these slaves happy that they were stole? Were these slaves moved to a better place or were they suffering more than before? What gave these people the right to steal someone like they are a object and force them to do what they want them to do. I hate how slaves are looked at as a piece of property. I hate how the slaves were being stolen as if they were just an object. These slaves were people, they were all different and all had different personalities and characteristics. As I look through the slave advertisements for the slaves that were accused of being stole I noticed they all had rewards to be returned. I see ten, fifteen, twenty, …show more content…

This means that some of the slaves could have been taken somewhere where they know nothing about the culture or language. This can be a very hard thing for slaves to go through especially if they were children that were stolen away from their parents and slave owners. I think that some these slaveowners may have been concerned about the well being of their slaves that were stolen. In all of the ads the slave owners had rewards but was this because they cared about the slaves or they cared about the profit or labor they would be loosing? Slavery is such a controversial topic, these slave owners may think they were doing the right thing, but sometimes their intentions weren't the best for the slave. I believe that it would have been a lot different if the slaves would have got to choose where they wanted to work, if they got paid, and if they got to leave whenever they chose. However this is not how it worked back then and we will never know whether or not the slaves in these ads were happy about being stolen or

Open Document