Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of the concept of ‘independence’ in the role of the external auditor
Relationship between internal and external auditing
Importance of independence to external auditing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Internal auditing has become an important part of corporate governance. Internal auditors are tasked with protecting an entity’s assets and producing reliable accounting reports used in decision-making processes. However, the most vital role of today’s internal auditor is testing the efficiency and effectiveness of all aspects of an entity’s operations (e.g., financial and nonfinancial; In’airat, 2015). According to In’airat, the components of corporate governance must cooperate with each other to ensure the efficiency of a functioning business. These components of corporate governance include, but are not limited to, the audit committee, internal auditor, executive management, financial management, and external auditors. Of these components, …show more content…
In’airat argued that the perceived levels of the independent variables (i.e., internal audit, internal control, and the external audit) would influence the perceived levels of fraud (i.e., dependent variable). The results of his quantitative research showed that internal audit proved significant at p = .01. In addition, In’airat found that, although the respondents perceived the existence of each component was important, the perception of effectiveness and implementation of these controls were low. Therefore, In’airat concluded the simple existence and implementation of corporate governance was not enough to reduce fraud. However, when the components of corporate governance are effectively established, reduction of fraud levels is …show more content…
(2015) examined the nature of financial statement fraud in a globalized market and found that typically management was the perpetrator of the fraud. In an international marketplace, it is still common to compensate managers with a fixed salary and a bonus based on company performance (Dimitrijevic et al., 2015). Compensating organizational managers based on company performance creates a potential risk, in that management may place self-interest before the best interests of the entity, which can lead to undesirable consequences, such as financial statement fraud (Dimitrijevic et al., 2015). Most frauds involved the income statement’s revenues and expenses, which management easily concealed (Albrecht, Holland et al., 2015; Dimitrijevic et al., 2015). False revenues included such activities as fictitious invoices, recognizing revenue in advance or postponing revenue recognition, and duplicated posting of invoices. False expenses included such activities as aggressive asset write-offs, increase/decrease depreciation expenses, improper capitalization, and deferring costs into another accounting
But the stakeholders play a very important role in preventing and deterring fraud. Stakeholders includes customers, suppliers, employees, the community and the government. Each play an important role since they have an interest in the integrity of financial reports of the publicly-traded company. Employees have a vested interest in the company’s success and they have a responsibility to protect their interest. Their roles may start from the bottom but they are key players in the company. To help deter or prevent financial statement fraud, the employee must report financial reporting fraud if it is detected. This can be done by way of a vigorous whistleblower program of some other tip line provided by the company. The community and its members, including the news media, can play a regulator role by confirming that the company is a good citizen with fair business practices. Shareholders should make sure that any company in which they’d like to invest is in compliance with standards of oversight and ethics. Investors need to play and active role also. They should be actively involved by monitoring the companies in which they invest. They should attend shareholder’s meeting regularly to discuss concerns and check the books of the company. This will allow them to stay current with what is going on within the company. Shareholders should always remain vigilant and make
Individual Article Review Lily Cobian LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Ramon E. Ortiz-Velez Individual Article Review Introduction My article review is based on Sarbanes-Oxley and audit failure, a critical examination why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was established and why it is not a guarantee to prevent failure of audits. Sarbanes-Oxley Act talks about scandals of Enron which occurred in 2001 and even more appalling the company’s auditor, Arthur Anderson, found guilty of shredding company documents after finding out Enron Company was going to be audited. The exorbitant amounts of money auditors get paid to hide audit discrepancies was also beyond belief. The article went on to explain many companies hire relatives or friends to do their audits, resulting in fraud, money embezzlement, corruption and even the demise of companies. Resulting in the public losing faith in the accounting profession, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 by congress was designed to restrict what company owners and auditors can and cannot do. From what I gathered in the article, ever since the implementation of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act there has been somewhat of an improvement but questions are still being asked as to why there are still issues that are not being targeted in hopes of preventing more audit failures. The article also talked about four common causes of audit failure: unintentional auditor mistakes, fraud, fatigue and auditor client relationships. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct clearly states an independent auditor because it produces a credible audit, however, when there is conflict of interest, the relation of a former employer, or a relative or even the fear of getting fire...
Madura, Jeff. What Every Investor Needs to Know About Accounting Fraud. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 1-156
Krishan, G.V., & Wei, Y. (2012). Do small firms benefit from auditor attestation of internal control effectiveness? Auditing, 31(4), 115-137. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50238
The oversight responsibilities of the board, the CAE lacking of expertise or broad understanding of financial controls and responsibilities, and the understaffed internal audit functions lacking of independence and direct access to the board of directors contributed to the absence of internal controls. To begin with, the board should be retrained to achieve financial literacy to review financial reporting. Other than attending formal meetings, the board of directors should be more involved with the management. For the Audit Committee, the two members who were recruited as acquaintances to Brennahan need be replaced with experts who are more sufficiently knowledgeable about accounting rules beyond merely “financially literate”. Furthermore, the internal audit functions need to expand with different expertise commensurate with the expanded activities of the organization, testing financial reporting rather than internal controls from an operational perspective. The CAE should be more independent and proactive to execute audit plans, instead of following orders from the CFO, and initiate a direct and efficient communication between internal audit and audit
[17] Robert K. Elliot, CPA and John J. Willingham PhD, CPA, Management Fraud: Detection and Deterrence. New York: Petrocelli Books, Inc., 1980, pp. vii.
Sunbeam committed the following two fraud schemes while Al Dunlap was the company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO): (1) Improper Timing of Revenue Recognition via Bill Hold Sales, Consignment Sales, and Other Contingency Sales and (2) Overstating Earnings via Improper Use of Restructuring Reserves. A series of detection methods were utilized in each fraud scheme to determine the indicators that proved that Sunbeam was involved in manipulating its financial data. The most utilized method for detecting Sunbeam’s fraud was Financial Statement Analysis. Utilization of Annual Reports and Disclosures were utilized just as much as Corporate Research and Media while Business Plan Analysis was ranked as being the fourth most used. Finally; leadership
According to the article authored by Mark Rupert, what are the seven best practices in the roles and responsibilities of an internal audit function?
Solomon, J (2013). Corporate Governance and Accountability. 4th ed. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p.7, p9, p10, p15, p58, p60, p253.
In today’s day and age, there is a lot of news that is related to corporate accounting fraud as companies intentionally manipulate their financial statements to show a better picture of their financial health. The objective of financial reporting is to provide financial information about a company to its various stakeholders such as investors and creditors so that these stakeholders can make decisions accordingly. Companies can show a better image of their financial well being by providing misleading information. This can be done by omitting material information from the books or deceitful appropriation of assets such as inventory theft, payroll fraud, check forgery or embezzlement. Fraudulent financial reporting will have an effect on the This includes but is not limited to; check forgery, inventory theft, cash or check theft, payroll fraud or service theft.
Accounting fraud refers to fraud that is committed by a company by maintaining false information about the sales and income in the company books, when overstating the company's assets or profits, when a company is actually undergoing a loss. These fraudulent records are then used to seek investment in the company's bond or security issues. By showing these false entries, the company attempts to apply fraudulent loan applications as a final attempt to save the company by obtaining more money from bankruptcy. Accounting frauds is actually done to hide the company’s actual financial issues.
The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.
The fraudulent financial reporting is the information in financial statement that will misleading, omission, and misrepresenting the users in order to attract potential investors and fulfil the shareholder’s expectation wealth. The company may has intended to use wrongly the accounting principle which related to classification, method of depreciation,
Dowd (2016) runs above and beyond with the clarification to state accounting fraud incorporates the change of accounting records in regards to sales, incomes, costs and different components for a profit motive, for example, boosting organization stock prices, getting ideal financing or maintaining a strategic distance from obligation commitments. Dowd is of the feeling that covetousness, absence of straightforwardness, poor administration data and poor accounting interior controls are a couple of explanations behind accounting fraud. (Dowd,
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.