Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Impact of company social responsibility on society
Impact of company social responsibility on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Evaluation: Ethical Perspectives on Social Responsibility This paper evaluates Cohen’s article on social responsibility and considers how his perspective and ideas align in comparison with other management experts including Drucker and Friedman. Some key components that are included in the evaluation are: • A definition of the concept of social responsibility. • What Cohen identifies as the social responsibility of a business to the workers, stakeholders, and society as a whole. • How Cohen’s perspective of the social responsibility of business aligns with the perspective of Drucker. • How Cohen’s opinion of the social responsibility of business compares with the opinion of Friedman. • Finally, an identification of which of the expert opinions best aligns with the current business climate promoting a ‘green environment and why. Social Responsibility The basic definition of social responsibility is that all companies should embrace more than just the focus of maximizing profits, and should have as part of their business model the goal to have a positive impact upon the society in which they operate. (Investopedia, 2014) Some businesses believe that social responsibility can only be applied to individuals and not to a corporation or business entity, and that the social responsibility of business is only to maximize the profits of the company for the shareholders of the organization. By maximizing the profits of a business, society as defined by these companies, is benefiting because the business is successful adding value to the entire society in which the company is operating. Cohen’s Beliefs Cohen was a student of Peter Drucker and thus understandably his beliefs on social responsibility align with those of Druck... ... middle of paper ... ....iisd.org/business/issues/sr.aspx Knowledge@Wharton. (2012). Why companies can no longer afford to ignore their social responsibilities. Time, May 28 Mackey, J. (2011). What conscious capitalism really is. California Management Review, 53(3), 83-90. Krishan, G.V., & Wei, Y. (2012). Do small firms benefit from auditor attestation of internal control effectiveness? Auditing, 31(4), 115-137. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50238 Rethinking the social responsibility of business. (2005) Retrieved on April 11, 2014 from http://reason.com/archives/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-social-responsi/print Saco, R.. (2008). Social Irresponsibility. Journal for Quality & Participation, 31(3),39-40. Social Responsibility Definition. (2014). Definition of ‘social responsibility’. Retrieved on April 11, 2014 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialresponsibility.asp
...Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate’, Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 9-18.
For example, that he …social objective of reducing poverty”. Thus, according to Freidman, profit maximization is the sole responsibility of a firm and spending shareholder money for the social interest is not ideal. This statement is less compelling to me as I believe social responsibility means: the right quality of life is given and human rights is not sacrificed or compromised in order to attain your opportunities or demands. Freidman illustrates that he is against social responsibility by stating: “there is one and only one social responsibility of business–to use it resources… without deception or fraud." Due to these reasons, I do not agree with Friedman arguments, because he believes that social interest can harm the organization’s productivity; whereas, I disagree and highly believe there are many benefits in taking lead in social interest and
The earliest impressions that the book makes on the mind of the reader is that “Corporate Social Responsibility” is not just about some kind of vague theories but supports all that it preaches with practical applications. Labelling the book as “a Bible for today’s corporate citizen”- as the publisher does on the flap of the book- may be stretching it a bit too far, but “Corporate Social Responsibility”, does provide thoughtful answers to a number of vital questions on how a corporation could do most good for itself and its
DBQ Social responsibility is an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large. One of the many social responsibilities of a business is to maximize profits but this is not the only social responsibility of business. There are many social responsibilities to take into consideration when striving to expand and maximize your business. Wanting to maximize profit and minimize cost can be perceived as greed but this assumption is wrong. A man with a straight forward mindset , a man that won a nobel prize for his extensive knowledge and studies in business stated that there's one and only one social responsibility of business and that is
Bibliography:.. Works Cited Friedman, Milton. A. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Profit. N.P. Santayana, George.
Ciulla, J. B., Martin, C. W., & Solomon, R. C. (2007). Is "The Social Responsibility of Business... to Increase Its Profits"? Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory. Honest work: a business ethics reader (pp. 217-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to make Profit. New York Times
To understand this issue from both sides, it is also important to gain a perspective from the corporate finance world. Understanding that the goal of a corporation is to maximize the profits of its shareholders, H.B. Fuller really did not have a social obligation. If, howe...
The article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” is written by a famous economist Milton Friedman. Friedman in this article implies that shareholders are the main drivers of the corporations and he believes that it is to them corporations must be socially responsible to. The goal of any corporation is to maximize profits and return the portion of these profits to shareholders for investing in the corporation. The shareholders can themselves decide which social causes to take part in rather than assigning a corporate executive to decide on their behalf. Friedman argues that a corporation must have no social responsibility to society because its only concern is the increase profits for itself and its shareholders.
Covey & Brown (2001) “the role of business in society has progressed over the years, from being primarily concerned with profit for sharehold¬ers to a stakeholder and community approach with a focus on corporate social responsibility”
Based on this descriptive claim now, the canonical view of business social responsibility is trying to identify what we ought to do,in other words it changes this descriptive claim into a prescriptive one. According to this people have to be self-interest and companies ought to maximize its profits by obeying the law. A corporation is swan as a society. A good organized society would take care of its citizens. It would protect them by making a fair distribution of the wealth and capital and would solve the problems with new regulations and laws that will help not only people but companies as well to achieve their goals (Personal and professional).
Friedman, M., (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In W.
Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2011). Moral Issues in Business (Eleventh ed., pp. 230-244).
However, there can be more definitions about what Corporate Social Responsibility can be. For example, Corporate Social Responsibility can be the commitment which is continuing for a business to behave ethically and bring to economy the development to improve the workforces’ of the whole society and local community and their families’ quality of life. Corporate Social Responsibility is also known as the obligation of a company to serve the society’s interest and of course its own. With the help of the Corporate and Social Responsibility, social and environmental concerns companies can integrate into their business and stakeholders operations.
A company has an economic obligation. It must earn a favorable return for its stockholders in the restrictions of the law. But, corporate social responsibility means that organizations have also ethical and societal responsibilities that go past their economic responsibilities. CSR needs organizations to develop their documentations of their responsibilities to include other stakeholders such as workers, customers, suppliers, local societies, state governments, international organizations, etc. Ethics could be seen as a fundamental component of individual and group activities at the heart of organizations’ errands.