Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utilitarianism and its flaws
Utilitarianism philosophy
Discussing utilitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Utilitarianism and its flaws
The Experience Machine and the Inclusion of Meta-Pleasure Robert Nozick is a philosopher who seeks to disprove the utilitarian notion of hedonism through a thought experiment that he has entitles “The Experience Machine” (Nozick 646). I will first explain the concept of utilitarianism and hedonism, then the experience machine before I give a reply about the inclusion of a third category of pleasure which I have called “meta-pleasure”. Finally, I will show how technology may be disproving the entire experience machine thought experiment altogether. Utilitarianism is a moral theory that seeks to define right and wrong actions based solely on the consequences they produce. By utilitarian standards, an act is determined to be right if and only if it produces the greatest total amount of happiness for everyone. Happiness (or utility) is defined as the amount of pleasure less the amount of pain (Mill, 172). In order to act in accordance with utilitarianism, the agent must not only impartially attend to the pleasure of everyone, but they must also do so universally, meaning that everyone in the world is factored into the morality of the action. However, utilitarianism is not without its critics. One notable critique about the notion of hedonism, or the utilitarian concept that states that pleasure and freedom from pain are the only meaningful ends, is the thought experiment wherein there exists machine that can simulate any experience (Nozick 644). The “experience machine” would be able to cause the user to experience anything they choose, all while keeping them unaware that they are plugged into the machine. If “pleasure, and the freedom from pain are the only thing desirable as ends” (Mill 172) then it should not matter whethe... ... middle of paper ... ...xperience machine, it would still seem that people should not want to log on to second life when they could be experiencing things in reality. However, Second Life boasts that millions of accounts have been created (Second Life Official Site). It remains to be said just why they are doing this, but it appears that the conclusion one could draw from this is that virtual experiences do have meaning to us, insofar as people will choose them over certain real life experiences. So would people actually choose to log into a total life simulation? Nozick would say that they would not and I agree, however I do not see this as a refutation of hedonism but rather a proof because of the inclusion of meta-pleasure. Recent advancements in technology such as Second Life, though, might prove that humans would be willing to tune out of reality in favour of a virtual life.
Many theorist believe that happiness is the only important in people's life, and all that should matter to a person is being happy. The standard of assessing a good life is how much or quantity of happiness it contains. This openness of happiness, its generosity of spirit and width of appreciation, gets warped and constricted by the claim pretending to be its greatest friend—that only happiness matters, nothing else. Robert Nozick does not on the side of hedonistic utilitarianism, he gives several examples to show that there are other elements of reality we may strive for, even at the expense of pleasure. In this essay, I will focus on Nozick's opinion of the direction of happiness and the experience machine, and finally how do I answer the question What is happiness.
As humans we are constantly in search of understanding the balance between what feels good and what is right. Humans try to take full advantage of experiencing pleasure to its fullest potential. Hedonism claims that pleasure is the highest and only source of essential significance. If the notion of hedonism is truthful, happiness is directly correlated with pleasure. Robert Nozick presented the philosophical world with his though experiment, “The Experience Machine” in order to dispute the existence and validity of hedonism. Nozick’s thought experiment poses the question of whether or not humans would plug into a machine which produces any desired experience. Nozick weakens the notion of hedonism through his thought experiment, claiming humans need more than just pleasure in their lives. Nozick discovers that humans would not hook up to this machine because they would not fully develop as a person and consider it a form of suicide.
The ultimate desire of humanity and the focal point of human endeavor has been that elusive beacon of life that flutters, flickers, teases but pleases only a few. That beacon of happiness is sought and hunted by all as the ultimate goal. In this essay, I will outline the theory of utilitarianism along with a very compelling objection to it, called the ‘innocent bystander’ objection. I will begin my paper by defining the ethical theory of utilitarianism, preference and hedonistic utilitarianism, lay out the innocent bystander objection and provide support. "The maximum happiness for the greatest number", linked to the philosophy of utilitarianism is lopsided and illogical in its ideology when/ if it does not take into account morality and legality of the issues it condones. The theory of utilitarianism stands faulty against the innocent bystander objection which can be proven by providing a convincing justification to the innocent bystander objection.
In the following essay, I will be discussing the similarities and differences that exist between the ethical philosophies of Hedonism and Utilitarianism, and how these moral theories relate to Nozick’s Experience Machine thought experiment. Both of these theories hold a fundamental value that is to find that which is “good” in their own ways, but slightly differ in the meaning of what the “good” is. Hedonism defines this value to be pleasure of the self, whereas Utilitarianism values the happiness of the greatest number of people, even if the self happens to be unhappy or ill-fated. Nozick’s thought experiment gives the reader the task
As we examine the consequences of Utilitarian actions, we see an emphasis on the theory of intrinsic value. Intrinsically valuable actions are described as morally good in themselves and are in some cases a means to an end like helping the poor after a natural disaster. Extrinsically valuable actions are similar in that one would still help the poor, but not because it is the right thing to do, rather because it makes them feel good to help people. It is said that all we place value on today has worth because of it’s close relationship to what is intrinsically good. For example, some people including consequential hedonists view happiness itself as emphasizing pleasure before pain, and hold close to them that such emotions are both intrinsically invaluable and valuable. Additionally, Utilitarians believe we can compare intrinsic values created by opposing actions to calculate the least harmful outcomes. An English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, held the belief that moral beings could determine the total amount of pleasure and pain, and from that, could determine the amount of good or evil in certain actions.
I believe that creating a world that allows you to fulfill your fantasies makes us more human in a sense. In the final chapter, Boellstroff sums up the argument that this virtual world actually creates new people and in creating this new world, people become more human. He also tells us what Second Life is and isn’t: Second Life may seem like it creates a world similar to ours, but it does not replicate the actual world. It is nothing like social media because it is a place where people interact. In Second Life, you can actually do typically everyday things like find friends, meet a significant other, attend events, make money, buy and sell things, etc. This is not something that you can do through a television program or a
In The Experience Machine by Robert Nozick brings up the idea of having a machine which you are hooked up to that will make you feel like you are experiencing certain desires. Someone who is a hedonistic that tries to maximize pleasure on how you feel on the inside, while reducing pain will think this is would be a great idea. What more could you want? Having the feeling of accomplishing all of your dreams while doing virtually nothing. Nevertheless, I believe there is more to life than just the feeling of pleasure. During those years that you are plugged in may seem appealing and pleasurable, but spending the rest of your life plugged into a machine while everyone else around you is living their life in the moment and accomplishing their dreams
In Tom Boellstorff’s ethnology “Coming of Age in Second Life” the world of second life is explored. Second life is a three dimensional online world in which users interact. The world of second life is created with user-generated content, which means that users design different types of dwellings, and can customize many aspects about their avatars including gender, appearance, and body modifications. Boellstorff also talk about the idea of techne, which is human action, in second life, which engages with the world and thereby results in a different world. Boellstorff states on page 31 that, “it is in being virtual that we are human (Boellstorff, 2008, p. 31).’ He uses his research in second life to present an argument that despite drawing on
If you were given the opportunity to plan out your life in a way that would maximize the amount of pleasure in it, would you take it? This question is key to Robert Nozick’s thought experiment which attempts to show that humans are not hedonists. A hedonist is a person who lives and behaves in a way such that they can experience the most pleasure out of life as possible, according to the belief that the pursuit of pleasure it the most important thing in life. Nozick’s thought experiment attempts to refute hedonism through a hypothetical question involving what Nozick likes to call the “experience machine”. This imaginary machine would have the ability to simulate all sorts of experiences on a subject, from the greatest pleasures to the worst pains. The subject of the experiment would be given the ability to pre-program any series of experiences into the machine to fit their own desires or will. Once plugged into the machine, the subject would have no knowledge of their prior experiences and would believe the simulated experiences to be reality. Nozick’s question asks whether you would plug into the “experiment machine”. Nozick makes the claim that if we, humans, were hedonists we would plug into the machine. However, he makes
Hedonism is a theory of well-being which prioritizes pleasure when determining the value of a life. It does so by expressing that “all and only positive experiences are good for you, and that all and only negative experiences are bad for you” (Gregory, 2015, p. 1). This perspective on well-being aims to describe what is good for us by solely giving importance to conscious experiences. By doing so, it is subject to objections such as Nozick’s experience machine objection (1974, p. 42-45). The objection asks the reader to imagine being plugged into a machine which will give the subject all sorts of pleasures. This is what occurs in the case given for this essay: two people live identical experiences with the difference that one of them is plugged
One problem with utilitarianism is that it leads to an "end justifies the means" way of thinking. However, it is known that the ends do not necessarily just...
hedonism as a valuable worldly truth was not only dangerous, but also silly, saying, “The ideas of life on which X
One can say that there is a general tendency towards the experience of pleasure that is often in conflict with other drives. An example of such a drive is the reality principle, which is a result from the ego’s impulses towards self-preservation and forces pleasure to be postponed or attained in different way.
I had many mixed views after finishing my most recent read of The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters, by Thomas Hurka. I agree with his idea that the value pain is greater than the value pleasure. I oppose Hurka’s views more than I agree with them. I disagree with the idea that only pleasure is good and only pain is evil and the idea of ethical hedonism.
Hedonism is the ethical theory that states that a life is good only to the extent that it is filled with pleasure and free from pain. Harvard philosopher, Robert Nozick’s uses “the experience machine” to justify his argument that happiness may be necessary but that it is not sufficient in living a ‘good’ life. “The experience machine” is an imaginary scenario where people would be able to be connected to a preprogramed machine and would experience living a good life without actually living it in